Steven Hester's Bonus

Posted by: Calum F on 01 February 2012

I would have paid the new RBS guy his £ 1M bonus. He has been charged with turning around RBS and if successful in returning even a small part of the BILLIONS we have locked up is a million not pocket change ? Far too much hysteria for me about bonuses but good that Goodwin is no longer Sir.... 

Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Don Atkinson
Originally Posted by Paper Plane:

I don't care what job a person does, nobody, repeat, nobody, deserves to earn that amount of money.

 

steve

lots of people are worth £1m+ pa and they know it.

 

Cheers

 

Don

Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Tony2011

So you think he should be working Mon-Fri and earning £8.50/h while shareholders share a few billions among themselves. Oh, yes. They have names for these people: they are called cashiers.

RBS got a bargain.

75K?  Be serious!

There's a link somewhere in this forum for Jokes.

 

 

 

Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Exiled Highlander
Tony, It's OK. Appoint Bob Crow to lead RBS and cut his salary to £75K. Clearly leading the RMT is twice as valuable to the country as leading RBS. Cheers Jim
Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Calum F
Originally Posted by George Fredrik:
Originally Posted by Exiled Highlander:
Dear Jim,

 

It is Naim's Forum. If it were only a rich person's forum, then I would definitely not be here. This is my modest system: PC [iTunes on Windows XP], budget DAC, Leak Troughline "3" mono VHF tuner, Nait 5i, and Quad ESL 57s. For the cost of that set, some would settle for a couple of Burndies, and a Hiline! And it stretched the budget quite a bit! But I suppose that in world terms I am wealthy beyond the wildest dreams of billions - just like Debs is!

 

ATB from George


And we were lucky ! Our dad used to make us sleep in a shoe box ...

Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Tony2011
Originally Posted by Exiled Highlander:
Tony, It's OK. Appoint Bob Crow to lead RBS and cut his salary to £75K. Clearly leading the RMT is twice as valuable to the country as leading RBS. Cheers Jim


Jim,

 

Mr Hester's only crime is to have been hired by RBS to restore its profitability. He's done a fine job this year and should be remunarated accordingly. As for B.C....Sorry,  I'm a busy man!

 

 

Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Jonathan Gorse

Personally I think Steven Hester is merely the tip of the iceberg and was a very easy target.  I think the issue here is one of reasonable fairness.  He clearly is a very able chap who has worked extremely hard to reach the top of his profession and as such deserves a significant reward.  The issue is one of proportion though.  The simple reality is that over the past 20 years the differential between the highest earners and the blue and white collar average has grown disproportionately large.  The average wage is around £25000 and I really do feel that a CEO is simply not worth 100x that amount, although 10x may be fair.

 

I also do not believe in the argument that says you have to pay ridiculous salaries to attract the best talent or to stop such people going abroad.  The simple reality is that people even at a senior level are not quite as mobile as current thinking implies.  Successful people enjoy a fine quality of life in England, great schools, superb countryside, excellent leisure opportunities and it's not always that easy to sell the beamed mansion is Sussex, tear the kids out of school and disappear to some tax haven in the third world.  Also in case anyone hasn't noticed the financial markets, industry and banks in the Western world are in a very depressed state and there simply aren't so many opportunities for these people as there once were.

 

I have spent the past twenty years in industry having my wages and terms and conditions squeezed and my workload increased due to a perceived need for cost savings while the Executives and bankers took a bigger slice of the pie.  Perhaps you will forgive me if I smirk a little if it's their turn to share the medicine...

 

Jonathan

 

Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Exiled Highlander
Tony, My comment was totally tongue in cheek and done merely to point out the absurdity of it apparently being OK for Bob Crow to earn twice as much the £75K proposed by Debs as being how much Bob Hester should be paid annually. My earlier comment about this being a rich mans forum was less tongue in cheek as witnessed by the myriad of very high end equipment and systems owned by many on here. This was in no way meant to be demeaning to the many who have to save hard to get on the bottom rung of this (almost) never ending Naim ladder, so my apologies if I offended anyone. I just found it a strange place for someone to decide to rant about overly high pay given the apparent net worth of many on here. Jim
Posted on: 03 February 2012 by Tony2011
Originally Posted by Exiled Highlander:
Tony, My comment was totally tongue in cheek and done merely to point out the absurdity of it apparently being OK for Bob Crow to earn twice as much the £75K proposed by Debs as being how much Bob Hester should be paid annually. My earlier comment about this being a rich mans forum was less tongue in cheek as witnessed by the myriad of very high end equipment and systems owned by many on here. This was in no way meant to be demeaning to the many who have to save hard to get on the bottom rung of this (almost) never ending Naim ladder, so my apologies if I offended anyone. I just found it a strange place for someone to decide to rant about overly high pay given the apparent net worth of many on here. Jim


