Need help with this can of worms...

Posted by: KTMax on 31 July 2011

OK guys (I take it 98% here are...) I need your help here.

 

Appologies upfront as I am sure this has been covered and discussed to death but reading through old topics I get completely lost.

 

I'm on the verge of jumping into streaming audio and to start building a music library on a NAS. I'm undecided on the 'front end' but at some point I'll probably end up with a Naim NDX in my all Naim-on-Fraim rig except for the speakers and some cables. To see if streaming audio is really for me I might try something like the Arcam rDAC first before fushing out big bucks on another Naim box. Dunno yet. But this topic is not about which player/streamer though.

 

Your music library is the hart of it all IMO so here goes.

 

From what I've read it seems that ripping your CD collection to WAV seems the best way to go for SQ and future use? I've read about tagging issues with WAV but I don't have a clear picture on how important or big this issue is.

 

Living in an all Apple environment my current idea is to rip CDs and manage my library with iTunes from a MacBook Pro. What I don't know is how good WAV rips made with iTunes are? I guess they'll not be as good as the files ripped with Naim equipment? How big would this difference be?

 

In my novice mind on this subject storage, infrastructure/network and players/streamers are all subject to change and development but the files in your library are not so I'd like to get this right from the start.

 

Thanks for your thoughts & help!

 

Richard

Posted on: 01 August 2011 by Tog

@KTMax

 

Living with an all Apple environment is only right and proper - and it annoys Patrick!

 

However, Apple and UPnP don't quite mix and Apple/Itunes and Wav is fraught with niggles.

 

Whatever server/NAS you choose - I doubt if you will be managing it with iTunes (something it took me a while to come to terms with) Your MBP however, should be perfectly able to rip and transfer files to your NAS/Server over your network. 

 

My solution was to rip/convert files on a Mac to aiff to store in master ITunes library (firewire HDD - multiple backups) and convert to flac (lossless and very UPnP friendly) for transfer to my server/Nas library for use with my Naim gear. I use Picard for difficult tagging and Bliss for file path / cover art issues.

 

I'm one of those cloth eared people who can't hear a difference between wav and aiff (or flac for that matter) and wav tagging is a pain in my experience.

 

Flac is the perfect compromise - lossless - open source - and supported by almost everyone except Apple.

 

Hope this helps

 

Tog

Posted on: 01 August 2011 by DQ
Hey there, I have also travelled the path from apple to upnp and agree that it takes a while to cone to terms with what you give up and what you get in exchange. I am now pretty happy but still miss a few features. If you want you can rip to wav and tag using dbpoweramp and then keep your master files in wav. They will have tags in the metadata section. If you use dbpoweramp to convert to alac, flac or whatever format you want, the tags will come across. Whether there is a sound difference between aiff and wav is beyond me. Cheers
Posted on: 01 August 2011 by KTMax
Thanks for the replies.
What is exactly the problem with tagging & WAV files then? Just to try I've ripped a few CDs with iTunes to WAV and all the info (artist, tracknames, cover art etc) seems to come throught fine.

Or is this about something else? (streaming noob, sorry...)

Richard.
Posted on: 02 August 2011 by Stubby

Hi Richard, I don't bother to get too bogged down in the detail, so the exact details of what I'm about to say may be wrong, but I know that in principle this is the issue at hand...

 

It's to do with the format of the standard files: the WAV file format does not define standard header tags that must be used by every application that generates them. This means that 2 different applications can generate a WAV with the same tag information in different meta data tag locations (if it's saved anywhere at all). The music element is defined by WAV - hence the PCM data (the music) is the same. Applications such as dBpoweramp use WAV meta data tags to shoe-horn in tag data such as artist, album title etc. However, because these tags are effectively customised to the app that generated the WAV it means that not all apps reading these files will know how to extract this tag data correctly.

 

In fact, in order to get the tag data from the file correctly you usually need to use a sister application from the same company that made your ripping software, this way it will know how to interpret the tag information correctly.

 

Stuart

Posted on: 02 August 2011 by DQ

Hello,

 

Stuart's reply is spot on and to reiterate one thing, separate the notion of how you rip to create a master copy (potentially wav) and the version you use for replay (FLAC, ALAC etc). If using a Naim or Linn UPNP solution these may be one and the same (all wav), but if not using Naim and you are trying to future-proof your rips they may be different.

