Obama Care: Res Ipsa Loquitur:

Posted by: Russ on 25 November 2013

Some time ago, I endured the whips and scorns cast by many of my well-meaning European and American friends by having the gall to question the policies of the chosen one whom I should very well know is better able to guide my future than I am.  At that time, I promised all of those who sang my praises on that thread that at some point I would pontificate on Obama Care.  Well, I wanted to, but I have been too busy watching with a combination of horror and amusement, the vast body of material which we are now provided by the Democrats themselves.  At first you could only hear about it on the hated Fox News channel, but eventually even the liberally-oriented cable organizations as well as the New York Times and Washington Post had to acknowledge what was going on. 

 

Now, Obama Care was passed when the Democrats held not only the White House, but both houses of Congress.  Not a single Republican voted for it—all of them predicting disaster.  The Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi famously said: “We need to pass the bill so we can find out what is in it.”  Go Nancy!  Heartfelt Republican opposition was characterized as obstructionism and racism.   The bill mandated that all private health insurance plans include:

 

Insurers not being able to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions

 

Insurers not being able to drop coverage for those who become sick

 

A ban on price discrimination based on sex, medical history, or community rating

 

Allowing “children” or dependents to remain on a parent’s policy through age 26

 

No lifetime or annual coverage caps on essential benefits—broadly defined in the bill as:

 

"ambulatory patient services; emergency services; hospitalization; maternity and newborn care; mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management; and pediatric services, including oral and vision care."

 

Contraception supplies mandatory

 

Elimination of co-pays and deductibles     

 

And with all of these “freebies”, Obama promised:

  1.  Health Insurance will be more affordable—across the board—saving families an average of $2,500.00 per year.
  2. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
  3. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan------PERIOD!

Hell, we really don’t need any of our mythical Supreme Beings to bring about miracles—we have Obama!

 

Now of course, like all the freebies promised by this unapologetic socialist—(who occupies the same Oval Office where Franklin Roosevelt worked day and night with Sir Winston Churchill to defeat Adolph Hitler and where William Jefferson Clinton worked day and night to get hum jobs from Monica Lewinski,) this was patently and obviously false—at the very least to anyone who could add two and two.  Unfortunately, it is apparent that a majority of the American People—at least a majority of Democrats, did not fit into that category.  The very Democratic leaders who pushed through passage of the bill are all on videotape parroting Obama’s talking points—word for word, just as they parroted President Bush’s words about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction—having seen the same intelligence reports he saw.

 

But in the case of Obama Care, they have proven themselves to have been lying, opportunistic weasels—just like their Boss.

 

Forget Operation Fast and Furious where Obama’s Attorney General sold guns to the Mexican Drug Cartels.  Forget the so-called Justice Department’s illegal investigation of Fox News executives.  Forget IRS (the same bunch who are supposed to enforce the individual mandate of Obama Care) targeting Tea Party and other conservative organizations.  Forget Obama and Hillary turning their backs on their own ambassadorial staff in Benghazi and letting them be murdered.  Forget their stonewalling Congress in all of the investigations of these matters.  Obama says he did not know about any of those scandals. 

 

Of course, he also said “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan---PERIOD.” In the past, Presidents have been held accountable for lying.  George H.W. Bush famously said: "Mark my words--no new taxes."  When he later raised taxes, the American People understandably and rightly held him responsible.  Obama has no more races to run, and it is doubtful that his own fall from grace will affect the coronation of Hillary Rodham Clinton.  We shall see.

 

But as I say, forget all that—Obama Care affects millions of Americans and it is now obvious to all that its creator and namesake lied.  He didn’t forget—he didn’t misrepresent—he didn’t mis-state—He Lied!  53 percent of the American People now believe he is not trustworthy.  Well, Yeah!  We Racist Republicans (RR) were trying to tell you the truth five years ago.

 

So Obama Care got passed—all 2,200 pages of it.  The website was contracted out to a Canadian firm that had been dismissed from many other projects for failed results.  They had 3 ½ years to build the goddamn site and screwed it up royally.  Not with glitches—but with a completely faulty architecture.  As of today, 40 percent of the underlying structure—the back end—is not even built—the part that uh, actually pays the premiums to insurance companies!

 

But forget the website as well—that is the least of it.  So far 5.5 million Americans—almost all in the individual market-- have received cancellation notices from their companies.  Why?  Because they do not meet the list of some ten or so non-negotiable coverage items required by Obama Care.  So a 22 year-old male in perfect health with no wife or children who had a policy that did not include mamagrams, pap smears, or birth control pills now gets his relatively cheap policy cancelled.  But what the hell?  All he has to do is find a “better” policy for him on healthcare.gov—(once it starts working in 2045).  Oh, sure, the price may be higher—gee, ya think?  Now it is obvious that when the shit hits the fan with the individual mandate (recently delayed by Obama until two weeks after the 2014 midterm elections in order to protect several Democratic Senators who are going ape-shit over their own vulnerability) as many as one-hundred-million Americans may well lose their “crummy” plans.

