Love my CDX2. But what about vinyl??
Posted by: Andib on 08 July 2017
After months of abstinence (only using my nds and bauer TT) I am once again very impressed by my CDX2. Just wow!! A very dynamic and "punchy" sound. And also warm and detailed - nearly a bit of everything to me..
But I never found a turntable with that CDX2 sound.. Is there any out there? I tried proJect expression and rpm5, rega P5 and RP10 (just lent 3 days), and bauer dps2 over the years. The "nearest" in that category to my ears was the RP10... But what would you say? Is there any TT masterpiece in this regard? Thank you for any recommendations.
analogmusic posted:and how much did the CDS2 cost.
Not 400 GBP that Mojo costs.
Fairer fight is Hugo with CDS2. Jury still out on that one.
Oh. I thought the argument was any dac with the chord super infinate tap filted would see off 10 year old dac technology. Well you live and learn.
yes fair point Filipe, personally as I posted earlier, the LP12 and Naim go very well together.... I don't think there is much doubt about that.
He asked for a turntable with CDX2 sound... I assume he is talking about a boogie factor, groovy sound, and it really is the LP12 for me, and many, many other Naimees, Naimoholics, whatever the Naim is.
I took a look at Andib profile, he has 4 turntables. All of a muchness, with not a suspended subchasis in sight. Although quality turntables.
Perhaps an old British subchasis turntable, LP12, Manticore or systemdek fitted with a good arm and Denon DL103 would produce the sound he’s after.
The manticore would probably give a more realistic presentati……… (NO, NO WHAT AM I SAYING ).
analogmusic posted:yes fair point Filipe, personally as I posted earlier, the LP12 and Naim go very well together.... I don't think there is much doubt about that.
He asked for a turntable with CDX2 sound... I assume he is talking about a boogie factor, groovy sound, and it really is the LP12 for me, and many, many other Naimees, Naimoholics, whatever the Naim is.
I would certainly have doubts about the cost of a top LP12. The Superline with SuperCap DR is silly money on its own and even the Stageline needs a good PS. The setup of these systems is another issue. I'm sure as many like their RP10 and when they use a Rega Aria they don't have frustrations getting the right capacitors etc. The Rega Aphelion cartridge when it's run in is amazing. The Rega stuff deserves the full Rega front end. It just works without hassle once it's run in.
I certainly find all my LPs over a wide range of genres sound amazing. Boogie and groovy are not in my vocabulary.
Phil (very British through and though - Filipe to confuse)
You'd be surprised how good an LP12 Klimax can sound with Superline and Supercap with some decent all analogue LPs. I might have thought the same a few years back. I bought my first LP12 in 1990 and have had an LP12 ever since. Not everyone's cup of tea I accept but there's always room for one in this house
Funny old hobby this isn't it? My mate across the lane spends a small fortune restoring his E-type drop head and can't get our hobby at all. Still at least I get to ride in the E-type from time to time - just an AM radio in that!
Innocent Bystander posted:Keler Pierre posted:i found a recent review of comparaison of: dave-hugo- berkeley reference dac and don't remember the last two. The reviewer found the dave very good, but little harsh on voices vs the berkeley...
John Atkinson, on june stereophile, preferred the meridian ultra dac, more realistic true tones colors and decay of notes.
Martin Colloms preferred the nds/555dr to chord dave: nds was more dynamic and had more prat.
To end, dave is a very good dac, yes. the best of all: no. better as high end vinyl: absolutely not.
I've never heard any of the current crop of high end vinyl above standard LP12: I presume there are differences between them, too, with some possibly preferred by some reviewers, and some by others? If so, none is absolutely the best.
Similarly I haven't heard the other high end DACs quoted, and assume that yes, indeed there will be differences, and some systems will be better suited to some DACs over others, which in part will depend on system and user preferences. But Dave, and possibly some or all of these others, and, I contend, even lowly Hugo, make music that can be every bit as involving as vinyl. I believe.
