Chailly Beethoven set

Posted by: JeremyB on 05 January 2012

I know this has been mentioned in other posts in passing but I got it as a Christmas pressie and really like it. It is really different from other sets I have heard, and any live concerts come to that. I especially like the way the overtures are located in roughly the right places chronologically for the time of composition, and the fact that you can easily listen straight through all nine in sequence.
Posted on: 11 January 2012 by EJS
I have a soft spot for Haitink's 2nd set with the Concertgebouw, which includes a great ninth. Also very good sound (George: ESLs were used by the recording and balance engineers) Cheers EJ
Posted on: 11 January 2012 by Chris G

What a wonderful and fascinating thread!  There isn't THE definitive cycle of Bven 1-9 as apparent from the differing views.  I personally immensely enjoy Osmo Vanska with the Minnesota on BIS - fine playing, quick performances but offering to my ears more than Chailly, Vanska provides insights not apparent in many other performances, also superb SACD sound.  Recent cycles from Krivine, Paavo Jarvi, and Thielemann are also worth hearing.  The Chailly is very exciting but a little hard - I feel he misses some of the lyrical aspects of the symphonies and some of the playing sounds a little confused on occasion.  The Thielemann is a much more romantic approach, but just listen to the expressive qualities and magical playing of the Vienna Phil - makes one realise how much can be missed by the "authentic" approach to interpretation, and I say this despite being an advocate of period performance.  A wonderful older set is the Karl Bohm with the VPO, or if you want original instruments, don't forget Norrington and Hogwood.

Posted on: 11 January 2012 by EJS
Originally Posted by Chris G:

What a wonderful and fascinating thread!  There isn't THE definitive cycle of Bven 1-9 as apparent from the differing views.  I personally immensely enjoy Osmo Vanska with the Minnesota on BIS - fine playing, quick performances but offering to my ears more than Chailly, Vanska provides insights not apparent in many other performances, also superb SACD sound.  Recent cycles from Krivine, Paavo Jarvi, and Thielemann are also worth hearing.  The Chailly is very exciting but a little hard - I feel he misses some of the lyrical aspects of the symphonies and some of the playing sounds a little confused on occasion.  The Thielemann is a much more romantic approach, but just listen to the expressive qualities and magical playing of the Vienna Phil - makes one realise how much can be missed by the "authentic" approach to interpretation, and I say this despite being an advocate of period performance.  A wonderful older set is the Karl Bohm with the VPO, or if you want original instruments, don't forget Norrington and Hogwood.

Chris, can you share some more thoughts on Vanska vs Krivine?

 

EJ

Posted on: 11 January 2012 by George Fredrik
Originally Posted by EJS:
I have a soft spot for Haitink's 2nd set with the Concertgebouw, which includes a great ninth. Also very good sound (George: ESLs were used by the recording and balance engineers) Cheers EJ


Dear EJ,

 

Quite apart from the monitoring equipment,[which is certainly the best!], I can believe that Haitink would lead performances that are both lucid, and passionate. Beethoven needs both to really come across. The trouble with some performances is that the conductor mistakes passion for surface fire!

 

I'll watch out for these. What is the year or years of publication, please?

 

ATB from George

Posted on: 11 January 2012 by EJS
Originally Posted by George Fredrik:
Originally Posted by EJS:
I have a soft spot for Haitink's 2nd set with the Concertgebouw, which includes a great ninth. Also very good sound (George: ESLs were used by the recording and balance engineers) Cheers EJ


Dear EJ,

 

Quite apart from the monitoring equipment,[which is certainly the best!], I can believe that Haitink would lead performances that are both lucid, and passionate. Beethoven needs both to really come across. The trouble with some performances is that the conductor mistakes passion for surface fire!

 

I'll watch out for these. What is the year or years of publication, please?

 

ATB from George

George,

 

Around 1986, made in commemoration of the Concertgebouw's centennial and one of Haitink's last projects as principal conductor of the RCO. The two main characteristics are Haitink's firm grasp of the structure and direction of the music (and it is indeed lucid), and his ability to let the music speak for itself. 