 

Soon after passage, Obama granted “waivers” to over 1,500 organizations, including AARP and many of the huge labor unions who had helped him get it passed.  Several important states were given exemptions in order to appease them politically.   Now the major unions are going ape-shit because they have read the bill and discovered they may have to pay a reinsurance fee for each of their covered members.  Oh, but I forgot, Obama is considering a waiver for that as well.  After all, they voted correctly—and that is the only important thing to him.

 

But why would Obama lie about: (1) the cost of the bill to the government, (2) the cost of the bill to individuals, (3) the ability of individuals to keep their doctors and plans, (4) the fact that deductibles would go sky-high, (5) the fact that the intention behind the bill was, from the first, to do away with the private insurance market,   and most importantly that (6) the bill was (now acknowledged by even the New York Times) a giant scheme for the re-distribution of wealth?

 

BECAUSE HAD TOLD THE TRUTH, HE WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ELECTED!

 

Now, the heathens are truly raging, the rats are leaving the ship, the lights have been turned on in the kitchen, the roaches are running under the stove, the insane are running the asylum, and the Democrats are pulling out all the political stops.  The Senate has changed the rules of cloture for filibustering, available in one form or another for over 200 years, so that a minority of Senators can no longer block appointees to the D.C. Court of Appeals—the second most powerful court in the land, because it is the court which decides administrative and regulatory cases and controversies—especially important to the cockroaches in today’s Washington--any challenges to administrative end-runs around Congress—including the Republican House of Representatives.  Hmmm.

 

Predictably Obama has chosen the strategy of blaming: (1) the insurance companies--(for cancelling the policies--even though it was his law that forced them to,) (2) the media (for having the guts to dare to question Him,) and (3) most hilarious of all, the Republicans--(even though not one voted for the garbage that became Obama Care and not one was consulted on either the content of the bill or the construction of His website.)

 

Obama is a sad, sad story.  Don’t get me wrong—he is enormously intelligent, apparently a great husband and father.  People who know him like him.  Until now, even with all the cynicism and incompetence, his likeability has kept his approval rating up.  And he is a political genius.  He knows how to campaign.  But to some extent he is either incompetent in the realm of actually governing OR in some ways, he is devilishly clever in governing in a radical way and then covering up the truth. 

 

Even sadder, as the first black man elected President of the United States, he might have been the inspiration even I, and others like me who knew where he came from politically and what he really stood for, (Chicago and the principles of Saul Alinsky) hoped he might be.   But sadly, a political hack from Chicago, black, white, or polka-dotted, is still a hack.  He promised to be a uniter—but no one has been more divisive.  And make no mistake—it is not white Republicans or Tea Party members who have created the division because he is black.  Rather, it is he and his race-baiting supporters who are vicious enough to claim that it is impossible to oppose the policies of a black president—UNLESS you are a racist.  There must, in short, be a double standard for blacks in that office.  And that, my friends, is by far the most damaging racist, paternalistic view one could hold. 

 

Black Americans of course support Obama by a factor of nearly 10-1.  But they make up only 15 percent of the country.  A very great part of white America elected President Obama.  (Fewer voted for him in 2012, so must one assume that they became racists overnight?)

It may be too late to stop the Democratic coalition in this country: too many checks are being written and there is, after all, the promise of all that wealth redistribution.  (Yummm!)  But at least, this train wreck that is Obama Care has proved beyond any doubt three things:

 

First, Barack Obama has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be capable of lying to the American People about anything and everything. 

 

Second:The kind of big government advocated by Barack Obama and his heir-apparent Hillary Clinton, is incompetent to either formulate sound policy or to execute it.

 

Third: Barack Obama is, whatever he may claim, attempting to introduce European Socialism into the United States, even as that ideology is being almost universally discredited.

 

The next step to "fix" Obama Cae will be single-payer socialized medicine--what they all said they wanted in the first place!

 

But now President Obama has turned from destroying the nation through domestic policies that are either naively incompetent or cynically socialistic—or both, in favor of the kind of pathetic foreign policy demonstrated by Neville Chamberlain in 1939—in the present case, leaving the Israelis to either attack Iran or allow themselves to be turned into a parking lot.  (But that’s another story.)  Or perhaps I am being unfair—The President of the United States says it is a good agreement.  But then he also said: “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan—PERIOD!”

Posted on: 28 November 2013 by Bruce Woodhouse

Kevin

 

I think that is a good post. Perhaps we do underestimate the American adherence to philosophical individualism. I guess the problems I have are twofold. Firstly such an apparently libertarian ideal is not obviously manifest in US foreign policy (political and economic) and secondly I believe that a total-free-for-all does not work for the poor and the weak. I don't think these groups can be left to fend for themselves without falling away and being trampled. Individualism and independent spirit is not terribly useful if you have chronic mental illness and no money. This reflects a post by someone earlier; suggesting 'free' health care just makes people dependent. I understand the point but would argue that some people, through no fault of their own, need a degree of dependency to survive and flourish. Like the benefit system there is of course a balance. However I think a fair and equitable society requires the haves to support the have-nots and that underpins much of the more socialist principles of European government.

 

I also don't think people should have the freedom to do exactly what they want with regard to lethal weapons but that is another thread!

 

I always sense the US election comes down to quite basic principles (once race and religion are covered), basically the size of government. The Democrats seems to want big, the Republicans small.

