Naim, give us a preamp refresh!

Posted by: Stefan Vogt on 10 November 2015

Sorry, but it has to be said, after all those years...

 

 

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Chris Dolan
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:

But the 552 should be next for uplift.

No it shouldn't. Not now that I have bought a DR one 

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Bert Schurink

S1, DR, 272.....Something happened.....

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Darke Bear
Originally Posted by Chris Dolan:
Originally Posted by Darke Bear:

But the 552 should be next for uplift.

No it shouldn't. Not now that I have bought a DR one 

I meant the 'Head Unit' this time rather than the DR 552 supply.

 

But I'm also happy if it never gets changed either!

 

DB.

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Well people of obsession is discourteous to those that suffer from OCD.. However this is silly as the logical conclusion to this is that we will end up avoiding all personal adjectives for fear upsetting or offending someone, and instead hide behind some vague obviscating Orwellian double speak and thought control.. and then the plain English brigade will be offended..

In a democracy one needs to keep a sense of perspective. There are a few vague lines which most respect and don't cross unconsciously .. Which is what taboo is all about.. But surely almost by definition this can only refer to a tiny minority of instances of the human condition. We need to be able to take offence, sure I don't have to like it.. But in a democracy I can chose to ignore it, but I, just like my ancestors did, would strongly defend the right for people to be able to speak openly and possibly offend.. in fact I find political correctness offensive.. There is a paradox

 

Now back to listening to my 252...

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Fueller

Back to the OP I completely agree and I think we've agreed before. I'd love a 282 on SQ grounds but DR update or not I can't Invest this sort of money (even sh) while it has the current limited range volume control, source button labels which don't match any of my sources and a bank of redundant (for me) record selectors. Surely a 272 style volume control and configurable input selection would be a great refresh even if the fundamental audio internals remain unchanged?

 

I've recently acquired a bargain 2008 model nac202 to keep me going - it obviously suffers some of the above but at least I find the frill free look more appealing and sounds great with a hicap and napsc.    

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by feeling_zen
There will always be sonic benefits to keeping purely analog devices like a preamp isolated from more noisy digital circuits. For that reason, I don't see the NAC dying off. The Statement S1 was literally a "statement" of this belief by Naim.

On the other hand, some tweaking of the formula for the current NAC range won't go amiss. Things like different input sensitivity, user definable input labels (even if just buttons we can fit ourselves), fewer inputs (streamers and DACs consolidate many sources now), and maybe a rethink of the record out bank. Of course there are people using the current festures now but most of us use between 1 and 3 sources (1 in my case) and recording stuff in analogue via the preamp is pretty fringe these days.

These thoughts are on of the reasons I am holding off on a 252. I know it is excellent but just can't shake the feeling it is due for something beyond DR on the Supercap.
Posted on: 10 November 2015 by ChrisSU

To my mind, a 282 with all those buttons, inputs and outputs makes no sense. All I need is a couple of inputs for digital devices, and I'm sorted. Then I listened to one. Then I ordered one. I have no idea why a preamp made so much difference to the system I was listening to, but it did, and on sound quality alone, I had to have it.  

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Zeny

I've been having this gut feeling that a preamp refresh is coming very soon, with improved components and board layout and of course, the volume control upgrade. If it does come it will be very, very bad for our pockets.

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by feeling_zen

It is one of those things. If there is an update, there won't be a whisper until it happens (which is correct in my opinion). So you could hold off getting a new preamp only for the current models to stay current for another decade. Or they might change tomorrow.

 

Though it is important to note that a 252 will be just as good tomorrow as it is today.

 

The current 282, 252 range are some of the longest ever serving Naim models. Though the NDX has also been around a long time compared to previous CD players bar the 555. And the tech in the NDX, while old, still delivers the goods and a lot was used in the 272. What I am trying to say is, we could speculate until the cows come home.

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by bluedog
Originally Posted by Fuzzy giant:

Yeah, I hear what you're saying. I know no offence was meant. I think it's just thrown around way too much without thinking. I hope it didn't seem I was having a go. Anyway, back to the thread and sorry if I came across the wrong way. 

You're either a new poster, or, you've changed your forum ID. In either event you have completely misjudged the general character of the members of the forum. I'm sure your comment was well intentioned but it did come across as a little over zealous. "Crazy" has been in common usage for many years completely outside the context of labelling people with mental illness.

