Statement has landed

Posted by: Graham Clarke on 09 May 2015

So after three long months of waiting, my Statement preamp finally arrived yesterday.  I managed to do pretty well in being patient until we got down to around the last ten days…  This was the starting point:

 

 

Since my Statement home demo via UHES in January I’ve changed my two main interconnects to Super Lumina ones and have swapped out NAC A5 for Super Lumina, at a somewhat excessive cost, but with brilliant results. 

 

 

To answer a previous question asked on the Forum regarding how these speaker cables are tuned, it is down to the resistor used.  The resistor is soldered across the positive and negative cables and then surrounded in the metal box to protect it.  This provides the correct inductance that the power amps require.  The tuning is the value of the resistor and the type of resistor used (e.g. RS Components, Farnell etc).  Required values were determined for specific lengths via listening and then other lengths were calculated via a computer program.

 

Anyway, onto the day.  The plan was to check the torque settings on the S-600 speakers’ drive unit screws, break down, clean, tighten and reconfigure the Fraim racks, install the six Super Lumina DIN-XLR cables and oh, just add the Statement S-1 pre-amp to the mix, replacing the 552…

 

To complete this task we had four people.  Ian and Norman from UHES of course, plus Jason Gould and Mark Raggett directly from Naim.  It’s always enjoyable spending time with Ian and Norman but also getting to spend around four hours with Jason and Mark was the icing on the cake.

 

 

Ian first checked the speaker torque settings, which turned out to be fine since their last check nearly two years ago.  Given I purchased these as ex-demo speakers from UHES it’s probably no surprise that they had already bedded in and didn’t need further adjustment.

 

I wish I could say the same about the Fraim racks.  These were new a year ago and Ian had told me that I should check the tightness of the spikes after a few months because there is a degree of compression and expansion of the wood from new which will loosen them.  Having assumed that they would just be slightly loose combined with a degree of laziness and a manic work schedule I’m afraid I hadn’t bothered.  Well, when we broke down the power supply Fraim rack and lifted the base off the carpet, one of the spikes remained embedded in the concrete floor, to my embarrassment!  So YES, you really DO need to check these with newly built Fraim racks.

 

During this time break down time, Jason and Mark had man handled the S-1 flight case out of Mark’s car.  At least for the UK, these are delivered direct from the factory to the customer.  “Man handled” is the correct term given the 102Kg shipping weight but this was slightly easier than in January as the case now has detachable wheels.  Direct delivery is done to ensure that the unit turns up in 100% perfect condition both cosmetically and functionally.  This was of course not a problem with mine.

 

While they were busy doing this, I kept myself busy by taking a look at the long awaited DIN-XLR cables.

 

Anyone familiar with Powerlines or Hi-Lines will recognise the packaging.

 

 

 

As you can see, both ends use the Air-PLUG technology that the other Super Lumina cables use via a set of interconnecting metal rings.  The XLR canons are also metal, unlike the original ones.

 

Jumping forward slightly, the only glitch of the day was that when installing these cables into my Snaxo BMR, the far end of the Air-PLUG connectors on the top cable touch the one beneath.  When the system has bedded in I’ll have to see whether this actually makes an audible difference.

 

 

There was another box which was unexpected, this turned out to be the Statement accessory kit, the finish of which was beautiful.

 

 

There were three layers to this box with the top containing the manual and a spirit level.

 

 

The second layer in mine was empty given I had not purchased the Statement power amps.  Apparently I am the first person world wide that Naim have supplied with just the pre-amp, all other purchasers have gone for the complete system.

 

In the bottom layer of the box were a number of tools

 

 

Including some Statement Fraim chips (different from standard ones) and the remote control which is in the bag on the right.  This is constructed of metal and is similar in weight and feel to the NARCOM remote.

 

Given the NARCOM remote is £300, I dread to think how much a replacement one of these would be.  I better not lose it down the back of the sofa.

 

After completing the first Fraim rack, Jason and Mark unpacked the pre-amp.

 

 

Given the size, weight and space constraints this does need to be planned!  With the protective cover removed it finally appeared for the first time.

 

 

Even unpackaged this weighs 60Kg so moving into position isn’t an easy task.  This is what it looks like inside to help explain (no, this isn't mine!)

 

 

That's a lot of components!

 

Happily (for me) I left the task of moving to Mark.

 

 

No pressure there Mark, I’m sure you loved me taking pictures of you while you were doing this!

 

 

We agree not to put it flush up to the racks so that it could be easily cleaned.  Getting the position right, ensuring it was absolutely level and parallel with the left hand rack easily took 30 minutes such was the perfectionist nature of Ian and Mark. 

