S U P E R L U M I N A - Is this the biggest improvement ever?
Posted by: Martin.L on 08 November 2015
I naively used to assume that the NAC A5 are perfect...
Just got the speaker cables and could not believe that cables could make this difference.
Clearly these cables need a good warm up and run-in before they are going to approach their optimum sound and I have been told that it takes one week for them to really start to disappear behind the music. Yet from the off with only day’s warm up this upgrade delivered a more musical result than the majority of others.
The system now creates an effect of a non-electronic device, the end result gives the overall feel of a much more realistic space. The wider and deeper soundstage has very consistent perspectives.
These luminas changed the system, it became a variety of moods expressed in tones that are almost endless, they depend actually upon the great working together of all the tonal attributes– color, quality, pitch, and loudness.
The heavy tones assert their will with a more insistent energy; the long tones upon which we linger make a deeper and more lasting impression; while the light and short tones in contrast become points of mere passing and transition.
The contrasts between piano and forte – loudness that brings the tones so near that they may seem threatening in their insistence; softness that makes them seem far away and dreamlike.
The treble is delicate - sweet and clear. Voices are strongly holographic, female singers do not screech and are outstandingly articulate.
The energy it managed to extract from the albums was nothing short of astounding.
It also preserved the ability to put the music before the sound...
It makes you want to keep on listening! can't get to sleep.
What a great project.
Good job naim,
Martin
Richard,
The dem is booked for 5th December
Kevin
....
But the acid test is will I miss the SL speaker cable when I return them next week?
And then whether it is value for money for a 9m run.... on the face of it NO it isn't but there again I do run a Superline which compared to a Urika some people would say it is not value for money!
![]()
We will see,
All the best,
Richard
richard, i suspect you will end up with this new SL speaker wire ... i believe its a good choice.
i need 4x7m
-- and that is serious dosh -- but i expect i will probably succumb at some point...
good luck and
enjoy
ken
Richard,
The dem is booked for 5th December
Kevin
I will try to drop in to see it and say hi if yiou are there.
Richard
Richard
Are you doing a straight choice between SL and NACA5 - or would you be tempted to try alternatives?
Chris
Richard
Are you doing a straight choice between SL and NACA5 - or would you be tempted to try alternatives?
Chris
are there any alternatives? tehe... :-)
enjoy
ken
The Urika has the sound of a tube amplifier, whilst Superline/Supercap has a more bombastic, full, fleshy and involving sound. The sound of naim...
Suffice it to say that I prefer the Superline over the Urika.
It has been a great experience over the last two weeks with them.
Wonder if I will miss them ��
Richard
If anyone has a pair, could they tell me the exact size of the square bit? I'm wondering if they'd fit through my trunking that runs under the fireplace. Somehow I think they will be too big. I wonder if the square bit could be removed and then replaced?
This new computer era, I can't hear your voice, but for some reason I sence you won't be a happy trooper, once they have left the premise!
""Returning my SL speaker cables from my home loan tomorrow.
It has been a great experience over the last two weeks with them.
Wonder if I will miss them ""
The dims of the square bit give or take a mil are 26mm across the cables X 35mm along the cables X 14mm thick.
There are 4 small screws on the back of the square bit but am not sure what lies within. An e-mail to Naim should advise if the square bit can be removed and replaced safely without any damage.
It has been a great experience over the last two weeks with them.
Wonder if I will miss them ��
Richard
Only time will tell Richard. ![]()
Richard
Take your credit card
, you'll miss them
Kevin
If anyone has a pair, could they tell me the exact size of the square bit? I'm wondering if they'd fit through my trunking that runs under the fireplace. Somehow I think they will be too big. I wonder if the square bit could be removed and then replaced?
HH,
When I installed mine behind my fireplace I had the same issue.
The plastic block at one end has the extra bits. The plastic block on the other end just looks pretty.
I took the pretty block off threaded it through and then put it back together.
I know some folk will be shaking their heads at this but it worked for me.
The block is 27mm x 14mm.
Regards,
Nick
If anyone has a pair, could they tell me the exact size of the square bit? I'm wondering if they'd fit through my trunking that runs under the fireplace. Somehow I think they will be too big. I wonder if the square bit could be removed and then replaced?
HH,
It measures approx 25mm x15mm in cross section. Are you seriously considering the SL speaker cable? Looking at your system set up I would guess you'd need about 5m. Wouldn't the money be better spent on a 300DR?
Let's say I'm vaguely considering whether it might be an option. I'm not going to have more boxes (three is the self-imposed limit) so the wires could be something to optimise the system. I think there is just enough space the fit them behind the speakers, then I thought about the square bit and thought it might be an unconquerable obstacle. But if the fancy bit can be temporarily removed they might be viable. I might give them a home dem one day, now I know more about them, but realistically I'm looking about a year ahead, especially if 5m lengths are required. Many thanks to those who supplied the measurements.
