Expensive Cables. Are they worth the Money?

Posted by: wenger2015 on 12 November 2017

Back in March this year I auditioned TQ Black Diamond Speaker Cables, they turned out to be extremely impressive.

To cut a long story short I ended up, after a lengthy home audition, purchasing a Brand new set of the top of the range Silver Diamond Speaker Cables.

Although they sounded good from the start, I have experienced a few lows from time to time over the weeks and months but gradually they have just got better and better. 

It’s been approximately 6 months now and ‘Wow’.....they are altogether on an another level, truly remarkable.....

So if anyone is contemplating the possibility of treating oneself to an Xmas gift and was wondering if these High End Cables are truly worth the significant outlay, rest assured in this case, with TQ SD they most certainly are. 

The exceptional reviews are no exaggeration. (eg hi fi pig )

I personally think in our enthusiasm to upgrade the boxes it’s the Cables we often compromise on.

Cables can provide a clear conduit to maximise the performance from whatever black boxes we have.

So has anyone made plans to splash out and upgrade the cables over the festive season?

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by TOBYJUG

I'm saving up for when they bring out cables with a clear gel jacket filled with star particles. You squeeze the cable at those points that corresponds with your room nodes and the Atmosflat.

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by Huge
MDS posted:
Huge posted:

My cables come out at 1.75%!

Ah, but have you factored in your own time spent on R&D and manufacture, Huge? 

And did all the people buying their cables factor in their time doing their research as to which cables to buy, their time assessing the potential purchase and any time listening to demos?

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by lyndon

Huge

why would they ??

if you bought a house for 500 grand, then it cost 500 grand, your stamp duty is on 500 grand not 500 grand plus your time and x’s

most of us would be doing this when we’re not at work so time is really irrelevant as a cost as there is no actual money lost

same applies to a car, pint of milk or even fancy cables 

lyndon

 

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by Huge

Lyndon,

The same equally applies to my time, hence my question.

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by lyndon

I think that only applies if your time spent looking at cables cost you money ie you took the morning off work

if it was a Saturday or Sunday when you wasn’t going to be working anyway then your time as a financial cost is irrelevant as you would only have been down the pub, playing golf, washing the car etc

 

lyndon

 

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by DUPREE
wenger2015 posted:

Good question Haim,

what is the percentage cost for cables in our systems???

who is willing to get the ball rolling? 

I have just got back from work so I will work mine out later and post

2.65%

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by TOBYJUG
lyndon posted:

I think that only applies if your time spent looking at cables cost you money ie you took the morning off work

if it was a Saturday or Sunday when you wasn’t going to be working anyway then your time as a financial cost is irrelevant as you would only have been down the pub, playing golf, washing the car etc

 

lyndon

 

I only look at cables on a bank holiday.    

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by Huge
TOBYJUG posted:
lyndon posted:

I think that only applies if your time spent looking at cables cost you money ie you took the morning off work

if it was a Saturday or Sunday when you wasn’t going to be working anyway then your time as a financial cost is irrelevant as you would only have been down the pub, playing golf, washing the car etc

 

lyndon

 

I only look at cables on a bank holiday.    And there are sometimes, when others that try and help me look at other things at other times

I'm retired!

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by TOBYJUG
Huge posted:
TOBYJUG posted:
lyndon posted:

I think that only applies if your time spent looking at cables cost you money ie you took the morning off work

if it was a Saturday or Sunday when you wasn’t going to be working anyway then your time as a financial cost is irrelevant as you would only have been down the pub, playing golf, washing the car etc

 

lyndon

 

I only look at cables on a bank holiday.    And there are sometimes, when others that try and help me look at other things at other times

I'm retired!

Good for you. **** them.

 

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by Kiwi cat

2.8%

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by yeti42

If you don't count bundled powerlines it’s around 2%, largely of un-bundled hi and powerline

Source first, cables last - and I still have the second source to sort before I muck about with cables.

Posted on: 22 November 2017 by Finkfan

I remember hearing a pair of TQ black diamond speaker cables that Wenger2015 had on demo, on my CDX2/SN combo. With my black diamond din, black and ultra blue mains cables the wires were nearly the same value as the boxes. It was the best I’d ever heard those 2 boxes sound. Currently my wires are about 15% of the system value. 

Posted on: 23 November 2017 by Adi Stefan

Yep cable dressing is very important, depends from system to system and on our tastes. I have a principle: if a system sound "good" with "stock" cables then worth to take a look at cable dressing. The meaning is if you have a system "matched" then go ahead, if not is hard to impossible to repair with cables whats wrong in a system.   

Posted on: 23 November 2017 by wenger2015
Finkfan posted:

I remember hearing a pair of TQ black diamond speaker cables that Wenger2015 had on demo, on my CDX2/SN combo. With my black diamond din, black and ultra blue mains cables the wires were nearly the same value as the boxes. It was the best I’d ever heard those 2 boxes sound. Currently my wires are about 15% of the system value. 

