Brexit is off ?
Posted by: engjoo on 03 November 2016
So from the look of it, the parliament has to vote and now that there has been so many regrets (loss of jobs, weakening pounds..), brexit looks set to be off ?
Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
"We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?"
... The ever quoted confused cry of the Brexit Babies! And no, not clear at all - just knee-jerk styled newspaper headlines.
Cuts both ways - and insults get us nowhere: Try sticking to facts rather than relying on rants, particularly if you can't recognise humour.
Pev posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:True - but that was the dictatorship 'government' defining that back then - these days its the editorial comment from our free press - somewhat different me thinks. if you don't agree with it - don't buy their paper..
The notion that we have a "free press" is problematic. Certainly it is not government controlled (rather the reverse!) but the barriers to publishing a newspaper are so high that it is essentially a billionaires club. I don't agree with any of the national papers on most things but I don't have the option of starting my own paper to promote my views. What do you get for the man (usually) who has everything? Power - and the easiest way to obtain that is to buy up media outlets.
Most people get their information from the national established media and if that is full of lies and distortion then their choices are made on false premises. This is one reason why referenda are a flawed way to make major decisions - we won't have a real democracy until the mass media are reformed. Of course the problem then becomes who do you trust to reform it? I don't have an answer to that, but it's got to be something better than government being overruled by a clique of billionaires.
Politics may be local, but the similarities are Global. Funny thing, I live across the pond, but the above views can easily be applicable to the US.
Why ? That's what Global Elites do, they use there millions as a means to achieve power.
Example: Never heard of this guy.
"Sheldon Gary Adelson is an American casino magnate. He is the founder, chairman and chief executive officer of Las Vegas Sands Corporation, which owns the Marina Bay Sands in Singapore, and is the parent ... Wikipedia"
This Global Elite donated an additional 25 Million to Mr Trump's campaign, during the last week.
I'm retired, and scan the Media Highlights daily, and couldn't help but to notice the barrage of anti Clinton headlines that was appearing, as we approached the last week of voting.
Almost a reversal, point being the Populist are influenced by these Global Elites, who use their wealth to protect their interest.
I agree with both of you gentleman!
If we could only take the Super Pac's out of the equation, perhaps policy would be more reflective of the Populist, and not driven by Media!
Globalization!
We may be across the pond, but don't be mislead, we are all connected.
When it's all said and done, Obama, Hillary, Merkel, Holande, and Theresa May will all lean towards the EU.
The New World Order, and the American Dollar!
Is the Brexit Off ?
Just some extended Thoughts.
Allante93!
MDS posted:andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
andarkian posted:Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
The £350M was an intentional misstatement, and if you know the actual facts, then so must have been your claim that could be repatriated (if not then please accept that you are in error).
The maximum amount ever paid to the EU per month was less than £240M. The £350M is the amount that would have been paid if we never had the rebate: The £110 (i.e. the difference due to the rebate) was never paid to the EU so couldn't be repatriated.
Please check your facts before denigrating others.
andarkian posted:MDS posted:andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
Sorry but "We send the EU £350million a week, lets fund the NHS instead Vote Leave"...
...was not just a headline number. It was an out and out lie to appeal to certain voters.
As for acceptance from the Brexiteers if Remain has won, that's another big lie. Farage for starters would NOT have let the matter rest. The anti-EU brigade in the Conservative party would not have let the matter rest.
As for the people, well I sincerely believe that the majority can't care less about the EU one way or another. They care about the funding of the NHS, they care about their jobs, they care about looking after their family. They were lead to vote leave on the back of many big lies and many misdirection of the causes of their problems. They are going to be just as frustrated when leaving the EU solves none of their problems (IMO). Most things could have been solved if it had been the will of the government while remaining part of the EU.
Brexit was not about giving the people a say, it was about a power play between different factions of the ruling elite. But it will be "the people" who pay the price.
andarkian posted:MDS posted:andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
I don't think your response to my attempt to broaden the consequences for brexit you described is warranted, andarkian. Reverting to factionalisin all those who comment into two antagonistic groups is not constructive or likely to shed more light on what is a complicated and important topic to the future of the UK. That said, your response is I regret to say consistent with some of the behaviour of the right-wing Press and some politicians in the brexit camp.