 

As Stuart points out, if you use software from the same company that does the rip, then you can convert from wav to alac and have all the tags in the right place. This is how I do it for my music-on-the-go collection.

 

Cheers

Posted on: 02 August 2011 by Hook
Originally Posted by DQ:

Hello,

 

Stuart's reply is spot on and to reiterate one thing, separate the notion of how you rip to create a master copy (potentially wav) and the version you use for replay (FLAC, ALAC etc). If using a Naim or Linn UPNP solution these may be one and the same (all wav), but if not using Naim and you are trying to future-proof your rips they may be different.

 

As Stuart points out, if you use software from the same company that does the rip, then you can convert from wav to alac and have all the tags in the right place. This is how I do it for my music-on-the-go collection.

 

Cheers

 

Hi DQ -

 

This is a good strategy, and I can see how it works for you.  I have a slightly OT question that I hope nobody minds if I ask...

 

I am ripping my CDs (and recording my vinyl) to FLAC level 0.  I then stream to my NDX using Asset, which transcodes to WAV on-the-fly.  The Mrs. and I compared this to streaming native WAV directly via Asset, and could not hear any differences in sound quality.

 

At rip time, I also create a second copy -- a 320kbps MP3 file, which I use only for syncing to our mobile devices.   But this seems like such a waste of space, and I dislike the idea of redundant data!   So late last year, I tried using Media Monkey to transcode to MP3 at sync time, but ran into issues and eventually gave up.  MM was telling me that all of the songs on my iPod needed to be deleted and replaced, and then after about a day, it hung. I started over, refreshing the iPod from my MP3 folders, and that worked just fine.

 

iCloud looks like it could work for me sometime in the future, but I think I would prefer a local solution.   Are you, or is anyone else, having success using their media management software to transcode their "master copies" on-the-fly to MP3 or AAC for their iPods at sync time?

 

Thanks very much!

 

Hook

Posted on: 02 August 2011 by likesmusic

I sometimes use mediamonkey to transcode and sync files - seems ok to me. For some, probably irrational, reason I more often use dBpoweramps Music Convertor and let iTunes do the sync. J River Media Center is another option.

Posted on: 02 August 2011 by totemphile

Hook,

 

iTunes offers the option to downsample stored files to 320kbps, etc. when copying them over to your ipod/phone/pad. But you probably know that...

 

Best

tp

Posted on: 02 August 2011 by DQ

Hook,

 

I have been flipping between the TP solution and creating a dedicated itunes library. The issue with the TP solution is that if your main library is in wav, then you have itunes tagging issues. And what is the point in converting to ALAC or AIFF and then converting again to AAC? If you are already an ALAC or AIFF user then this approach makes a ton of sense. I would warn you that the conversion time really slows down the ipod transfer rate.

 

So,  I think I am going to set the home PC to producing an itunes dedicated library of AAC and then use that just for ipods and laptop on the road.

 

Anyway, this is all so much more fun than thinking about different storage solutions for piles of CDs!

 

Cheers, David

Posted on: 02 August 2011 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by Hook:

 


 Are you, or is anyone else, having success using their media management software to transcode their "master copies" on-the-fly to MP3 or AAC for their iPods at sync time?

 

 

Wont iTunes convert on the fly for you????

Posted on: 02 August 2011 by KTMax
Thanks for the replies all.

I still don't have clear picture on what to do though. Seems this streaming thing is still the same mess on standards, formats and apps that it was 3 years ago when I first looked at it...

Sigh... :-)

Richard
Posted on: 03 August 2011 by Hook
Originally Posted by pcstockton:
Originally Posted by Hook:

 


 Are you, or is anyone else, having success using their media management software to transcode their "master copies" on-the-fly to MP3 or AAC for their iPods at sync time?

 

 

Wont iTunes convert on the fly for you????

 

Hi Patrick -

 

My FLAC library was built from MediaMonkey rips, and I have not used iTunes (except for an occasional experiment here and there).

 

My understanding is that iTunes is still not FLAC-friendly, so using it to convert my files on-the-fly to MP3's at iPod sync time is not an option for me.

 

Since Likesmusic says MM works for him, am going to upgrade to the latest version and try it again.  If that fails, I can also try JRMC (I used it use it for playback before getting the NDX, and moving to UPnP).

 

Am just trying to get away from having multiple music libraries in different formats.  Unfortunately, there does not seem to be one lossless format they equally serves the Mac and PC worlds other than WAV, or possibly AIFF, each of which presents issues with tagging (or so I've read).  I think I'll be sticking with FLAC...

