Danny Baker's Great Album Showdown on BBC4

Posted by: J.N. on 06 February 2013

Anyone else catch yesterday's first episode on 'Rock'? Fascinating vinyl album discussion, information and trivia for us devotees of the 12 inch plastic platter from an interesting and well informed collection of studio guests.

 

Two more episodes to go - and it's on BBC HD later in the evening too.

 

For once I was able to listen to Jeremy Clarkson without feeling nauseous or shouting obscenities at the screen. The man has a decent taste in music.

 

John.

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Ron Brinsdon

In my case it would have been Jerry Garcia and John Cippolina posters.

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
I've just been forced by Mrs. H. to watch episode 2 again. The idea that pop was great but only what you liked until you graduated to rock. Pfft.
Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Wugged Woy:

As you say, I think we should stop romanticising vinyl,  and remember it's faults aswell as it's virtues.

Why should we? It was on the whole a better medium/carrier, for all its faults. Isn't music abut romance and passion to a large degree anyway?

Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Mike Hughes:
Kevin, I mourn the cover art; the smell and so on. Then I got on with listening to music. The harsh fact is that those who feel that cd was a poor trade off are in the overwhelming minority . The history of hi-fidelity is one of convenience and portability winning out over sound quality every time. However, with vinyl there is the additional argument that the sound quality thing to vinyl fans is a clear cut thing. To the rest of us it's a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy and nowhere hear clear cut. Nobody is about to change anyone's mind. On that. None of that takes away from the fact it was a piss poor programme; badly spliced together from some half cocked ideas and inaccurate facts. It was entertaining... but not actually any good.

Well I agree with you that for most punters convenience and portability win out every time.

 

I thought it was entertaining and fun. It wasn't supposed to be a history lesson, just some music fans sitting around talking - not something we see very often on the telly. It was also part of a wider season of progs on BBC TV and radio, rather than a Baker vanity project.

Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Gavin B:

 

 

I think the choice of guests has been a little odd.  The young journalist (on the rock show) had a couple of interesting things to say, but I don't believe she can have had the same passion because she didn't grow up in the vinyl era.

I fail to see the relevance. So what if she was born circa 1980? Does that mean she has no right to be passionate about vinyl? For all you know she could have a record gigantic collection. She certainly seemed pretty knowledgeable to me, and it was good that they had a young woman on, rather than just ageing blokes. I think it's great that a woman in her late 20s or early 30s is really passionate and knowledgeable about her music. Let's see more of this!

 

I also thought she was rather lovely, and much better looking than the other panellists.

Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Music is absolutely about passion and romance but the debate about which is the best carrier is completely coloured by such nonsense. When people come out with such black and white stuff as one carrier has been proven to be better than another we're into pseudo science. The market says cd and mp3. Hi-fi nerds are completely divided so it's silly to pretend otherwise. The argument is a complex one and it's perfectly possible for cd, for example, to win on replay alone. Unfortunately the romanticised and re-written version of history simply doesn't allow for this outcome. This is a world in which analogue is "always" better. A world in which valve amps are "always" better than solid state and so on. No allowance is made for the fact that some valve amps are simply not very good and ditto solid state. This is a world in which all real world variables are removed and we're left with "ooh vinyl was harshly treated."It always sounded better; performed better and so on. I mean really. Vinyl was in decline thanks to cassettes before cd even came along. Most people trashed albums and album covers and so for most people something smaller was a big win, Equally the debates we have about vinyl and turntable quality were simply not there in the past. Most vinyl by the end of the 70s was 2nd to 4th generation and reduced on both frequency and dynamics and, whisper it, reliability. They jumped; were mislabelled and often didn't even have a hole dead centre. How easily we forget that side of things. It was killed in the market place for a number of reasons but we repeatedly forget the ones around the fact that, as a mass market product, it was a major failure in terms of quality and quality control. Still, romantic eh! We still live with this nonsense now and it stifles real debate about quality. 180g vinyl anyone? What's the gain over 130g? Show me the actual evidence. People buy into this nonsense and people like Baker make it worse. Now, on one level it's hardly worth building up a head of steam about but equally why the heck not. It's a small step from 180g vinyl to homeopathy and other nonsense but hey we're all too sane for that. Right?
Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Mike Hughes:
Music is absolutely about passion and romance but the debate about which is the best carrier is completely coloured by such nonsense. When people come out with such black and white stuff as one carrier has been proven to be better than another we're into pseudo science. The market says cd and mp3. Hi-fi nerds are completely divided so it's silly to pretend otherwise. The argument is a complex one and it's perfectly possible for cd, for example, to win on replay alone. Unfortunately the romanticised and re-written version of history simply doesn't allow for this outcome. This is a world in which analogue is "always" better. A world in which valve amps are "always" better than solid state and so on. No allowance is made for the fact that some valve amps are simply not very good and ditto solid state. This is a world in which all real world variables are removed and we're left with "ooh vinyl was harshly treated."It always sounded better; performed better and so on. I mean really. Vinyl was in decline thanks to cassettes before cd even came along. Most people trashed albums and album covers and so for most people something smaller was a big win, Equally the debates we have about vinyl and turntable quality were simply not there in the past. Most vinyl by the end of the 70s was 2nd to 4th generation and reduced on both frequency and dynamics and, whisper it, reliability. They jumped; were mislabelled and often didn't even have a hole dead centre. How easily we forget that side of things. It was killed in the market place for a number of reasons but we repeatedly forget the ones around the fact that, as a mass market product, it was a major failure in terms of quality and quality control. Still, romantic eh! We still live with this nonsense now and it stifles real debate about quality. 180g vinyl anyone? What's the gain over 130g? Show me the actual evidence. People buy into this nonsense and people like Baker make it worse. Now, on one level it's hardly worth building up a head of steam about but equally why the heck not. It's a small step from 180g vinyl to homeopathy and other nonsense but hey we're all too sane for that. Right?

