Going to a 552?

Posted by: Zipperheadbanjo on 19 November 2015

Hi All,

 

I have an opportunity to pick up a dealer demo 2013 552 + 552 PS DR with about 300 hours of use on it. Cost is about 55-60% of retail. I would inherit the remaining 3 years of warranty on the unit.

 

I'd like some feedback if those on the forum believe it would work well with my gear (i.e. not be unbalanced). It would be fed by a Rega RP 10 + Superline / Hicap, and a Naim NDX>Chord Hugo TT (these are my primary sources). My amp is a 2013 250-2 which I plan on DR'ing at some point in 2016. Interconnects are Naim Hilines... speaker cable is Naca5... speakers are Proac D30R's.

 

I have no intention of ever moving to a larger amp, as my listening space is relatively small, but acoustically treated... I  don't need anything more powerful than a 250-2.

 

I had never even considered the possibility of moving to a 552 preamp as the price new is just too hard to justify. That said, the price is right with this demo unit, and 552's come up on the used market very rarely... especially a 552 with so little mileage on it.

 

I can afford it... no remortgaging or taking a loan required (or stealing from the kids college funds).

 

Thoughts appreciated... note that a demo isn't possible... although I can get a 30 day window to return the unit if it's not to my taste.

 

 

 

 

Posted on: 19 November 2015 by Bert Schurink
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:

Zipperheadbanjo, go grab your audition or 30 day evaluation  .. I am sure you will enjoy, but do listen carefully at home. Despite what you might read here a 552 is not automatically better, I have heard some very disappointing 552 setups as well as extremely good. Even with the 552 it's about system, speaker and room synergy.

By auditioning you have no pressure or expectation bias, and if its right for you, and the chances are it will be, the go ahead you lucky fellow.. as that is a steal of a price in my opinion.

Simon

 

You don't want a 552 to move away from your fingers. The 552 is that special that I would recommend to get it without auditioning.

Posted on: 19 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Bert, I am afraid I disagree.. It's only special in the right systems in my experience...its not a magic wand despite what some would have you believe and I naively believed by reading this forum until I discovered otherwise.. but I agree should the worse happen, unlikely but quite possible,  it will not be difficult to move on..

 

Posted on: 19 November 2015 by Christopher_M

You holding out for the Statement S1 then, Simon?!

 

Chris

Posted on: 19 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Chris, LOL, no at the moment I am enjoying my music and dramas, no great urge to change anything at the moment (with poss exception of DR modding my 250.2) as it works well and I don't want to risk upsetting  the balance .. however I should say the disappointing 552 auditions have not been with my own system...

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by rackkit
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:

Chris, LOL, no at the moment I am enjoying my music and dramas, no great urge to change anything at the moment (with poss exception of DR modding my 250.2) as it works well and I don't want to risk upsetting  the balance .. however I should say the disappointing 552 auditions have not been with my own system...

You don't fancy adding a used 300 to your 252/SCDR instead of doing a DR on your 250.2? 

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by SamS
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:

Chris, LOL, no at the moment I am enjoying my music and dramas, no great urge to change anything at the moment (with poss exception of DR modding my 250.2) as it works well and I don't want to risk upsetting  the balance .. however I should say the disappointing 552 auditions have not been with my own system...

Simon - I fear that my 552 you heard a about year ago when picking up the SCDR may have been one of the disappointments you refer to. I can assure you it was not the 552. At the time I had just introduced a 500 into the system purchased from a chap who had it in storage for many months and it was very cold and really not representative (in fact I recall it sounding worse than my 135s for a while). I think you heard it on day 2 or 3. It took quite a few weeks to settle in. The whole system now delivers as one would expect. 

Hope the SCDR is treating you well.

Sam

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Bert Schurink
Originally Posted by Simon-in-Suffolk:

Bert, I am afraid I disagree.. It's only special in the right systems in my experience...its not a magic wand despite what some would have you believe and I naively believed by reading this forum until I discovered otherwise.. but I agree should the worse happen, unlikely but quite possible,  it will not be difficult to move on..

