There have been a number of discussions in the past on this - such as the now closed (why?):-
https://forums.naimaudio.com/topic/how-to-qobuz
But these haven't resolved matters for me. I have recently, after much wavering between Tidal and Qobuz, decided to support the latter, and I've bought a Sublime subscription at a useful discount. My main reason is Qobuz including access to CD booklets, very important for the classical that is the bulk of my listening, but useful for all genres.
For some time I've used Qobuz via iPad/iPhone apps connecting to an Apple TV device via Airplay over wifi, then by digital output into my SU. This works pretty well, but can occasionally suffer from interference, and the quality is limited by the rather Heath Robinson route for the music. Noting that the estimable Simon-in-Suffolk doesn't think proper Qobuz integration by Naim is likely any time soon, I've now decided to consider other ways to create a wired connection to the system for Qobuz.
I've tried a Mac (actually a MacBook Pro, but if I wanted to do this permanently would buy a MacMini to use headless), using one of the apps designed to run a Mac remotely from iPad or iPhone - but I didn't like it. It creates a complicated sequence of apps to open to play music, and actual control of the screen is a bit fiddly, and resolution not that great. So not the solution for me.
In the 'How to Qobuz' thread above, there were references to using something called uPnP Bubble on a Synology NAS. By good fortune, I happen to use a Synology NAS hard wired into my system. But I lack an understanding of how this would work, whether it would give the hard-wired solution I seek, and how it's controlled in use. If anyone is using this and understands it, I'd be really grateful for an explanation!
My other option would seem to be buying either an Auralic Aries Mini or a Bluesound Node 2. Both of these devices have been well reviewed, and both claim Qobuz integration - though one thing I don't yet know is whether if one is using the Auralic or Bluesound control apps, one still has access to the booklets.
At this point I'm willing to invest a bit of money to resolve things, though it goes against the grain to buy the Auralic or Bluesound devices which largely duplicate functionality which I already have on the SU (and theoretically at a higher quality level). I'd very much welcome contributions before I make a final decision.
Posted on: 27 October 2016 by Ardbeg10y
In my humble opinion, this is one of the first threads on this website where people are in public writing about the very good quality / satisfaction of the ChromeCast Audio.
I start to think to get an nDac, and leave the NDX / NDS / any Naim Streamer for what it is. nDac / PS + chromecast audio or another digital thingy seems to be the key to happyness, much cheaper, widely supported.
All we do is sharing our music preferences with Google Almighty (yes, they monitor these tiny devices - all of them).
Posted on: 27 October 2016 by Dozey
I think the NDS is a very good dac. And it is an excellent streamer. But I can see that a CCa plus Hugo would be a good option too. I haven't done the comparison though.
My comment earlier about avoiding wifi is not correct. You avoid the phone, but the data goes from your router to the CCA directly via wifi.
The battery is just a standard Chinese power bridge from amazon - the sort with a lithium cell which can power a usb socket. Cost about £15. You can use it to power your phone too.
Posted on: 27 October 2016 by DavidS
[@mention:27613035029716976] You can run off wired Ethernet using the Google Adaptor I mentioned above (page 2). My CCA is near my Wi-Fi access point and I didn't notice any difference though others have reported more stable streaming.
[@mention:55771800629066628] Like @Dozey, I'm using the CCA mini-TOSLINK output and relying on the DAC in the mu-so, not the DAC in the CCA. Haven't compared them. Maybe I should
Posted on: 27 October 2016 by Ardbeg10y
[@mention:27613035029716976] You can run off wired Ethernet using the Google Adaptor I mentioned above (page 2). My CCA is near my Wi-Fi access point and I didn't notice any difference though others have reported more stable streaming.
[@mention:55771800629066628] Like @Dozey, I'm using the CCA mini-TOSLINK output and relying on the DAC in the mu-so, not the DAC in the CCA. Haven't compared them. Maybe I should
Regarding the first point, I did not notice a difference either in SQ. The problem is that I have a wife and 4 kids. Apart from the fact that they are lovely beings, they consume loads of bandwidth :-) Since the CCA is hardwired, I have no dropouts anymore.
Regarding the second point: I am a happy owner of the SuperNait 1, which has an internal DAC. So, my CCA is also connected using the optical connection. Looking backwards, I made a good decision in buying this device. Loads of power, and most flexible in one box. Maybe not the most refined amp, but definitely a head start in the Naim world without spending too much money.
Posted on: 02 November 2016 by Ardbeg10y
New Mac Mini arrived here today.
Got the kids on my side when I told them that it is the perfect minecraft computer on a 4K screen.
Wife had to agree.
Rest is history.
Now I can choose to run the Digital Concert Hall app embedded on my Loewe tv, or via the Mac Mini. All hard-wired.
Feeding either the Dac of my SN1, or one of the optical ports of my AV2.
Can't hear a difference of WAV files between these Dacs. Very similar.