Attacks in Paris
Posted by: Erich on 13 November 2015
Paris attacks leave at least 60 dead and about 100 hostages.
All information is still very confusing.
Hollande closed all borders. Should be something very massive.
Force amis franÇaise.
Regards.
Erich
The Saudi's have an appalling human rights record and seemingly finance extreme Islamic groups but on the question of arms sales I could understand that the US view might be that since they have the money and will buy the weapons anyway it is probably better to sell direct rather than, say, see Russia or China meets those needs and with it gain some influence with the Saudi regime.
Mike
Nothing in question time I found offensive and don’t recollect any appalling comments. I know nothing about the views of Mehdi Hasan, (Kevins link doesn’t work), but on the evidence of last nights program he talks a lot of sense.
While Andrew Neals comments where admirable, they won’t actually achieve anything, it’s not as though everybody doesn’t hold the same views.
On the other hand, QT panels unanimous agreement that demonising every Syrian refugee for the actions of a few, hopefully will.
I know nothing about the views of Mehdi Hasan, (Kevins link doesn’t work), but on the evidence of last nights program he talks a lot of sense.
Try this FC - should work
https://soundcloud.com/spectator1828
Here's a transcript of part of it (although the clip is worth listening to for the vehemence of Hasan's expression):
‘The kuffar, the disbelievers, the atheists who remain deaf and stubborn to the teachings of Islam, the rational message of the Koran; they are described in the Koran as “a people of no intelligence”, Allah describes them as not of no morality, not as people of no belief – people of “no intelligence” – because they’re incapable of the intellectual effort it requires to shake off those blind prejudices, to shake off those easy assumptions about this world, about the existence of God. In this respect, the Koran describes the atheists as “cattle”, as cattle of those who grow the crops and do not stop and wonder about this world.’
And he's supposed to be a moderate!
Oh dear, the Yanks never learn, do they?
Just when they should be putting pressure on KOSA to cut off funding for ISIS and stop exporting Wahhabism, they sell 'em more weapons...
Now you wouldn't be trying to wind up DrMark now, would you Kevin?
I would actually agree with the good Dr on this Mike. Why we have anything to do with such a disgusting regime as KOSA (apart from the fact that they have loadsamoney) is completely baffling.
I agree with most of what you have said in this thread Kevin.
However. on the above point - the reason the KOSA has loadsamoney is because they have loadsofoil and we have given them loadsamoney in exchange for loadsofoil.
Now I know that its slow progress, but the KOSA is moderating the disgusting parts of its culture, mainly due to diplomatic pressure from the west. When I first went to Oman and The Trucial States in 1968, they were much as KOSA is today, and at that time the UK was there in force, but brought about change through diplomacy, education and persuasion. Walking away won't bring the necessary change in the KOSA but I appreciate it will be a longer, slower process than elsewhere in the Gulf.
Same applies to many other countries.
And he's supposed to be a moderate!
Being very sceptical (about most things) and rarely believing anything I read on the internet, I tried to find out the context in which that part of the sermon was taken. Wasn't entirely successful, but came across this.
The full speech is actually more critical of Muslims than than the west – and uses the word ‘cattle’ of unthinking Muslims too. Here are some more key quotes:
We just follow the crowd, we are the cattle that Allah condemns in the Quran, and we can’t be. We can’t be. We have to acquire knowledge every day, night and day. And Rasoollah [the Holy Prophet] says…you have to go as far afield as China.
…
I watched this programme [“Science and Islam”, BBC4] and I really enjoyed it: a well-made programme, presenter very good…and yet I watched it with a sense of despair and a sense of sadness. Because this programme was pure history, every contribution was from the past, and the elephant in the room is the current Islamic contribution to knowledge and science and learning. Where was that in the series of programmes? It wasn’t there because fundamentally there isn’t one. That is the tragedy of our community today.
…
The Middle East, despite all its oil wealth…is an intellectually stagnant area of the world, where one in three Arabs, 65 million human beings, Muslims, are functionally illiterate, of which two thirds are women. 10 million children in the Middle East have never stepped foot inside a classroom, inside a school. That is the modern Muslim legacy. The Middle East…is now intellectually closed off to the outside world. … Closed off to the world – and let s not hear any of this nonsense about foreign literature, or foreign books, or foreign languages, being alien to Islam. It is the only way to learn, to open your minds to non-Muslims, to open your minds to other cultures, to learn foreign languages.
…
It is no surprise then that when you look at the Muslim world you see that we 1.2 billion Muslims have just 10 Nobel prizes to our name….and our Jewish brethren who we spend so much time fighting and arguing with, 12 million Jews in the world, they have 150 Nobel prizes to their name….We are not under-armed, we are under-educated. We have lost our ability to think, to acquire knowledge, to advance intellectually, and then we wonder why our community is in such decay, why globally wherever you find Muslims we have such problems. It’s not a secret, it’s not a conspiracy, its clear to anyone who looks at the numbers.
