New Naim DAC at my house today - initial thoughts and experiments.
Posted by: GrahamFinch on 11 December 2009
I have been lucky enough to acquire a new Naim DAC from my dealer today. To put things into perspective for you I want to use it instead of a Dacmagic used with a SOnos wireless system to stream music from my PC to my main system (cds3\555ps\552\250-2, Allaes, powerlines and hilines etc. The digital cable is an Atlas coax cable.
Initially I played a few tracks on the existing Sonos\Dacmagic and then connected the Naim Dac. At this point I used the same Chord Cobra 3 phono to din lead that I used with the Dacmagic. Bearing in mind the Naim DAC was just out of the box it sounded pretty good but with a degree of harshness and sibilence I did not like.
As Naim recommend DIN connections I swapped the Cobra 3 for the standard Naim grey interconnect. This improved the sibilence but maybe at the expense of something else. Overall thought I thought it sounded more natural and less strident. Possibly the edginess would have eased anyway as the unit burns in but I would suggest it is something to consider.
After a while I used one of my Hilines to replace the standard interconnect and this borught about a fantastic imporvement, in the way it usually does. CLeaner, more dynamic, quieter background, better separation etc. A while later I substituted the standard mains lead with a Powerline and another huge improvement followed. This brought the overallpresentation towards the sound I get from the CDS3\555ps
I will try over the weekend to see which cable gives most benefit i.e if forced to choose only one cable whether it should be the Powerline or the Hiline.
I listened happily for ages and then the final experiment was to add the 555ps. It is worth pointing out that wHen adding an external ps the DAC itself must still be powered from its own power socket. It is not necessary to use a Powerline on the DAC at this point as it will only power the software side of the unit whilst the external ps will power the D\A conversion side of things. So at this point the Powerline was connceted to the 555ps. This took the setup to another dimension but whether the setup rivalled or beat my CDS3\555ps is hard to say at this stage. I only have one 555ps so would have needed to swap everything about. I sense the DAC\555ps was probably slightly more laid back than the CDS3 but I will hopefully try that experiment later this weekend.
My conclusions so far are that the new DAC is very good but can sound significantly better with the Hiline and Powerline added. I would suggest if you have a higher end system you really ought to consider these as a priority as this setup represents great value in my view, especially considering the significant extra cost of an external ps.
I would like to have tried a Naim DC1 digital cable instead of my Atlas as I have read that these are very good, albeit £225 each. Presumably the DAC was designed around this cable. Unfortunately my dealer did not have one to try.
The Sonos system works a treat with the DAC and is a very convenient way of listening to music.I haven't yet tried playing from a USB stick or any other digital source.
My overall conclusion based on a few hours listening is that I will not be retuning the DAC to the dealer and will be enquiring about the possibility of getting a deal on another Powerline and a Hiline.
For those of you waiting I think it will be worth it.
Initially I played a few tracks on the existing Sonos\Dacmagic and then connected the Naim Dac. At this point I used the same Chord Cobra 3 phono to din lead that I used with the Dacmagic. Bearing in mind the Naim DAC was just out of the box it sounded pretty good but with a degree of harshness and sibilence I did not like.
As Naim recommend DIN connections I swapped the Cobra 3 for the standard Naim grey interconnect. This improved the sibilence but maybe at the expense of something else. Overall thought I thought it sounded more natural and less strident. Possibly the edginess would have eased anyway as the unit burns in but I would suggest it is something to consider.
After a while I used one of my Hilines to replace the standard interconnect and this borught about a fantastic imporvement, in the way it usually does. CLeaner, more dynamic, quieter background, better separation etc. A while later I substituted the standard mains lead with a Powerline and another huge improvement followed. This brought the overallpresentation towards the sound I get from the CDS3\555ps
I will try over the weekend to see which cable gives most benefit i.e if forced to choose only one cable whether it should be the Powerline or the Hiline.