Yes, but you forget that it's not actually about sound quality (as least as "objectively" measured) for most people. Even the people who say they "prefer the sound of vinyl".

 

I prefer the sound of vinyl myself, and I don't care if someone with a graph tells me otherwise. I prefer it. If you don't think te same way then far enough, it's a free country.

 

I also like the whole thing of sleeves, putting a record on, lifting up the arm, having shelve and shelves and shelves of records etc. That's why streaming doesn't interest me. It's boring. Perhaps I'm in a minority, perhaps the people in DB's programme are in a minority. Who cares? I certainly don't and I was more than happy to watch.

Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Kevin. Given the choice and the space I would possibly have stayed with vinyl. I certainly agree with much of what you say. The problem I have is that the DB programme started from and then added so many assumptions which were wrong. As I posted earlier, there is a great programme to be made on the subject. This was simply not it.
Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Guido Fawkes

A world in which valve amps are "always" better than solid state and so on. No allowance is made for the fact that some valve amps are simply not very good


i disagree. Most valve amplifiers are dreadful and sound woolly and convey very little pleasure in terms of music at all ... there are a few notable exceptions from conrad-johnson, audio research and croft, for example. But one HiFi rag goes on and on about valve amps and recommends some of the most dreary equipment around .. I think one manufacturer is closely associated with said mag and if there is a more boring amplifier range then thankfully i've not heard it.


Vinyl records though are entirely different ... enchanting, magical things that save us from a world of UPnP and MP3 .... though i like my computer audio system, i prefer the old LP12 .. as indeed does a good  friend of  mine: Anna Log. Yes .. Far too expensive and prone to surface noise, just like most things in life really.


Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Clearly you haven't heard enough valve amps. There are some terrific ones out there but I know what you mean about said mag. Everything I've heard conforms to a stereotype and it's euphoric, which I don't mind, and dull, which I do. On the other hand I find the LP12 to be the epitome of dull and at most shows nowadays turntables sound pretty much like bad CD players so, where does that leave us? There are bad turntables just as there are bad amps. Probably back where we started. Life is not so simple as analogue being better than digital and that was a poor programme.
Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Steve J

^^^^^ in your opinion Mike

Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
No Steve. All my opinions are not my own and not that of my employer. Unless otherwise stated they are clearly the opinion of someone else!!! Er...
Posted on: 12 February 2013 by BigH47

Really 'cos those opinions sound like lectures to me.

Posted on: 12 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
And you have such a long and glorious history of saying that to me and anyone else who disagrees with you don't you Howard! This is a forum. It's a place for opinions. Some are stronger than others. Some people have strong opinions on some things and are less fussed on others. Why bother posting if you don't? However, in your world there's a narrow spectrum of the correct way to do everything and those who don't confirm are highlighted. What a dull, conformist place THAT must be. Always in the comfort zone. Always seeking confirmation from others. Yawn. I have an opinion Howard. I'm prepared to express it in my own terms and to debate and defend it. You on the other hand, along with a few others here, consistently pick on people who have strong opinions that differ to your own, rather than pick apart the opinions.
Posted on: 13 February 2013 by Salmon Dave
Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:

Now you've got me wondering who is Donny Hathaway ... I guess i'm going to have to have a listen. 

Mick Jagger did a radio show not long ago about his influences at the time of 'Exile' (1971 ish). The standout track was Hathaway's 'The Ghetto' - great stuff (not to be confused with 'In the Ghetto' or 'Out of the Ghetto' etc.

 

Surprised no-one on this bloke-centric forum has mentioned Kate Mossman. She surprised even Mr Baker by choosing Colosseum's 'Those who are about to die' - good one.

 

I think it would have made a good 2-parter at say 45 minutes each. Certainly shows how personal everyone's own taste is.

Posted on: 13 February 2013 by Guido Fawkes

I now have some of Donny Hathaway's music and am really enjoying it. Especially The Ghetto which is indeed a great track. 

 

Colosseum are a great band though i'd have gone for Valentyne Suite .... Jon H's wife Barbara Thompson is also one of my favourite artists. It is sad she has Parkinson's disease, but has still continued to make some fine music somehow. Jon signed my copy of Valentyne Suite - surely one of the best drummers ever. 

Posted on: 13 February 2013 by J.N.

I loved it. People chatting abouth the joy of the vinyl album and coming up with personal faves and information. Nice to see some passion about music. Hell; it made me quite like Jeremy Clarkson for an hour!

 

There is no doubt that we tend to eulogise the passions of yesteryear. Colours are brighter in one's youth and as was pointed out during the programme, the LP provided one of the few forms of 'media based' entertainment available to the individual before all this clever digital jiggery-pokery swamped us with i-thingies.

 

I liked the reference to the music industry having the perfect 40 minute music carrier (which took some effort to copy effectively) in the form of the LP, and how it kinda shot itself in the foot by 'pushing' new technology.

 

Evolutionary refinement of the ancient technology of the gramophone continues to pull more and more from those wiggly black grooves. For me, it still sounds makes music sound more vibrant and real in the home than anything else.

 

Madness I tell you Sir. Madness.

 

John.

Posted on: 17 February 2013 by formbypc

Danny Baker needed to take a leaf out of Parkinson's book. If you're going to have guests on a talk show, then for most of the time, let them talk. Don't talk over the top of them.

Posted on: 17 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Episode 3 was by far the most interesting because they ignored him and understood that they had more interesting things to say than the peripheral trivia he obsessed over. The bottom line is he loves the culture more than the music itself. That's okay but when you make a programme about vinyl it makes you look an empty vessel looking for some noise to make and that's exactly how he came across.