…
Just think about our priorities as a community, as a Muslim world, think about our priorities,: because when you look at our priorities….you look for example in the field of research and development…the West as an average spend around 2% of their GPD, their national income, on research and development…no Muslim country spends more than 0.5% of its national wealth on research and development…instead we spend the money on what? On killing, bombs, bloodshed, destruction, warfare, arms. Take Pakistan, for example, the “Islamic” Republic of Pakistan, with shamefully high levels of child illiteracy, and one of the world’s worst child labour problems, and yet it spends 20% of its GDP on its military and 2% of its GDP on education.
Of course, I don't actually know if the above quotes where actually part of the sermon.
The 5 permanent members of the UNSC must get into action mode - atleast now.
regards
Three of them can usually be relied upon to do what is right. Russia can be bloody minded and China bloody obstructive. It takes a lot of diplomacy to get UN agreement to do almost anything. Don't hold your breath !
This is part of my dis-affectation; the US (and its vassals) has been waging illegal war for 15 years but Russia is "bloody minded." When the Russian jet was shot down Obama didn't even have the class to extend condolences to the Russia government/people. Those 224 Russians were nothing - they didn't have hopes and dreams and families who loved them, right? Ditto the 43 in Beirut.
Russia had been asking to coordinate efforts since they began their operations, but in its typical arrogance and hubris the US government said "no way" - and after the Russia jet ordeal that wasn't compelling enough, but NOW they are thinking of doing something cooperatively.
Gee Don, so bleeping honored that you have deemed me not a terrorist...I'll surely sleep better tonight with your blessing.
I have previously posted George Carlin's video on why he doesn't vote, so I will not repeat it here, but I find it difficult to point out any falsehood in his logic.
I look at the last 4 elections, and forward to this one, and see NOT ONE person worthy to hold the office, and more to the point, worthy of my vote. Obama has been as horrible as I knew he would be, but I would have been ashamed to vote for that troglodyte McCain (when is Satan going to call that guy home?), Romney? Please. Kerry is as inept as they come, and George Bush (along with others, including Cheney and Tony Blair) should literally be in jail cells somewhere awaiting execution for crimes against humanity.
And every person running right now is a kleptocrat war-monger; there is not one that is worthy of the office. I actually think voting only enables the system to continue, because it is the barometer used to determine whether or not their bullshit is still selling. (Even in spite of current mediocre turnout, it is enough.) Want to see these bastards sweat? Hold an election where nobody comes. THAT might get their attention. But holding a reality show with 2 sides of the same coin will affect nothing.
I would gladly vote if I even saw a hint of a sign that people were waking up to what is happening, and a candidate would run that remotely was going to try and fix things. But the system is completely rigged such that when it finally gets down to 2, there is NO possibility of change. Our presidents are selected, not elected. Anyone who might upset the apple cart won't even get close to the Big Chair...there's too much money invested in keeping things as they are.
And it grieves me to no end that these fools are destroying my country, the greatest nation that ever has been on this planet. (Although an honest assessment shows that it was largely founded on the genocide of the red man as an concerted US government policy, and heavily built on the slave labor of the black man.)
My country has been the only world power for about 25 years now, and they have run roughshod over the planet because there has been no check on anything they have wanted to do; hence the rise of the now omnipresent & trans-administration neocon faction. These people are largely the architects of the "Empire of Chaos." It has been open policy to try and destabilize regions to exploit for economic gain and control, all in the name of "spreading democracy."
I think voting only encourages them. Were I uninformed (as are most of my Kim and Kanye following fellow citizens) I could understand the criticism. But I refuse to participate in something that is nothing more than a charade. I look at the 13 or so people running, and were I to vote for any one of them my conscience would literally bother me. It would be like advocating murder. And that doesn't even get into the economic issues, which are going to be the real Waterloo of this country.
Give me someone who is not human garbage and I will gladly rejoin the electorate. (Or as I said, a parliamentary system might interest me...I actually did cast my vote in Italy's last election.) But the current corrupt system mitigates against it, & I gave up believing in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy a long time ago.
Besides, I have been saying Killary is going to be the next POTUS for 3 years now, and I will wager a NAP500 that I am correct.
The US has been waging war for 15 years but Russia is bloody minded?
Yes. Yes, they (Putin) are. Compared to the United States. Do you think any recent Russian military action is more legal or justified than the US wars in Afghanistan or Iraq? Or anywhere near as restrained? Take a look at their methods in the Georgia and Chechnya as a contrast.
Bernie Sanders isn't a kleptocrat war monger. Maybe you should vote for him.