Statement has landed

Posted by: Graham Clarke on 09 May 2015

So after three long months of waiting, my Statement preamp finally arrived yesterday.  I managed to do pretty well in being patient until we got down to around the last ten days…  This was the starting point:

 

 

Since my Statement home demo via UHES in January I’ve changed my two main interconnects to Super Lumina ones and have swapped out NAC A5 for Super Lumina, at a somewhat excessive cost, but with brilliant results. 

 

 

To answer a previous question asked on the Forum regarding how these speaker cables are tuned, it is down to the resistor used.  The resistor is soldered across the positive and negative cables and then surrounded in the metal box to protect it.  This provides the correct inductance that the power amps require.  The tuning is the value of the resistor and the type of resistor used (e.g. RS Components, Farnell etc).  Required values were determined for specific lengths via listening and then other lengths were calculated via a computer program.

 

Anyway, onto the day.  The plan was to check the torque settings on the S-600 speakers’ drive unit screws, break down, clean, tighten and reconfigure the Fraim racks, install the six Super Lumina DIN-XLR cables and oh, just add the Statement S-1 pre-amp to the mix, replacing the 552…

 

To complete this task we had four people.  Ian and Norman from UHES of course, plus Jason Gould and Mark Raggett directly from Naim.  It’s always enjoyable spending time with Ian and Norman but also getting to spend around four hours with Jason and Mark was the icing on the cake.

 

 

Ian first checked the speaker torque settings, which turned out to be fine since their last check nearly two years ago.  Given I purchased these as ex-demo speakers from UHES it’s probably no surprise that they had already bedded in and didn’t need further adjustment.

 

I wish I could say the same about the Fraim racks.  These were new a year ago and Ian had told me that I should check the tightness of the spikes after a few months because there is a degree of compression and expansion of the wood from new which will loosen them.  Having assumed that they would just be slightly loose combined with a degree of laziness and a manic work schedule I’m afraid I hadn’t bothered.  Well, when we broke down the power supply Fraim rack and lifted the base off the carpet, one of the spikes remained embedded in the concrete floor, to my embarrassment!  So YES, you really DO need to check these with newly built Fraim racks.

 

During this time break down time, Jason and Mark had man handled the S-1 flight case out of Mark’s car.  At least for the UK, these are delivered direct from the factory to the customer.  “Man handled” is the correct term given the 102Kg shipping weight but this was slightly easier than in January as the case now has detachable wheels.  Direct delivery is done to ensure that the unit turns up in 100% perfect condition both cosmetically and functionally.  This was of course not a problem with mine.

 

While they were busy doing this, I kept myself busy by taking a look at the long awaited DIN-XLR cables.

 

Anyone familiar with Powerlines or Hi-Lines will recognise the packaging.

 

 

 

As you can see, both ends use the Air-PLUG technology that the other Super Lumina cables use via a set of interconnecting metal rings.  The XLR canons are also metal, unlike the original ones.

 

Jumping forward slightly, the only glitch of the day was that when installing these cables into my Snaxo BMR, the far end of the Air-PLUG connectors on the top cable touch the one beneath.  When the system has bedded in I’ll have to see whether this actually makes an audible difference.

 

 

There was another box which was unexpected, this turned out to be the Statement accessory kit, the finish of which was beautiful.

 

 

There were three layers to this box with the top containing the manual and a spirit level.

 

 

The second layer in mine was empty given I had not purchased the Statement power amps.  Apparently I am the first person world wide that Naim have supplied with just the pre-amp, all other purchasers have gone for the complete system.

 

In the bottom layer of the box were a number of tools

 

 

Including some Statement Fraim chips (different from standard ones) and the remote control which is in the bag on the right.  This is constructed of metal and is similar in weight and feel to the NARCOM remote.

 

Given the NARCOM remote is £300, I dread to think how much a replacement one of these would be.  I better not lose it down the back of the sofa.

 

After completing the first Fraim rack, Jason and Mark unpacked the pre-amp.

 

 

Given the size, weight and space constraints this does need to be planned!  With the protective cover removed it finally appeared for the first time.

 

 

Even unpackaged this weighs 60Kg so moving into position isn’t an easy task.  This is what it looks like inside to help explain (no, this isn't mine!)

 

 

That's a lot of components!

 

Happily (for me) I left the task of moving to Mark.

 

 

No pressure there Mark, I’m sure you loved me taking pictures of you while you were doing this!

