Unitiqute/Mac/album art

Posted by: tonyj on 02 October 2011

Hi I am new to the forums , this may have been answered already but I cannot seem to get the album artwork from my Mac / iTunes onto my iPad app . I am running a Unitiqute / allegro media server / Mac . I have talked to allegro about this and have used the import art work option in the AMS drop down menu but to no avail . can anyone help please .
Incidentally I used to run Eyeconnect and had endless trouble streaming my iTunes library , it would stop and not play whole albums and was painfully slow at accessing tracks but the AMS is way better and has cured all of those problems .
regards
Tony
Posted on: 03 October 2011 by 0rangutan

Hi Tony,

 

Neither Allegro or EyeConnect serve up artwork correctly.

 

Try Majestic from the Mac App Store.  This does artwork well, but has downsides of thrashing the disk occasionally when re-indexing and of listing some playlists alphabetically rather than as intended.  I am running the current iTunes beta however so this may be at fault.

 

Alternatively, Twonky also does artwork.

 

John

Posted on: 03 October 2011 by DavidDever

Take a look at Doug's Scripts, which have a variety of Mac-specific plugins for iTunes that will allow you to save iTunes cover artwork as a folder.jpg.

 

I'd also consider Logitech Media Server which, in tandem with the plug-ins above, should work fine as a media server with a smallish number of clients.

Posted on: 03 October 2011 by ScurvyPig

I'm new to the forums too.

 

I had a very similar experience to tonyj with Eyeconnect / Mac & itunes for decoding my ALAC files.

I bought an Apple TV which I connected to the unitiqute with an optical cable.

 

It now works perfectly. Very fast, no drop outs & all album art displayed.

 

I can detect no discernible difference in audio quality either although I can't pretend that I have particularly tuned in ears

 

Posted on: 03 October 2011 by Guido Fawkes

The Apple TV upsamples - so what comes in does not equal what goes out. 
Apple TV converts all audio to 16-bit/48KHz. 


Does this matter .... no, not one jot in my view. 

If you can hear no difference then this is purely for information as in your system it is totally benign. 

I don't have tuned ears either (wonder if can upgrade them). 

 

I tend not to care about things when I can't hear a difference. 

Though bit perfect for some seems the holy grail of digital audio: strange when so many use upsampling DACs these days (this forum is much more sensible and claims about magic ripping process have long since vanished from its pages). 

 

ALAC files seem to be troublesome for some music streamers: of course not the ATV which being Apple works perfectly will the Apple format. Sonos players work well too. 


ATV is a really neat device, I have one as well. 

The UQ is superb and one of the most amazing products Naim has made. 


I've never really got streaming through UPnP to work with my Apple kit (I don't think I'm alone) so I have been moving my files to FLAC on a Vortexbox, which is Naim, Sonos and Apple friendly (at least so far). Vortexbox software is free, but needs dedicated hardware.   


All the best, Guy

Posted on: 03 October 2011 by rhr

The last 2 weeks I've been trying Serviio, I haven't tried the OS X version, but the Linux version seems fine, could be worth a trial on your Mac.

Posted on: 03 October 2011 by james n

Tony,

 

Try Playback from Yazsoft. You can download a demo before buying to see if it's right for you.

 

It served up my iTunes library without any major issues but i did find a few CD's where artwork wasn't shown.

 

I ran a small iTunes utility called embed artwork on the problem albums and this sorted the artwork.

 

James

Posted on: 03 October 2011 by james n
Just tried Majestic, albeit with just eLyric on my iPad - very quick and responsive. Better than playback. Tried Allegro as well but that was so sloooooooowwww it's gone in the trash already. Thanks for the heads up John.

James
Posted on: 03 October 2011 by tonyj
Thanks for all the replies chaps . Would Dougs Scripts work with Allegro?? I would like to if I could keep AMS as it works so well and after my Eyeconnect disaster am reluctant to change , in saying that does Twonky work well , accessing tracks quickly and playing whole albums ??
I could try Logitech too . I wish Apple and Naim would talk more as not everyone is going to fork out for an Nserve .

