The Jokes Thread - a point of view

Posted by: Donuk on 16 May 2013

I have started a separate thread, rather that dilute the jokes thread.

IMHO the main problem with the jokes thread is that contributors overlook the fact that they have a widely varying audience.  The sort of joke one might tell a close friend down the pub may not be suitable for general consumption.  Would you tell an inappropriate joke to a friend who has breast cancer, whose marriage is breaking up or may just have gone bankrupt.  Would you shout out the Ms Jolie joke at a party??

 

If the answer is yes, read no further......

 

I presume that everybody on the Naim forum is a friend.  I start with that premise - even if they refuse to believe that 9/11 was orchestrated by little green men.  If it were not a forum where I could meet friends who have a similar hobby, I would not be here.  Why on earth would I?  I actually do believe that almost to a person this forum is populated by pleasant people even if some are drawn to sound a bit tough-guy at times.  The ones I have actually met are fine fellows.

So IMHO one should be aware that one is surrounded by sensitive people - who probably are not the ones who contribute much - but who may have their problems.

I know that always a decision has to be made about what is a suitable joke or not.  And of course we do not always get it right.  That is where the moderator comes in.  Sometimes I think our moderators try too hard to let "free speech" prevail without realising some of Naim's less verbose customers may be offended and possibly leave.

 

But the Naim forum is a public place and if we go there we should respect it as such.  I regularly e mail a number of my friends jokes that I would not display in public.

 

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Richard Dane
Mike if any member finds a post offensive then it should be reported using the appropriate button and the admin will consider your reasons and take whatever action is appropriate. Thanks.
Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly

Understood, and I've done so in another thread BUT I asked the question as I wanted to see if I was alone in feeling that Irish "jokes" are best left in the 1970s.

 

Pretty obviously I'm not alone in thinking that.

 

Regards

 

Mike

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Mike-B

Mike,  I understand your point,  but while you may call them "Irish" jokes but that is just a label, its not Racist - unless the joke teller means it that way

Having lived & worked in Ireland, USA, mid east & South Africa, I can tell you its the same everywhere, same joke different label.  

In other places its jokes about some another group like an ethnic group, a culture group,  another town or area,  even a name.  The joke theme is not racist,  its about a funny part of being simply slow on the uptake or maybe appearing to be slow but canny with it.

 

In Ireland they are Kerryman jokes,

Kerry people make money out of Kerry jokes

In USA its aimed at Polish or hillbillies or ....... 

In Canada its USA'ers ..... or ......

In Australia its New Zealanders typically with wives called Ba-a-a-bra

In South Africa its Van Der Merwe or Boksburg or ........ 

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly

Mike

 

The fact that it denigrates a specific or identifiable Ethnic group makes such "jokes", by definition, racist.

 

The fact that this is done across the globe makes no odds.

 

The intention of the teller is also irrelevant. 

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Mike-B

OK Mike,  I guess we (& numbers of others) will have to disagree

I know what racism is, I've lived with it.  So maybe my point of view comes from another angle to yours.  

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly

I know what racism is, too - and "jokes" that denigrate on ethnic grounds are racist.

 

Seems like my PoV was agreed with in the "best jokes" (sic) thread.

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Kevin-W

For what it's worth (not a great deal I suspect), I think we have to be very wary about banning jokes or going running to forum moderators.

 

Being offended is a consequence of living in a free society, and of free speech. Don't like a joke? Find it offensive? Providing said joke does not break a law or is likely to cause a breach of the peace, let it stand.

 

One man's delicate sensibilities being wounded are a small price to pay for living in a free society. And someone, somewhere, will always be offended by someone else's idea of a funny.

 

On the subject of Irish jokes, they are no longer mainstream - you won't hear them on the BBC or ITV any more, as you did forty of 50 years ago. They will never go away, but they've gone underground, along with the jokes about blacks with big willies, "smelly" Pakistanis, "penny-pinching" Jews and thick Essex girls with bottle blonde hair and a relaxed attitude towards sexual restraint. And the internet is one of the few places these jokes can live now.

 

Personally, I find most of Paul's cut and paste Irish jokes unfunny, but that's because I heard most of them when I were a lad back in the 1970s. They are but dusty, cobwebbed relics of a long-gone era.

 

And I bet he wouldn't go into a genuine (as opposed to faux or themed) Irish pub and tell one...

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Cbr600

Kevin,

   yes a lot of the jokes are old hat ( as one would expect when you are my age) however recycling jokes sometimes brings them to a newer generation, so there may be some value is posting.

 

As a resident of Ireland, i concur with your comment.

 

Tarquin, a quick look at your profile shows your key interest is MOANING

 

enough said. i will not be getting into a protracted discussion

 

out

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly
Originally Posted by Cbr600:

 

enough said. i will not be getting into a protracted discussion

 

out

Of course not.

 

I'd hope thats because you realise that, as mentioned, such "jokes" are best left in the 1970s.

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

 

One man's delicate sensibilities being wounded are a small price to pay for living in a free society. 

 

As worthy as that sounds, its not the case.

 

Why should anyone feel able to abuse another ethnic group? Casual racism is still racism. It can be seen as worse than overt racism of the KKK / EDL variety, because it somehow intimates that its OK to be just a little bit racist.

 

After all, why should someone be offended just because they're the butt of racist "humour"? Its a free society!

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by mista h

Paul

Hows about you start a thread and call it.....LETS ALL BE BLOODY MISERABLE...... and its a good job your not Irish otherwise you could take offence at your own jokes.

 

Mista h

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly

Hilarious - now I know who can fill the boots of the late Eddie Braben.