 

I honestly wonder if Republicans cling to the freedom stance and 'frontier mentality' because it suits their wish to be left to do as they please rather than a deeply held philosophical position. Personally I think it is out of date.

 

Happy Thanksgiving by the way

 

Bruce

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:

 

I just believe that issues like universal health care and gun control represent far more than just health care for all and guns.  Taking away any part of a persons ability to freely determine the outcome of his life is objectionable to a large portion of Americans.  I feel that a lot of outsiders are lacking in an understanding of the philosophical individualism underpinning Americans' belief systems.  Conversely, it is difficult for many here to understand why the British didn't implement the French solution.

 

I want everybody to have affordable access to health care.  I don't want anybody to suffer malnutrition.  I want a world where people are able to achieve their full potential in life.  Society  benefits greatly when all these conditions are met.  Society should feed the hungry, care for the disabled and elderly and help heal the sick.  The issue is that the government is not society.

 

As Bruce said, this is a good post. The problem is that to much of the rest of the world, America's attachment to guns and aversion to state-provided healthcare looks not like rugged individualism; but at best incomprehensible and at worst plain mad.

 

If by 'the French solution' you mean getting rid of the monarchy, well we did - 140 years before the French revolution. The over-mighty monarch Charles I was executed for treason and tyranny in 1649. The problem was, he was replaced by the dour tyranny of Cromwell and his Puritans.

 

Once Cromwell died, we decided we'd had enough of this dreadful bunch of religious fanatics and killjoys and restored the monarchy in the shape of  Charles II, a jolly chap whose whoring and extravagance made him wildly popular (We rather like our royals to be rakes - which is why Prince Harry is so well-liked).

 

Charles died childless (well, he had plenty of illegitimate kids) and was succeeded by his brother  James II, whose fanatical Catholicism and overweening ways led to his being booted off the throne, and the establishment of a constitutional monarchy, which was subject to the will of Parliament and the people. As a result, we never suffered the horrors of the type of Terror which the French had to endure in the late 18th century. We fudged a classic English compromise, because we don't like extremists or fanatics, and it has on the whole worked reasonably well.

 

As I think I've pointed out to you before, nobody, not even the most insane monarchist, actually believes themselves to be a subject of the Queen. I can't think of any way in which the crown actually has any practical power over anyone.Don't forget, our head of state, unlike your President, is a nominal one, and has no real executive power.

 

For centuries now our monarchy has been run for the amusement of the populace. The Royal Family has always rather feared the mob, and has consistently (and wisely) adapted itself to the whims and will of the people - as even a cursory read of biogs of the likes of George V and VI, Victoria and Edward VII will demonstrate.

 

Also, most people in my country would rather have a Queen or King as head of state than a President - the idea of a Nixon, Berlusconi, Bush, Chavez (or, God forbid, Blair) representing us would fill us with horror.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by MangoMonkey

Sometimes you need a helping hand to get you through hard times. Failing that, all of life's work is destroyed. If you get that little help, you can breath to fight another day.

 

The problem with the medical approach in the US is this: if you're unlucky enough to need the helping hand of the medical establishment when you're unlucky enough not to have medical insurance: the establishment will trample your head to the ground. :-)

 

A friend had to go in to the ER for sudden high BP. They put him in an ambulance (even though I would have been fine driving him to the other hospital) and kept him one night under observation.

 

If he did not have insurance, the total medical bill would have been close to $25000. The 3 mile ambulance journey was itself $998. Now, the bill they presented the insurance company was $25K. Because it was 'In-Network' the negotiated rates brought it down to around $10000 total. He had to pay around $1000 out of pocket, and the insurance company took care of the rest.

 

At least Two problems with this story:

a) If you don't have insurance, they'll actually try to come after you for that whole amount. You can negotiate it down a little but not much, I suspect.

b) That's still way too much, IMHO. Ultimately, it's the customer who buys insurance that is paying for this.

 

IMHO, All that Obamacare has done is force everyone to pay insurance companies so they can continue to pay the medical establishment exorbitant prices. 

 

I hope I'm wrong, but haven't seen evidence to the contrary.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Bruce Woodhouse

...and if you had effective Primary Care access his BP should have been managed long term without ever going near a hospital. That rarely happens if people have to pay for regular monitoring, and medication costs added in means the management of such simple but important long terms conditions for a big chunk of the population is haphazard at best.

 

Prevention loses out-it all becomes crisis management in hospitals.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by osprey
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Sometimes you need a helping hand to get you through hard times. Failing that, all of life's work is destroyed. If you get that little help, you can breath to fight another day.

 

The problem with the medical approach in the US is this: if you're unlucky enough to need the helping hand of the medical establishment when you're unlucky enough not to have medical insurance: the establishment will trample your head to the ground. :-)

 

A friend had to go in to the ER for sudden high BP. They put him in an ambulance (even though I would have been fine driving him to the other hospital) and kept him one night under observation.

 

If he did not have insurance, the total medical bill would have been close to $25000. The 3 mile ambulance journey was itself $998. Now, the bill they presented the insurance company was $25K. Because it was 'In-Network' the negotiated rates brought it down to around $10000 total. He had to pay around $1000 out of pocket, and the insurance company took care of the rest.

