Best streamer for Naim Dac?
Posted by: Davy on 19 November 2013
Hi
I have naim apple tv/dac/200/202 setting in my home. As you can see, the weakest part is the apple tv. I connect apple TV to nDac via optical ouput. But apple TV upsamples everything to 48/16. So it is not an optimal solution. I have a NAS that stores .wav .flac .ape. So using airplay controlled my my Mac is really easy to switch from music to music. But all airplay doesn't support bit accurate passby. I'm looking for a better streamer to replace apple TV.
My requirements are:
1) better be controlled by mac
2) better be wireless.
3) better be able to play hirez
4) better have optical output
5) better not too expensive
Here are some possible ways I'm thinking:
1) Logitech squeezebox touch. This can play hirez music. But logitech has discontinued this product. so i'm not thinking of it since it supposes that the software update will also be discontinued.
2) Mac mini. I'm not interested in using another mac to control my music. I want to control music from the same computer.
3) NDX. I have already had nDac, I'm looking for a non-dac solution. It is such a waste to have the NDX/Dac solution.
4) SONOS. This doesn't have the hirez support. but it is bit accurate. How does it sound?
5) OPPO 105. Maybe I need to give up streamer and get a universal player? and use the HDMI splitter to output hirez from bluray and SACD? I heard this is the best universal player on the market now.
I really like the airplay. It is so easy to play everything and controlled by computer. But it is not bit accurate. How do you guys rate the SQ? I compared it with the 24/196 files on thumb drive directly connected to the front panel of nDac. The sound is more solid, much better. But without comparison the sound is acceptable yet.
Posted on: 19 November 2013 by Scooot
Hi,
Option 3 in your second list. But this does not apply to option 5 in your first list.
If you want a all naim system a unitiqute is a good choice into your ndac.
Scott
Posted on: 19 November 2013 by pcstockton
Get a Touch before they are gone. Then use it for a few years while you save up for the NDS.
-Patrick
Posted on: 19 November 2013 by Davy
Originally Posted by Scooot:
Hi,
Option 3 in your second list. But this does not apply to option 5 in your first list.
If you want a all naim system a unitiqute is a good choice into your ndac.
Scott
For unitiquote,
Not only the dac but also the amp i will not use. It doesn't seem to be a nice option...
Posted on: 19 November 2013 by Davy
Originally Posted by pcstockton:
Get a Touch before they are gone. Then use it for a few years while you save up for the NDS.
-Patrick
I have the nDac already. I might save money for the 555ps.... Do you have touch? did you compare it to the usb stick?
Posted on: 19 November 2013 by Rich27
Posted on: 19 November 2013 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by Davy:
Originally Posted by pcstockton:
Get a Touch before they are gone. Then use it for a few years while you save up for the NDS.
-Patrick
I have the nDac already. I might save money for the 555ps.... Do you have touch? did you compare it to the usb stick?
I have a ultra quiet HTPC so I do not require streaming in the way you do. I would have bought a Touch before they were discontinued but missed the boat.
I run a server in the office that runs J River's Server and has all of my media drives connected. That machine serves up my media to anything I want.
My HTPC "streams" from the server and sends out to the Naim DAC via Mobo's optical. Because optical is limited to 24/96 on the Naim DAC, I just ordered, and received today, a MF V-link 192 so I will output from the HTPC via USB and then Coax to the Naim DAC.
I want to use my own servers and control points and have everything work perfectly, so I am not in the market for a streamer unless Naim came out one. I would only use it for the "best" possible digital source for the Naim DAC. I am guessing that anything would be better than the toslink output of the motherboard. But who knows, Mac users seem to think its optical output is fine.
We shall see.
-Patrick
Posted on: 19 November 2013 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by Rich27:
That looks nice. I wonder it is "plays well" with [my] servers vis-a-vis getting pushed content and all of the AV-Next-transport what not or whatever it is called, to ensure gapless playback.
Posted on: 20 November 2013 by Eloise
Never seen them mentioned much here ... probably cause most Naimies are in UK and they are predominantly US ... but sonore.us do some interesting devices which may be of interest.
Posted on: 20 November 2013 by likesmusic
Just because Logitech have discontinued the Touch is no reason not to buy it - the software was well developed and mature and works fine, and most developers are still supporting it. Gives you HiRes, Spotify, Wireless - you can even run it from a UPnP server or JRiver if you don't like LMS. At the price it gives you an awful lot, and as pcstockton says, won't break the bank, will let you save for a fancy naim solution, and when you get that will still do great in a second kitchen/bedroom system.
Posted on: 20 November 2013 by Louis-Andre
I woulg alsp go for a SBT, but you should also buy PSU...
Posted on: 20 November 2013 by Scooot
Hi,
Alough I have just sold my touch and bought a nd5 the touch is great value for the money. They are still highly sort after and I actually sold mine fo more than I bought new.I think the software will be supported for a long time to come.