Thanks
Tony
Posted on: 03 October 2011 by tonyj
is there a consensus on the best media server to use with ITunes ?  One that accesses tracks quickly , works well off the iPad and displays artwork .

Tony
Posted on: 03 October 2011 by Guido Fawkes

I'm not sure I completely understand the question, but the Vortexbox is the best music server I have ever used and it works with iTunes. So you get the iTunes interface if you want, it works with other players like Sonos and Logitech too. You can also use its own built in player. If you use an iPad with iTunes then you'll see all the artwork, same goes for Sonos. I've not got anything from Logitech so can't comment on that, but I've read good reports. If there is something another music server can do that a Vortexbox can't then it is not something I've ever found a need for. 

 

Doug's Scripts are Apple Scripts for iTunes. They manipulate files within the iTunes structure. I have only used a few of them, but when they change things that alter tags with AIFF for example then they stay altered so any other player accessing the files will reap the benefit. The ones I have used just do what I could do myself manually through the iTunes interface, except at about 100 times the speed which is the whole point. 

 

I'm delighted with my set-up Vortexbox/W4S Sonos ZP90/Naim DAC - 555PS. It is quick enough for mewhen used with an iPad and the SQ is excellent. Only downside is it doesn't do hi-res. However, I can feed my DAC hi-res with a USB stick. 

 

The Sonos without W4S Cullen mods works faultless with my music storage whether on a Vortexbox or Apple computer. 

 

I'm not sure if that answers your question. If you have an old PC you can sacrifice then you can install Vortexbox for free and see if it does what you want. 

Posted on: 03 October 2011 by Steven Shaw

I can vouch for Majestic streaming an iTunes folder on a MacBook pro to a unitiqute. 

 

I'm very pleased now since I have a lot of stuff on my mac in iTunes that I haven't got ripped to flac on my nas.

 

Thanks for that Orangutan.

Posted on: 04 October 2011 by 0rangutan

Assuming that you aren't using a NAS and do want to use iTunes (which accounts for many Mac users I think), then there is still no single perfect UPNP server for OS X.  You need to choose which compromises work best for you.

 

For example (and all based on my experiences only!):

 

EyeConnect:  Slow, no artwork in N-Stream, no FLAC support, but stable and transcodes ALAC to WAV on the fly

Majestic:  Fast, artwork in N-Stream, disk intensive and only transcoding to MP3

Playback:  Fast, no artwork in my case, streams FLACs really well including HiRes, no ALAC support

Twonky:  Fast, artwork, flakey and inconsistent iTunes support

 

Having played with each (and others like Allegro, Rivet, Songbook, Kinsky), I have eventually settled on using Playback.  This is because I use iTunes plus a seperate folder of HiRes FLACs and can live without artwork in N-Stream.  Playback fits well for this combination.

 

You can also run two or three of these servers at once if you like and just use the one that matches your need at the time.

Posted on: 04 October 2011 by james n

Unfortunately (and Majestic is close) none of these match the Chorus DS server which seemed to offer the best integration with iTunes but only works with the Linn DS players.

 

A UPnP plug in for iTunes and the ability to use the iTunes Remote app on the iPad would be rather nice

 

James

Posted on: 04 October 2011 by Tog

M Fawkes speaks truth

Vortexbox + nStream just works

 

Tog

Posted on: 04 October 2011 by tonyj
I tried Majestic last night , it brought the artwork over was fast at selection but would not play the song . I forgot to mention all my sngs are ripped in wav .
I agree with Orangutan and need to find the server that works the compromises best , so far I would go with Allegro , fast , reliable , nice track name layout , but no artwork .
What do you mean when you say Majestic is " disk intensive" and what do you mean when you say it " transcodes to MP3"??

