Going active
Posted by: living in lancs yearning for yorks on 06 May 2018
Current system nds, 555, 52, sc, 300, SBLs. None of the above has been dr’d. I have ten shelves of Fraim, also lp12. In a fit of something, I am picking up a 250dr in a couple of days and also considering SL2s.
Contemplating going active. Not going to rush into anything but main options seem to be:
1. Trade 300 for second 250dr so I go active with 2x250dr. This is least cost / least shelves option, I could do sooner and could end up being end game (though I might always wonder what might have been if did 2x300)
2. Forget about active until I can go 2x300 (250dr then used elsewhere) - maybe next year
3. Go wonky active with 300 / 250dr as a stepping stone on the way to 2x300 - could later on trade towards a 300 (got it at v good price) or use elsewhere
Active 2x300 would def be the end game - mentally I could not cope with going 2x500
i think I would need a wall shelf for lp12 before I can house 2x300s
thoughts?
Nice write up on active journeys. And a journey it sure is. Mine seems comparatively straight forward. I had a passive 555/552/500/dbl system for over ten years. It was not until I had my 500 serviced and dred that I would think about going active. It was rather steep as I went straight to 3x500dr with snaxo/Scdr. The Investment is not insignificant as it includes six more boxes much more fraims more cables and quite some effort with proper setup. But for me absolutely worth the effort .
140 Credo
140 x 2 IXO Credo
140 x2 SNAXO Hicap Credo ( big jump, IXO was a bit rubbish on reflection)
140 x2 SNAXO Hicap SBL
140 x2 SNAXO Supercap SBL (stayed here for a long time)
250 x2 SNAXO Supercap SBL (fantastic system but a nice pair of SL2’s came along..)
250 x2 SNAXO Supercap SL2
250 x2 SNAXO Supercap SL2 plus Superlumina SNAXO cable.
Source and other changes from CDX to CDS3, HDX to NDS not included, not least as I am not quite sure when each happened.
I post this to show that active systems can indeed be thought of as a journey. Few if any of these steps were not worthwhile or enjoyable in their own right. The pleasure is seeing a whole new level of playing pleasure each time you set up. So I would not stop anyone stepping on the active ladder ‘low down’ and just having fun with it.
Bruce
Thanks, Bruce. Interesting.
Well I heard my first active system yesterday evening and it didn’t do anything for me. Now, by no means does that mean I don’t like active - there are far too many variables floating about. So the system I heard is source Hugo (if I have remembered that correctly), 52 and supercap (same as me), 2x250dr (300 here) and SL2s (SBLs here). The rooms are different too, of course - mine is L-shaped with stone floor (yesterday’s square with wood floor), my SBLs really are not set up optimally and I have quadraspire whereas yesterday evening’s system is on Fraim (my Fraim is all still in my study in the loft)
There was a harshness in higher notes / voices that on listening to the same tracks at home (particularly noticeable on the first track which was tidal-sourced - don’t know if that had anything to do with anything, the other tracks were on a local server via Roon) is this morning definitely not there on my own system. No idea if that is room-related or due to something else
possibly need to try a 200 with my 300, and 250dr with my 300 and another 300 with my 300. That’ll be a busy day! But going to get the room redecorated before all that - don’t want to do that after all has been set up and disturb it again
as an aside the 250dr that I picked up (at a stupid cheap price) is now playing between my UQ and nSats in my study. A couple of hours in it is a good improvement with hopefully more to come. And of course I need to try it out once run in downstairs in place of my 300 to understand the difference in sound between the 250dr and my (non dr) 300
I started with Nac 42.5, hicap , Nap 140 CD 3.5 and PSB gold stratus speakers, Upgraded to 72 and 250 and CDS2. Followed by a 82 and CDS3. When I found my NBLs I decided to try active and purchased 2 more Nap 250s. Upgraded to Nac 52 and had everything serviced. I do not plan on changing anything. More of everything in spades.
living in lancs yearning for yorks posted:There was a harshness in higher notes / voices that on listening to the same tracks at home (particularly noticeable on the first track which was tidal-sourced - don’t know if that had anything to do with anything, the other tracks were on a local server via Roon) is this morning definitely not there on my own system. No idea if that is room-related or due to something else
Perhaps the pots in the SNAXO were not set correctly? Apart from that I can't think of a reason why an active system should sound especially harsh.
