There have been a number of discussions in the past on this - such as the now closed (why?):-
https://forums.naimaudio.com/topic/how-to-qobuz
But these haven't resolved matters for me. I have recently, after much wavering between Tidal and Qobuz, decided to support the latter, and I've bought a Sublime subscription at a useful discount. My main reason is Qobuz including access to CD booklets, very important for the classical that is the bulk of my listening, but useful for all genres.
For some time I've used Qobuz via iPad/iPhone apps connecting to an Apple TV device via Airplay over wifi, then by digital output into my SU. This works pretty well, but can occasionally suffer from interference, and the quality is limited by the rather Heath Robinson route for the music. Noting that the estimable Simon-in-Suffolk doesn't think proper Qobuz integration by Naim is likely any time soon, I've now decided to consider other ways to create a wired connection to the system for Qobuz.
I've tried a Mac (actually a MacBook Pro, but if I wanted to do this permanently would buy a MacMini to use headless), using one of the apps designed to run a Mac remotely from iPad or iPhone - but I didn't like it. It creates a complicated sequence of apps to open to play music, and actual control of the screen is a bit fiddly, and resolution not that great. So not the solution for me.
In the 'How to Qobuz' thread above, there were references to using something called uPnP Bubble on a Synology NAS. By good fortune, I happen to use a Synology NAS hard wired into my system. But I lack an understanding of how this would work, whether it would give the hard-wired solution I seek, and how it's controlled in use. If anyone is using this and understands it, I'd be really grateful for an explanation!
My other option would seem to be buying either an Auralic Aries Mini or a Bluesound Node 2. Both of these devices have been well reviewed, and both claim Qobuz integration - though one thing I don't yet know is whether if one is using the Auralic or Bluesound control apps, one still has access to the booklets.
At this point I'm willing to invest a bit of money to resolve things, though it goes against the grain to buy the Auralic or Bluesound devices which largely duplicate functionality which I already have on the SU (and theoretically at a higher quality level). I'd very much welcome contributions before I make a final decision.
Posted on: 17 October 2016 by DavidS
Me too, and also much earlier setting up two AM radios to listen to "stereo". One of the demos was of a ping pong match! Meanwhile, back on topic, currently listening to Music for a While L'arpeggiata Christina Pluhar streamed from Qobuz at 24 bits/88.2 kHz via the Chromecast Audio, thinking it doesn't get much better than this, and getting a bit worried that I might starting wanting always to listen in 24 bits...
david
Posted on: 17 October 2016 by Ardbeg10y
How would you compare the CC Audio streaming into the SU (or similar) versus audio natively processed on the SU from e.g. Tidal (if you have experience on this)?
Personally, I'm very satisfied by my Spotify / CC Audio / Supernait setup, but I would like to know which area I should spend my money on when I get some pennies again.
Doubting to put it in either source or speakers and I don't know yet.
Posted on: 17 October 2016 by ChrisByrd
Well, that's impressive, apart from one big BUT - gapless playback doesn't seem to work. This must be down to the Chromecast Audio as the Qobuz app works fine (apart from the SQ) with Bluetooth
Otherwise setup was very easy and the sound is excellent. I've connected the Chromecast Audio to one of the TOSLINK inputs on the SU. Comparing CD quality using one of my Qobuz purchases - streaming using JRiver running on a MacBook Pro as the UPnP server perhaps has a slight edge but it's very close. I tried one of the high res downloads but this played back at CD quality - I though I could stream high res without a sublime subscription.
Once an app is connected to the Chromecast Audio, it doesn't show as being available in other apps, but there's no conflict. I can stream Netflix to the Chromecast on the TV at the same time as listening via Qobuz - I don't know how much the newly installed fibre broadband is helping.
Apart from the gapless playback issue, it's such a good solution for Qobuz on the iPad that I'll definitely use it for most of my Qobuz listening - and hope Google get gapless sorted.