 

Simon, if we are talking completely black and white I have to agree with you. So of course there are setups in which the 552 will not be able to shine or would not even work. F.i. with extremely sensitive speakers the output can be a problem and would need to be customized (example Verity Audio Lohengrin). And of course with a rather low spec system also the 552 would not shine. But the % of cases in which the 552 will shine is relatively high....

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Fabian Daniel Belger

Hi,

 

As a owner of a nac552 DR I can only say try it  and if  you like what's doing with the rest of your system BUY IT!!!  an offer like this - as  you  described it - I think its very rare.

 

Best Regards,

 

Fabian

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk

Hi Sam , I feel embarrassed,  you and your family were so hospitable and we had a lovely evening - your 552 system was sounding clean clear, perhaps a bit bright for me for me initially - but was that not the poweramp settling in?  - but yes we did hear your system evolving and thickening out as the evening went on. Were we not listening to Pink Floyd albums? They sounded good.

 

But I have heard other 552 setups - and don't get me wrong the 552 is incredible - but if there are issues elsewhere like subjectively bad speaker balancing etc then it cant magically wave that away..

 

Yes the SCDR is doing sterling business - I very glad we connected over that

 

Bert - I suspect we do really agree... it is about balance - but with all things being equal I see no reason why the 552 shouldn't shine - but to my point surely its worth auditioning - as you might get better bang for your buck addressing something elsewhere in your system first.

 

Simon

 

 

 

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Originally Posted by rackkit:

You don't fancy adding a used 300 to your 252/SCDR instead of doing a DR on your 250.2? 

I think the 300 would be over kill for me - and I really don't want to add to my box count it I can help it. From the comments here the 250DR packs quite a performance - and the 250.2 (2014 version) is no slouch either

Simon

 

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by analogmusic

Simon - the 250 DR is another amp altogether, and only shares the name "250" with the older 250.2

 

It is hugely superior in every way.

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by SamS
Sorry Simon, didn't intend to put you on the spot. Thanks for the kind words, but the system was indeed very 'shut in' at that time. 
Yes we played PF and I can't for the life of me remember what else.  Says it all I suppose. 

Glad the SC is working well.

All the best
Sam
Posted on: 20 November 2015 by J.N.

Simon makes a pertinent point - the 552 is not a magic bullet or panacea for all Hi-Fi ills. Gilbert Briggs' (the founder of Wharfedale) truism of over fifty years ago still holds true - 'The wider you open the window, the more the muck flies in'.

 

The open window of the 552 places increased demands upon the rest of the system chain and room acoustics. If things are not copacetic all the way down the line, one's expensive upgrade can sound disappointing.

 

John.

 

 

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Hook
Originally Posted by J.N.:

Simon makes a pertinent point - the 552 is not a magic bullet or panacea for all Hi-Fi ills. Gilbert Briggs' (the founder of Wharfedale) truism of over fifty years ago still holds true - 'The wider you open the window, the more the muck flies in'.

 

The open window of the 552 places increased demands upon the rest of the system chain and room acoustics. If things are not copacetic all the way down the line, one's expensive upgrade can sound disappointing.

 

John.

 

Agreed 100%.  

 

Zipp has two fine sources that will benefit from the 552. His table should benefit most, as the Superfine will get a PS upgrade from HiCap to 552PS (perhaps freeing the HC as additional trade-in). DR'ing the 250 is an obvious next step, but of course, a 300DR would be an bigger move.

 

Mega-deal perhaps? Go right to 552/300? It is no doubt a great stopping place. I say go for it, mostly because it is far easier spending Zipp's money than my own! 

 

ATB.

 

Hook

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Zeny

I'm so content at 252/300 that I have zero desire to go further. I would suggest the OP consider whether his passion for music justifies such an expensive preamp. One has to draw an artificial line somewhere and say - yes this level of performance is more than sufficient for my needs - and stop at that. Otherwise this upgrade business could go on forever with no end in sight, to the detriment of other family members who have not gone a well deserved holiday for many months.

