Naim DAC versus M2 Tech Young DAC?

Posted by: John R. on 31 July 2011

Hello,

 

did somebody compare both DACs side by side in a Naim system? Or any experience with the Young DAC in a Naim system? I have a Naim DAC but I would simply prefer a DAC that can be connected via asyncronous USB to a PC/Mac and I do not want to use additional USB to S/PDIF converters like the Wavelink, V-Link, Halide... Nor do I want to go the Firewire route via INT 202 or DAC 202.

 

A DAC with an integrated asyncronous USB is what I am looking for and based on some reviews the Young DAC looks very promising even using its cheap power supply... adding a better power supply will improve things for sure... I know that there are already more DACs with asyncronous USB around and I tested some of them but they did not present the music in a way that I like with lots of PRaT... Probably I end up with a solution that I try to avoid: USB to S/PDIF converter into Naim DAC.

Posted on: 31 July 2011 by C P

Review on Computer Audiophile site which mentions the nDAC obliquely...

Posted on: 31 July 2011 by Bart

If you DID go with a re-clocking usb to spdif converter into the nDAC, would you essentially be re-clocking the signal twice?  For better or worse?

Posted on: 31 July 2011 by Noogle

Some people say they hear SQ improvements from the Ndac when they use an external re-clocker (e.g. V-Link) but there is no reason for this to be so.  Asynchronous x asynchronous doesn't equal more asynchronous.  I use a V-Link because my PC clock is so out of whack the Ndac won't sync without it.

Posted on: 31 July 2011 by Guido Fawkes

I wouldn't swap my Naim DAC because it didn't have async USB - just use a V-Link or if you don't like the extra box the use a Halide Bridge (one neat cable). Naim will support the DAC for years - why change? Reviews are of little value - you need to hear it yourself, most reviewers only listen to a product for a short time and quite often have decided what they are going to write before they even listen - it is also a fact that the worst systems I've ever heard were set up by hi-fi reviewers, the one of the best was set up by Naim and used a Naim DAC.


 

Posted on: 31 July 2011 by CSAS bite
Couldn't agree with Guido more; have a listen for yourself and only rate the review you do.  I've been through all the permutations and ended up with an NDX (sold the nDAC).

Enjoy!

Al.
Posted on: 03 August 2011 by DHT
A fried of mine has the Naim and we did compare them both in his system, he uses a Weiss INT to connect his dac to Mac, as others have posted you would have to hear both in your own system.
But the Young is extraordinarily good and a third of the price of the Naim Weiss combo.
H.
Posted on: 03 August 2011 by John R.

@ DHT: 

That sounds very promising! How good is extraordinarily good

Are both on the same level regarding sound quality? Did you use the normal power supply that comes with the Young? Could you please describe the sound character of both DACs in comparison? Does the Young offer good PRaT?

Thanks a lot!

Posted on: 04 August 2011 by AMA

I guess a proper demo should be done between the maximized units which is Young DAC/ Paul Hynes and nDAC/555PS. Not sure if these two combinations will ever come in the same room though...

Posted on: 04 August 2011 by Gale 401

John,

As you already have the Naim DAC,

Why dont you just get a M-Tech BNC Hi-Face and bolt it onto the BNC socket on the back of the DAC using a BNC coupler around 29p.

Then just run a female to male USB cable to your Mac/PC?

Doing it this way, its out of sight and you cut out the need for any digital coax cable.

Stu

 

Posted on: 04 August 2011 by John R.

@ AMA:

 

Why not only Young DAC versus Naim DAC? Not everyone can spend that much money on Naim DAC and PS 555 or is willing to spend that much money...

 

And by the way: A demo with Young DAC/special power supply versus Naim DAC without XPS2 or PS 555 would be fair regarding the prices.

Posted on: 04 August 2011 by John R.

@ Gale 401:

 

That is a good idea but than I would rather spend some extra money for the EVO, although this is an extra box...

Posted on: 04 August 2011 by Gale 401

John,

I see R Abbott has added the young to his site. 

Posted on: 04 August 2011 by totemphile
Originally Posted by John R.:

Why not only Young DAC versus Naim DAC? Not everyone can spend that much money on Naim DAC and PS 555 or is willing to spend that much money...

Nor is it required, the nDAC is plenty fine on its own...

Posted on: 05 August 2011 by AMA
Originally Posted by John R.:

@ AMA:

 

Why not only Young DAC versus Naim DAC? Not everyone can spend that much money on Naim DAC and PS 555 or is willing to spend that much money...

 

And by the way: A demo with Young DAC/special power supply versus Naim DAC without XPS2 or PS 555 would be fair regarding the prices.

Because, a bare nDAC is not a great VFM in my measures of SQ. It's overpriced for what it does without external PS. The sound is bright  and a bit fat in bass. It does not outperform many 1.5 - 2 K$ DACs which I happened to audition in a direct A/B demo. The only benefit of bare nDAC is that it features amazing jitter rejection so it lifts the performance of cheap transports substantially. For those who already have a low jitter transport it's possibly more reasonable to buy a cheaper DAC like Benchmark or Lavry or go for Logitech Transporter and be happy. Lavry and PS Audio are very energetic DACs and those who addicted to Naim sound will not be disappointed.

 

The beauty of nDAC is that nDAC/XPS is becoming one of the best digital players I ever come across and stands on par with more expensive players like KDS or MBL.

Actually I like the nDAC/XPS bass line more than KDS and MBL.

Posted on: 06 August 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
AMA, I concur. The nDAC is good on it's own, but there are plenty of comparable offerings at a similar price. Put a 555PS on the NDAC and the device is transformed, and I have yet to hear it bettered on 16/20bit 44.1kHz.
Simon
Posted on: 06 August 2011 by DHT
I have, you should try a Weiss 202.
H
Posted on: 07 August 2011 by AMA
Originally Posted by DHT:
I have, you should try a Weiss 202.
H

I heard a lot of good words about 202 but no chance to audition it in Dubai.

 

Some forum members still prefer INT202/nDAC/XPS to DAC202, btw 

Posted on: 07 August 2011 by Guido Fawkes
> Some forum members still prefer INT202/nDAC/XPS to DAC202, btw 
 
I prefer the V-LInk to the INT202 with my Naim DAC 555PS - it's a funny old world

I did one of those blind listening bake-offs with 5 DACs on show: it didn't have a Naim or Weiss, but it did have a very impressive DAC called the BAD Alpha. I think if Naim hadn't brought out such a superb product then I'd have bought one of these or the Chord Electronics DAC. I would definitely urge anybody to listen for themselves: one of DACs listed in posts above would definitely disappoint me, although some others swear by it (I think the Logic Transporter would sound better without it attached). As always subjective views/reviews don't count for a lot in the end - my views are just that, an opinion on what I prefer.  
 

All the best Guy