Scott
Posted on: 20 November 2013 by GregU
I'm finding all this confusing but why don't you plug a Mac mini into your ndac. You can get a used one and have unlimited storage with an external hard drive. You can control it from your phone, iPad , other mac computer etc
Posted on: 23 November 2013 by Massimo Bertola
Davy,
the main advantages of the SB Touch over the Classic are a better clock and a better DAC. Since you have an excellent Dac, why not consider a plain SB3?
Logitech squeeze server has recently been upgraded to a new version, it's free, it configures itself nicely on any Mac, works well, and if you connect an SB3 (whose display, BTW, I like more and is rather more visible than the Touch's, meaningful only at a few inches from the unit) with a good coaxial like Naim's DC1 or a Stereovox, you should have a good streamer, for a few tenths of £.
Otherwise, Patrick's advice is very sensible.
Max
Posted on: 23 November 2013 by m0omo0
Originally Posted by maxbertola:
the main advantages of the SB Touch over the Classic are a better clock and a better DAC.
And, it was reported, a better digital out as well, derived from the work done on the Transporter. Not mentioning the various tweaks available to get the most out of it.
Posted on: 27 November 2013 by Eloise
Originally Posted by m0omo0:
Originally Posted by maxbertola:
the main advantages of the SB Touch over the Classic are a better clock and a better DAC.
And, it was reported, a better digital out as well, derived from the work done on the Transporter. Not mentioning the various tweaks available to get the most out of it.
And not to mention 24/96 support out of the box and 24/192 via the EDO plugin.
Posted on: 27 November 2013 by totemphile
A Mac Mini optical out will be as good as an ND5XS or even NDX feeding your nDAC.
You got money to burn, go for an NDX. You got better things to spend it on, go for the Mac Mini.
A Dr. Gert Volk modified Sonos Connect / Naim DC1 RCA/RCA will be as good as the Mac Mini but it won't play hires. Is it important though? Not to me, hires isn't. I love my Sonos! Integrates well with your iTunes library too!
Spend the money saved on a HCDR for your 202 would be my advice!
Posted on: 27 November 2013 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Hi, in my experience, option 3 gives the best results . Just ensure you disable the internal NDX DAC so it concentrates it's resources on producing the clean external SPDIF signal. You need to tell the NDX to ideally one or the other.. although it can do both at the same time it's a compromise, and you best feed the NDX PCM files. Really makes a difference.
if you are using mp3 or AAC then AppleTV can do a good job into the NDAC.
Simon
Posted on: 28 November 2013 by Ears
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:
Just ensure you disable the internal NDX DAC so it concentrates it's resources on producing the clean external SPDIF signal.
Simon, could you say precisely how to disable the internal DAC please.
Many thanks, Ears
Posted on: 28 November 2013 by m0omo0
Ears,
Until Simon answers, I guess it means disabling analog output and enabling digital output:
- Enabling digital out [Manual §4.6]: Setup -> Digital Output: Enabled = Yes, Output = Native
- Disabling analog out [Manual §4.4]: Setup -> Analog Outputs: Main Out = Disabled
HTH
Posted on: 28 November 2013 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Ears
Thank you both - that was very helpful. I had not disabled analogue out, which caused some muddling in the sound. Much better now.
Posted on: 29 November 2013 by dave4jazz
Doesn't requirement 5), not too expensive, rule out option 3) Naim NDX?
Logitech Squeezebox Touch/Duet or Sonos is a great way of getting into streaming for minimum outlay and there is scope for upgrading the SQ later. IMHO.
Posted on: 30 November 2013 by CharlieP
Davy,
I am using a UnitiQute as "streamer" with coax (BNC) digital out to my nDac, and it provides the best sound quality compared to some alternatives I have tried. While it seems a waste of the DAC and amp sections of the UQ - get over it. IMHO it still offers sound quality value compared to other options. Also, I suggest you not limit yourself to optical.
The options are many, and I suspect you can be very pleased with whatever you choose - I just think you should not be concerned about "wasted capability" - rather think what you will pay for the streaming component. For me the sound was worth what I paid for used UQ 24/96, and it will eventually end up in a different room or be gifted to my daughter.
Cheers,
Charlie
Posted on: 30 November 2013 by plexxx
Another option is to use a basic netbook or pc connected via USB to an Audiophilio device to convert USB to s/pdif. Connect that to your nDAC, use Foobar 2000 to play all your files. I have a similar setup and it works great. There are apps you can get to control foobar from a smartphone or tablet.
Posted on: 30 November 2013 by Davy
Originally Posted by CharlieP:
Davy,
I am using a UnitiQute as "streamer" with coax (BNC) digital out to my nDac, and it provides the best sound quality compared to some alternatives I have tried. While it seems a waste of the DAC and amp sections of the UQ - get over it. IMHO it still offers sound quality value compared to other options. Also, I suggest you not limit yourself to optical.
The options are many, and I suspect you can be very pleased with whatever you choose - I just think you should not be concerned about "wasted capability" - rather think what you will pay for the streaming component. For me the sound was worth what I paid for used UQ 24/96, and it will eventually end up in a different room or be gifted to my daughter.
Cheers,
Charlie
How lucky your daughter is!
Davy