 

 

We agree not to put it flush up to the racks so that it could be easily cleaned.  Getting the position right, ensuring it was absolutely level and parallel with the left hand rack easily took 30 minutes such was the perfectionist nature of Ian and Mark. 

 

Installing the second Fraim was relatively straightforward after this, poor Ian was left to do this while everyone else chatted and watched on.  Jason commented that normally with home installs they get involved directly but knew that they could leave this to Ian given his expertise.  High praise indeed for UHES.

 

One added bonus of moving to two racks and separating them slightly is that cable dressing is now much better, with no Burndys touching the wall and all but a few cables off the floor.

 

 

Finally, after over four hours of work, everything was set up and listening was about to begin!

 

 

By now it was about 6:30PM and we had a dinner reservation for 7:30 as we were all hungry, so we only had limited listening time.  I wasn’t too worried about this because the pre-amp is brand new and stone cold, the DIN-XLRs are also new and the rest of the system would have cooled down, so my expectations weren’t too high.

 

From the first track there was a slight degree of harshness around the sound.  This was consistent with the from cold demo in January.  High frequencies were also a little tight and I’d say that the pre-amp and system in generally was probably only at around 50% of its full potential.  Despite that, some of the greatness from the January demo was already apparent: the super low noise floor (if it was any lower it would be sucking noise out of the room) along with the incredible detail and separation of every instrument being played.

 

Unfortunately Saturday obligations mean I won’t get to listen further until later in the afternoon, but both main sources have been left active playing into the system and with further warm up I’m expecting a big jump.  So you’ll have to wait a while longer for the clichés and superlatives.

 

More to follow and thanks for reading if you got this far.

 

 

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by PTPlayers
Originally Posted by Penarth Blues:
Originally Posted by PTPlayers:
Originally Posted by Chris Dolan:
Originally Posted by Tabby cat:

I don't know if you saw the recent Statement thread on PFM.

It took me a while to locate it - but while browsing I did learn that a piece of wet string is better than NACA5 

Hi What site is PFM ?

 

Thank you 

A search for PFM Audio will reveal it. It has aquatic creatures in its title

Doh , little brain dead today .

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by Ravenswood10

Well, I know what I like and it's made in Salisbury. I'm proud to support British industry and Naim's service is second to none. Jealousy is a terrible tihing but I know when I'm happy and that's what matters most!

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by ken c
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:

Just read some of the thread and the conclusion seems to be that the Statement is all smoke and mirrors, along with the new Lumina cables, while Graham is apparently insane

this sort of banter is a form of "entertainment" for some Graham. 

 

lack of good music at home does strange things to one.

 

enjoy

ken

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:
 ....However, they are entitled to their opinion, how ever much others may feel it is misguided.

 

PS I probably am insane.

Insanity is fun.

 

Rejoice!

 

DB.

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by Penarth Blues
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:
Originally Posted by Penarth Blues:
Originally Posted by Tabby cat:

Thats Great news Graham.My God what will it be like after a month of warm up.

 

I can see some late nights for you.Especially if its all ready sounding wicked.

 

I don't know if you saw the recent Statement thread on PFM.There was a link to the most expensive amps and £150 000 for Statement was low down the price list.Way up there was a Jadis pre and power almost £700 000  !!

 

Thanks for the write up and pics

 

Cheers Ian

 

 

Just read some of the thread and the conclusion seems to be that the Statement is all smoke and mirrors, along with the new Lumina cables, while Graham is apparently insane

Yeah, just read the thread.  Kind of weird reading about oneself in that way.  Clearly I am BONKERS for pairing the preamp up with S-600s.  I mean, they're OVATORS for heaven sake!  Err...

 

I was tempted to join up and respond but then thought better of it.  Given most have written it off without ever hearing it, a reasoned argument would just fall on deaf ears (literally and figuratively!)

 

However, they are entitled to their opinion, how ever much others may feel it is misguided.

 

Graham

PS I probably am insane.

 

We're all insane really when you look at the things we tend to prioritise.

 

Life is about taking pleasure where you can find it in the small moments we are given - and regardless of whether or not the Statement is a complete waste of money it is clearly giving you enormous pleasure.

 

You are lucky enough to be able to indulge this passion and a few commentators on that thread seem to be incredibly miserable people.

 

What was that saying 'knowing the cost of everything and the value of nothing?'

 

I'm enjoying reading your delight in your new acquisition and I feel no envy at all - just happiness that a thing that can bring such pleasure exists in the world.

