New U2 Album
Posted by: rodwsmith on 10 September 2014
I haven't heard it. But isn't it awful?
Or
"Tedious f*cking sh*te from a tax-dodging w*nker called Bongo and a bunch of sanctimonious t*ssers who wouldn't know what real life was if it sh*t on them from a great height.
They haven't been good since 19xx (insert preferred date here) if indeed they ever were, which they weren't anywhere near as much as xxxx (insert name of band no-one else has ever heard of). I remember xxxxx concert (insert made-up un-checkable pre-recording deal boast here), through a haze of 'proper' Guinness made from Liffey water and proper Irishman's piss, That was when U2 were last good, that was. And still the support act was six million percent f*cking better.
Every time I click my f*cking fingers a new iphone scalds the tiny hand of the Chinese child that just made it.
Edge! F*cking "Edge", I mean what the f*ck is that about, then eh? Can you imagine: "Dinner's ready Edge". What a c*nt. One name. One chord, more like.
Still, at least you can't moan about the price, eh?"
Well ever since the Beatles copied their rooftop concert idea I have been upset.
(Oh, maybe I got that backward?)
They have had some good stuff, but in my opinion, even at their height, suffer from being highly overrated, and excruciatingly self-important and pretentious. And their time has passed as far as I am concerned...quite a while ago I might add.
They still haven't found what they were looking for - which presumably is a 3rd chord?
They found it - it was a tax haven in the Netherlands. Not only a w*******r but a hypocritical w******r to boot.
listened once every song sounds the same
it was free
you get what you pay for
yeah the first albums were really growing, I've had a spiritual experience to Joshua, Enjoy Rattle and Hum. That's the end tho.
And I'm so pissed at Edge, he wants to take the op of a mountain in Malibu and cut it off, put an enclave of 5 homes and f* the tossers below. What a grand environmentalist. Coastal review is letting it go thru after about 3 years review, many changes, not the top of the hill drop it down, one story and cluster the homes. Thank goodness someone did that, bigger than his ego.
I remember having to see them play at Wembley Arena, I was working there, and they only had enough material for a 50 minute set. I wish they'd left it at that. I wouldn't give them space on my hard drive even if they paid me.
I think I was at that gig it was The Unforgettable Fire tour, and I'd seen them the previous month at the Brixton Academy, back then I actually liked them a lot, bought my 1st proper hifi listening to that album, Rotel RP830, 820B and the original Diamonds.. Oh, and it was a lot longer than 50 minutes....not huge, but at least 90 minutes...However, since Live Aid and Bono's inane crap lost interest years ago...
I could never understand the appeal of U2, It certainly was not the rock music yet a lot of fans appear to like the Joshua Tree album, was it the lyrics...? With bands such as Deep Purple, Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin , Genesis and Muse (just to mention a few from numerous examples) their appeal was obvious, out there for all to see and hear. Yet when I hear U2, they do appear to have their own sound (guitars) but all else appears a mystery...
I'm no fan of U2 but they did the 2nd best live gig I've been to. But that was in 1983 or so before they were famous so to speak. Only surpassed by Dick Dale in Brighton maybe 10yrs ago.
So apparently it will be free to all iTunes users?
One part of me feels it is very nice of a band to give away their album free.
Another part thinks it is quite mind blowingly arrogant to believe that so many people would be grateful for it.
Press release this morning:
U2 has apologised for upsetting people by foisting the band's latest album on users of Apple's iTunes service. Bono blamed: "A drop of megalomania, a twitch of generosity, a dash of self-promotion" for the free album release that some Apple customers claimed amounted to malware.
I listened to it on a mates full fat download file
- flat featureless & tired, so no thanks, not even a free copy.
So apparently it will be free to all iTunes users?
One part of me feels it is very nice of a band to give away their album free.
Another part thinks it is quite mind blowingly arrogant to believe that so many people would be grateful for it.
Press release this morning:
U2 has apologised for upsetting people by foisting the band's latest album on users of Apple's iTunes service. Bono blamed: "A drop of megalomania, a twitch of generosity, a dash of self-promotion" for the free album release that some Apple customers claimed amounted to malware.
I listened to it on a mates full fat download file
- flat featureless & tired, so no thanks, not even a free copy.
There is a video on the BEEB site with their apology. Still trying to work out whether it is a true apology or just them taking the piss. More latter than than former methinks. Bit late to do this as they must have been aware of furore that they have caused over this.
You can please some of the people some of the time...
I just don't understand people who look gift horses in the mouth. If you don't like it, erase it. It was free and we should be grateful for the generous gesture if not for the content.
The album has not automatically planted itself in my iTunes library. (Not that I want it).
Anyone else?
John.
U2 supplantation. Yet another reason I'm glad I don't have iTunes.
The album has not automatically planted itself in my iTunes library. (Not that I want it).
Anyone else?
John.
Luckily it didn't happen for me either.
Oh boy, it's only a free album, nothing to apologise for IMO. Most of the complainers would probably have preferred the traditional illegal download from the internet .
The album has not automatically planted itself in my iTunes library. (Not that I want it).
Anyone else?
John.
Luckily it didn't happen for me either.
We received our copy automatically. I'm not bothered by the process. I don't feel "spammed", taken for granted or think anything negative about the whole thing. They have nothing to apologize for. I haven't listened to it yet, though.
The album has not automatically planted itself in my iTunes library. (Not that I want it).
Anyone else?
John.
+ 1 Thankfully!
Phew! Discrimination concerns allayed.
Thanks folks.
John.
You can please some of the people some of the time...
I just don't understand people who look gift horses in the mouth. If you don't like it, erase it. It was free and we should be grateful for the generous gesture if not for the content.
It's only a gift horse if you want the music. Look at it this way, what if Apple decided to allow other groups/bands to release tracks/albums in this way. I for one don't want my music library filled with files downloaded without my authority.
Dave
Dave, my understanding is that it is the giver who decides to give not the recipient. An unwanted gift is still a gift.
But semantics aside, if you're that bothered, then you can turn off automatic downloads. My iTunes is permanently set to that mode. I had to find the album and manually click to receive it.
Perfect: free brilliant album and I get to exercise free choice. All I want now is a decent high quality version...that's why I bought the vinyl!
Loki
Since both Apple and U2 have apologised so the issue is probably now water under the bridge and they'll think twice about trying to pull a similar stunt in the future. But I still hold the view the intended receiver should be given the opportunity to politely decline a gift however well intended it may have been.
More interesting how did you set iTunes to stop automatic downloads?
Dave
Preferences-Advanced has a selection for stopping/selecting automatic software updates.
Preferences-Advanced has a selection for stopping/selecting automatic software updates.
Yes, I have "Check for new software updates automatically" de-selected but that action may have been post the U2 download.
As a side-note I also see there's an iTunes software update available which means more pain as you have to uninstall the old version, and the associated programs, before you can install the latest version. There must be another way of managing the files on my iPod Classic?
Dave
As a side-note I also see there's an iTunes software update available which means more pain as you have to uninstall the old version, and the associated programs, before you can install the latest version. There must be another way of managing the files on my iPod Classic?
Dave
Media Monkey will handle your iPOD classic nicely, and no U2 issues either.
SJB
Sloopy John B
Thanks. I used Media Monkey at one time. Time to revisit I think.
Dave
Great news: the LP is pressed in 'innocent' white! Wicked
As a side-note I also see there's an iTunes software update available which means more pain as you have to uninstall the old version, and the associated programs, before you can install the latest version. There must be another way of managing the files on my iPod Classic?
Dave
Not sure what you're alluding to. My iTunes updates over the years have been seamless.