 

At least Two problems with this story:

a) If you don't have insurance, they'll actually try to come after you for that whole amount. You can negotiate it down a little but not much, I suspect.

b) That's still way too much, IMHO. Ultimately, it's the customer who buys insurance that is paying for this.

 

IMHO, All that Obamacare has done is force everyone to pay insurance companies so they can continue to pay the medical establishment exorbitant prices. 

 

I hope I'm wrong, but haven't seen evidence to the contrary.


Wow! Stories like this make me so glad that I live where I live. High taxes are a happy thing compared to above.
Posted on: 29 November 2013 by MangoMonkey

This was a sudden onset thing. He's lived most of his life in Australia (where they have a nationalized system) and just recently moved to the states.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Kevin Richardson
Originally Posted by osprey:
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Sometimes you need a helping hand to get you through hard times. Failing that, all of life's work is destroyed. If you get that little help, you can breath to fight another day.

 

The problem with the medical approach in the US is this: if you're unlucky enough to need the helping hand of the medical establishment when you're unlucky enough not to have medical insurance: the establishment will trample your head to the ground. :-)

 

A friend had to go in to the ER for sudden high BP. They put him in an ambulance (even though I would have been fine driving him to the other hospital) and kept him one night under observation.

 

If he did not have insurance, the total medical bill would have been close to $25000. The 3 mile ambulance journey was itself $998. Now, the bill they presented the insurance company was $25K. Because it was 'In-Network' the negotiated rates brought it down to around $10000 total. He had to pay around $1000 out of pocket, and the insurance company took care of the rest.

 

At least Two problems with this story:

a) If you don't have insurance, they'll actually try to come after you for that whole amount. You can negotiate it down a little but not much, I suspect.

b) That's still way too much, IMHO. Ultimately, it's the customer who buys insurance that is paying for this.

 

IMHO, All that Obamacare has done is force everyone to pay insurance companies so they can continue to pay the medical establishment exorbitant prices. 

 

I hope I'm wrong, but haven't seen evidence to the contrary.


Wow! Stories like this make me so glad that I live where I live. High taxes are a happy thing compared to above.

Call it a tax or mandatory health insurance, its a similar end result.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by osprey
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:

       
Originally Posted by osprey:
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Sometimes you need a helping hand to get you through hard times. Failing that, all of life's work is destroyed. If you get that little help, you can breath to fight another day.

 

The problem with the medical approach in the US is this: if you're unlucky enough to need the helping hand of the medical establishment when you're unlucky enough not to have medical insurance: the establishment will trample your head to the ground. :-)

 

A friend had to go in to the ER for sudden high BP. They put him in an ambulance (even though I would have been fine driving him to the other hospital) and kept him one night under observation.

 

If he did not have insurance, the total medical bill would have been close to $25000. The 3 mile ambulance journey was itself $998. Now, the bill they presented the insurance company was $25K. Because it was 'In-Network' the negotiated rates brought it down to around $10000 total. He had to pay around $1000 out of pocket, and the insurance company took care of the rest.

 

At least Two problems with this story:

a) If you don't have insurance, they'll actually try to come after you for that whole amount. You can negotiate it down a little but not much, I suspect.

b) That's still way too much, IMHO. Ultimately, it's the customer who buys insurance that is paying for this.

 

IMHO, All that Obamacare has done is force everyone to pay insurance companies so they can continue to pay the medical establishment exorbitant prices. 

 

I hope I'm wrong, but haven't seen evidence to the contrary.


Wow! Stories like this make me so glad that I live where I live. High taxes are a happy thing compared to above.

Call it a tax or mandatory health insurance, its a similar end result.


The difference I guess is that here the health care is available for all regardless of the financial status (including those without income).
Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Kevin Richardson
Originally Posted by osprey:
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:

       
Originally Posted by osprey:
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Sometimes you need a helping hand to get you through hard times. Failing that, all of life's work is destroyed. If you get that little help, you can breath to fight another day.

 

The problem with the medical approach in the US is this: if you're unlucky enough to need the helping hand of the medical establishment when you're unlucky enough not to have medical insurance: the establishment will trample your head to the ground. :-)

 

A friend had to go in to the ER for sudden high BP. They put him in an ambulance (even though I would have been fine driving him to the other hospital) and kept him one night under observation.

 

If he did not have insurance, the total medical bill would have been close to $25000. The 3 mile ambulance journey was itself $998. Now, the bill they presented the insurance company was $25K. Because it was 'In-Network' the negotiated rates brought it down to around $10000 total. He had to pay around $1000 out of pocket, and the insurance company took care of the rest.

 

At least Two problems with this story:

a) If you don't have insurance, they'll actually try to come after you for that whole amount. You can negotiate it down a little but not much, I suspect.

b) That's still way too much, IMHO. Ultimately, it's the customer who buys insurance that is paying for this.

 

IMHO, All that Obamacare has done is force everyone to pay insurance companies so they can continue to pay the medical establishment exorbitant prices. 

 

I hope I'm wrong, but haven't seen evidence to the contrary.


Wow! Stories like this make me so glad that I live where I live. High taxes are a happy thing compared to above.

Call it a tax or mandatory health insurance, its a similar end result.