 

Ignore the miserable people, there is never any outcome that will end well for you as you can only end up moving towards their viewpoint - and what does that gain you?

 

Looking forward to the next stage of the run-in description

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by Stephen Tate
Originally Posted by Penarth Blues:
 

We're all insane really when you look at the things we tend to prioritise.

 

Life is about taking pleasure where you can find it in the small moments we are given - and regardless of whether or not the Statement is a complete waste of money it is clearly giving you enormous pleasure.

 

You are lucky enough to be able to indulge this passion and a few commentators on that thread seem to be incredibly miserable people.

 

What was that saying 'knowing the cost of everything and the value of nothing?'

 

I'm enjoying reading your delight in your new acquisition and I feel no envy at all - just happiness that a thing that can bring such pleasure exists in the world.

 

Ignore the miserable people, there is never any outcome that will end well for you as you can only end up moving towards their viewpoint - and what does that gain you?

 

Looking forward to the next stage of the run-in description

Very well said, I could not agree more.

 

I suspect a lot of Naim owners (regardless of hierarchy) have the green eyed monster around them.

I know I've dealt with a few in my time even on the other end of the scale. LOL!

 

Great thread by the way and a awesome system.

 

Enjoy the music.!!

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by John Willmott

Graham:

 

I would like to echo the comments of others on this thread and say how interesting and entertaining I found (and continue to find) your write up on the S-1.

 

Purely to satisfy my curiosity what is the service interval on the S-1 ?  

 

John

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by Justin9960

Hello Graham, a lovely thread, and a great system. Many congratulations, and hope it gives lots of joy.

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by Kiwi cat

+1

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by 911gt3r

See Graham, there are some really nice people here after all, so YOU just carry on describing just how much be.......bet.........BETTER it is than the 552!  I am not jealous Peter

Posted on: 11 May 2015 by Bert Schurink
Originally Posted by 911gt3r:

See Graham, there are some really nice people here after all, so YOU just carry on describing just how much be.......bet.........BETTER it is than the 552!  I am not jealous Peter

+1

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Chris Dolan
Originally Posted by Bert Schurink:
Originally Posted by 911gt3r:

See Graham, there are some really nice people here after all, so YOU just carry on describing just how much be.......bet.........BETTER it is than the 552!  I am not jealous Peter

+1

…. and another one.

 

Although my wife says that she prefers the look of my current amps - I think there might be a pattern emerging here 

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Old Parkland

Yes, ... and yet another one.

 

Shy one, ... watching far off at 52 distance.

 

 

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Graham Clarke

Well, thanks for all the kind comments.

 

I'm not in the slightest bit flustered by comments on PFM.  I learnt long ago not to worry about the opinions of those not important to oneself, particularly on the internet!

 

Anyway, if you think that was bad, you should have seen the abuse I got on a DIY forum when I asked about dedicated mains spurs.  It was practically the equivalent of an on line mugging by a bunch of electricians who "knew better".

 

The sad thing about that was that they couldn't comprehend whether or how it could make a difference and were then closed minded about the whole thing.  I can't explain how or why it would make a difference either but after getting one installed the difference was enormous and I hadn't simply dismissed it because I couldn't explain it.  I took the chance that it would be better (based a lot on experiences of others on this forum) and it paid off.

 

Ultimately everyone is different and I don't expect everyone to think the same way I do.  These differences can often make people interesting and it's what makes each of us an individual.

 

But back to the music now

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by John Willmott:

Graham:

 

I would like to echo the comments of others on this thread and say how interesting and entertaining I found (and continue to find) your write up on the S-1.

 

Purely to satisfy my curiosity what is the service interval on the S-1 ?  

 

John

Thanks, and good question.

 

 

This came up on Friday during the install.  The honest answer from Naim is that they don't really know given how new the product is, however as there are some shared components with other products in that range that are known to age it is expected to be 8-10 years. 

 

I'm hoping that's a conservative estimate as I'm not even going to think what they will charge for a service!

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by james n

An interesting read Graham. Very nice indeed.

 

I hope you get many years of pleasure from your new purchase. 

 

James

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by 911gt3r:

See Graham, there are some really nice people here after all, so YOU just carry on describing just how much be.......bet.........BETTER it is than the 552!  I am not jealous Peter

Peter, have you not put your 552 in a skip yet, like I recommended?

