My new NDX & I have been happily getting to know each other for 3 weeks now. I made the move with some trepidation - I live in a world of volts ohms & hertz with some joules & watts on the side - I’m not into the technobabble that seems to go with streaming. Then reading the troubles some have with network installs - I was determined to keep it simple from the outset.
I ordered the NDX & then selected & bought the NAS so I could get started with ripping CD’s. I chose the Synology DS214 as the brand seems to be well regarded around all hifi network player circles, it has 2x 2TB WD RED HDD’s.
I use dBpoweramp to rip & manage the process, this turned out to be a breeze & dBpoweramp has to be highly rated for its simplicity & ease of use. The rips were all loaded as WAV – Naim recommend WAV & that’s good enough for me.
I chose Supra Cat-7 ethernet cables over my other short listed AudioQuest Cinnamon. The ethernet routing has the simplest circuit – a Netgear GS105 switch between NDX & NAS & a branch off to the BT Hub to handle internet & wireless.
Setting up the NDX was just so easy with the remote & with the iPad & n-Stream, UPnP, Synology Assistant & Synology Media Server all the components shook hands & were ready to go.
The NDX replaced a much loved CDX2 so it’s still all a comparison at the moment. I connected it from the get-go to my XPS so I have no idea what a bare NDX in my system sounds like.
Immediate impressions have not changed much since, it’s a little smoother for sure but in some respects does not have the immediacy. With some recordings it has a lot more detail, better separation, space & air giving a very clear & stable sound stage positioning with wider & deeper perspective. I say some recordings, so I put this down to the recording not the player. Some instruments sound slightly different, I originally said it was like sitting at a piano with the CDX2 & a few rows back with the NDX, I am still thinking that way. It’s more realistic with some recordings – high-res especially - the timbre is more pronounced with more of the physical feel to string & body vibration.
The changes in volume of the source material is more pronounced compared to CDX2, the quiet passages are quieter & loud is louder. It is also more pronounced in the volume differences between albums, changing an album invariably involves a small volume adjustment more so than I had noticed on CD.
I would add that I am disappointed with the price & availability of high-res recordings. It seems all the larger commercial cmpy’s are only interested in MP3 & AAC low-res. It seems the public have become conditioned to think nothing better exists – what hope to move them away from DAB !!! – seems we have settled into acceptance of a world of mediocrity.
But those prices !!! very questionable IMO, why pay so much more for a download (no plastic disc, case or paper artwork costs) the original recording was probably in high res anyhow. Why differentiate 96kHz cost at a lower level than 192kHz.
Where are all the UK & European high-res sites, why are what there is so genre limited. HDTracks & others in USA has recording cmpy restrictions imposed on overseas sales or high-res files, not impossible to work around, but a PITA to need to do so.
The install & set up was a breeze & apart from a minor glitch with the BT Hub it was quick & simple - & I think this is the secret - K.I.S.S.
Overall I am highly delighted & I know we have a way more to go & that is something to really look forward to. Mucho
all round .
Posted on: 07 May 2014 by antony d
Mike
think we got our NDX about the same time, almost the same set up use QNAP 210 with x2 red TB memory - dBpoweramp for ripping -
yes the Cache memory can get a bit blocked, so just clear down on IPAD and reset - could not be any more pleased - Phil from Cymbiosis was the master at setting up and giving me some real tips -
I too was from the CDX2- XPS- 252 etc etc - but I have to say I am delighted with the results and so are my ears - the NDX has rarely been off since installation - I am a real fan of this machine
I use FLAC (losses) but I am not going there! brilliant and the 3 studio 24 bite masters purchased from Naim (Holly Ghost Marc Ford ) Linn (so Peter Gabriel) and B&W (Jean M Jarre) are truly beyond belief -
If the NDX gets better after 3 months I can't wait - just need to fine tune 202 with Hi Cap
also the ease of having 800+ albums at the touch of your fingers using the IPAD is a delight
I'm sold................................................but still get a buzz putting LP on the LP12 though


Posted on: 08 May 2014 by Mike-B
Hi Ears, I listened to the change with & without an XPS2 at the dealers - I heard clearer detail, more rounded, natural, sharper leading edge notes & rimshots, better sense of space & separation around the sound stage. It was much the same as the changes an XPS brings to CDX2 but not so pronounced as I remember, maybe that was because of different room & other system parts, but it is a step up for sure.