The difference I guess is that here the health care is available for all regardless of the financial status (including those without income).

We have a gvt run health insurance plan called Medicaid/Medicare .  Provides for poor, disabled and elderly.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by osprey
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:

       
Originally Posted by osprey:
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:

       
Originally Posted by osprey:
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Sometimes you need a helping hand to get you through hard times. Failing that, all of life's work is destroyed. If you get that little help, you can breath to fight another day.

 

The problem with the medical approach in the US is this: if you're unlucky enough to need the helping hand of the medical establishment when you're unlucky enough not to have medical insurance: the establishment will trample your head to the ground. :-)

 

A friend had to go in to the ER for sudden high BP. They put him in an ambulance (even though I would have been fine driving him to the other hospital) and kept him one night under observation.

 

If he did not have insurance, the total medical bill would have been close to $25000. The 3 mile ambulance journey was itself $998. Now, the bill they presented the insurance company was $25K. Because it was 'In-Network' the negotiated rates brought it down to around $10000 total. He had to pay around $1000 out of pocket, and the insurance company took care of the rest.

 

At least Two problems with this story:

a) If you don't have insurance, they'll actually try to come after you for that whole amount. You can negotiate it down a little but not much, I suspect.

b) That's still way too much, IMHO. Ultimately, it's the customer who buys insurance that is paying for this.

 

IMHO, All that Obamacare has done is force everyone to pay insurance companies so they can continue to pay the medical establishment exorbitant prices. 

 

I hope I'm wrong, but haven't seen evidence to the contrary.


Wow! Stories like this make me so glad that I live where I live. High taxes are a happy thing compared to above.

Call it a tax or mandatory health insurance, its a similar end result.


The difference I guess is that here the health care is available for all regardless of the financial status (including those without income).

We have a gvt run health insurance plan called Medicaid/Medicare .  Provides for poor, disabled and elderly.


Ok, I do not know enough of your system to really discuss about it any further. I was just shocked about Mango's example but if anyone never in reality has to pay these kind of amounts then I agree the mandatory health insurance is just a form of tax.
Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Jasonf


Hi Russ,

 

I would like to echo Daniels's sentiments in his post earlier and congratulate you in allowing those big brassy Texan balls to be displayed on the chopping board of public debate so us "well meaning" Europeans to give them damn good prod

 

And if you ever do venture to these woods, please feel free to drop me a line.

 

To MM - I detect that your post regarding "holier than thou" is a slight nod in my direction. So I would just like to say that I too consider Kevin's post is a very good point made and in the same way refer to Bruce's post as being a very good reply to it.

 

It is noted that Russ refers to me and others as "well meaning Europeans", which is fair enough, so I am aware that there is quite a big cultural difference with the majority of Americans on these two particular debates. But they are debates, and I do object to the "holier than thou" phrase being banded about in such circumstances, purely on grounds that It gives less credence to that side of the debate and to a certain extent, stifles the debate. It so happens that both the Right to Bear Arms and this issue are particularly interesting and very important to me, hence my participation. And as I have tried to point out, are in fact peculiarly American and in my view, very much linked...well I have not made that point quite yet

 

The fact that Russ has posted on these topics has enabled me to sound out some views I have on these matters, they are no more "holier than thou" than any other alternative view. We had this on the Forum about a year ago on the topic of travellers being coined as "scum", some people objected to this and then were accused of being "holier than thou" by, let's say the more conservative/right side of the debate. It also crops up with any debate on environmental issues, and you can guess who are "holier than thou" in those debates. In my experience, it Tends to arise from the right in accusation of the left. Certainly on these very important issues, we should be aloud to give it a fair crack of the whip, especially when old Russ's balls are on the chopping board

 

Anyway, Kevin's point is well noted and has been for a while but we can't stifle our own views because of a cultural difference, especially when the overriding global evidence is saying the contrary.

 

Jason.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by MangoMonkey
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:
 

We have a gvt run health insurance plan called Medicaid/Medicare .  Provides for poor, disabled and elderly.

What if you're not poor, disabled or elderly, but just scraping through ..

 

@JasonF: Not entirely sure whether you're talking about Kevin-W or Kevin-Richardson.  :-)

Maybe I had one smiley too little ?

 

In any case, It's probably clear from my posts that I'm not taking any one side. I've lived in Europe long enough (about 6 yrs) to appreciate it, and the medical system - but also to realize that not everything over there is perfect.

 

The point is - I'd rather discuss potential solutions - rather than dissing any given country.

 

There is a lot to be proud of, and a lot of not very pleasant memories - on all sides.

 

Maybe I'm doing Russ a disservice - but I don't take his posts very seriously. He paints himself as a caricature of his true self.

 

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Russ
Kevin R: Wow, did you hit the nail squarely on the head in your assessment of the connection betweeen our  yankee (I'm a Southerner so that is a word I don't capitalize ) philosophy in general and our liberties.

Do some of us go overboard?  Surely.  Do there have to be controls?  Of course.  And no doubt as people become increasingly urbanized and dependent on government, and people of my generation who oppose big government die out (hang in there, Oprah) the liberties Amercia once cherished will die with them.