 

What is eye opening about this is that the 552 clearly remains a fabulous pre-amp, it's amazing that it is possible to better it by such a margin.

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by Chris Dolan:
Originally Posted by Bert Schurink:
Originally Posted by 911gt3r:

See Graham, there are some really nice people here after all, so YOU just carry on describing just how much be.......bet.........BETTER it is than the 552!  I am not jealous Peter

+1

…. and another one.

 

Although my wife says that she prefers the look of my current amps - I think there might be a pattern emerging here 

That one works both ways Chris.  "No, my lovely wife, I really think the current kitchen looks better than a remodeled one would"

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Graham Clarke

So today's burn in update is brought to you by the letters B and W (no, not the speakers).

 

B is for blanket.  Blanket?  Yes, as S-1 makes listening to a 552 seem like someone had thrown a blanket over each speaker, muffling them.  Or to put it another way, imagine looking out of a window on a bright day through a net curtain where things look indistinct and obscured and then the effect of whipping the curtain back.

 

W is for weight.  There's an authority to the replay that just wasn't there before.  Imagine a drum being hit.  On the 552 this would be "thump", with S-1 it's "THUMP" but not in an overblown or artificial way.

 

The S-1 presentation is quite different from the 552.  I'm struggling to understand exactly how, or to be able to put it into words.  It could be the combination of the above and the additional detail, or it could be that the frequency response is different, or something else.  Nothing seems to phase it, you can have heavy powerful bass at the same time as a delicate triangle or cymbal and nothing gets swamped or masked.  The presentation seems different in the mid range too, but I'm yet to fully understand that either!

 

 

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Nagual

This is a great read thx.  Lottery tickets bought! 

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by 911gt3r
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:

So today's burn in update is brought to you by the letters B and W (no, not the speakers).

 

B is for blanket.  Blanket?  Yes, as S-1 makes listening to a 552 seem like someone had thrown a blanket over each speaker, muffling them.  Or to put it another way, imagine looking out of a window on a bright day through a net curtain where things look indistinct and obscured and then the effect of whipping the curtain back.

 

W is for weight.  There's an authority to the replay that just wasn't there before.  Imagine a drum being hit.  On the 552 this would be "thump", with S-1 it's "THUMP" but not in an overblown or artificial way.

 

The S-1 presentation is quite different from the 552.  I'm struggling to understand exactly how, or to be able to put it into words.  It could be the combination of the above and the additional detail, or it could be that the frequency response is different, or something else.  Nothing seems to phase it, you can have heavy powerful bass at the same time as a delicate triangle or cymbal and nothing gets swamped or masked.  The presentation seems different in the mid range too, but I'm yet to fully understand that either!

 

 

Hi Graham.

There is 'insensitive', but to me describing the 552 'being like putting a BLANKET over the speakers' is outright c.....cru.....CRUEL !  

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Graham Clarke
Originally Posted by 911gt3r:
Originally Posted by Graham Clarke:

So today's burn in update is brought to you by the letters B and W (no, not the speakers).

 

B is for blanket.  Blanket?  Yes, as S-1 makes listening to a 552 seem like someone had thrown a blanket over each speaker, muffling them.  Or to put it another way, imagine looking out of a window on a bright day through a net curtain where things look indistinct and obscured and then the effect of whipping the curtain back.

 

W is for weight.  There's an authority to the replay that just wasn't there before.  Imagine a drum being hit.  On the 552 this would be "thump", with S-1 it's "THUMP" but not in an overblown or artificial way.

 

The S-1 presentation is quite different from the 552.  I'm struggling to understand exactly how, or to be able to put it into words.  It could be the combination of the above and the additional detail, or it could be that the frequency response is different, or something else.  Nothing seems to phase it, you can have heavy powerful bass at the same time as a delicate triangle or cymbal and nothing gets swamped or masked.  The presentation seems different in the mid range too, but I'm yet to fully understand that either!

 

 

Hi Graham.

There is 'insensitive', but to me describing the 552 'being like putting a BLANKET over the speakers' is outright c.....cru.....CRUEL !  

Well then think of it this way: it's a £37,000 blanket, at least to remove it!

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Foot tapper

Oh Peter, you are definitely going to have to scratch that Statement itch now!

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by Harry

Good stuff Graham. Thank you and please keep it coming.

Posted on: 12 May 2015 by MDS
Originally Posted by Harry:

Good stuff Graham. Thank you and please keep it coming.

Yes, another vote here for further updates please, Graham.

 

Mike