 

Installing the second Fraim was relatively straightforward after this, poor Ian was left to do this while everyone else chatted and watched on.  Jason commented that normally with home installs they get involved directly but knew that they could leave this to Ian given his expertise.  High praise indeed for UHES.

 

One added bonus of moving to two racks and separating them slightly is that cable dressing is now much better, with no Burndys touching the wall and all but a few cables off the floor.

 

 

Finally, after over four hours of work, everything was set up and listening was about to begin!

 

 

By now it was about 6:30PM and we had a dinner reservation for 7:30 as we were all hungry, so we only had limited listening time.  I wasn’t too worried about this because the pre-amp is brand new and stone cold, the DIN-XLRs are also new and the rest of the system would have cooled down, so my expectations weren’t too high.

 

From the first track there was a slight degree of harshness around the sound.  This was consistent with the from cold demo in January.  High frequencies were also a little tight and I’d say that the pre-amp and system in generally was probably only at around 50% of its full potential.  Despite that, some of the greatness from the January demo was already apparent: the super low noise floor (if it was any lower it would be sucking noise out of the room) along with the incredible detail and separation of every instrument being played.

 

Unfortunately Saturday obligations mean I won’t get to listen further until later in the afternoon, but both main sources have been left active playing into the system and with further warm up I’m expecting a big jump.  So you’ll have to wait a while longer for the clichés and superlatives.

 

More to follow and thanks for reading if you got this far.

 

 

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:

And so it begins...

 

DB.

Did you use the specific Statement "Fraim" chips?

 

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:

Did you use the specific Statement "Fraim" chips?

 

Yes - they are smaller diameter and very thick - seem to do the job.

 

This is the beginning of a home demo, not a definite decision to purchase as of yet.

 

Getting used to a very different sound, presentation and performance.

 

 

DB.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Foot tapper

Uh oh!  

 

A sense of inevitability in the air, despite the best intentions to be rational...

 

I hope you enjoy the S1 as much as I did at Jon Honeyball's.

 

Best regards, FT

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by Foot tapper:

Uh oh!  

 

A sense of inevitability in the air, despite the best intentions to be rational...

I'm being very rational!

 

After hearing Grahams I wanted to hear what it would do in my system.

 

As an initial comment - it has a lot more bass extension and control than the 552.

 

DB.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Harry

Cor. That looks promising. Looking forward to hearing about it.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by hungryhalibut

I wonder how passive Statement power amps would stand up to three 500s active? The combination of the S1 with a load of standard boxes on Fraim looks odd to me, and the full statement rig is far easier to dust (hint, hint). And you'd need only one set of speaker leads. 

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

I wonder how passive Statement power amps would stand up to three 500s active? The combination of the S1 with a load of standard boxes on Fraim looks odd to me, and the full statement rig is far easier to dust (hint, hint). And you'd need only one set of speaker leads. 

It also costs a lot more. No intent to go back to Passive.

When the lights are low it is fine! The Statement Pre also has a beautiful up-lighting effect at night too!

 

DB.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

I wonder how passive Statement power amps would stand up to three 500s active? The combination of the S1 with a load of standard boxes on Fraim looks odd to me, and the full statement rig is far easier to dust (hint, hint). And you'd need only one set of speaker leads. 

Realise some people place a higher value on aesthetics than others, but for a temporary demo I think that is fine.

 

Here's what it looked like when I had my demo in January.  This was when I borrowed it for a week and made it totally clear to my dealer that I was DEFINITELY NOT buying one.  And actually thought I meant it!  Oops.

 

 

And now :

 

 

I think it looks fine.

 

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Steve J
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:

Did you use the specific Statement "Fraim" chips?

 

Yes - they are smaller diameter and very thick - seem to do the job.

 

This is the beginning of a home demo, not a definite decision to purchase as of yet.

 

Getting used to a very different sound, presentation and performance.

 

 

DB.

I knew it would only be a matter of time before you took the plunge. Good luck.

 

Steve

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by Steve J:
I knew it would only be a matter of time before you took the plunge. Good luck.

It required a slight modification to fraim layout to handle a rather too healthy deep bass - I've now raised the supercap supply (one on top or fraim stack to right of S1) by temporarily inserting an empty standard fraim level. This removed an over-powerful very low bass emphasis and opened-out the sound more to my liking. I've always found the Snaxo and associated Supercap rather sensitive to placement.

 

The S1 Pre is very capable indeed from my brief exposure to it so far. It gives a deep powerful tuneful melodic presentation - delightful in fact.

 

Good job it is only a home demo...

 

DB.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Steve J
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:
 

Good job it is only a home demo...

 

DB.

..... for now. If you like it and can justify the expense then go for it. The Statement Preamp is probably the best VFM compared with the mono block amps.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by dayjay
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

I wonder how passive Statement power amps would stand up to three 500s active? The combination of the S1 with a load of standard boxes on Fraim looks odd to me, and the full statement rig is far easier to dust (hint, hint). And you'd need only one set of speaker leads. 

