My only experience of streaming over WiFi with Naim kit has been with the Qb in the Kitchen. My Uniti and a couple of original Mu-so units have been directly connected via Ethernet. So I have been musing on the 48kHz maximum limit over WiFi noted in the Mu-so manual. I did not really see how this could be imposed if it was a hard limit.
Earlier today, I decided to renew my network monitoring skills and managed to capture UPnP network traffic while the Qb, connected over WiFi, requested and then played a 24bit/96kHz AIFF piece. I could tell no difference in sound quality than when playing the same piece over directly-connected Ethernet. Happily, for me, the network trace confirmed that exactly the same data was requested and sent in both cases and sounding equally good.
Checking this with Naim Support, I am delighted to be able to report that they confirm that *NONE* of the streamers downsample to 44/48kHz when playing higher resolution files and that we simply only rate WiFi streaming to 44/48kHz due to expected real world WiFi performance.
So indeed it is the case that Naim do not impose any hard limit where the player is connected over WiFi. I understand that the note in the Mu-so manual was already under review and corrections should be posted in future.
Let us all recognise that it is very hard to be precise about performance under the very wide range of conditions that apply to domestic WiFi setups. I am pleased that no hard limit is set by the player connected over WiFI and then negotiated with the server, which is how I had previously interpreted the note. Many thanks to Naim Support for their responsiveness.
Posted on: 14 March 2016 by Harry
Was there ever a suggestion that the MuSo or Qb downsampled? I've never seen such a claim.
We have a wireless MuSo which does 24/192 just fine. A wired B&W A5 stuttered with the same material.
You never can tell....
Posted on: 14 March 2016 by noname
There indeed would be no point in the receiver down sampling having received the full quality file over WiFi.
it was a matter of understanding the asserted maximum in the manual.
Posted on: 14 March 2016 by Harry
I get you.
Probably best regarded as a guide.
Sonos impose a physical limit of 16/44, which is a drag because even on something that small, source quality will always count to some extent.
Posted on: 15 March 2016 by Adrian_P
Noname, I made the same point over in the "Qb in da house" thread. I think some of the early reviews after the launch at CES referred to music above 48kHz needing to be downsampled but I couldn't see then how that could happen.
Like Harry, I'm happy to report that my Qb reliably streams 24/192 files transcoded to WAV using wifi. That's around 10Mbps, albeit on a carefully optimised wifi network.
Posted on: 16 March 2016 by nudgerwilliams
Thanks for the information, Noname.
I had read it as a physical limit, so set my UnitiServe to downsample higher res stuff to 48k max.
I'll see how my Muso gets on without that restriction.
I think you still have to cap the source material to 48khz in order for multiroom to work, though, which is the other constraint.
David
Posted on: 16 March 2016 by noname
David
But to save you time, yes. The 48kHz does seem to be a hard limit for a Multiroom master (Mu-so in my case) receiving from a UPnP server.
Would love someone else to do some reality testing though 
Posted on: 16 March 2016 by nudgerwilliams
Have done a bit of listening this afternoon to my Muso on wireless. 96kHz seems fine. One drop out listening to Take Five at 176.6kHz. Rather impressive.
Multiroom doesn't work though - as expected.
David