For me, the sound that now can be achieved by good digital mean that the limitations of vinyl outweigh its all-analogue signal path (assuming recorded in analogue) and somehow I doubt any high end turntable can remove the surface noise or restore the dynamic range. But of course, others will prefer the colouration of analogue, if that is not too strong a word, just as some prefer the colouration of various other bits of kit, whether that be a particular 'house sound' or a particular style of speaker. And as others have said there's nothing srong with that.
It's a myth that vinyl suffers from surface noise. As long as you don't mistreat them most are silent and even slight crackles on older albums can be cleaned up using a decent record cleaner.
Of the c600 albums I own all but a handful bought second hand have any discernable surface noise. As long as you hold them by the edge and keep them in poly inner liners they will remain pristine.
The only "limitation" of vinyl albums is that you have to get up half way through to turn them over.
Exercise!
Jonn posted:It's a myth that vinyl suffers from surface noise. As long as you don't mistreat them most are silent and even slight crackles on older albums can be cleaned up using a decent record cleaner.
Of the c600 albums I own all but a handful bought second hand have any discernable surface noise. As long as you hold them by the edge and keep them in poly inner liners they will remain pristine.
The only "limitation" of vinyl albums is that you have to get up half way through to turn them over.
Well, my experience is very different. Most of the 500 or so records that I collected had some discernible surfacenoise from the day they were bought (mostly new), and over time this increased, more so with the most played records. And no I am not talking about master tape hiss, or turntable rumble, and yes, I knew how to handle LPs properly from before my first purchase, and took great care both to handle correctly and place in the inner sleeve carefully. (In fact I discovered a source of inner sleeves that folded over the LP rather than having to slide in, and used those to replace many of the original inner sleeves). Very occasionally, despite careful handling, there would be occasional mishaps causing minor damage on some records (clicks or pops), however those could be ignored more than the feint but gradually increasing frying eggs and bacon sound, which on 30-40 year old albums that may have been played 100s of times
Yes, tracking and bias were properly set and weight correct, and I was particular about regularly changing the stylus. I was also very particular about cleaning, using a velvet cloth, later a velvet pad with carbon fibre leading bruch, and a 'dust bug', and a piezo antistatic gun etc. however, recent received wisdom suggests that the root cause of the majority of the surface noise may have been gradually ingrained dust despite my best efforts at cleaning, as I never had -through lack of awareness of need - a wet cleaner. I accept that it is possible that dirt may have been the cause, but it was indeed real, And I doubtbcompletely unique to me - and is something to which digital streaming is completely immune.
analogmusic posted:Je comprends, vous avez une affection avec le Vinyl, a certain Je ne sais quoi.
enjoy the sauna, I'm enjoying the music
By the way I'm listening to David Hallyday, the debut album,
on Vinyl
Vive la difference
i am listening more with my nds, because it is more funny, have not to clean my lp, take some time to choose a vinyl...and i am not discovering much new lps to hear. The turntable is only on special occasions now, but always a great moment!
If one day my digital rig will sound so good as vinyl for music recorded originally on lp, i will sell my turntable with no regrets.
fatcat posted:I took a look at Andib profile, he has 4 turntables. All of a muchness, with not a suspended subchasis in sight. Although quality turntables.
Perhaps an old British subchasis turntable, LP12, Manticore or systemdek fitted with a good arm and Denon DL103 would produce the sound he’s after.
The manticore would probably give a more realistic presentati……… (NO, NO WHAT AM I SAYING
).
for me the most dynamic and punchy turntables are direct drive. But it can not be always the case, like clearaudio innovation, very dynamic, but a bit clinical.
For Fremer, the most bombastic is the vpi direct drive, a 25 k rig. I would love to have it. New garrard 401 or 501, and also less expensive brinkman bardo.
Lp12 / ekos/ armagedon/ lyra also...
Jonn posted:Innocent Bystander posted:Keler Pierre posted:i found a recent review of comparaison of: dave-hugo- berkeley reference dac and don't remember the last two. The reviewer found the dave very good, but little harsh on voices vs the berkeley...
John Atkinson, on june stereophile, preferred the meridian ultra dac, more realistic true tones colors and decay of notes.
Martin Colloms preferred the nds/555dr to chord dave: nds was more dynamic and had more prat.
