Vulcan XH558

Posted by: Mike-B on 29 August 2015

Its getting close to the end of its last flying season.  

If anyone is interested where its flying in the next weekends, search Vulcan in the Sky  & a very useful twitter can watched during flights.  They normally give location (flying over) & show a map of the scheduled flight path.

 https://twitter.com/XH558?ref_...serp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

The flight path to central south England is normally right over my house,  it looks like its doing so today, so hope to click some pics in about 40 minutes,  will post on the forum if OK 

 

Posted on: 29 October 2015 by Don Atkinson
Originally Posted by George Fredrik Fiske:

In early 1962 my first visit to Norway was on a Vickers Viscount!

 

Early flights to Norway were on the Caravelle, Comet Three [I think] and later the Trident!

 

Probably none of them as safe as the BA 146, but in those days people accepted the risks!

 

Sea journeys were made on the Fred Olsen Breamar and Blenheim.

 

ATB from George

The 146 (along with the Boeing 757, A319 and Embraer 145) seems to be particularly prone to contamination of cabin air. Cabin air is usually drawn from the engine intake compressor, cooled and mixed with previously circulated air. The filters don't manage to remove fumes and vapours introduced due to fuel and oil leaks in the engines.

 

The Dreamliner doesn't draw it's cabin ait from the compressor, so shouldn't suffer this type of problem

Posted on: 29 October 2015 by Huge
Originally Posted by George Fredrik Fiske:

In early 1962 my first visit to Norway was on a Vickers Viscount!

 

Early flights to Norway were on the Caravelle, Comet Three [I think] and later the Trident!

 

Probably none of them as safe as the BA 146, but in those days people accepted the risks!

 

Sea journeys were made on the Fred Olsen Breamar and Blenheim.

 

ATB from George

I remember the Comet and the Viscount.

As I recall the Viscount actually had quite a good safety record (not perfect, but still good).

The Comet was horrible; insufficient cabin ventilation.

 

For sea journeys (Newcastle to Stavanger) it was Fred Olsen's 'Vomiting Venus'!

Posted on: 29 October 2015 by JamieWednesday

'The Vomit Comet', as it was known

Posted on: 29 October 2015 by Bruce Woodhouse

Throughout this thread the Vulcan gets referred to a great deal as 'she'.

 

I find this a bit odd, and I wonder what people think about it. I see that it is a dramatic looking machine and represents historical interest but ultimately it is a machine; and specifically one designed for war. War as in dropping bombs on people, to kill them.

 

Personally I find the romanticisation of machines of war an odd thing. Calling it 'she' seems to be part of that process, suggesting some form of personal connection which I must confess I just don't feel.

 

I know I'm out of kilter with the rest of this thread but I'd be interested to know what others think.

 

Bruce

Posted on: 29 October 2015 by Richard Dane
Originally Posted by JamieWednesday:

 Bring 'er back

 

 

Bring Her back

 

 

This angle really does show off the graceful lines of the VC10 at their best.  Also the BOAC livery worked so well with the VC10 - much better than the BA livery did!

 

I had my first VC10 flight as a boy with one that was still in BOAC livery. Sadly my last VC10 flight was in a very down-at-heel BA liveried example that had obviously been well-used and been dredged up from somewhere in a mad scramble to get back to the UK before a major BA strike took place.  That one had an airframe and wings that vibrated like no other plane I'd experienced. Also quite a few of the seats were broken and the galley was faulty with fridges that ran warm.  The flight crew didn't realise about the latter until a noxious smell filled the cabin mid-atlantic.  Upon investigation the cause was discovered; because of the impeding strike lots of the passengers were coming back to the UK early.  Among us were some who hadn't yet had their trophy Conch shells properly cleaned up and so they had been placed in one of the fridges.  After an hour or two they had warmed up very nicely...

Posted on: 29 October 2015 by Innocent Bystander
Originally Posted by Bruce Woodhouse:

Throughout this thread the Vulcan gets referred to a great deal as 'she'.

 

I find this a bit odd, and I wonder what people think about it. I see that it is a dramatic looking machine and represents historical interest but ultimately it is a machine; and specifically one designed for war. War as in dropping bombs on people, to kill them.

 

Personally I find the romanticisation of machines of war an odd thing. Calling it 'she' seems to be part of that process, suggesting some form of personal.  connection which I must confess I just don't feel.

 

I know I'm out of kilter with the rest of this thread but I'd be interested to know what others think.

 

Bruce

 

 

I think it's just a (British) convention, originally from talking about boats, extended probably a century ago to aeroplanes. Not a convention I've generally adopted myself, but i assumed that was the reason.

 

personally my 'affection' is of the engineering, and awe at both the visual gracefulness in flight and the evident power it has. But absolutely balanced with a revulsion of what it was built for, and everything that made/makes it, and predecessors and successors, an apparent necessity. 

 

Greed/lust for power, and religeon, it seems, or maybe they're actually the same thing in this context are guilty in making machines of defence a necessity for mankind, whether stones and a sling, or bombs and a tool for depositing them.

Posted on: 29 October 2015 by Don Atkinson
It was provided as a deterrent, ie with the express hope that it would prevent a disastrous war. Whether such a war was avoided because of the V-bomber force, or despite the force, is probably up for debate.

 

We can still debate the sensibility of such a policy and vote for the appropriate political party even today, as we decide upon Trident.

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Mike-B

UK TV Channel 4 7:30pm Sunday 29 November

"Guy Martin: Last Flight of the Vulcan Bomber" 

 

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Innocent Bystander
Originally Posted by Mike-B:

UK TV Channel 4 7:30pm Sunday 29 November

"Guy Martin: Last Flight of the Vulcan Bomber" 

 

I assume he wasn't flying it, though if he had been it might explain the alleged illegal barrel roll...!

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Mike-B

Rumour has it he takes control for a few minutes - #@%   !!!!!   

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Innocent Bystander

Maybe it accidentally did a barrel roll as control was handed over.....

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Huge
Originally Posted by Mike-B:

Rumour has it he takes control for a few minutes - #@%   !!!!!   

With the hydraulic restrictors on the controls in use, she's dead easy to fly.  Turn them off and it's a whole different ball game.

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Innocent Bystander
Originally Posted by Huge:
Originally Posted by Mike-B:

Rumour has it he takes control for a few minutes - #@%   !!!!!   

With the hydraulic restrictors on the controls in use, she's dead easy to fly.  Turn them off and it's a whole different ball game.

A bit like a motorbike at up to nearly 200 mph on twisting country lanes when you come across something unexpected  - normal day at the office for Guy then!

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Mike-B

..........  is that easier to fly than to understand Guy Martin  

 bye 'ek ahh kid.

Posted on: 24 November 2015 by Mike-B
Originally Posted by Innocent Bystander:
Originally Posted by Huge:
Originally Posted by Mike-B:

Rumour has it he takes control for a few minutes - #@%   !!!!!   

  - normal day at the office for Guy then!

 ..........  like riding a bike over a white line & coming too in a green field