 

That aside, welcome to the forum.

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Zeny
The biggest problem right now for the naim marketing department is what to call the new preamps. Since the current preamps are already labelled DR, certainly the new preamps would not be called double DR. Then 552.2?? Sounds plain weird.
Posted on: 10 November 2015 by analogmusic

Naim will not bring another range of preamps until it can make them better.

 

and Naim just did, through the DR power supplies.

 

we just got the DR upgrades for the power amps.

 

Seems to be a pretty good product line to me.

 

The Naits got a pretty good refresh a while ago.


Naim now has Something for all budget levels (UQ2), convenience levels (272) and then sound quality maximization 282/252/552.

 

Personally if starting from zero the 272/250DR seems very compelling to me

 

The only thing missing is a statement level source, which I am certain is being worked on nowadays.

 

And yes maybe a return to the days of traditional speakers like Intro, Credo, Allaes... 

 

But anyway the Naim sound has remained fundamentally the same from 40 years ago to now, isn't that what it is all about anyway?

 

Enjoy the music

 

 

 

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by joerand

What a wacky thread.

When I googled "wacky" it returned this definition "odd or irrational; crazy"

 

I like to buy my bread sliced and am really looking forward to the day someone finds a better way to slice it, even though I'm not exactly sure how they now slice it or what improvements could be made to the process. I'm certain it will taste better and wonder what they will call it. Most of all, I hope it comes without crumbs. Very annoying to clean. In the mean time I'll suffer along with my current sliced bread and make my sandwiches all the same.

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Jude2012
Got a 282 about 6 months ago.  I doing so, I compared it with the 272. 

It was strange paying that much money for a product that did not have a digital display and menu.

However, when I listened to the 282 all doubts were gone. 

Jude
Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Jude exactly. I am not knocking the new combined digital products.. They are a great way to access the Naim world, and for many provide all that is required. But for others that want to go further and take advantage of Naim digital/analogue isolation and powersupply isolation the analogue preamps provide the next level of audio performance that often seems to provide a marked difference.

personally I find digital electronics in audio so often a curse on great analogue performance.. and I decouple as much as possible. I use four inputs and occasionally the monitor output on my 252.. A really useful and fantastic feature.. Bravo Naim. Yes it would be nice to have display configurable buttons, but I can live without it and digital noise pollution of such a feature may be unacceptable... and through automation my NDX display shows the NAC input in big green assignable letters...

 

An observation for all those just using a single digital input on thier NAC, do ensure its ground is connected to Mains earth.. Naim have a little switch for this on many of thier sources.

 

 

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by analogmusic
I did not hear either 272 or 282, but just trusted what Naim said all along about the separation of PSU from the analog preamp, and bought a used 282 (for almost the same price as a brand new 272)
 
I have not heard a 272 yet, but the 282 is superb, all the pre one could ever need
 
How do I know? I have a friend who has a 552/500 and get to hear it sometimes but when I came home to my 282/HCDR/200 I still enjoy it  musically immensely.
 
 
Originally Posted by Jude2012:
Got a 282 about 6 months ago.  I doing so, I compared it with the 272. 

It was strange paying that much money for a product that did not have a digital display and menu.

However, when I listened to the 282 all doubts were gone. 

Jude

 

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by feeling_zen
Originally Posted by Jude2012:
Got a 282 about 6 months ago.  I doing so, I compared it with the 272. 

It was strange paying that much money for a product that did not have a digital display and menu.

However, when I listened to the 282 all doubts were gone. 

Jude

I feel the same about my 282 which is 18 months old now. But now my dealer is whispering in my ear about a 252 since I already have an SCdr and the age of the 252 in the line up is what is giving me second thoughts. 

 

Have a feeling he will twist my arm to go to a 252 at the same time the 250.2 goes in for a DR fit.

Posted on: 10 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Ahh those dealers.. They are a real menace 

 

PS Do audition the 252 first.. mine was  a very clear improvement over the 282 from the start, good though the 282 is. However it was only after several days of home audition it occurred to that I was appreciating my music in a way I had never been able to do before.. It was a strange tingling moment.. It was if many of my recordings suddenly made sense.. It is hard to describe..  it was then I felt this is the NAC for me, and haven't upgraded since.