To end, dave is a very good dac, yes. the best of all: no. better as high end vinyl: absolutely not.
I've never heard any of the current crop of high end vinyl above standard LP12: I presume there are differences between them, too, with some possibly preferred by some reviewers, and some by others? If so, none is absolutely the best.
Similarly I haven't heard the other high end DACs quoted, and assume that yes, indeed there will be differences, and some systems will be better suited to some DACs over others, which in part will depend on system and user preferences. But Dave, and possibly some or all of these others, and, I contend, even lowly Hugo, make music that can be every bit as involving as vinyl. I believe.
For me, the sound that now can be achieved by good digital mean that the limitations of vinyl outweigh its all-analogue signal path (assuming recorded in analogue) and somehow I doubt any high end turntable can remove the surface noise or restore the dynamic range. But of course, others will prefer the colouration of analogue, if that is not too strong a word, just as some prefer the colouration of various other bits of kit, whether that be a particular 'house sound' or a particular style of speaker. And as others have said there's nothing srong with that.
It's a myth that vinyl suffers from surface noise. As long as you don't mistreat them most are silent and even slight crackles on older albums can be cleaned up using a decent record cleaner.
Of the c600 albums I own all but a handful bought second hand have any discernable surface noise. As long as you hold them by the edge and keep them in poly inner liners they will remain pristine.
The only "limitation" of vinyl albums is that you have to get up half way through to turn them over.
exactly, very low noise, only on beginning when there is no music. I am buying only near mint or mint original records at discog. But i must confess it is not dead quiet as digital. For me it is the only negative aspect.
Innocent Bystander posted:Jonn posted:It's a myth that vinyl suffers from surface noise. As long as you don't mistreat them most are silent and even slight crackles on older albums can be cleaned up using a decent record cleaner.
Of the c600 albums I own all but a handful bought second hand have any discernable surface noise. As long as you hold them by the edge and keep them in poly inner liners they will remain pristine.
The only "limitation" of vinyl albums is that you have to get up half way through to turn them over.
Well, my experience is very different. Most of the 500 or so records that I collected had some discernible surfacenoise from the day they were bought (mostly new), and over time this increased, more so with the most played records. And no I am not talking about master tape hiss, or turntable rumble, and yes, I knew how to handle LPs properly from before my first purchase, and took great care both to handle correctly and place in the inner sleeve carefully. (In fact I discovered a source of inner sleeves that folded over the LP rather than having to slide in, and used those to replace many of the original inner sleeves). Very occasionally, despite careful handling, there would be occasional mishaps causing minor damage on some records (clicks or pops), however those could be ignored more than the feint but gradually increasing frying eggs and bacon sound, which on 30-40 year old albums that may have been played 100s of times
Yes, tracking and bias were properly set and weight correct, and I was particular about regularly changing the stylus. I was also very particular about cleaning, using a velvet cloth, later a velvet pad with carbon fibre leading bruch, and a 'dust bug', and a piezo antistatic gun etc. however, recent received wisdom suggests that the root cause of the majority of the surface noise may have been gradually ingrained dust despite my best efforts at cleaning, as I never had -through lack of awareness of need - a wet cleaner. I accept that it is possible that dirt may have been the cause, but it was indeed real, And I doubtbcompletely unique to me - and is something to which digital streaming is completely immune.
in that conditions i understand that vinyl is not a joy! try discogs, you can have mint original sealed lps: it smells also so good. No noise at all. Or new lps remasters by mobile fidelity: fantastic. like santana:abraxas, pink floyd, miles davis : in a silent way... better than original, than dsd, than even sex( sometimes)...
Keler Pierre posted:Innocent Bystander posted:Jonn posted:It's a myth that vinyl suffers from surface noise. As long as you don't mistreat them most are silent and even slight crackles on older albums can be cleaned up using a decent record cleaner.
Of the c600 albums I own all but a handful bought second hand have any discernable surface noise. As long as you hold them by the edge and keep them in poly inner liners they will remain pristine.
The only "limitation" of vinyl albums is that you have to get up half way through to turn them over.