 

Hook

Posted on: 04 August 2011 by KTMax
To me it seems that WAV is the prefered choice to build a music library in iTunes. From what I've read and understand it seems that WAV is the only 'unquestioned' format with regards to SQ?

What would be the 'risks' of doing so with regards to the tagging issues wit WAV? I've read things about embedded or tagged metadata? Or will you be heading for disaster sooner or later with a WAV library?

Also, will there be a significant difference in SQ between a WAV rip made with iTunes on a Mac and one made with a more sophisticated device/software (like a Naim rip).
Posted on: 04 August 2011 by pcstockton

Hook,

 

just use dbPoweramp Batch Converter and convert hundreds at a time for you iPod.  I do it for my iPhone regularly.  Then delete them.  It takes a few minutes to convert enough to fill it up.

 

-patrick

 

Posted on: 05 August 2011 by Tog
No real evidence that Aiff sounds any different to wav Flac sounds any different to alac Naim rips are better than iTunes/Asset/Ripit Folding speaker cables into an S makes a better sound That Currency Traders know what they are doing That margarine tastes like butter. Tog
Posted on: 05 August 2011 by Nickalexander0703
I was trying to get my head around converting my cd collection last year and didn't want to have to do it twice. After quite a bit of research and trial and error, I now have a qnap 259pro which I use to store my Flac files (ripped with dbpower amp). This has upnp so works well with a variety of streamers. When copying a cd I do one rip to the nas in Flac and one rip to the Pc using iTunes, it doesn't take long to do two rips and you then get the best of both worlds. Hope this helps - nick
Posted on: 05 August 2011 by pcstockton

Nick,

 

If you are simply making two copies of everything, most proper rippers will convert to MP3 and FLAC in the same rip.  No need to rip twice.

 

-p

Posted on: 05 August 2011 by Nickalexander0703
Yeah it is a bit backwards but it only takes a min or two for each one and they both are going to different places... Also if you have mp3's, iTunes then makes a copy into the iTunes folder so in effect you have a Flac copy, an mp3 version and an iTunes version the other way to avoid so much duplication is an app called 'Flac player' which let's you copy Flac straight into your iPhone.. Food for thought
Posted on: 05 August 2011 by Richwleeds
In an all Apple environment this is what I did.. Ripped or converted to aiff (most was apple lossless) in itunes Stored everything on a mac friendly Synology NAS with built in upnp server Added album art with an AppleScript that creates folder.jogs Stream from NAS to NDX via NStream with no transcoding needed Stream to rest of house using iTunes / AirPlay All working fine!
Posted on: 06 August 2011 by Nickalexander0703
Originally Posted by Richwleeds:

       

         class="quotedText">
        In an all Apple environment this is what I did..
Ripped or converted to aiff (most was apple lossless) in itunes
Stored everything on a mac friendly Synology NAS with built in upnp server
Added album art with an AppleScript that creates folder.jogs
Stream from NAS to NDX via NStream with no transcoding needed
Stream to rest of house using iTunes / AirPlay
All working fine!



That's the best plan I've heard, I'm surprised there isn't more of a standardised way of ripping music which companies like naim and linn recommend - it's still a bit of a grey area
Posted on: 06 August 2011 by Simon-in-Suffolk
Dare  I say ripping on a MS platform is straightforward and largely seamless using programs like EAC or  dBpoweramp. the latter I find very straightforward and helpful with regard to confirming or correcting metadata, art and rip integrity in creating Naim friendly WAV files.
Reading this forum, it would appear that ripping becomes a little more trial and error outside iTunes on the Apple platform. Perhaps you might want to consider a cheap MS laptop and use that as your ripper and NAS feeder? At 5800 ripped tracks and climbing using dBpoweramp, the only glitch I had was the meta data for one particular multi disc was completely wrong.
Simon
Posted on: 07 August 2011 by Tog

Can't understand where this idea that ripping is more complicated on OSX if you don't use witunes has come from at all. XLD can be configured in any way that you could reasonably want and is easily the equal of dbpoweramp.

 

If you can tie your own shoelaces - very straightforward.

 

Dare I say it - ripit on VB is also pretty effortless

 

Tog

Posted on: 07 August 2011 by likesmusic

Does XLD give the same choice of metadata providers as dBpoweramp?