After seeing the artwork on my iPad I realize I could live without it in favor of other factors .
Cheers
Tony
Posted on: 04 October 2011 by james n
Tog - fair enough but it doesn't really provide a solution of us who run a large iTunes library and want to keep it for music management. I've had a good solution for my Linn setup and hopefully Majestic will do the job nicely with n-stream.

The Vortexbox appliance is rather neat though.

James
Posted on: 04 October 2011 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by james n:
large iTunes library

what is that???? iTunes choked on my library like 6 years ago.  Just importing my MP3s only bogs it down.

Posted on: 05 October 2011 by james n

2000 odd CD's seems a pretty large library to me. I dont waste time with MP3's so haven't had any problems  ?

Posted on: 05 October 2011 by 0rangutan

20,000+ files in my iTunes library, including 250 films, many in HD.  Never stumbles.

 

TonyJ - I noticed that if I ever update iTunes, the Majestic process that updates its index seems to send the CPU high and thrash the disk for some time.  I suspect this is not well optimised for small changes so just indexes the lot each change.  Playback and EyeConnect must use an alternative approach as they stay up to date with iTunes content without this issue.

Re. transcoding, Majestic can optionally transcode files for you so that they are presented to your client (Qute in your case) as mp3 on the fly.  The options are under the General tab, however it is always mp3, even at high quality.  By way of comparison, EyeConnect will convert to WAV instead, creating more network traffic but maintaining the highest sound quality.

Posted on: 05 October 2011 by pcstockton
Originally Posted by james n:

2000 odd CD's seems a pretty large library to me. I dont waste time with MP3's so haven't had any problems  ?

I waste time with MP3s to load up my iOS devices with some local files.  Just in case I am out of 3G range (in the mountains), and cant access ALL of my music at home.

 

2000 cds???  Really?  Screenshot please! That  would be what, 80K-100K songs?  I dont buy it.  Maybe my PC just isn't fast enough.

 

My buddy has finally hit the performance limit at about 50K songs on his top-spec Mini.  It takes about 15 seconds for it to draw all album art on the screen, and there is PLENTY of swirling ball of death just scrolling around.  Plus, retagging takes forever.

 

He confirmed what I ran into a long time ago.  No he is investigating other players.  But as he is on a Mac there aren't any decent options (which I find bizarro).

 

Do you have any suggestions for him?  Does iTunes require self-organizing the library at this point (he doesn't), or some other different setting?

 

-patrick

Posted on: 05 October 2011 by Tog
Best approach to Vortexbox is to build your own intel based server - huge amounts of fun. As for transcoding if Majestic transcoded to mp3 where does that get you? EyeConnect serves up wav to UPnP but it's so clumsy what is the point? Tog
Posted on: 05 October 2011 by james n

Patrick - Not quite sure how you get 80 to 100k songs from 2000 CDs ?

 

Anyway just had a look and i've not got quite as much as i first thought (the other half would disagree!) -  1333 CDs which equates to 15230 songs. To match your buddy i'd need on average 5-6000 CDs so i think iTunes will cope for now 

 

Tog - i don't find fiddling with computers a lot of fun, let alone building one (although i did build a ZX80 once). That's why i've got a Mac. 

 

James

Posted on: 05 October 2011 by Lontano
73,000 songs in my itunes library and all works fine for me.....
Posted on: 05 October 2011 by Tog
I've got four Macs at the last count and have a long long history with Apple since the 80s. They look lovely but what really distinguishes them is the software - iPhone would be a glorious glass paperweight without iOS. The hardware is a glittery distraction - the real genius is the software. Vortexbox is a great collection of software that needs very tweaking - the hardware is simple to build and fun but you don't have to build your own if you would rather stick with VB Europe's increasingly attractive lineup. Tog
Posted on: 05 October 2011 by james n
Glittery or not. They just work which appeals to me. Tog, with you being the VB expert on here. If I had on of these sat on my network could i see it from my mac running iTunes and then just import ripped CDs from the VB into iTunes ?

James