The term 'Catastrophic disk failure' is used in the IT industry to denote the unannounced failure of a hard drive... it's the Operations Manager's nightmare stuff.
But modern disk technology provides us with warnings that something is about to go wrong, giving us the opportunity to aquire a new, replacement disk.... usually.
But not always. Last Friday at around lunchtime my Netgear readyNAS Duo suddenly and without any warning announced that one of its two disks had been 'disconnected'. It was now running in unprotected mode - RAID protection was no longer operative. One of the disks has simply failed totally, no warning signs, no error reports... it just stopped working and the NAS drive had disconnected it from its RAID array.
Panic would be the usual reaction... almost my entire music collection now spinning on just the one disk, failure of which would cause the loss of everything.
It cannot be denied that this is a scary situation.
Amazon Prime to the rescue... delivery of a replacement hard drive by 09.30 Saturday, installation of the new disk by 09.45 and sit back all day and watch the RAID array being slowly re-built (completing fourteen hours later). So as of this beautiful, sunny Sunday morning, my music collection is once again safe.
What did I learn?
Well there's not a lot you can learn other than the unexpected can and does still happen, even in these days of advanced hard drive technology.
The failed disk was a Seagate - installed in May 2012, so four years + service. The replacement is a WD RED, matching the remaining disk - probably worth paying that bit extra for a 'server rated' disk. Four years service from a hard drive seems to be about right... in my computer-maintenance business I always advise customers who have had their PCs for over three years to think carefully about the consequences of a disk failure; you'd be surprised how many folks are not aware they would lose all their photos and other documents because they never thought of this thing called backup !
...but most importantly... while I was sitting there for the 24 hours waiting for Amazon to deliver my replacement disk, the consequence of the second disk failing were constantly at the forefront of my mind. The loss of thousands of albums... unthinkable, catastrophic ! And how many of us would be in a similar situation? Hair turning grey overnight would become a reality (if I had any).
BUT I'm an IT guy (albeit retired), so you wouldn't expect me to be satisfied with a single level of backup, and I'm not. My ReadyNAS drive is copied each week to a second NAS drive which is located in my garage, away from the house, connected by undergrount CAT6 cable. Different folders (shares) are copied each day, so over a week, everything is replicated. Those shares that get updated often (HD albums for example), are copied daily, my CD collection twice weekly, my MP3s weekly.
So having in place a robust, two layer backup strategy enabled me to sleep peacefully last night 
But there's a sting in the tail...
Forty years in IT has taught me that you can never plan for every contingency... even the most 'robust' of backup strategies have flaws... and the sting? You don't discover the flaws until a real disaster happens. Complacent I'm not... optimistic....always! 
Don't forget, if a disk is involved, the worst can and sooner or later will happen to you too 
Roger
Posted on: 26 June 2016 by rjstaines
+1 - good call on the reminder to have robust back up strategies. Especially if you have a large collection of music and other digital content.
Roger - You have probably considered this already, but is your garage back up raised some distance off the floor (protection against floooding) and on a different (protected?) mains supply (protection against lightning strike/unforeseen power surges)? As you say you never know until a real disaster strikes. Some people I know have their second layer at a more distant location either connected via WAN/Internet or physically move drives.
Quite right, DWO- the garage has its own power supply and the NAS is mounted on a protected shelf half way up the wall, out of reach of grandchildren and cats. This part of the garage is actually used as an outside office, complete with heating, so the NAS environment is very 'friendly'. And of course, having a network feed enables not only the NAS to run but also a separate PC that SWMBO uses for her tennis club activities.
I've never been a fan of physically moving devices offsite as other respondees have mentioned... maybe back to my days working in Virgin when we had to schedule a guy or girl out for a few hours, transporting the backup device to it's 'safe' location... the need for care during transport and the need for testing the re-connection of the returned device... altogether too many opportunities for things to go wrong. For me personally I'm a lifetime fan of 'set it and forget it' (oh and have it monitor its own health, of course).
I thought twice about wrtiting this, DWO- but here where I live in the Wirral, stuck between Liverpool and Wales, we've never been flooded, so that hasn't been a consideration. I realise though, looking out on the rain this afternoon, that I should probably now spend the remainder of the day with my fingers crossed 
Posted on: 29 June 2016 by jon h
"BUT I'm an IT guy (albeit retired), so you wouldn't expect me to be satisfied with a single level of backup, and I'm not. My ReadyNAS drive is copied each week to a second NAS drive which is located in my garage, away from the house, connected by undergrount CAT6 cable. Different folders (shares) are copied each day, so over a week, everything is replicated. Those shares that get updated often (HD albums for example), are copied daily, my CD collection twice weekly, my MP3s weekly.
So having in place a robust, two layer backup strategy enabled me to sleep peacefully last night "
So a power spike to your house could easily take out both devices. Its possible that both NAS's are the same, in which case a bad firmware upgrade could vape both.
What you have described is better than a single point of storage. But not much.
Posted on: 29 June 2016 by Foot tapper
Hi Roger
Helpful advice, much appreciated.
I also have 2 physically separate NAS drives, of different design, both mirrored, with one backing up the other. Jon makes a good point re firmware, so I'll keep them different from now on, as both are Synology NAS drives.
My main concern has been a lightning or mains spike, so I have recently installed a small APC "Back-UPS CS650" uninterruptible power supply for the main NAS drive, computer, broadband modem, wifi router, ethernet switch & office printer.
Never thought I'd need it though.
Until 2 days later when the mains supply suddenly went down.
Phew!
Still vulnerable to lightning hitting the cat6 network and frying everything, but I'm not sure how to avoid that one!
Best regards, FT
Posted on: 30 June 2016 by Guy007
I would endorse the HGST ( formally know as Hitachi ) Deskstar NAS range,
Prior to getting the QNAP NAS I was using LaCie d2 Quadra drives ( which I still use, but as incremental back ups ) they also are solid drives too - only issue I had was with a power supply to an older 500GB model. But as of 2014 Seagate own LaCie.
So it looks regardless of the name, WD or Seagate are the main players. But I look at the HGST as the Lexus brand and the WD as the Toyota.
And if you are looking for SSD's, I would look at SanDisk Extreme Pro's with their 10 year warranty - which also ironically, is a company now owned by WD too - as of May 2016.