downgrade advice needed...

Posted by: Stefan Vogt on 12 July 2016

Where is the slack in my system, where is room for downgrading without severe loss in sound quality? For example, how about replacing the Superline against a chordette Dual? Heelp...

NAC-N 272+XPS DR mod., headline, NAP250 DR, CD5XS, B+W 804D2, in parallel: Snaxo 242 -> NAP200 -> bass extenders; Thorens TD147 with Schopper arm + Ortofon Cadenza Blue + Superline with non-Naim PSU; auralic aries mini & chord 2Qute

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by ChrisSU

Flog the CD5 and get a NAS...

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by b_lund

Simple

Flog the lot except CD5

Get a Nait 2 or Qute/nSats or other Bookshelfs plus the new Planar 3

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by gary yeowell
b_lund posted:

Simple

Flog the lot except CD5

Get a Nait 2 or Qute/nSats or other Bookshelfs plus the new Planar 3

Good call.

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by joerand

Certainly the Headline and its PSU could go, unless you prefer it enough over the 272's HP out.

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by ChrisSU

I'm curious, what are the 'bass extenders'?

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by Innocent Bystander
ChrisSU posted:

Flog the CD5 and get a NAS...

Or change the aries mini for Mac Mini + Auduirvana. Not sure if OK into 2Qute or if Gustard U12 would be beneficial (I belive the 2Qute has better isolation than Hugo, just not sure how good. No NAS needed (no need to move files on network) unless wanted for some other reason, e.g backup.

+ rip all LPs and then flog the turntable etc (there should be no loss of quality, and vinyl compression and any imperfections and thus character will be preserved)

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by Innocent Bystander
ChrisSU posted:

I'm curious, what are the 'bass extenders'?

Speaker stands.

Oh, no, they're base extenders...

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by joe9407

Hi Stefan -- why both a 272 and a 2Qute?

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by Bob Edwards

Keep the CD5, sell everything else and get a Nait 5 (pick your version) and a pair of IBLs. 

Add FC2 if desired.
Posted on: 12 July 2016 by Klout10

Could you please tell us why you want to downgrade and how you enjoy your music? You might get better answers ...

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by Chag...

I would take out the 242/200 and bass extenders, and the 2Qute of course. Not even a downgrade IMHO.  

Chag -

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by jfritzen

I'd keep the 272, XPS, 250, B+W, perhaps the Thorens and accompanying stuff. I can't see the need for a second streamer (auralic/2qute) or the bass extender.

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by marcusman

Stefan, out of curiosity how is the auralic/2qute combo?

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by ChrisSU
Innocent Bystander posted:
ChrisSU posted:

Flog the CD5 and get a NAS...

+ rip all LPs and then flog the turntable etc (there should be no loss of quality, and vinyl compression and any imperfections and thus character will be preserved)

I once considered ripping my vinyl, but decided it was cheaper and easier to buy used CDs to replace the albums I really wanted to listen to. I then went one stage further and kept just a single NAS/streamer source to declutter my rack. Now life is simple!

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by joerand
Innocent Bystander posted:
ChrisSU posted:

I'm curious, what are the 'bass extenders'?

Speaker stands.

Oh, no, they're base extenders...

So they serve as both bass extenders and a base extender?

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by ryder.

I don't think the OP is looking to replace the B&W 804 D2. If that's the case, the 250 DR will likely stay.

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by Innocent Bystander
ChrisSU posted:
Innocent Bystander posted:
ChrisSU posted:

Flog the CD5 and get a NAS...

+ rip all LPs and then flog the turntable etc (there should be no loss of quality, and vinyl compression and any imperfections and thus character will be preserved)

I once considered ripping my vinyl, but decided it was cheaper and easier to buy used CDs to replace the albums I really wanted to listen to. I then went one stage further and kept just a single NAS/streamer source to declutter my rack. Now life is simple!

Not sure how that is cheaper? I ripped a few hundred LPs, and have subsequently replaced about  a third to improve sound (especially lower noise floor) - however once ripped replacement can be as and when.