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by count.d

So....... your small room has a large tv and massive lp cabinet between speakers. Your system is directly and closely in front of a speaker. Your stands are relatively poor performers. You're stopping at 250.2. The demo units (imo) would not have been particularly looked after. They would have been transported many, many times to customer's houses, left with many owners, constantly switched on/off, hundreds of unplugging/plugging and generally more abused than units that were sold to a careful discerning owner. Are the 552s that rare? No.

 

Will the 552 sound great? Of course it will. Will it go back within 30 days? I very much doubt it. Will you be happy with your hifi after the £11,000 purchase, without any more purchases? I very much doubt it. Would the £11,000 be better spent elsewhere to give you a more balanced result, that you'd be overall happier with? This is what a good dealer does for you and not a forum full of cheerleaders congratulating your new arrival, as if it's a baby.

 

Always enjoy a civil thread. 

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by hafler3o
Originally Posted by count.d:

So ... a forum full of cheerleaders congratulating your new arrival, as if it's a baby.

Wonderful imagery, this is what I keep my bunting for, the royal arrival!

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Harry

We too were more than content with our 252.300. Delighted, enthralled, set for ever. We then heard a 552. Nothing changed about the excellent 252/300 but the shape of the world it sat in had changed and possibilities became interesting.. But no one held a gun to our heads. 

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Jonas Olofsson
552 is a no brainer if you can afford it. Just do it!

//Jonas
Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Zipperheadbanjo
Thank you all for your comments. So to sum things up... The consensus is as follows:

CountD - OP is a non discerning doofus. Thanks for that Count. Sadly I don't belong to the ranks who would  consider installing concrete pillars so that my system could avoid contact with a suspended wood floor. I live firmly in the world of compromise. Compromises like for example, placing a TV BEHIND my speakers so that I can watch a film in my listening room should I so choose, recognizing that from a strictly audiophile geek perspective, said TV will negatively impact sound quality.

Minority View - spoken eloquently and without the need for personal insults (thank you Simon in Suffolk et al), that the OP's sources are generally up to the task, however that other upgrade paths may be preferable and/or that the 552 is not a panacea, is system and room dependant etc.

Majority View - the OP's source are up to the task and if finances allow, it's a no brainer.

So thanks again for the feedback. And I'm still sleeping on it.
Posted on: 20 November 2015 by Christopher_M

Stylishly put.

 

C.

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by varyat

The 250.2 pairs very well with the 552- no worries long term as far as I'm concerned .

Smallish room would not concern me either as long as you like how your speakers sound sitting in it.

The "open window" analogy is a very good one when hearing the 552 compared to lesser preamps- I prefer a big, wide open window.

The 30 day return policy is an option you can always fall back on- I doubt you will.

ATB,

Mark

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by LarsDK
Go for it! 300 is not about more power but amazingly coherent musicality over 250.2 (which i also like a lot). Either way, you are in for a treat
Posted on: 20 November 2015 by count.d

Zipperheadbanjo,

 

Discerning comment had nothing to do with you. Merely stated that a 552 owner would be discerning enough to look after it very carefully and that's who you should buy from and not a dealer's demo unit.

 

Your tv AND huge cabinet WILL have a large effect on the sound. Perhaps a 552 is wasted on a non audiophile geek.

 

There's been two personal insults on this thread; first, from you stating the word "civil", second, your latest summary post naming me.

 

There must be a way of putting someone on 'ignore' or blocking their posts here. I never remember who's a bad egg on this forum, so for the first time in the 14 years I've been a member, I'll search the settings list and put you on it. If I can't do that, I'll email Richard for help. Hopefully this will work. After this one, ignore all my posts.

 

   

Posted on: 20 November 2015 by count.d

Didn't take long to find, but blocking is rubbish. It just collapses the post and keeps the member's name there.

 

There must be a better way.