Andarkian posted:
."....... You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat....."
Nigel Farage would have accepted a remain vote?
You really must be taking the ****!
Either that, or you have been partaking of some pretty effective hallucinogenic substances.
Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
I actually wondered whether one of your statements earlier was supposed to be ironic - it's clear from what you have gone on posting that it isn't and you are only interested in parroting the propaganda peddled by the leavers before the vote and the subsequent insults to those who voted to remain. The story from the leavers seems to be: first, the remain case was just Project Fear and had no substance; now everything turns out to be a bit more complicated - economically, legally and politically - than the simplistic leave case, then those who point this out are branded as 'remoaners' and accused of trying to turn over the result of the referendum , for which there seems no evidence.
Clive
Eloise posted:andarkian posted:MDS posted:andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
"As for the people, well I sincerely believe that the majority can't care less about the EU one way or another. They care about the funding of the NHS, they care about their jobs, they care about looking after their family. They were lead to vote leave on the back of many big lies and many misdirection of the causes of their problems. They are going to be just as frustrated when leaving the EU solves none of their problems (IMO). Most things could have been solved if it had been the will of the government while remaining part of the EU.
Brexit was not about giving the people a say, it was about a power play between different factions of the ruling elite. But it will be "the people" who pay the price."
I think that about sums it up perfectly.
I'm also sceptical that we've done anything other than put ourselves in a worse bargaining position with the rest of the World but only time will tell. Right now everything is about the world continuing to believe we're worth trading with and the EU Member States will be looking to take as much advantage of the uncertainty that exists as possible. The quality of our negotiations now will determine the quality of the next 25 - 50 years of all our lives i.e. to the end of mine.
While waiting to see what these negotiations will bring, I fail to see any way in which we can take advantage of our 'lone state' position as we have less to offer compared to a deal with our larger neighbour, the EU. I hope to be proved wrong but the whole basis of BREXIT for me was simply about far right ideologies rather than any firm basis in fact that we'd be better off outside the EU.
Anyway, lots of one-eyed views being stated on here so not going to get involved in any slanging matches but will try and find any facts in favour of BREXIT that may be posted to give me some hope.
I see you lot are still going over and over and over this again and again and again.
Drewy posted:I see you lot are still going over and over and over this again and again and again.
Because it's very very very very important...
Eloise posted:Drewy posted:I see you lot are still going over and over and over this again and again and again.
Because it's very very very very important...
And that bears repeating.
Huge posted:Eloise posted:Drewy posted:I see you lot are still going over and over and over this again and again and again.
Because it's very very very very important...
And that bears repeating.
Because it's very very very very important...
Eloise posted:PeterJ posted:Eloise posted:What would be best would be if the government accepted the sovereignty of parliament and opened the Brexit plans to scrutiny and debate. That's what the ruling in the courts required.
The main problem I see here is that doing this is likely to expose and weaken our negotiating position.
Sorry but that's just rubbish. It's not going to reveal the minutia of the negotiating position. It's debating the outline position which will be revealed to the EU 5 minutes after any negotiation actually begins.
Its debating the relative priorities between access to the single market, financial commitments and blocking free movement.
Please do me the favour of reading the rest of my post. You are quoting, and responding, selectively.
fatcat posted:andarkian posted:The polarisation of opinion on this thread reflects the self same thing that happened during the Referendum campaign. When Dodgy Dave gave an unequivocal guarantee to the British people that should the people vote to Leave then Article 50 would be invoked forthwith, clearly given in the naive assumption that the rest of us were Europhiles like him, he did hang himself out to be dried. As it happens, he cut and ran as soon as the result came in. Dodgy Dave's promise was one made with the backing of Parliament by a majority of 6/1 when they were asked if there should be a Referendum. No ifs, no buts, we're OUT!