 

Cheers,

 

EJ

Posted on: 11 January 2012 by George Fredrik
Originally Posted by EJS
George,

 

Around 1986, ... two main characteristics are Haitink's firm grasp of the structure and direction of the music (and it is indeed lucid), and his ability to let the music speak for itself. 

 

Cheers,

 

EJ

 Dear EJ,

 

Such characteristics make for grand recordings, as well as satisfying cincerts in my view.

 

Thanks from George

Posted on: 12 January 2012 by Chris G

EJ: the Krivine is a much smaller orchestra using original instruments so the pitch is slightly different and the orchestra produces a thinner more shrill sound which allows more detail to be heard.  The recording is quite close so despite the smaller orchestra the sound has impact but can get a little tiring on repeated listening.  Tempi are mainly very quick and the performances are very exciting and dynamic.  Well worth exploring, but I wouldn't recommend this as your only complete set of 'the nine'.  The Vanska is a bigger orchestra, a slick (in the best sense) and well drilled highly accomplished orchestra, and Vanska is similarly often quick (usually not perhaps as quick as Krivine) and the performances initially don't have quite the impact but do bear much repeated listening.  Either way there is plenty to explore in both sets and each conductor brings his own interpretation to the performances each showing insights not always apparent elsewhere.  Both are worth exploring - you can't have too many sets of the Beethoven nine!  Good luck and let me know your reaction if you hear either.  The complete Krivine set can be heard on Spotify as can Symphonies 2&7 from Vanksa.

 

Haitink with the LSO is another fine cycle, as is Szell with the Cleveland Orchestra.  I echo earlier sentiments about Carlos Kleiber - his performances of 5,6&7 are amongst the best in the catalogue - what a tragedy that he didn't record the remainder.

Posted on: 12 January 2012 by EJS

Thanks Chris - I think a band and conductor need to bring something really special to the table to offset the reduced orchestra, now that the novelty of HIP has worn a little. Immerseel and Krivine, but also the old Norrington.

 

Cheers,

EJ

Posted on: 12 January 2012 by graham55

Chris, Carlos Kleiber was an unmatchable genius.

 

You can get his Beethoven Fourth in two forms: as a CD, on Orfeo, with the Bavarian State Orchestra, in a live recording from Munich; or as a Philips DVD, in a live recording with the Amsterdam Concertgebouw Orchestra (coupled with the Seventh, see below).

 

His Beethoven Vienna PO Fifth is available on CD from DG, now coupled with the Seventh, see below. It used to be available as a single DG LP. If you try hard, you may be able to find a live bootleg from one of his two concerts with the Chicago SO.

 

CK only ever conducted the Pastoral once in his life, with the Bavarian State Orchestra, available on CD from Orfeo. It's remarkable that this moment in time exists on tape at all. 

 

He left behind three (!) recordings of the Seventh: the famous VPO account now coupled with the Fifth on DG, the old LP no longer being available; a live account with the Amsterdam Concertgebouw on the Philips DVD mentioned above; and a live Bavarian State Orchestra account on CD on Orfeo.

 

It was an absolute frigging tragedy that Carlos Kleiber left behind so few recordings, but we should rejoice in the few that he made! 

Posted on: 12 January 2012 by JeremyB


So my favourite Choral is that done in the Festival Hall in 1960 by the Philharmonia and Klemperer. Live recording on Testament. I very much want to get the Vienna Cycle [with the Philharmonia] also from 1960, which altogether was quite possibly also the high water mark of Klemperer's career.

