Driving etiquette………..

Posted by: Don Atkinson on 27 May 2015

Driving etiquette………..

 

I drive about 60 miles a day to/from work. I tend to use the dual carriageway trunk roads in the morning and the quiet country roads in the evening.

 

For some while now, I’ve observed the driving “tactics” of others and myself and wondered what is considered acceptable etiquette in various situations. The scenarios are numerous, so I’ll start with an over-simplified situation……….

 

For example, four-lane dual carriageway (two lanes each direction) with a National speed limit at 70mph. Long line of relatively slow moving traffic at 57mph in the nearside lane. Lone motorist following at 65mph and obviously catching up the long, slow line. Lone motorist notices that a long line of vehicles in the outside lane, travelling at 70mph are catching up with him. Decision time !

 

Does etiquette suggest the lone motorist should :-

Posted on: 28 June 2015 by Huge
Originally Posted by Lionel:
Originally Posted by Huge:

 

Unofficially I would recommend at least a 15 second gap and use of a Carl Gustav M3.

Is that a machine gun...?

Nothing so subtle, it's an 84mm recoilless rifle.

Posted on: 28 June 2015 by Lionel

Is that legal in the UK for the average motorist?

Posted on: 28 June 2015 by Don Atkinson
Originally Posted by Lionel:

Is that legal in the UK for the average motorist?

Can't find any specific reference in either the Highway Code or the Road Traffic Act, so not quite sure !

Posted on: 28 June 2015 by fatcat
Originally Posted by Huge:

 

 

The RTA also specifies

"Careless, and inconsiderate, driving.

If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence."

 

This can easily be considered to cover both undertaking and middle lane hogging.

Hogging the middle lane doesn't necessarily result in driving without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road.

 

I quite happily hog the middle lane of a motorway doing 70 in the knowledge I'm being considerate to the left hand lane users. Preventing middle lane users driving at 80+ allows drivers doing 60 in the left lane to move into the the middle, easily and safely.

Posted on: 28 June 2015 by fatcat
Originally Posted by Lionel:

There has been one prosecution of a middle lane hog (where did hogg come from?).

 

 

I think there's been one successful prosecution.

 

The only reason it was successful is the accused didn't turn up at court. If he had, and pointed out the police description of what happened was so far fetched to be believable, he'd have been found not guilty.

Posted on: 28 June 2015 by winkyincanada
Originally Posted by fatcat:
Originally Posted by Huge:

 

 

The RTA also specifies

"Careless, and inconsiderate, driving.

If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence."

 

This can easily be considered to cover both undertaking and middle lane hogging.

Hogging the middle lane doesn't necessarily result in driving without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road.

 

I quite happily hog the middle lane of a motorway doing 70 in the knowledge I'm being considerate to the left hand lane users. Preventing middle lane users driving at 80+ allows drivers doing 60 in the left lane to move into the the middle, easily and safely.

It would all be easy if we didn't all turn into such impatient, inconsiderate @$$h0le$ when we get behind the wheel (or handlebars).