Fibre optic networking for audio using POF

Posted by: ChrisSU on 18 April 2016

After much procrastination, I’ve finally got round to installing a fully wired network in my house. It was always going to be messy, with two half-metre thick internal stone walls to get through, but it’s done. I was also put off by the idea of linking my streamer and server/NAS through the network back to the phone line, as my house is in an exposed location, and I’ve already had a Unitiserve, amongst other things, destroyed by a direct lightning strike via the phone cable, not to mention the possibility of linking numerous SMPS-fed devices more-or-less directly to my streamer.
My interest in using fibre started when Andrew Everard posted here, and on his blog, about very positive results of using TP Link media converters, but I wanted to go further and network my whole house too. With a bit of online research I discovered some rather expensive commercial fibre devices, switches etc., but then I stumbled across Plastic Optical Fibre (POF) which is a little different to regular (Glass) Fibre Optic. I now have a 4-port POF switch, and Media Converters linking my router, streamer, Unitiserve etc and it all works nicely. It seems to have cleaned up the sound a little, but I really need to do some more listening to evaluate this.
Rather than rambling on too much about this, here’s a list of the pros and cons of using POF vs regular Ethernet cabling:
+ optical isolation to help keep RFI etc out of your sensitive audio gear.
+ optical isolation prevents a lightning strike to your phone line from frying your HiFi.
+ very thin 2.2 x 4.4mm cable is much easier to instal and conceal than Cat5/6/7.
+ low ‘minimum bend radius’ makes it easier to route around corners (MBR is 20mm, as opposed to 50mm for Chord C-Stream Ethernet cable.)
+ cable terminations are a very simple DIY job - so you only need to drill very small holes in your wall to accommodate the cable, there is no bulky RJ45 style plug.
 
- the system I chose runs at 100meg speeds, which is plenty for my needs, but hardly cutting edge, if you need GB network speeds, products are in the pipeline for this, but maybe not available yet.
- each media converter introduces another SMPS, so care might be needed in choosing and siting these.
 
I would certainly recommend POF to anyone who is considering a fully wired network. I’ll leave it at that for now, but can post further info if anyone is interested. 
Posted on: 22 April 2016 by ken c

i will watch developments in this area with interest, and perhaps make a move if/when Naim devices are enhanced to have the appropriate interfaces.

for now, iterative changes to my net set up have converged - and so other than a few small remaining changes that i will report elsewhere -- i am parking where i am parking here for a while.

enjoy

ken

Posted on: 22 April 2016 by ChrisSU

Ken, after your marathon Ethernet Cabling thread, you must be ready for a break from this stuff!

Posted on: 22 April 2016 by ken c
ChrisSU posted:

Ken, after your marathon Ethernet Cabling thread, you must be ready for a break from this stuff!

yes, you are right Chris -- i have a much better idea now of what changes have what impact in my system (streaming side) -- and that was very useful indeed.

but i will still be following your fibre adventures with interest. there is something that to me sounds 'right' about fibre -- but this is only a hunch -- i dont know the deeper details.

enjoy...

ken

Posted on: 23 April 2016 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Eloise posted:

 

What I can't discover ... is this POF networking a standard or just a closed creation of a single company?

Hi Eloise, from what I know POF is a marketing/sales term and not a standard.

The main standards for gigabit Ethernet fibre are here

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet

And mainly its 1000BaseSX and 1000BaseLX that are used for LANs. The mode 1000BaseSX is then further split into sub categories determining frequency and distance such as OM1 and OM2. When you buy fibre you buy fibre for SX or LX use and is optimised for specific subcategories such as OM1. The actual material of the fibre construction is irrelevant to the networking standard.

For domestic use 1000BaseSX with any subcategory such as OM1 or OM2 will be fine in my opinion.

Fibre is straightforward, and it typically used for longer uplink type connections and definitely for links greater than 100m or where environmental  electrical noise is an issue.

With fibre the only real additional consideration over electrical is that you also choose your transceiver and termination type... but If this is determined by your hardware, that decision is made for you.

Simon

Posted on: 11 June 2016 by ChrisSU

Just as a follow up to this thread....

I've had this fibre optic network up and running for a few weeks now, and it has been rock solid, much to my relief. Compared to my previous setup, which was a mix of Cat6 and WiFi, this is considerably faster.

When I set this up, I had intended to attach my two Airport Express range extenders to the POF fibre network, rather than let them connect wirelessly to the LAN. The really weird thing is that I didn't do this in the end, and yet there was an immediate improvement in wireless performance too. iOS devices, and especially the Naim app, work way faster despite the lack of a direct connection to the fibre network.   

Posted on: 11 June 2016 by ken c

good its all working out Chris -- please keep us updated if anything changes...

enjoy

ken