 

Its not miserable to point out racism. You've read Pauls comment about being a resident of Ireland as meaning he's Irish, which s probably what he intended.

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by JamieWednesday

Bloody Romans

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Steve J

 

"You can please some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time but you can never please all of the people all of the time."

 

Abraham Lincoln

 

I think this quote just about sums up the general argument here.

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by mista h

Have just had a look at Tarqers profile.....under interests the first thing he lists is MOANING,now that has taken me by suprise. This will my last post on this matter so come back all you like.

 

Shocked of Croydon

 

Steve...still not heard from mayday hospital RE the biopsy they cut out my stomach so they have either lost my notes(again) or its no big deal

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly

I think you've accidentally published a PM, rather than commented on the issue.

Posted on: 21 May 2013 by Adam Meredith
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
One man's delicate sensibilities being wounded are a small price to pay for living in a free society. And someone, somewhere, will always be offended by someone else's idea of a funny.

Something I wrote some time ago - and still relevant to my opinion.

 

https://forums.naimaudio.com/to...889#1566878604582889

 

As my action/reaction prompted this thread I would add:

 

In the specific case of the joke about Angelina Jolie's 'tits' -

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22520720

 

I had heard the news that morning and, in addition to some private and personal thoughts, found the question 'I wonder if some **** will post a joke about this on the forum?" bothering me.

 

I removed the post - in the hope that the action would prompt a reconsideration of its suitability and be the end of the matter.

 

It wasn't and I reacted as I did.

 

It is unlikely that Ms Jolie would ever see this joke so my concern was less directly for her but more the tone of the forum - and to indicate that some would find such unthinking, crass reactions insensitive.

 

If you fall in the street with a heart attack I don't believe that you would welcome the crowd standing around, laughing and filming you on their mobile telephones - to post on You Tube.

 

I would also hope you would feel the same lack of approval toward that crowd if it were not you.

 

I probably should not have said what I did - I cannot change what I think of such casual insensitivity.

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Adam Meredith:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:
One man's delicate sensibilities being wounded are a small price to pay for living in a free society. And someone, somewhere, will always be offended by someone else's idea of a funny.

Something I wrote some time ago - and still relevant to my opinion.

 

https://forums.naimaudio.com/to...889#1566878604582889

 

As my action/reaction prompted this thread I would add:

 

In the specific case of the joke about Angelina Jolie's 'tits' -

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22520720

 

I had heard the news that morning and, in addition to some private and personal thoughts, found the question 'I wonder if some **** will post a joke about this on the forum?" bothering me.

 

I removed the post - in the hope that the action would prompt a reconsideration of its suitability and be the end of the matter.

 

It wasn't and I reacted as I did.

 

It is unlikely that Ms Jolie would ever see this joke so my concern was less directly for her but more the tone of the forum - and to indicate that some would find such unthinking, crass reactions insensitive.

 

If you fall in the street with a heart attack I don't believe that you would welcome the crowd standing around, laughing and filming you on their mobile telephones - to post on You Tube.

 

I would also hope you would feel the same lack of approval toward that crowd if it were not you.

 

I probably should not have said what I did - I cannot change what I think of such casual insensitivity.

I never saw the Jolie tit joke but I've already heard enough of them to last a lifetime, and most of them aren't especially funny. I agree that it was probably a good idea to remove the joke for reasons of tone.

 

I don't actually have a problem with that, what I object to is the idea - expressed openly or implied by a number of members on this thread - that people don't have the right to post or laugh at sick/poor taste jokes. They do.

 

To look at it another way: Holocaust deniers or creationists might be absurdly, barmily, offensively wrong but they still have the right to be wrong. If you know what I mean.

 

 

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Tarquin Maynard - Portly:
Originally Posted by Kevin-W:

 

One man's delicate sensibilities being wounded are a small price to pay for living in a free society. 

 

As worthy as that sounds, its not the case.

 

Why should anyone feel able to abuse another ethnic group? Casual racism is still racism. It can be seen as worse than overt racism of the KKK / EDL variety, because it somehow intimates that its OK to be just a little bit racist.

 

After all, why should someone be offended just because they're the butt of racist "humour"? Its a free society!

That's not what I said. Please read the post again, in full, and stop taking quotes out of context.

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly

My post is entirely in context with your comment.

 

If you've not understood it, thats another matter.

 

You say:

 

"what I object to is the idea - expressed openly or implied by a number of members on this thread - that people don't have the right to post or laugh at sick/poor taste jokes. They do"


Are you saying I don't have the right to point out that a "joke" is racist, and should be left in the 70s?

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Steve J
Originally Posted by mista h:

Steve...still not heard from mayday hospital RE the biopsy they cut out my stomach so they have either lost my notes(again) or its no big deal

I hope it's the latter mista h.

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Adam Meredith
Originally Posted by Cbr600:
...... however recycling jokes sometimes brings them to a newer generation, so there may be some value is posting.

Something like this service will be offered by my Youth Summer Camp module - 'Smallpox and Polio'.

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Mike1951

I read "Cbr600"'s "joke" about the Jewish Taxi driver and thought to myself "Why does he have to be Jewish?" Then I read his next two jokes and thought "Oh. Riiiiight..."

 

Currently searching for a punchline to: "Have you heard the one about this racist twunt who kept posting garbage on a NAIM forum?"

 

Any suggestions?

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Jan-Erik Nordoen

Posted on: 22 May 2013 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly

No idea what thats supposed to mean.

 

@ Mike - its not racist, you have no sense of humour. 

 

Wink smiley.