But damnit, big government buggers up (have I mentioned what a great expression that is?) everything it touches.  It buys votes from individuals and from corporations alike.  This is true of Democrats and Republicans alike, and the only thing that favors the latter is their tendency toward smaller government.

A little over a century ago, we all stood shoulder to shoulder on the Isle of Wight.  In my childhood, we moved to the Isle of Man.  Just a couple of years ago, we arrived at our predicted destination on Zanzibar.  I suspect when we all have to be transported to Australia, toilet paper will become more important to me than my rifles and shotguns.  Until then, think: "...my cold dead finger..." and that sort of thing.  Now I need to run and take my medications.

Russ
Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Jasonf
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:
 

We have a gvt run health insurance plan called Medicaid/Medicare .  Provides for poor, disabled and elderly.

What if you're not poor, disabled or elderly, but just scraping through ..

 

@JasonF: Not entirely sure whether you're talking about Kevin-W or Kevin-Richardson.  :-)

Maybe I had one smiley too little ?

 

In any case, It's probably clear from my posts that I'm not taking any one side. I've lived in Europe long enough (about 6 yrs) to appreciate it, and the medical system - but also to realize that not everything over there is perfect.

 

The point is - I'd rather discuss potential solutions - rather than dissing any given country.

 

There is a lot to be proud of, and a lot of not very pleasant memories - on all sides.

 

Maybe I'm doing Russ a disservice - but I don't take his posts very seriously. He paints himself as a caricature of his true self.

 

That's Kevin R.

 

I am posting too slow, but I was getting around to the 'no system is perfect' side of things.

 

Jason.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Jasonf

And please note.

 

We are not dissing Americans, but questioning the American system regarding gun control and/or health care In the same way that you would equally question the archaic Monarchist system in Britain. There, I am sure we would certainly agree.

 

The so called 'Liberty' argument is also a bit of a red herring...but we have to come back to that as it's getting late here.

 

Jason.

Posted on: 29 November 2013 by Russ
Jason,

Guilty as charged on not being serious ALL the time, but on the issue of approaching bankruptcy and government incompetence (at least here) I am in in earnest.  When people get nasty, it does bring out the worst in me.  Hopefully, if I can be forgiven, it will be on the basis of my not taking MYELF overly seriously.

Best Regards,

Russ
Posted on: 02 December 2013 by MangoMonkey

I think obamacare is a disaster - because it didn't go far enough to curtail costs.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/03/health/as-hospital-costs-soar-single-stitch-tops-500.html

 

 

Posted on: 02 December 2013 by Kevin Richardson
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

I think obamacare is a disaster - because it didn't go far enough to curtail costs.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/03/health/as-hospital-costs-soar-single-stitch-tops-500.html

 

 

Well doing a single stitch is pretty easy. You can buy kits for DIY stitches.  I have a few on hand since i don't have health insurance.  If its on your face then you might not want a scar so 500$ Doesn't seem too unreasonable.

Posted on: 05 December 2013 by Onthlam
Originally Posted by Russ:

Some time ago, I endured the whips and scorns cast by many of my well-meaning European and American friends by having the gall to question the policies of the chosen one whom I should very well know is better able to guide my future than I am.  At that time, I promised all of those who sang my praises on that thread that at some point I would pontificate on Obama Care.  Well, I wanted to, but I have been too busy watching with a combination of horror and amusement, the vast body of material which we are now provided by the Democrats themselves.  At first you could only hear about it on the hated Fox News channel, but eventually even the liberally-oriented cable organizations as well as the New York Times and Washington Post had to acknowledge what was going on. 

 

Now, Obama Care was passed when the Democrats held not only the White House, but both houses of Congress.  Not a single Republican voted for it—all of them predicting disaster.  The Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi famously said: “We need to pass the bill so we can find out what is in it.”  Go Nancy!  Heartfelt Republican opposition was characterized as obstructionism and racism.   The bill mandated that all private health insurance plans include:

 

Insurers not being able to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions

 

Insurers not being able to drop coverage for those who become sick

 

A ban on price discrimination based on sex, medical history, or community rating

 

Allowing “children” or dependents to remain on a parent’s policy through age 26

 

No lifetime or annual coverage caps on essential benefits—broadly defined in the bill as:

 

"ambulatory patient services; emergency services; hospitalization; maternity and newborn care; mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management; and pediatric services, including oral and vision care."

 

Contraception supplies mandatory

 

Elimination of co-pays and deductibles     

 

And with all of these “freebies”, Obama promised:

  1.  Health Insurance will be more affordable—across the board—saving families an average of $2,500.00 per year.
  2. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
  3. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan------PERIOD!

Hell, we really don’t need any of our mythical Supreme Beings to bring about miracles—we have Obama!

 

Now of course, like all the freebies promised by this unapologetic socialist—(who occupies the same Oval Office where Franklin Roosevelt worked day and night with Sir Winston Churchill to defeat Adolph Hitler and where William Jefferson Clinton worked day and night to get hum jobs from Monica Lewinski,) this was patently and obviously false—at the very least to anyone who could add two and two.  Unfortunately, it is apparent that a majority of the American People—at least a majority of Democrats, did not fit into that category.  The very Democratic leaders who pushed through passage of the bill are all on videotape parroting Obama’s talking points—word for word, just as they parroted President Bush’s words about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction—having seen the same intelligence reports he saw.