If anyone has a pair, could they tell me the exact size of the square bit? I'm wondering if they'd fit through my trunking that runs under the fireplace. Somehow I think they will be too big. I wonder if the square bit could be removed and then replaced?
HH,
When I installed mine behind my fireplace I had the same issue.
The plastic block at one end has the extra bits. The plastic block on the other end just looks pretty.
I took the pretty block off threaded it through and then put it back together.
I know some folk will be shaking their heads at this but it worked for me.
The block is 27mm x 14mm.
Regards,
Nick
Nick,
Did you actually remove the blocks from both ends? Out off curiosity what were the extra bits. I'm interested how the cables are "tuned". Which end are they in? Some say they are resistors.
Apologies to Richard or Naim if I'm treading on confidential ground.
The bits are at the amp end.
If I recall, they are simple resistors between the two wires.
Clearly it does the trick...
Regards,
Nick
According to the HiFiCritic review, there is a damping resistor connected to the cable shields (braids) of each pair:
" This braid is not actively connected, save via a low current 10kohm damping resistor (the value chosen for our 7m lengths) interconnecting the floating shields. This will drain away a proportion of any environmental RFI induced in the cable run."
Source: https://www.naimaudio.com/site...%202_July%202015.pdf
- SL £600 per metre (I'm not sure if those prices are single or twin runs?) - eye watering figures when you think about it for cables. Nice dilema to have though!!!
£600 per Stereo pair, i believe
i agree with you re 'nice dilemma' to have...
likely i will go for the snaxo242 SL cable first --still not exactly 2pence...
its an addictive hobby this...
enjoy
ken
Actually it's exactly 75,000x 2 pence ![]()
- SL £600 per metre (I'm not sure if those prices are single or twin runs?) - eye watering figures when you think about it for cables. Nice dilema to have though!!!
£600 per Stereo pair, i believe
i agree with you re 'nice dilemma' to have...
likely i will go for the snaxo242 SL cable first --still not exactly 2pence...
its an addictive hobby this...
enjoy
ken
Actually it's exactly 75,000x 2 pence ![]()
haha... that explains my hesitation then... its the thought of counting 75K tupence coins![]()
enjoy
ken
Iron Cobra posted:I changed from superline/hicap/hiline to urika. Urika is far better IMO. Exact? not convinced either. Interested in Booplinth for LP12 have dem at SORG in 2 weeks
Hi Iron Cobra,
Did you have that Booplinth dem?
I saw the plinth in the shop but have not had a dem. I must say that it was 'poor' that the dem plinth had a few bamboo pin prick holes in it otherwise seemed solidly built!
RIchard
FangfossFlyer posted:Returning my SL speaker cables from my home loan tomorrow.
It has been a great experience over the last two weeks with them.
Wonder if I will miss them ��
Did you miss them? ![]()
Or fully re-tuned into NACA5 again?
DB.
Darke Bear posted:FangfossFlyer posted:Returning my SL speaker cables from my home loan tomorrow.
It has been a great experience over the last two weeks with them.
Wonder if I will miss them ��Did you miss them?
Or fully re-tuned into NACA5 again?
DB.
I must admit that the system still sounds mighty fine with NACA5 and I only miss them a little bit but not enough to rush out and purchase them at £5,400 as for me it is not value for money.
But if I come across a spare wodge of cash after my 500 service and DR upgrade then I would reconsider.
There again I am still to dem the DIN-XLR SL and 4-5 pin DIN SL when Naim get round to producing one..... and a wall shelf..... and nice new plinth would be nice... and possibly a new top plate ....and I am resisting listening to the new B&W 802 Diamonds!
But I am still delighted with my system so the music plays on.
Richard
For me the SL Spaeker cables did more than I heard the DR 500 upgrade do for about the same price, but in different aspects of performance as I before mentioned, so having both the SL and DR will be good.
Presently the full SL loom I purchased a few months ago seems to have run-in rather wonderfully, but it is hard to separate these from the change to the S1 Pre, which did rather a lot too. Suffice to say the combination is sumptuously good at present and seems to have really taken-off in performance from what I considered great a few months ago. The timing, clarity and insight into the music is beautiful. Bass weight, power, tightness, depth and perceived phase-linearity projects the performance into the room with depth and realism.
But the strange thing I find is that the tracks seem to last longer and yet everything is quicker in timing. I was playing an old Madonna Album 'Like a Virgin' and it seemed that there were suddenly a couple more bits of depth to the digital recording than I'd heard before; acoustics of her voice in the environment it was recorded gave the impression of her standing there not as a point-source of sound but as a real person singing and expressing the vocals of the songs.
This is not an Album I thought particularly good before, but suddenly it became very different. The bass-riffs have more power and 'start-stop' quality that draws you along and into the music and bass percussion was awesome in power, depth and tightness.
So going to this thread's title 'is it the biggest improvement ever' I could not say unequivocal 'yes', as context does matter, but my system is transfigured musically from what it was nine months ago with the old cables, so they probably did help with that.
DB.