I omitted to agree no need for CD5. 

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by joerand
ChrisSU posted:

I once considered ripping my vinyl, but decided it was cheaper and easier to buy used CDs to replace the albums I really wanted to listen to.

Cheaper to buy a redundant used CD instead of ripping the existing vinyl album? How does that economic model work? Did you sell off your vinyl for a better price?

Posted on: 12 July 2016 by Innocent Bystander
jfritzen posted:

I'd keep the 272, XPS, 250, B+W, perhaps the Thorens and accompanying stuff. I can't see the need for a second streamer (auralic/2qute) or the bass extender.

Presumably the bass extender, whatever clever  component it is, is to extend the bass which otherwise is not adequately extended?

Posted on: 13 July 2016 by ChrisSU

I figured to get decent LP rips I'd need a record cleaning machine, a decent ADC and some sortware....and a lot of time. I only had about 300 LPs that I was really bothered about, and if you're not in a hurry, you can pick up used CDs for between £1 and £5. So fot me it was a much cheaper option. 

Posted on: 13 July 2016 by Innocent Bystander

I used it as an opportunity to listen to every LP (400+). Playing for the rips was as per normal, so noise from accumulated dust (I didn't have a specialist cleaner - and I wish I was aware of the benefit a couple of decades earlier!) is in all the rips: but no different from what I would hear if I had retained the LPs - and no further deterioration. 

It was an interesting exercise, some not having been played for a long time, reminding myself of some music, and deciding to discard a few (maybe 10% or so). Maybe something everyone should do from time to time with their collections!

 

Posted on: 13 July 2016 by jfritzen
Innocent Bystander posted:
jfritzen posted:

I'd keep the 272, XPS, 250, B+W, perhaps the Thorens and accompanying stuff. I can't see the need for a second streamer (auralic/2qute) or the bass extender.

Presumably the bass extender, whatever clever  component it is, is to extend the bass which otherwise is not adequately extended?

Perhaps, but then I would simply buy an n-Sub or so. SNAXO plus PSU plus 200 seems to be a bit too complicated for the task.

Posted on: 13 July 2016 by Innocent Bystander
jfritzen posted:
Innocent Bystander posted:
jfritzen posted:

I'd keep the 272, XPS, 250, B+W, perhaps the Thorens and accompanying stuff. I can't see the need for a second streamer (auralic/2qute) or the bass extender.

Presumably the bass extender, whatever clever  component it is, is to extend the bass which otherwise is not adequately extended?

Perhaps, but then I would simply buy an n-Sub or so. SNAXO plus PSU plus 200 seems to be a bit too complicated for the task.

Except active isn't to increase the bass extension but improve control over the drive units and avoid degradation by the speaker's passive crossover. Maybe the extender is a sub?

Posted on: 13 July 2016 by hungryhalibut

This seems not to really be a question about downgrading at all, rather about rationalisation. There seems to be an awful lot of superfluous stuff. Why not just keep the 272, XPS and 250, and a suitable phono stage. With the cash freed up the main system can be maxed out with Powerlines and really good speaker wires. 

Posted on: 13 July 2016 by jfritzen
Innocent Bystander posted:
jfritzen posted:
Innocent Bystander posted:
jfritzen posted:

I'd keep the 272, XPS, 250, B+W, perhaps the Thorens and accompanying stuff. I can't see the need for a second streamer (auralic/2qute) or the bass extender.

Presumably the bass extender, whatever clever  component it is, is to extend the bass which otherwise is not adequately extended?

Perhaps, but then I would simply buy an n-Sub or so. SNAXO plus PSU plus 200 seems to be a bit too complicated for the task.

Except active isn't to increase the bass extension but improve control over the drive units and avoid degradation by the speaker's passive crossover. Maybe the extender is a sub?

Perhaps it's time for Stefan to explain his bass extender, before speculations grow any further . IF the B+W could be used actively (which they can't AFAIK), then the SNAXO would absolutely make sense and I would upgrade the 200 to 250DR too. But I think the SNAXO/200 drive some other speakers to mimic a sub?