ATB from George


George, thanks for the reply. Comparing the Testament RFH 1961 with the Vienna Festival 1960 tonight. Apart from the cast (2 GREAT casts by the way Lipp/Boese/Wunderlich/Crass vs Christa Ludwig/Richard Lewis -hello the RFH is much more polished and I have to say smoother  throughout whereas the Vienna starts quite rough but after a fantastic but probably way too slow for some adagio reaches all sorts of warm, powerful and contemplative places in the super long finale.  I actually prefer the Vienna Festival performance, to use the hifi cliche of space around the instruments as an analogy there is more time between different parts especially in the first movements - yet another dimension I hadn't noticed before adding even more to the drawn-in feeling. Glowing fInale too.
Posted on: 13 January 2012 by George Fredrik

Dear Jeremy,

 

In a month or two it is my plan to get the Vienna Cycle from 1960, which will make three performances apiece of each symphony by Klemperer! Sounds mad, but they all bring something special out in the music, and though Klemperer always came at the music from a thorough re-examination of the score each time, he was never quite the same twice in performance, and these differencves are suprisingly significant in alterring the listeners perspective of the music from the various performances.

 

Over along period there is a significant aspect of evolution in his performances as well ...

 

Maybe when I get the Vienna cycle I'll start a thread on it.

 

ATRB from George

Posted on: 14 January 2012 by EJS

Listened to symphonies 1 - 6 today, after a long time. I'd forgotten how good this set is, amazed at how Bernstein keeps the tension going almost unflaggingly (the first movement of the 3rd starts a bit tepid, but that's as far as it goes. Even #5, in which Bernstein underlines the famous four note motif in neon colors, works much better than I remember it to.

 

Cheers,

EJ

Posted on: 15 January 2012 by JeremyB
Received the parvo jarvi in the mail today. Went straight to 9 then 5. I have to say this is probably the finest vinyl I own, I now understand the problem with cd, the distortion is just too high unless the recording is almost completely compressed. With this set the sound has a dynamic range I have not heard before on vinyl, I was able to turn up the volume to almost 10 o'clock - the highest classical level I have been able to set. The vinyl is so good that I realized my TT setup is fine, there is really no speed stability issue and no distortion problem that I had suspected.
As we have been discussing there are differences in the performances. With this lp set these differences become irrelevant, the playing is so close to a live performance I think it will be sufficient to listen over and over to fully appreciate the works and no longer bother about performance differences. For me this is the one to get if you want to fully investigate these symphonies as a non-musician and has exceeded all my expectations.

I know this is expensive however it is worth every penny. Thanks kuma for letting me know about his wonderful lp set.
Posted on: 15 January 2012 by JeremyB
Originally Posted by JeremyB:

       

         class="quotedText">
        Received the parvo jarvi in the mail today. Went straight to 9 then 5. I have to say this is probably the finest vinyl I own, I now understand the problem with cd, the distortion during low level passages is just too high unless the recording is almost completely compressed. With this set the sound has a dynamic range I have not heard before on vinyl, I was able to turn up the volume to almost 10 o'clock - the highest classical level I have been able to set. The vinyl is so good that I realized my TT setup is fine, there is really no speed stability issue and no distortion problem that I had suspected.
As we have been discussing there are differences in the performances. With this lp set these differences become irrelevant, the playing is so close to a live performance I think it will be sufficient to listen over and over to fully appreciate the works and no longer bother about performance differences. For me this is the one to get if you want to fully investigate these symphonies as a non-musician and has exceeded all my expectations.

I know this is expensive however it is worth every penny. Thanks kuma for letting me know about his wonderful lp set.
Posted on: 17 January 2012 by EJS

Norrington's budget set with the London Classical Players arrived today. First spin, starting with symphony 5, so it's early days, but first impression is extremely good - exactly what the doctor ordered. 

 

Cheers,

EJ

Posted on: 17 January 2012 by graham55

Quite extraordinarily underpowered, from the extracts that I've heard, so wouldn't touch them with a bargepole!

Posted on: 17 January 2012 by EJS
Originally Posted by graham55:

Quite extraordinarily underpowered, from the extracts that I've heard, so wouldn't touch them with a bargepole!

That's how I felt for a long time, but I'm glad I took the gamble. Listened to 5, 6 and 9 straight through, and must say the music and performances struck me as fresh and just right. With the new Chailly and the old Norrington, I've really started to appreciate the symphonies like I never did before, even finding a renewed appreciation for my old favorites.

 

EJ

Posted on: 18 January 2012 by mrclick
Originally Posted by kuma:

Jeremy,

 

Are you going to get the new Impex Records Paavo Jarvi Beethoven 9LP box set?