Realise some people place a higher value on aesthetics than others, but for a temporary demo I think that is fine.

 

Here's what it looked like when I had my demo in January.  This was when I borrowed it for a week and made it totally clear to my dealer that I was DEFINITELY NOT buying one.  And actually thought I meant it!  Oops.

 

 

And now :

 

 

I think it looks fine.

 

It looks fine is an over so slight understatement (see what I did there).  I'm sure it sounds fantastic too

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Gingerbeard
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:
Originally Posted by Steve J:
I knew it would only be a matter of time before you took the plunge. Good luck.

It required a slight modification to fraim layout to handle a rather too healthy deep bass - I've now raised the supercap supply (one on top or fraim stack to right of S1) by temporarily inserting an empty standard fraim level. This removed an over-powerful very low bass emphasis and opened-out the sound more to my liking. I've always found the Snaxo and associated Supercap rather sensitive to placement.

 

The S1 Pre is very capable indeed from my brief exposure to it so far. It gives a deep powerful tuneful melodic presentation - delightful in fact.

 

Good job it is only a home demo...

 

DB.

Another fine looking system and I look forward to reading how the S1 works out. I would have to paint the wall behind the kit a 'Naim' green though  

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by hungryhalibut

I'm sure it sounds wonderful, but it still looks weird to me. This is what a stereo should look like...

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by ken c
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:
Originally Posted by Steve J:
I knew it would only be a matter of time before you took the plunge. Good luck.

It required a slight modification to fraim layout to handle a rather too healthy deep bass - I've now raised the supercap supply (one on top or fraim stack to right of S1) by temporarily inserting an empty standard fraim level. This removed an over-powerful very low bass emphasis and opened-out the sound more to my liking. I've always found the Snaxo and associated Supercap rather sensitive to placement.

 

The S1 Pre is very capable indeed from my brief exposure to it so far. It gives a deep powerful tuneful melodic presentation - delightful in fact.

 

Good job it is only a home demo...

 

DB.

congratulations DB!

is that S1 fully run-in??

 

enjoy

ken

 

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by gary yeowell

Excellent DB, possibly the first/only active 500/S1 system in existence?

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by J.N.

Great news Gary. We look forward to your reports as the slender beast blossoms.

 

John.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by MDS
Originally Posted by Hungryhalibut:

I'm sure it sounds wonderful, but it still looks weird to me. This is what a stereo should look like...

Nah. You'd hardly know there was a hi-fi system in the room! Where's the fun in that? Bring on those black boxes (or monoliths) 

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by ken c:
congratulations DB!

is that S1 fully run-in??

 

enjoy

ken

No it is brand new!

My Dealer did suggest he could run it in for me first - but took it as it was.

 

Possibly rather eager to hear it before it found its way into another lair first.

 

Impressions are very positive so far. I need to try a wide range of music to see how it handles it all, but so far nothing seems to be a problem for it.

 

Compared to 552 it has overall more resolution everywhere and is very stable and sure-footed. heavy deep Bass and drums at the same time not a problem - vocalist then enters and is as clear as when singing alone. It sounds more tuneful too - as if small changes in timing normally present when complex mixes caused strain before is now as it should have been.

 

Vocals have better separation for multiple simultaneous singers. Voice itself is more solid, real and revealing of inner structure compared to 552. Hard really to describe, but obvious once you hear it. Male vocals are better than I've ever heard them - the added resolution and confidence in lower frequencies helping here. Female vocals, which I mainly listen too, are more beautiful - rendition of sung held notes is striking.

 

552 is very competent but I'm hearing it rather convincingly bettered.

 

DB.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by MDS

I think DB's home trial of the S1 has just extended the life of this thread by a very considerable margin.

 

Very much looking forward to his updates, too. 

 

Mike

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Chris Dolan

Very brave DB - good luck 

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by Chris Dolan:

Very brave DB - good luck 

Brave or foolish?

 

The eventual test will be when going back to 552, but I'm not thinking about that just right now.

 

I did find cable-dressing is very important, getting the output lead to not touch the floor was very important.

 

DB.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Christopher_M
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:

......

 

The eventual test will be when going back to ["very competent"] 552.....

Ah, a home dem then. Nothing to be scared of. Money's not changed hands. Yet!  ;-)

 

C.

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by Lionel

A prediction: DB will buy a passive statement system then, when it has finally run in after 2 years, complain there is no active option...

Posted on: 22 June 2015 by ClaudeP

Congratulations DB - being still in awe with my new 552, I can hardly what the next step could be... but the way you describe makes it easier to grasp!

 

Claude