Now, the Remoaners argument lies as to what form of Brexit we should have, who should have authority over the terms and conditions, all before Article 50 is invoked. Personally, being one who is now called a Hard Brexiteer, my opinion is that our exit is based on a Tabula Rasa and with that clean slate a new relationship with Europe will organically emerge. If our Referendum result is allowed to be 'overturned' or completely distorted by Guyanan models, Brazilian Crimpers, Pimlico Plumbers, Liberal Lords and very much activist judges there will be a bigger anti-establishment backlash than was given by the Referendum itself.
Jeremy Hunt, a person I am never usually in agreement with, was clear today on Andrew Marr in the Government's intention to invoke Article 50 by the end of March. Of course this will probably be scuppered by the Supreme Court next month. May will then go to Parliament for the 'necessary' approval and invite suicidal northern Labour MPs and Liberal nonentities in the House of Lords to thwart her plans. A General Election will be called, Labour will be decimated, Nicola Sturgeon will continue to howl for Independence and her non-existent place in Europe and Article 50 will be invoked, followed by a clearing of the Augean stables known as The House of Lords.
Why will all this happen? Because my local MP, a complete sycophant who had to extricate himself from Dodgy Dave's nether regions when he scarpered from Parliament, and also a staunch Rremainer until May took power, to my utter surprise is now four square behind a hard Brexit. That man has prescience and is now strategically seated in the Justice Department. May does not want to call a General Election before the boundaries are reorganised, but if she has to due to the anti-democratic shenanigans of the Establishment Remoaners, then she will have a very healthy working majority and those not shown retribution by the electorate will feel it when they seek any form of Office.
Simples!
If only life was so simple.
Don’t forget the Tories promised a referendum as a tactical measure to encourage the Ultra Quitter Tory voter not to vote for UKIP. If an election is called without article 50 passing through the commons, so many UQT’s will vote UKIP, the Tories would consider decimation a good result.
Plus, don’t forget, a lot of the quitters have apparently changed their mind. The majority of the country, IE. the voters in a general election are in favour of remaining.
Your first point, in part, is correct, that is how Cameron got us in this mess and he never expected to have to deliver on that promise. However, bear in mind that UKIP is now imploding.
Your second point is pure conjecture without any evidence.
Huge posted:I like the way that the leave campaigners all campaigned for the sovereignty of the British Parliament, then vehemently complain when three senior judges rule in favour of the sovereignty of the British Parliament!
I must admit that this is a delicious irony. It is also ironic that those who wanted us to stay subject to ECJ rulings are now champions of parliamentary sovereignty.
Eloise posted:andarkian posted:MDS posted:andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
Sorry but "We send the EU £350million a week, lets fund the NHS instead Vote Leave"...
...was not just a headline number. It was an out and out lie to appeal to certain voters.
As for acceptance from the Brexiteers if Remain has won, that's another big lie. Farage for starters would NOT have let the matter rest. The anti-EU brigade in the Conservative party would not have let the matter rest.
As for the people, well I sincerely believe that the majority can't care less about the EU one way or another. They care about the funding of the NHS, they care about their jobs, they care about looking after their family. They were lead to vote leave on the back of many big lies and many misdirection of the causes of their problems. They are going to be just as frustrated when leaving the EU solves none of their problems (IMO). Most things could have been solved if it had been the will of the government while remaining part of the EU.
Brexit was not about giving the people a say, it was about a power play between different factions of the ruling elite. But it will be "the people" who pay the price.
But, but we did send £350 million a week to the EU. The fact is that they returned a discretionary £8 billion a year or so. They could have cut off the rebate any time they felt like it and the rules of the game would have prevented us, the U.K., doing anything about it.
As for most things being solvable while remaining part of the EU, we would have got exactly the same as Dodgy Dave did earlier this year i.e. nichts, rien, nada, niente, nothing. Only true beneficiaries of EU largesse or those with a stipenduary need for its existence could get so emotional about such a corrupt, sclerotic, controlling, unaccountable institution which is already on its way out.
There s no Nirvana about to emerge from the corrupting body of the EU, lift your eyes from your keyboards and look at what is happening throughout the great Schengen area. We have a lifeboat and I am very happy to jump in it.