Posted on: 17 October 2016 by Goon525
Thanks for the update, Chris. But that's a huge BUT for me - I listen to a lot of classical , and gapless is crucial to avoid gaps in the middle of continuous pieces. And it seems that I would have to use the tv digital audio output when running an App like the Berlin Phil Concert Hall - not the end of the world. It looks like I'm probably back to the Mac Mini solution.
I'm a bit surprised that DavidS hasn't mentioned the gapless issue, as he seems to listen to vocal classical material.
Posted on: 17 October 2016 by ChrisByrd
Paul, yes I listen almost entirely to classical so it is a real pity, unless they get it fixed (remember the early day of Tidal?). Listening to Danil Trifonov's Transcendental, the sound seems better than Audirvana+ via the optical out on the MacBook Pro.
i agree about Qobuz integration into the Naim streamers being dead in the water.
Posted on: 17 October 2016 by DavidS
[@mention:49577343082471944] Yes, sorry I didn't notice that gapless wasn't working. In fairness, comparing Music for While on Audirvana the track changes are very little different. However, on Celine Frisch The Well Tempered Clavier, where on Audirvana you can hear that she goes straight from Prelude 1 to Fugue 1 (the dying resonance of the prelude is still audible when the fugue begins), there is a tiny gap on the Chromecast. Perhaps our best hope is to ask Qobuz if they can persuade Google to fix it. If we both wrote to them, it might carry more weight. What do you think?
AIUI being able to stream in Hi-Res is one of the benefits of Sublime. To me it is also one of the benefits of ChromeCast Audio because my iMac is on the other side of the room from the mu-so and plugging in a 10m TOSLINK cable to listen to Hi-Res was too disruptive, to say nothing of the dog tripping over it. Up till now, I've streamed my Hi-Res downloads with UPnP. Being able just to tap a button on the Qobuz app is much less intrusive.
Given that I remember the BBC's early experiment with stereo, I don't really trust my hearing any more but I've been very impressed so far.
david
Posted on: 18 October 2016 by Aleg
Come on, a little bit of french needn't put you off. You're still part of Europe
and there is always Google translate for those who have forgotten what they learned at school.
essence of the message "Naim are going to support ChromeCast protocol in their new Uniti line, and the Qobuz application is already compatible with that protocol. Otherwise using AirPlay and UPNP on iOS or Android with BubbleUPnP should connect the Qobuz application with Muso (which was the device the poster asked about specifically)."
They apparently assume ChromeCast is going to be supported more widely, also outside the Uniti-line
Posted on: 18 October 2016 by Goon525
I just wanted to express my appreciation to everyone who has contributed and made this such an interesting thread. From my point of view, given that I want to maximise my chances of running current and future streams from orchestras, opera houses etc, but also get the best out of Qobuz, I think the MAC Mini is really my best option. I guess I should start a new thread on whether to buy new or second hand, how much RAM to get etc etc. I know there have been some threads on this topic before; and I also know that new models are rumoured for imminent release. Thanks again, everyone, especially those who tried to help me get Bubble UPnP Server working. Can't win 'me all!
Posted on: 18 October 2016 by endlessnessism
I have to say that after reviewing all of this I think you want access to Qobuz you are better to use one of the conventional streamers.
I use Bluesound Node 2 into Naim DAC and Amp - seamless integration and great sound quality. The only irritation is that the iPad app is less-than-perfectly intuitive - it tries to do a bit too much and ends up confusing.
I also have some old Simple Audio units which I like a lot. They have integrated Qobuz and a very nice and intuitive iPad app. Unfortunately, the company went bust so the iPad app is no longer available and the system itself requires a bit of ingenuity to keep it fully functional. If you're game, though, the units themselves come up very cheaply on a certain auction site, and I think the PC and Mac software is still available on the Simple Audio website.
Sonos is also very good for integrated Qobuz. The downside is a lack of hi-def capability, which Bluesound and Simple Audio both have up to 24/192.
I don't think any of the above will allow you to access album booklets via the control app but I shouldn't think it was a great hardship to flip to the Qobus app or desktop.