Well, my experience is very different. Most of the 500 or so records that I collected had some discernible surfacenoise from the day they were bought (mostly new), and over time this increased, more so with the most played records. And no I am not talking about master tape hiss, or turntable rumble, and yes, I knew how to handle LPs properly from before my first purchase, and took great care both to handle correctly and place in the inner sleeve carefully. (In fact I discovered a source of inner sleeves that folded over the LP rather than having to slide in, and used those to replace many of the original inner sleeves). Very occasionally, despite careful handling, there would be occasional mishaps causing minor damage on some records (clicks or pops), however those could be ignored more than the feint but gradually increasing frying eggs and bacon sound, which on 30-40 year old albums that may have been played 100s of times
Yes, tracking and bias were properly set and weight correct, and I was particular about regularly changing the stylus. I was also very particular about cleaning, using a velvet cloth, later a velvet pad with carbon fibre leading bruch, and a 'dust bug', and a piezo antistatic gun etc. however, recent received wisdom suggests that the root cause of the majority of the surface noise may have been gradually ingrained dust despite my best efforts at cleaning, as I never had -through lack of awareness of need - a wet cleaner. I accept that it is possible that dirt may have been the cause, but it was indeed real, And I doubtbcompletely unique to me - and is something to which digital streaming is completely immune.
in that conditions i understand that vinyl is not a joy! try discogs, you can have mint original sealed lps: it smells also so good. No noise at all. Or new lps remasters by mobile fidelity: fantastic. like santana:abraxas, pink floyd, miles davis : in a silent way... better than original, than dsd, than even sex( sometimes)...
As I indicated, I found most brand new albums had some surface noise, clearly normal- occasionally if particularly bad I'd return it to the shop and exchange for another, when usually better but sometimes a whole pressing would be bad.
Of course, I was able to ignore the surface noise on all but the worst records, but once digital became good it was so nice to be free of having to ignore it (except on vinyl that I ripped and still have in streamable form).
Having ripped all vinyl I sold my turntable about 7 or 8 years ago - with some sadness as it had served me well, but it went to a new home where it would be cherished.
I'm a bit worried that you think some LPs can be better than sex. Digital of course may be another matter...
Innocent Bystander posted:Innocent Bystander posted:Jonn posted:It's a myth ......
The only "limitation" of vinyl albums is that you have to get up half way through to turn them over.
Well, my experience is very different. Most of the 500 or so records that I collected had some discernible surface noise from the day they were bought (mostly new), and over time this increased, more so with the most played records. And no I am no.....
As I indicated..........
Of course, I was able to ignore the surface noise on all but the worst records, but once digital became good it was so nice to be free of having to ignore it (except on vinyl that I ripped and still have in streamable form).
Having ripped all vinyl I sold my turntable about 7 or 8 years ago - with some sadness as it had served me well, but it went to a new home where it would be cherished.
Posted by Pierre:
"exactly, very low noise, only on beginning when there is no music. I am buying only near mint or mint original records at discog. But i must confess it is not dead quiet as digital. For me it is the only negative aspect."
These are the reasons I sold my LP 12!
1986 ~ $1,486
2015 ~ $1,550 > Ittock/K 9 The Dog
The two things, I miss the most:
The matching Walnut Fluted TT with Fluted Briks, and the Status of owning, an LP 12!
I LOVE MY CDX2, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE TT!
Allante93!
fatcat posted:analogmusic posted:and how much did the CDS2 cost.
Not 400 GBP that Mojo costs.
Fairer fight is Hugo with CDS2. Jury still out on that one.
Oh. I thought the argument was any dac with the chord super infinate tap filted would see off 10 year old dac technology. Well you live and learn.
The Chord Dacs are about exceptional timing and resolution.
If you feel another CD player exceeds the performance of the mojo, good for you, your ears, YMMV, whatever etc etc etc.
People listen for different things, Mojo has been voiced for neutral frequency response, with exceptional timing.
Keler Pierre posted:exactly, very low noise, only on beginning when there is no music. I am buying only near mint or mint original records at discog. But i must confess it is not dead quiet as digital. For me it is the only negative aspect.