Jim,

 

That's the beauty of these forums. Everyone has an opinion. Like them  or not, at the end of the day they  make people talk about all sorts of subjects  and  for sure that is a good thing. I may not agree  with some members views - musical, political, social, etc- but the forum is always open to a good discussion. I may not agree, but I respect everyones opinion on these forum. Tha'ts still the beauty of democracy. There's still a couple of places wherer one's abitlity to perform a heart surgery is equalled whether you drive a taxi and you can (un)comfortably drive a vintage automobile.

Well...

 

Tony

Posted on: 04 February 2012 by Exiled Highlander
Allen I have not been exiled for some 3.5 years now, having swapped Chicago for Aberdeen, so your instruction for me to stay exiled is too late I'm afraid. Jim
Posted on: 04 February 2012 by Redmires

One can't ignore the fact that the average pay rise for directors (in the FTSE) was around 50% last year. Some probably deserved it, many probably didn't. In the current climate, people just see this as greed. The rich and the powerful have always got away with things that the small people would be strung up for. The latest being the head of the Student Loans company, a public body ....

 

The head of the Student Loans Company will have tax and National Insurance payments deducted from his £182,000 pay package in future, ministers say.


Unbelievable.

Posted on: 05 February 2012 by Harry

It's been so long since we owned anything like this. He's a publicly owned employee now and if the shareholders think the usual rules apply, perhaps they would care to dig into their pockets and pay me and everybody else what they owe.

 

This aside, we - and the media in particular - appear to be focusing on the pin head as usual. Big easy target. What about everybody else in the organisation? What do their bonuses all add up to? Steve's taking one for the team. Not written into his contract but understood without reservation. Doubtless a reward awaits down the line, well below the public and media radar.

Posted on: 05 February 2012 by Bananahead

My understanding is that RBS is not a nationalised company. It may be true that the UK government is the largest shareholder but that is not the same thing.

 

From looking at the third quarter results statement it seems that RBS is making a profit (full year results at the end of Feb?). Reported YTD Operating profit of £2,138 m against £1858 m in 2010.

 

 

Posted on: 05 February 2012 by Paper Plane

lots of people are worth £1m+ pa and they know it.

 

No, they think they are.

 

steve

Posted on: 05 February 2012 by TomK

You're worth as much as you like if it's your pals who are setting the rates.

 

Posted on: 07 February 2012 by Don Atkinson

Whichever way you look at it, and whoever sets the salary, lots of people are worth a £1m pa.

 

You may not think so, and that's your prerogative. You may not like it and that's also ok.

 

Equally, i'm sure lots of people get £1m pa and aren't worth it.

 

Cheers

 

Don

Posted on: 07 February 2012 by Exiled Highlander

Stephen Hester's salary and bonus.....a mere bagatelle...... http://www.globalpost.com/disp...ceo-golden-parachute

 

Hopefully since this is a link to news story Richard will not edit it.....I'm not entirely sure of the rules surrounding URL's these days!  If it is pulled then simply search for Eugene Isenberg payout pulled.

 

Cheers

 

Jim

Posted on: 09 February 2012 by Mike-B

Bankers get paid £1m p.a. plus performance related bonus and/or shares.

This group are responsible for countless millions & potentially the economic well being of this country. They have their package publicly scrutinised with media & political pressure to reduce it & forgo it despite it being part of an employment contract. 

 

England football manager gets paid £6m p.a., unconditional & non-performance related.

Then he gets sacked with a further £1.5m good riddance handshake.

He is resonsible for managing a group of people who kick a bag of air around for 90 minutes a few times a year.  No one discusses his pay packet.  

Strange.

 

Just a thought.  

Posted on: 09 February 2012 by Mike-B

I would't like to be so controversial Frank. 

Posted on: 09 February 2012 by Don Atkinson

..........or the amount of money collected by (say) four young men from Liverpool plucking strings and pushing air out of their mouths, albeit in a pleasant, co-ordinated sort of way.....

 

oh, sorry! You mean that's "entertainment", a bit like football, but on this forum everybody likes this "entertainment" (in some form or another).

 

So do we regulate pay or do we want a free society or is there any chance of self-imposed "moderation"

 

Cheers

 

Don