 

But in the case of Obama Care, they have proven themselves to have been lying, opportunistic weasels—just like their Boss.

 

Forget Operation Fast and Furious where Obama’s Attorney General sold guns to the Mexican Drug Cartels.  Forget the so-called Justice Department’s illegal investigation of Fox News executives.  Forget IRS (the same bunch who are supposed to enforce the individual mandate of Obama Care) targeting Tea Party and other conservative organizations.  Forget Obama and Hillary turning their backs on their own ambassadorial staff in Benghazi and letting them be murdered.  Forget their stonewalling Congress in all of the investigations of these matters.  Obama says he did not know about any of those scandals. 

 

Of course, he also said “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan---PERIOD.” In the past, Presidents have been held accountable for lying.  George H.W. Bush famously said: "Mark my words--no new taxes."  When he later raised taxes, the American People understandably and rightly held him responsible.  Obama has no more races to run, and it is doubtful that his own fall from grace will affect the coronation of Hillary Rodham Clinton.  We shall see.

 

But as I say, forget all that—Obama Care affects millions of Americans and it is now obvious to all that its creator and namesake lied.  He didn’t forget—he didn’t misrepresent—he didn’t mis-state—He Lied!  53 percent of the American People now believe he is not trustworthy.  Well, Yeah!  We Racist Republicans (RR) were trying to tell you the truth five years ago.

 

So Obama Care got passed—all 2,200 pages of it.  The website was contracted out to a Canadian firm that had been dismissed from many other projects for failed results.  They had 3 ½ years to build the goddamn site and screwed it up royally.  Not with glitches—but with a completely faulty architecture.  As of today, 40 percent of the underlying structure—the back end—is not even built—the part that uh, actually pays the premiums to insurance companies!

 

But forget the website as well—that is the least of it.  So far 5.5 million Americans—almost all in the individual market-- have received cancellation notices from their companies.  Why?  Because they do not meet the list of some ten or so non-negotiable coverage items required by Obama Care.  So a 22 year-old male in perfect health with no wife or children who had a policy that did not include mamagrams, pap smears, or birth control pills now gets his relatively cheap policy cancelled.  But what the hell?  All he has to do is find a “better” policy for him on healthcare.gov—(once it starts working in 2045).  Oh, sure, the price may be higher—gee, ya think?  Now it is obvious that when the shit hits the fan with the individual mandate (recently delayed by Obama until two weeks after the 2014 midterm elections in order to protect several Democratic Senators who are going ape-shit over their own vulnerability) as many as one-hundred-million Americans may well lose their “crummy” plans.

 

Soon after passage, Obama granted “waivers” to over 1,500 organizations, including AARP and many of the huge labor unions who had helped him get it passed.  Several important states were given exemptions in order to appease them politically.   Now the major unions are going ape-shit because they have read the bill and discovered they may have to pay a reinsurance fee for each of their covered members.  Oh, but I forgot, Obama is considering a waiver for that as well.  After all, they voted correctly—and that is the only important thing to him.

 

But why would Obama lie about: (1) the cost of the bill to the government, (2) the cost of the bill to individuals, (3) the ability of individuals to keep their doctors and plans, (4) the fact that deductibles would go sky-high, (5) the fact that the intention behind the bill was, from the first, to do away with the private insurance market,   and most importantly that (6) the bill was (now acknowledged by even the New York Times) a giant scheme for the re-distribution of wealth?

 

BECAUSE HAD TOLD THE TRUTH, HE WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ELECTED!

 

Now, the heathens are truly raging, the rats are leaving the ship, the lights have been turned on in the kitchen, the roaches are running under the stove, the insane are running the asylum, and the Democrats are pulling out all the political stops.  The Senate has changed the rules of cloture for filibustering, available in one form or another for over 200 years, so that a minority of Senators can no longer block appointees to the D.C. Court of Appeals—the second most powerful court in the land, because it is the court which decides administrative and regulatory cases and controversies—especially important to the cockroaches in today’s Washington--any challenges to administrative end-runs around Congress—including the Republican House of Representatives.  Hmmm.

 

Predictably Obama has chosen the strategy of blaming: (1) the insurance companies--(for cancelling the policies--even though it was his law that forced them to,) (2) the media (for having the guts to dare to question Him,) and (3) most hilarious of all, the Republicans--(even though not one voted for the garbage that became Obama Care and not one was consulted on either the content of the bill or the construction of His website.)

 

Obama is a sad, sad story.  Don’t get me wrong—he is enormously intelligent, apparently a great husband and father.  People who know him like him.  Until now, even with all the cynicism and incompetence, his likeability has kept his approval rating up.  And he is a political genius.  He knows how to campaign.  But to some extent he is either incompetent in the realm of actually governing OR in some ways, he is devilishly clever in governing in a radical way and then covering up the truth. 