Simon

 

Posted on: 11 November 2015 by analogmusic

LOL funny "twist my arm"

 

I think it more being seduced by the musical charms of the 252 than any dealer twisting your arm.

 

anyway I think in the end once you get the 252 you will thank the dealer  (well if the deal is sweet enough financially)

 

your SCDR has 14 outputs, and the 282 can only utilize 4 of them.

 

sad isn't it?

Posted on: 11 November 2015 by feeling_zen
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:

Ahh those dealers.. They are a real menace 

 

PS Do audition the 252 first.. mine was  a very clear improvement over the 282 from the start, good though the 282 is. However it was only after several days of home audition it occurred to that I was appreciating my music in a way I had never been able to do before.. It was a strange tingling moment.. It was if many of my recordings suddenly made sense.. It is hard to describe..  it was then I felt this is the NAC for me, and haven't upgraded since.

Simon

 

I may not get the chance. Not being near a dealer of any sort or any trips scheduled to my dealer. All I have is my memories of the 52 which is some time back. But I remember the 52 being in a different league to the 82. Not a good way to make a decision I know but it may be all I have.

 

We shall see.

Posted on: 11 November 2015 by Claus-Thoegersen
Originally Posted by feeling_zen:
There will always be sonic benefits to keeping purely analog devices like a preamp isolated from more noisy digital circuits. For that reason, I don't see the NAC dying off. The Statement S1 was literally a "statement" of this belief by Naim.

 

Always until the end of the universe, or just a day before that? technology change and Naim changes with technology. I see no reason why there will not be a 372 or 472 sometime in the future, or maybe an upgraded dac that can be used as a preamp. We want everything from Naim at the same time, but choices has to be made to determine what to spend Development resources on.

In one or two years  we will see what road Naim has chosen on the middel systems in the 252 quality range.

 

Claus

 

Posted on: 11 November 2015 by Christopher_M

Claus, 

I see you are with Don on your thoughts of Naim's 'mid-range' models. But please have a care. The proletariat are revolting   ;-)

 

Chris

Posted on: 11 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Originally Posted by Claus-Thoegersen:
Originally Posted by feeling_zen:
There will always be sonic benefits to keeping purely analog devices like a preamp isolated from more noisy digital circuits. For that reason, I don't see the NAC dying off. The Statement S1 was literally a "statement" of this belief by Naim.

 

Always until the end of the universe, or just a day before that? technology change and Naim changes with technology. I see no reason why there will not be a 372 or 472 sometime in the future, or maybe an upgraded dac that can be used as a preamp. We want everything from Naim at the same time, but choices has to be made to determine what to spend Development resources on.

In one or two years  we will see what road Naim has chosen on the middel systems in the 252 quality range.

 

Claus

 

As the 252 is the king of the Classic range - perhaps when Naim retire the Classic series - that is when we will see new NAPs and NACs

The NACs were DR'd then the NAPs were DR'd so next stop possibly series change and possibly goodbye to the black boxes

Simon

 

Posted on: 11 November 2015 by analogmusic

given that we just got the 250/300 and 500 DR in 2015, it could be a long long while before good bye to black boxes?

 

in the meantimes, the "naim" musicality has fundamentally remained the same from the first NAP 120 to the current ones...

 

The "naim formula" just works fine, and just keeps on playing the tunes.

 

 

 

 

Posted on: 11 November 2015 by Harry

A new range will be along in due course. But in the mean time we're not any of us slumming it are we? The DR upgrades to the PSs which power (or can power in some cases) preamps was no small improvement and in the best of Naim tradition was retro fit and not a cosmetic overhaul just for the sake of it. That's a proper upgrade - for the sake of the user base and not just PR.

 

I wouldn't mind a 552 level pre/streamer with a full range volume control in the visual and tactile style of the knob on the Mu-So and S1. It would have to sound bloody good though. Which is something else we can be confident of.

 

I bought my 552 and my 252 before based on what it could do musically. In my view both were peerless and compelling at their price points. That won't change. Things may move on but the enjoyment I have had in the interim for the outlay will not vanish or be devalued. With stuff of this calibre already on sale you might argue that an overhaul of the range is not necessary. But one will be along in due course. Guess we'll just have to suffer until then!