Yes, that was a revelation 

Posted on: 23 November 2017 by M37

Some would argue cables act as tone controls or frequency filter.  I had for some time “problems with boomy bass” and tried all sorts of “fixes”: different sources, positioning of speakers, spikes, damping feet, carpets and what not.

Then I tried different mains cable and I was astonished by the effect they had.

My experience is that they lower the distortion/ noise floor, making it easier to distinguish  different instruments and levels of details.

Lower frequencies become cleaner and with a better bass response you experience added space around instruments, allowing for a more “blacker background” if you like. 

But we can also look at it from another perspective. Are they worth it? Yes, I believe so. Because the cable manufactures “only” provide us with a tool to fully appreciate our beloved Naim electronics.

Posted on: 23 November 2017 by Allante93
wenger2015 posted:

Good question Haim,

what is the percentage cost for cables in our systems???

who is willing to get the ball rolling? 

I have just got back from work so I will work mine out later and post

My Living room System does not consist of any Brand new gear:

Year purchased & Model Year

93~ 1989/Briks - $3.5K - Brand new $7K

14~ 2008/282 - $3.4K

14~ 2014/HCDR - $1.6K

15~ 2012/250 - $3.4K

15~ 2011/250 - $3.0K

15~ 2015/250 - $4.0K

15~ 2008/Cdx2 - 1.7K

Passive Tri-Amped Briks

Total cost of System: $20.6K

Naim Lavender ~ $79

Linn K-20 ~ $221

300/20,600 = ?

Wow!

A very low percentage!

Enjoy Your Music!

You can't miss, what you never heard.

Allante93!

PS. Less than 1.5%

I think!

Posted on: 30 November 2017 by Finkfan

My TQ blacks cables have found a new home. New wires ordered. 

Posted on: 30 November 2017 by wenger2015
Finkfan posted:

My TQ blacks cables have found a new home. New wires ordered. 

Interesting Finkfan,  so which cables have you ordered?

Posted on: 30 November 2017 by Nina

New cost of my 3 Naim boxes would be £8,058 and cost of cables is £510 so that's 6.3%

The 5 Pin Din was free with both the Dac and the CD5XS so didn't count that

That rises to 12.6% if I take what I actually paid for the 3 Naim's vs cost of cables

Posted on: 30 November 2017 by Finkfan

Can’t say Wenger 

Posted on: 01 December 2017 by wenger2015

Having looked through most of the comments on this thread my conclusions are as follows......

How much we are prepared to spend on cables varies considerably. 

As for Black boxes, I don’t think anyone questions their value for money. Likewise with speakers.

How you link them together to extract the best performance ranges from homemade to bargain basement to does the job to extremely expensive???

For me, not investing in high quality cables is like buying a Porsche and running it on cooking oil.....

but everyone to their own....

Posted on: 01 December 2017 by Haim Ronen
wenger2015 posted:

Having looked through most of the comments on this thread my conclusions are as follows......

How much we are prepared to spend on cables varies considerably. 

As for Black boxes, I don’t think anyone questions their value for money. Likewise with speakers.

How you link them together to extract the best performance ranges from homemade to bargain basement to does the job to extremely expensive???

For me, not investing in high quality cables is like buying a Porsche and running it on cooking oil.....

but everyone to their own....

I don't understand the use of the term 'investing' for buying mass produced audio gear, especially cables, when there is never a monetary return, only depreciation. You just spend money or waste it on components.

For me, over spending on cables (out of proportion to source, amplification and speakers which I think are much more essential) is like buying Ferrari wheels to mount on a tiny Honda.

You are rushing into wrong conclusions. A lot of members question the value of the black boxes, avoiding some upgrades not because they cannot afford them but because the tiny increments in sound improvement do not justify the huge price increases. Personally, I think that the cost of the top NAIM gear (and I am not talking about the Statement) is just insane.

Wenger, you still didn't manage to find a single soul who meets the criteria of 30% spent on cables that your NAIM dealer recommended. Let us know when you find one and we will send you some flowers.

 

 

Posted on: 01 December 2017 by joerand
Haim Ronen posted:

I don't understand the use of the term 'investing' for buying mass produced audio gear, especially cables, when there is never a monetary return, only depreciation. You just spend money or waste it on components.

Agree. I've made the same point in the past. Replies indicate that some folks here are comfortable using 'invest' and 'purchase' synonymously.

I've never invested in audio gear. I've only ever bought it and kept it to depreciate, or sold it at a loss.

(This is where original owners of an Aro pipe in)

Posted on: 01 December 2017 by DrPo

Not 30% but currently just about 18% and making sense to my ears 

Posted on: 01 December 2017 by wenger2015

Haim Ronen, 

you use the expression  ‘only increments in sound’ between black box upgrades, that is most likely down to poor quality cables.

JoeRand, invest is not the best word to use, although black boxes do hold their value reasonably well, it’s more a case of making sure the boxes we buy work to the optimum level, hence the need for quality cables