And- Posted by graham55:

"But you need to start somewhere, David, so (not having heard the recent Chailly set).... 

Once you have that (or, say, the Chailly or Norrington, or whoever) and have listened to them closely, it's important that you buy another set, or two/three/four. Because unlike, say, Led Zeppelin IV or Abbey Road, where we have definitive recordings from the music's creators, we have to rely on individual conductors and orchestras to interpret and recreate Beethoven's scores composed some two centuries ago...."



What an intriguing thread this is turning out to be. Mindful of graham55's post I have now taken delivery of the Chailly set. And to keep JeremyB company I have also got a copy of the Jarvi  LP set, which Kuma introduced into the mix.

 

JeremyB has ably commented on the Jarvi box, but I wanted to add a couple of words about that, and in general.

 

First generally about performance. I appreciate I am not a credible commentator as a classical newbie. So this is really just to indicate I have now "got it" and understand that different conductors bring something different to the table. I have four versions of the 9th:

1) Karajan Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra on Deutsche Gramaphon LP

2) Konwitschny Gewandhaus Leipzig on Fontana LP

3) Chailly on CD

4) Jarvi on LP.

 

Karajan is the slowest and 'smoothest'. The Konwitschny has 'the big sound'. It interests me because it is Gewandhaus like the Chailly. The band may even have some Mum's/Dads of the current crew! Much slower in both speed, attitude, and tightness. Konwitschny uses heavy diminuendo. More sentimental in a way.The Chailly is at pace, tight, big, exciting. I like it no question. So far the Jarvi has it though. Nearly as fast, extremely vibrant, and with more luscious detail of the playing and counter melodies. The timings come in only a few seconds longer than the Chailly. Smaller band though so not as, well - big. But exciting and gorgeous.
 
The Jarvi Deutsche Kammerphilharmonie Bremen is around half the orchestra size compared with the Chailly and I suspect some of the points ChrisG drew out about the Krivine apply.
 
Why then does the Jarvi stand out so much? It may be about the recording to some extent. As JeremyB says  "...there are differences in the performances. With this LP set these differences become irrelevant"....
 
So a word about the recording. I feel on safer ground here because I have experience with this aspect. 
 
The dynamic range is extraodinary. Quiet is quiet, and loud is loud. It is really vibrant. I think quite close miked so there is a lot of detail. When the timpani play you can read the words on the drumheads. With the Chailly it is like having 1st class seats, about 5 rows back in a great hall with a great orchestra. With the Jarvi you feel as though you are standing in the place of the conductor. It is simply wonderful.
 
The LPs are quiet, flat of course. Not only were the performances mastered specially for LP, but mixed in analogue specifically for this LP set also. The original recording is digital, but this has been lovingly and expertly set up for LP.
 
The packaging is great. Traditional heavy card box but all kept in a strong plastic wallet for extra protection.
 
Thank you JeremyB, and Kuma.
 
Best regards
David

 

Posted on: 21 January 2012 by JeremyB
Originally Posted by EJS:

       

         class="quotedText">
       

Listened to symphonies 1 - 6 today, after a long time. I'd forgotten how good this set is, amazed at how Bernstein keeps the tension going almost unflaggingly (the first movement of the 3rd starts a bit tepid, but that's as far as it goes. Even #5, in which Bernstein underlines the famous four note motif in neon colors, works much better than I remember it to.

 

Cheers,

EJ



EJS thanks for the reminder, I didn't listen to this for a while but you prompted  me to dig it out and it is even better than I remember, the playing is so consistent and the whole set really satisfies, for some reason it is my favorite set to take when traveling even more than the Immerseel in fact. The distraction from audience noise is very low for a live recording.
Posted on: 21 January 2012 by graham55

Glad to see that a couple of you agree with my recommendation, almost two weeks ago, of the Bernstein set!

Posted on: 25 January 2012 by JeremyB
Sorry Graham I should acknowledge your post did encourage me to get out the Bernstein in the first place, I was to busy at that time faffing around trying to reply with my new ipad and forgot to mention that.