Indeed, its a myth that vinyl can be no noise on good replay equipment and good quality unworn vinyl. Sure it can be low noise and most dust cracks and pops can be removed with a good record cleaner - at least in my experience - but at the end of the day there is more noise compared non mechanical digital replay .. I guess the trick is to ensure the noise is at such a low level that it becomes inconsequential... but it is times in the music where there are deliberate extended pauses and quiet moments in live music and many classical pieces where the noise can detract ... but I think you can condition yourself to accept it - I did... mostly.
Indeed. If you're going to embrace vinyl you must also accept the inherent shortcomings; rumble, pitch variation, snaps and pops. As far as wearing of vinyl? I'm not certain that's much of a notable factor with well-cared-for LPs. As Simon suggests, a record cleaning machine ought to be considered an indispensable part of a vinyl system. Brand new or used, vinyl needs to be cleaned for best performance. Quality LP inner sleeves should also be part of that arsenal.
New discs always go through my VPI for a good clean and all are stored in nice Nagaoka inner sleeves.
analogmusic posted:People listen for different things, Mojo has been voiced for neutral frequency response, with exceptional timing.
It’s voiced to be smooth and warm.
I purchased the mojo because it IS smooth and warm. And that’s straight from the horses mouth.
From an interview by EAR with Rob Watts
“You say you tuned the Mojo to have a smoother sound”,
“Yes I wanted it smoother and warmer”.
That’s right, you read that correctly, Rob Watts said the mojo is Smooth and warm.
not sure what is your issue...?
it's only a 400 GBP DAC, what did you want 8000 GBP of Dave performance for 400 GBP?
You get what you paid for.
analogmusic posted:not sure what is your issue...?
it's only a 400 GBP DAC, what did you want 8000 GBP of Dave performance for 400 GBP?
You get what you paid for.
I don’t have an issue with warm and smooth, as I said, I bought it because it IS warm and smooth. Obviously you didn’t read that part.
I personally think warm and smooth is good, very good. I know others don't, but I do.
I Love My Cdx2, What about Vinyl?
Thought the following, might be interesting:
What is DMM-CD?
""A NEW FORMAT: THE STOCKFISCH DMM-CD/SACD
More and more music lovers are discovering the unique sound of a vinyl record. We have thought about whether it is possible just to make the sound creation factors of a vinyl record audible.
{A pressed record however has many artefacts arising from the vinyl pressing i.e. distortion, rumble, groove noise, vertical and lateral aberrations, clicks, etc. and other artefacts that are detrimental to a good sound.}
{Having said that, music lovers have already become accustomed to these disadvantages.}
We call our new production method "DMM-CD". With this solution, we can eradicate the aforementioned disadvantages of the pressed record - and yet still maintain the typical vinyl sound: ""
XRCD, K2-CD, SHM, HDCD, SACD/DSD, DMM-CD, HYBRIDS, or just good old Naim & Linn Mastering Techniques?
They're all 16/44.1 CDs. The mastering equipment differs or the disc material differs, but at the end of the day, the most important things are the mastering techniques employed and the tapes used.
Allante93!
PS. Just sharing Info.
This just in: The CD format isn't dead
It's starting to look like the CD will be cherished as the last physical digital music format.
well hopefully one day Blu-ray audio will be the de-facto standard, and we can all enjoy 192/24 bit audio for the price of a CD.
Not sure why the music industry is dragging this on, we can all enjoy hi-res audio, but.... they all need to do this at once, and force everyone to upgrade to this format.
MQA is the right step in that direction.
Innocent Bystander posted:Keler Pierre posted:Innocent Bystander posted:Jonn posted:It's a myth that vinyl suffers from surface noise. As long as you don't mistreat them most are silent and even slight crackles on older albums can be cleaned up using a decent record cleaner.
Of the c600 albums I own all but a handful bought second hand have any discernable surface noise. As long as you hold them by the edge and keep them in poly inner liners they will remain pristine.
The only "limitation" of vinyl albums is that you have to get up half way through to turn them over.