 

Even sadder, as the first black man elected President of the United States, he might have been the inspiration even I, and others like me who knew where he came from politically and what he really stood for, (Chicago and the principles of Saul Alinsky) hoped he might be.   But sadly, a political hack from Chicago, black, white, or polka-dotted, is still a hack.  He promised to be a uniter—but no one has been more divisive.  And make no mistake—it is not white Republicans or Tea Party members who have created the division because he is black.  Rather, it is he and his race-baiting supporters who are vicious enough to claim that it is impossible to oppose the policies of a black president—UNLESS you are a racist.  There must, in short, be a double standard for blacks in that office.  And that, my friends, is by far the most damaging racist, paternalistic view one could hold. 

 

Black Americans of course support Obama by a factor of nearly 10-1.  But they make up only 15 percent of the country.  A very great part of white America elected President Obama.  (Fewer voted for him in 2012, so must one assume that they became racists overnight?)

It may be too late to stop the Democratic coalition in this country: too many checks are being written and there is, after all, the promise of all that wealth redistribution.  (Yummm!)  But at least, this train wreck that is Obama Care has proved beyond any doubt three things:

 

First, Barack Obama has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be capable of lying to the American People about anything and everything. 

 

Second:The kind of big government advocated by Barack Obama and his heir-apparent Hillary Clinton, is incompetent to either formulate sound policy or to execute it.

 

Third: Barack Obama is, whatever he may claim, attempting to introduce European Socialism into the United States, even as that ideology is being almost universally discredited.

 

The next step to "fix" Obama Cae will be single-payer socialized medicine--what they all said they wanted in the first place!

 

But now President Obama has turned from destroying the nation through domestic policies that are either naively incompetent or cynically socialistic—or both, in favor of the kind of pathetic foreign policy demonstrated by Neville Chamberlain in 1939—in the present case, leaving the Israelis to either attack Iran or allow themselves to be turned into a parking lot.  (But that’s another story.)  Or perhaps I am being unfair—The President of the United States says it is a good agreement.  But then he also said: “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan—PERIOD!”

My favorite post for the year.

+1

Mangomonkey wrote-

"It isn't great,but a step in the right direction" 

LOL!!!!

Posted on: 05 December 2013 by MangoMonkey
Originally Posted by Onthlam:
Originally Posted by Russ:

 

My favorite post for the year.

+1

Mangomonkey wrote-

"It isn't great,but a step in the right direction" 

LOL!!!!

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced it's a disaster - he should have gone whole hog and nationalized the system. :-)

Failing that, all he's done is enrichened the insurance companies and hospitals at the expense of the tax payers money.

Posted on: 05 December 2013 by Kevin Richardson

I think we have all lost sight of the real enemy.  Linn.  With their Klimax Kontrol and what-not.

Posted on: 05 December 2013 by Kevin Richardson
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:
Originally Posted by Onthlam:
Originally Posted by Russ:

 

My favorite post for the year.

+1

Mangomonkey wrote-

"It isn't great,but a step in the right direction" 

LOL!!!!

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced it's a disaster - he should have gone whole hog and nationalized the system. :-)

Failing that, all he's done is enrichened the insurance companies and hospitals at the expense of the tax payers money.

Most hospitals are non profit.  Blue Cross is also a non profit.

Posted on: 05 December 2013 by Onthlam
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:
Originally Posted by Onthlam:
Originally Posted by Russ:

 

My favorite post for the year.

+1

Mangomonkey wrote-

"It isn't great,but a step in the right direction" 

LOL!!!!

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced it's a disaster - he should have gone whole hog and nationalized the system. :-)

Failing that, all he's done is enrichened the insurance companies and hospitals at the expense of the tax payers money.

Most hospitals are non profit.  Blue Cross is also a non profit.

And you can walk into any hospital, no matter who you are and get treatment. They can't turn you away.

So where is the broke?

This country has gone to hell..

Posted on: 05 December 2013 by Kevin Richardson
Originally Posted by Onthlam:
Originally Posted by Kevin Richardson:
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:
Originally Posted by Onthlam:
Originally Posted by Russ:

 

My favorite post for the year.

+1

Mangomonkey wrote-

"It isn't great,but a step in the right direction" 

LOL!!!!

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced it's a disaster - he should have gone whole hog and nationalized the system. :-)

Failing that, all he's done is enrichened the insurance companies and hospitals at the expense of the tax payers money.

Most hospitals are non profit.  Blue Cross is also a non profit.

And you can walk into any hospital, no matter who you are and get treatment. They can't turn you away.

So where is the broke?

This country has gone to hell..

The broken part is that anybody can get treatment but many are unable / unwilling to pay.  These costs are then passed on to those that do pay their bills.  I am not in favor of requiring every person to get comprehensive health insurance but if you don't get the insurance then don't use more healthcare services than you want to afford.

 

So some people lost their precious health care plans.  Big deal.  They were likely crappy plans that would have ultimately placed the financial burden on society.  People need to face the facts that health care is very expensive and everybody needs quality insurance.

Posted on: 07 December 2013 by Russ
Kevin R: 

It is either acceptable for public officials to lie or it is not. 

Obama obviously and demonstrably lied in order first, to ensure passage of the ACA, and second, to ensure his own reelection. 

If you do not think Obama lied,

OR

If you are willing to argue that his blatant lies were, for whatever reason, acceptable, (say because he is so much smarter than the rest of us and it was OK to lie to us to give us what we really need)

then, we probably do not have much to say to one another except to politely disagree.

Best regards,

Russ