Not much hope of me trying the NDX without the PSU with mine unless something unforeseen comes up.
It's installed in the same shelf position as was the CDX2 & all its connections & cable dressing unmoved - except the install of the ethernet cable.
All my power cables are made to measure & fit the various boxes without much wiggle room & with the PSU's located 2 shelves below the NDX there is not the spare cable to do that.
Posted on: 12 May 2014 by Mike-B
In another post we had some discussions about switching mode power supply (wall warts) noise getting into the system & particularly in the Ethernet switch. They couple electrical switching noise back onto the mains power line in the 30 to 100 MHz range. I spent some time with a small portable SW receiver trying to detect this, but not much luck.
Anyhow, after reading some Ethernet installer material & from my own distant past work installing radio & radar – albeit long before the Ethernet word had been invented - I have now IMO done everything that will minimize such noise, I’ve basically overloaded the SMPS area with ferrite.
I have 4x SMPS on a power socket strip with aprx 1m of Supra LoRad (shielded) 3 core 1.5mm cable. I’ve added 2 ferrites - 1 at each end.
I've added 1 to the NetGear GS105 switch DC power cable with 5 passes (4 turns) thru the ferrite core.
I’ve fitted a ferrite on each end of the Cat 7 ethernet cable. This cable has foil screened pairs overwrapped with a braid shield which connects thru the metal shrouded switch ports to form an unbroken screen from NAS to NDX.
The Synology DS214 DC power cable came with a ferrite located at the DS214 end & I’ve added an additional ferrite at the SMPS end, plus I’ve added a ferrite on the 240v power cable to the SMPS.
I’ve also added ferrite to SMPS’s for the wireless router & phone, plus I’ve added ferrite to the phone lines that supply each of them - nothing to do with SMPS noise, but phone lines can carry RF noise & I was able to pick that up on my SW radio & confirm the ferrite did significantly reduce it.
That’s it, I’m done. Back to listening to music & no more imagining RFI birdies.
Posted on: 12 May 2014 by Big Bill
Originally Posted by Mike-B:
"That’s it, I’m done. Back to listening to music & no more imagining RFI birdies". Good stuff whether this phenomenon exists or not the work you have done will hopefully have freed you from the spectre of it.
Most hifi kit uses a Regulator coupled to a paralleled capacitor across its output, so any A/c is short-circuited away from our kit. They also function as a reservoir of power. The problem is that you need to employ a very large Cap to short circuit any 50Hz or 100Hz etc left behind and so we end up using a large Electrolytic Cap. Anything else is too expensive, like a Polyprop for example. Electrolytic Caps have many problems one of which is that as you increase the frequency their impedance drops up to a certain frequency but as you approach the RF it starts to increase. This is not good, RF goes straight into the works. The usual answer to this is to connect a smaller cap in parallel to the big guy. Generally 1% of its value. So if we are using a 10k micro farad Electro then we can parallel a 100 micro farad polyprop across it. We can carry this on and bypass the polyprop with 1 micro farad cap.
This is commonly done by DIYer but I have no idea if NAIM use this technique, I wouldn't be surprised if they do though.
An even better solution is to use a Choke-Regulated psu and this is common in Valve/Tube designs but has been used in tranny designs. A 50H choke (inductor) which is basically a one-sided transformer will have a very high impedance to any A/c above a few Hz. It also acts as a very effective power reservoir. But like all the best solutions it has problems:
1) Expense - I bet you guessed that one, and
2) You will get a much lower voltage from a choke-reg psu, which means if you are building a single-ended baby that requires 500v for it's output stage (B+) supply then you have to have a transformer with a much higher secondary (go back to point 1).
So eliminating RF before it gets into your kit is a valid pursuit. I use choke/cap filters for my kit, it's simple choke to make with a ferrite rod. People often says this deadens kit but I have never noticed this, to mean it just makes it a bit smoother sounding. But I accept I may be imagining any differences.
One of the difficulties with RF is that it ain't constant and this makes A-B testing just about impossible.