Well, my experience is very different. Most of the 500 or so records that I collected had some discernible surfacenoise from the day they were bought (mostly new), and over time this increased, more so with the most played records. And no I am not talking about master tape hiss, or turntable rumble, and yes, I knew how to handle LPs properly from before my first purchase, and took great care both to handle correctly and place in the inner sleeve carefully. (In fact I discovered a source of inner sleeves that folded over the LP rather than having to slide in, and used those to replace many of the original inner sleeves). Very occasionally, despite careful handling, there would be occasional mishaps causing minor damage on some records (clicks or pops), however those could be ignored more than the feint but gradually increasing frying eggs and bacon sound, which on 30-40 year old albums that may have been played 100s of times
Yes, tracking and bias were properly set and weight correct, and I was particular about regularly changing the stylus. I was also very particular about cleaning, using a velvet cloth, later a velvet pad with carbon fibre leading bruch, and a 'dust bug', and a piezo antistatic gun etc. however, recent received wisdom suggests that the root cause of the majority of the surface noise may have been gradually ingrained dust despite my best efforts at cleaning, as I never had -through lack of awareness of need - a wet cleaner. I accept that it is possible that dirt may have been the cause, but it was indeed real, And I doubtbcompletely unique to me - and is something to which digital streaming is completely immune.
in that conditions i understand that vinyl is not a joy! try discogs, you can have mint original sealed lps: it smells also so good. No noise at all. Or new lps remasters by mobile fidelity: fantastic. like santana:abraxas, pink floyd, miles davis : in a silent way... better than original, than dsd, than even sex( sometimes)...
As I indicated, I found most brand new albums had some surface noise, clearly normal- occasionally if particularly bad I'd return it to the shop and exchange for another, when usually better but sometimes a whole pressing would be bad.
Of course, I was able to ignore the surface noise on all but the worst records, but once digital became good it was so nice to be free of having to ignore it (except on vinyl that I ripped and still have in streamable form).
Having ripped all vinyl I sold my turntable about 7 or 8 years ago - with some sadness as it had served me well, but it went to a new home where it would be cherished.
I'm a bit worried that you think some LPs can be better than sex. Digital of course may be another matter...
it is an expression of Michael Fremer, when he heard the continuum caliburn turntable in his house. The sound was so good, the pleasure so strong, that he said " better than sex". Ii is not to be taken too seriously....
As for lps, new one are very often noisy and the sound is compressed. I am buying new original one, which are still sealed since 40 years! or near mint ones.
Today new vinyl: only mobile fidelity and analogue productions.
But i can understand that you prefer all digital, no problem....For now i prefer both, but tomorrow i don't know....
Allante93 posted:I Love My Cdx2, What about Vinyl?
Thought the following, might be interesting:
What is DMM-CD?
""A NEW FORMAT: THE STOCKFISCH DMM-CD/SACD
More and more music lovers are discovering the unique sound of a vinyl record. We have thought about whether it is possible just to make the sound creation factors of a vinyl record audible.
{A pressed record however has many artefacts arising from the vinyl pressing i.e. distortion, rumble, groove noise, vertical and lateral aberrations, clicks, etc. and other artefacts that are detrimental to a good sound.}
{Having said that, music lovers have already become accustomed to these disadvantages.}
We call our new production method "DMM-CD". With this solution, we can eradicate the aforementioned disadvantages of the pressed record - and yet still maintain the typical vinyl sound: ""
XRCD, K2-CD, SHM, HDCD, SACD/DSD, DMM-CD, HYBRIDS, or just good old Naim & Linn Mastering Techniques?
They're all 16/44.1 CDs. The mastering equipment differs or the disc material differs, but at the end of the day, the most important things are the mastering techniques employed and the tapes used.Allante93!
PS. Just sharing Info.
This just in: The CD format isn't dead
It's starting to look like the CD will be cherished as the last physical digital music format.
16/44 isn't dead, but cd , as lp, are more and more to find on used market...but i continue to buy cds and rip them on my unitserve. .. But you have to agree that there is less and less new cds in shops... ok, perhaps it is half dead. I would prefer alive completely...
I enjoy all formats, it gives just more music....My points on analog is only opinion on absolute sound and musicality. But i am not only turntable man....