And as for all you Farage haters, take a good look at your Liberal, Socialist leaders, the Corbyn's, the Camerons, the Cleggs, the MErkels, the Hollandes, the Sturgeons, all so happy to lead you to societal extinction in order to maintain their unworkable Socialist pipe dreams
MDS posted:andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
I hope, like me, the majority ignored the £350 a week extra for NHS as a total falsehood (so unlike politicians to lie). The pound was overvalued anyway because of our trade deficit. Withdrawal from the customs union was forecast by both Leave and Remain campaigners. For tariffs, bear in mind that we have a trade deficit with the rest of EU and will gain from a tariff war. For the RoI boundary, this was open before we both joined EU.
andarkian posted:MDS posted:andarkian posted:Huge posted:Huge posted:Simon-in-Suffolk posted:Chris, thanks, yes I had seen that before... I couldn't help thinking what a load of rubbish ... I had to lookup to see what the Health Lottery was...
Isn't that the fact that the quality of healthcare depends on the postcode in which you live?
Oh, no, that's the postcode lottery isn't it? ...
Err, I think I might be getting a little confused here!
Ah, finally worked it out...
It's about Brexit isn't it: Since no-one who voted for it knew what it actually was, then that must be the National Lottery!
"No-one who voted for it knew what it actually was." The ever quoted whinge of the Remoaners.
We, the majority, voted to invoke Article 50, to take back control of our borders, repatriate sovereignty as well as our legal system and the right to formulate our own agreements with whomever we want. All of which was implied by the Referendum and expected after Article 50 is invoked. Clear enough?
Did the 'majority' also vote for an extra £350m a week for the NHS (a false promise)? A 20% fall in the value of the pound with a consequent inflation effect on petrol/diesel/gas/electricity/food prices? And to come, a likely withdraw from the EU Customs Union with the likely imposition of tariffs on many UK goods exported to the EU? The possible resurrection of immigration and customs controls at the Irish land boundary?
Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
Sorry, I'm a Brexit supporter but can we please try and keep it classy?
Huge posted:andarkian posted:Another misstatement by a Remoaner. The £350 million was a headline number to highlight the monies that could be repatriated, rather more realistic than the doom and gloom perpetuated by the Establishment. You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat, but I guess the Establishment never will accept that they can be wrong?
The £350M was an intentional misstatement, and if you know the actual facts, then so must have been your claim that could be repatriated (if not then please accept that you are in error).
The maximum amount ever paid to the EU per month was less than £240M. The £350M is the amount that would have been paid if we never had the rebate: The £110 (i.e. the difference due to the rebate) was never paid to the EU so couldn't be repatriated.
Please check your facts before denigrating others.
As a Brexit supporter, I must admit you are entirely correct here.
Sadly many didn't ignore the £350M claim, they actually believed it.
However, yes, the pound was overvalued, on the other hand no-one gains from a tariff war.
Andarkian posted:
"And as for all you Farage haters, take a good look at your Liberal, Socialist leaders, the Corbyn's, the Camerons, the Cleggs, the MErkels, the Hollandes, the Sturgeons, all so happy to lead you to societal extinction in order to maintain their unworkable Socialist pipe dreams"
Andarkian, you must admit that Farage is a very easy person to dislike or hate!
But seriously, just what is that substance of which you are partaking? I'm pretty sure I haven't had anything quite that effective since the mid 70s.
Methinks your far right roots are beginning to show.
Hmack posted:Andarkian posted:
."....... You had your chance, you blew it with your scare stories and, as you would have expected and got acceptance from the Brexiteers had we lost, then why do you not have the good grace to accept your own defeat....."
Nigel Farage would have accepted a remain vote?
You really must be taking the ****!
Either that, or you have been partaking of some pretty effective hallucinogenic substances.
Well, again speaking as a Brexit supporter, there was a petition to Parliament to have a re-run which gained many, many votes (arguably many created by bots and by hose outside the UK but that's not the point). This petition was created by a UKIP supporter who thought that remain would win. Such delicious irony!
I must apologise to all who (maybe rightly) think I'm being too flippant on Brexit. However, it has raised so many constitutional issues that would never have never have been exposed otherwise. My philosophy (from business) is that change is painful but necessary. Whatever the outcome, there will be change for UK and EU and IMHO that will ultimately be good for us all.