From SN to what? In search of just one parameter.

Posted by: Massimo Bertola on 13 February 2016

When the Supernait was released, hifi magazines used to report that its preamp section was derived from the 282, or even from upper in the range, and its power section from the 200. A common rumour was it was a 202/200 in a box. I have even read that its power section was a pumped up 5i's. SN seems to be a mysterious creature.

I don't know anything for sure, of course, as none of us know unless they're from Naim, but since I am planning to move from my Supernait to pre/power, I am asking questions (to myself, and now here). I essentially want a clearer, more open sound; I am not after bass, power, grip; I don't want to lose definition; I am only after that certain clarity and sharpness I remember I had with 202/200. But is a 202 definitely better than a SN's preamp section? If a SN's preamp section is 'derived' from a 282, is it 'better' than a 202?

I hear that some find a 282 too 'meaty' and not luminous enough; but if I am told that a 202 is not necessarily 'better' than a SN's preamp (mine is powered by a HCDR), and a 282 is not of my taste, which option is left? I don't think I want to go as far as the 252. So is there an actual option of improvement in the direction of plain clarity and openness from a Supernait? Which is not a SN2, a 5i, a 500?

It may seem an idle matter, but I am not sure I know which way to go to have just that 'plus' I'm after. Is a 202/200 a real improvement?

Thanks for more idle thoughts.

M

Posted on: 26 March 2016 by Iconoclast
Jan-Erik Nordoen posted:

The SN2 has a decent headphone amp...

Sorry, I meant I didn't own a Naim until recently (2 years ago) when they began including headphone outputs on their integrateds.

What I'm still considering is the Alabaster despite the fact that it doesn't have a HP output.

If it was for a second system I wouldn't hesitate but as my amp is occasionally used for late night TV and movies the HP output and remote are almost essential.