I remember that my SL2s sounded very different in the system of their previous owner, an olive system with 52, 52PS (IIRC) and 2x250, still very good but much brighter.
Hopefully you can listen to another active system somewhere else. One is essentially on one's own when trying to demo an active Naim system.
I think the only thing I can do, practically, is have the dealer bring another 250dr (a local owner has a snaxo that he has offered to bring round) and I can then hear 2x250dr active with my speakers / NDS etc and in my own room.
I doubt it is the active that brought the harshness but I don’t know what it was that did - and I did not hear the wonder of active that people rave about, which is the important thing. It is possible that I don’t like the 250dr compared to my 300 - but I can test that at home now
I don’t think the harshness is due to being active - per se. It sounds like something is wrong with the setup you heard. Active SBLs using 250’s should give a very lively and exciting sound. It really benefits live performances (rock). I had that setup for a good time and I was adicted to seeking out live recordings.
The weakness to my ears, was in the bass performance. That being more a function of the SBL than anything else. That motivated my switch to DBL, which proved to be a very expensive move as I really needed to upgrade everything else. By comparison, DBL’s much more revealing than SBL.
Now I have finally managed to have a balanced system on 500’s, it is really performing and I get the energy of that “active sound” on pretty much all recordings. Something that the 500’s bring, but for the DBL, does not really come through with 250’s or 300’s.
I hope you enjoy the audition. It can be a very expensive journey - although the end point is great. Having run a wonky system for a long time leading up to this, it is really quite a compromise and I would avoid if you can. However, for me, the end justified the means.
Enjoy!
Thanks, Gavin. The harshness was present on the active SL2s / 2x250dr that I listened to (I should add the owner is very happy with them! We all hear things differently) but not on my own passive 300 / SBLs
the dealer I have been speaking to about going active has advised strongly against going wonky - though his partner suggested 300/250dr would work. Before I decide that I need to be persuaded that I should go active which means a trial at home with 2x250drs. If we can manage it, it should be worthwhile trying 250dr/300 as well even if I decide not to do. I am content to make the decision now, let the bank balance recover from recent spending, and keep my eyes peeled for another used 300 (non dr) and make the jump next year
in an ideal world I would have another 300 lying around to try 2x300...
I've never heard active 250Drs into SBLs, but I ran a 52/ 2X250/ SNAXO/HiCAP/Active SBL system for almost twenty years, and despite listening to many so-called superior alternatives I still preferred my system. It was only when I converted to 552/2X500/SNAXO/SC/ Active sL2s that I felt I'd achieved a substantially improved setup. First time I heard a properly set up pair of active DBLs was at Jon Honeyball's place, and what Immediately struck me about them was their similarity soundwise to SBLs, which figures when you consider they were designed to be SBLs with extra bass (and how!). They were nicknamed FBLs during their development...
tonym posted:They were nicknamed FBLs during their development...
Which might be why some people counselled you that a Rangie wasn't a suitable vehicle for collection....
:-)
Slight change of plan - am getting a second (non dr) 300, so no wonky! Still need a snaxo but not in a desperate rush...
....and a pair of SL2s have landed in my living room as a little diversion. I had tipped a local off to their availability - he bought them but decided they weren’t for him. They are sounding happier in my living room (single 300) than in his (active 2x250dr). Maybe it’s the 300? My room? Anyway, they are sounding rather ????
Great news! How was the set up?
Wasn’t too bad but still an hour or so to get them in place - Rob had done it in his home first. He acknowledges that a pro will probably do a better job than him but we have to have the room decorated first before I get a pro in to help!
Fab. Enjoy. They are phenomenal speakers, especially with a 300????
Thanks
Looking forward to photos.
Franz K posted:Gavin L posted:Running wonky active is something I have had a lot of experience with and I would advocate it as a means to an end. I would certainly recommend active with the 250/300, as a stepping stone to getting to 300/300.
If anyone is interested, my journey is below. Against conventional wisdom, I have always put the better speaker on the bass - which is a matter of taste. It is true, however you do it, it is very much a compromise. But there is something addictive about the pace active brings.
Now I have finally made it to 3x500, the biggest thing I notice is how it all comes together, fantastic PraT, and less of a tendency to listen to the system and more getting lost in the music.
BTW - fully endorse the comments on the SCDR for the SNAXO and the SL cable between the SC and the 52. It certainly is a journey...
