NDX - input comparison with some unexpected results
Posted by: DrPo on 18 December 2017
I had yesterday at home two friends from my "audio" circle for a listening session after some recent key upgrades of my set up. We only listened to digital from my NDX+XP5PS using the same tracks from Tidal, USB flac rips and the digital input of the NDX fed by a basic MusicalFidelity CD transport. We did not try to listen to the same tracks from the NAS.
My understanding was that USB provides the best input to the streamers. However the results were quite different: best SQ was achieved from the digital input (i.e. using NDX as a DAC), followed by Tidal, and last, by quite some margin, the USB input. Although I am in general quite skeptic about such comparisons, on this occasion I think I must agree with my golden eared friends.
The above together with some recent posts on this forum but also some (recent again) reviews on top transport/players like the DCS Rossini where the reviewers find CD playback better than the "streaming" mode got me thinking. I cannot understand how can a mechanical and "real time" (as opposed to taking time to re-read and account for errors) reading device like a CD transport can achieve better sound quality than a buffered, non mechanical data stream.
I post this just in case someone has had similar experiences or bright ideas about what could the difference be attributed to.
Greg