CDI / NAC82 / NAP180 / SBL
CD2 / NAC82 / NAP180 / SBL
CD2 / NAC52 / SNAXO2-4 / NAP250 / NAP250 / SBL
CDS3+CD555PS / NAC52 / SNAXO2-4 / NAP250 / NAP250 / SBL
CDS3+CD555PS / NAC52 / SNAXO2-4 / NAP250 / NAP250 / SB
CDS3+CD555PS / NAC52 / SNAXO362 / NAP250 / NAP250 / NAP300 / DB
CDS3+CD555PS / NAC552 / SNAXO362 / NAP250 / NAP250 / NAP300 / DBL
CDS3+CD555PS / NAC552 / SNAXO362 / NAP250 / NAP300 / NAP500 / DBL
CD555 / NAC552 / SNAXO362 / NAP250 / NAP300 / NAP500 / DBL
CD555 / NAC552 / SNAXO362 / NAP300 / NAP500 / NAP500 / DBL
CD555 / NAC552 / SNAXO362 + SCDR / NAP300 / NAP500 / NAP500 / DBL
CD555 / NAC552 / SNAXO362 + SCDR / NAP300 / NAP500 / NAP500 / DBL + full SL
CD555 / NAC552 / SNAXO362 + SCDR / NAP500 / NAP500DR / NAP500 / DBL + full SL
Galvin,
a Little bit off topic but du you run a tt as well ..?
I have a Linn Axis TT. I did get it set up and had it sitting at the top if the stack (place now taken by the Arcam AIRDAC). I used it pre CDI, but not much for a long time.
I always hankered for a LP12 and thought if I used the Axis, I would treat myself. In turns out, I only used it a couple of times in the course of a year - so it is now relegated to some shelves. It could be added back in a few minutes - but it probably will not. The CD555 is pretty seductive given its quality. I might stream if there is something I haven’t got, but even that doesn’t happen often on the main system.
I have a CDI / 52/ SC / 250 / Kans in the lounge (just gone for servicing). That I mostly use for streaming, All the equipment is hidden in a cupboard. The setup is a bit of a compromise, but does the job.
(Apologies to the OP for the diversion)
No need to apologise, Gavin You have highlighted an issue that affects me - my TT is some way behind my NDS (some years ago I went for a cheap cartridge which with hindsight was not the best idea, though I was funds limited at the time) and I have had to decide if I want to keep my lp12 and bring it up to scratch. Which won’t be cheap. I am rather attached to it (had it 23 years so far) and I cannot bear to part with it and rather hanker after being able to buy vinyl now and again
living in lancs yearning for yorks posted:....and a pair of SL2s have landed in my living room as a little diversion. I had tipped a local off to their availability - he bought them but decided they weren’t for him. They are sounding happier in my living room (single 300) than in his (active 2x250dr). Maybe it’s the 300? My room? Anyway, they are sounding rather ????
Thats great news. Congratulations! They sure sing with a 300. isnt there a second 300 in the waiting for your active aspirations ..?
There is, Franz!
living in lancs yearning for yorks posted:There is, Franz!
Great, So bring it on get it going, fire those babies up and throw on your favouite pieces of music ????
No, seruotsly take your time and be careful with each step. It takes a lot of attention to detail to get an active system going for the first time. Best to do it together with somebody who is knowledgeable careful and trustworthy. But the reward should be a real revelation .. excited times ahead for sure ????
BTW ...what about a snaxo and a psu for it and more cabling ..?
Well franz you know I have the hicap - and I have some naca5 on the way but no snaxo / nazo. My wife has instructed me not to spend any more on the hifi after the SL2s though - which is a perfectly good and reasonable thing for her to say. So I may have to wait a while - I have to hold off for a month or two anyway as we are having the room decorated and I want to have that done before getting everything in place for active, and we have to finish the cinema room ...
i ran active 300s into SL2s for quite a while and I have very fond memories of this setup.
I recall I met you at a TomTom event and so I am pleased you are enjoying the elite club of SL2 owners :-)
enjoy
ken
Thank you, Ken! I remember “not quite” meeting you at that Tom Tom event - sadly the old “user name isn’t a real name” issue didn’t help at the time so i am unsure if we actually spoke. Anyway I have long admired your SL2s so it’s rather lovely to have a pair of my own