I listened happily for ages and then the final experiment was to add the 555ps. It is worth pointing out that wHen adding an external ps the DAC itself must still be powered from its own power socket. It is not necessary to use a Powerline on the DAC at this point as it will only power the software side of the unit whilst the external ps will power the D\A conversion side of things. So at this point the Powerline was connceted to the 555ps. This took the setup to another dimension but whether the setup rivalled or beat my CDS3\555ps is hard to say at this stage. I only have one 555ps so would have needed to swap everything about. I sense the DAC\555ps was probably slightly more laid back than the CDS3 but I will hopefully try that experiment later this weekend.
My conclusions so far are that the new DAC is very good but can sound significantly better with the Hiline and Powerline added. I would suggest if you have a higher end system you really ought to consider these as a priority as this setup represents great value in my view, especially considering the significant extra cost of an external ps.
I would like to have tried a Naim DC1 digital cable instead of my Atlas as I have read that these are very good, albeit £225 each. Presumably the DAC was designed around this cable. Unfortunately my dealer did not have one to try.
The Sonos system works a treat with the DAC and is a very convenient way of listening to music.I haven't yet tried playing from a USB stick or any other digital source.
My overall conclusion based on a few hours listening is that I will not be retuning the DAC to the dealer and will be enquiring about the possibility of getting a deal on another Powerline and a Hiline.
For those of you waiting I think it will be worth it.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by AMA
Nice reading, Graham!
But the posts like this normally raise more questions
Agree, PL is a universal piece. I use it on different non-naim preamps with very good results and also improve the sound on PS Audio DLIII DAC. When it comes down to a single PL I would avoid using word "significant" for my cases and prefer call it "marginal" as it contributes less than for example adding external PS or stepping up in Naim range. But when put PLs all around your system it gives a really significant cumulative improvement especially when complemented with HiLine. My friend has put PLs all around his tube gears and seems to be happy!
That was my big question for a long time: can re-clocking DACs (like Lavry) reject a jitter completely from the cheap streamers like Sonos and Squeezbox. Your experience suggests that Sonos is a good (or even flawless) digital transport -- at least when paired with re-clocking DAC.
It's very encouraging.
Did you make tests against Logitech (Slim Devices) streamers?
You tell me -- I don't have CD555 with two 555PS
I'm not even having a Naim DAC yet!

Long awaited analysis.
I mean it's not that surprising when we talk about sound clarity as Naim DAC provides better jitter handling than CDS3 non-reclocking DAC. But digital pre-processing and output stage is a key for CDS3 singing -- do we have the same in Naim DAC or it suggests a new voicing?
Do you feel it's a step up from Lavry?
I suppose it was a misprint and you probably mean Sonos/Coax/Lavry vs Mac/Tosslink/Lavry. There was a number of threads around with focus on PC/Mac vs dedicated streaming solutions. I was supporting that streamers are sonically ahead of USB solutions at the moment. But I never tried Mac/Tosslink as a transport.
But the posts like this normally raise more questions
quote:
I use a Sonos through a Lavry DA10 + Powerline. The Powerline makes a significant improvement to the Lavry.
Agree, PL is a universal piece. I use it on different non-naim preamps with very good results and also improve the sound on PS Audio DLIII DAC. When it comes down to a single PL I would avoid using word "significant" for my cases and prefer call it "marginal" as it contributes less than for example adding external PS or stepping up in Naim range. But when put PLs all around your system it gives a really significant cumulative improvement especially when complemented with HiLine. My friend has put PLs all around his tube gears and seems to be happy!
quote:This combo comes close to my CD555 with dual 555PSes. I can believe it takes the DAC up a level.
That was my big question for a long time: can re-clocking DACs (like Lavry) reject a jitter completely from the cheap streamers like Sonos and Squeezbox. Your experience suggests that Sonos is a good (or even flawless) digital transport -- at least when paired with re-clocking DAC.
It's very encouraging.
Did you make tests against Logitech (Slim Devices) streamers?
quote:
For serious listening the CD player is better, but is it £19k better???
You tell me -- I don't have CD555 with two 555PS
quote:
Assuming the Naim DAC is a step up from the Lavry I can believe it leads the way over a CDS3. Even with a Sonos as source.
Long awaited analysis.
I mean it's not that surprising when we talk about sound clarity as Naim DAC provides better jitter handling than CDS3 non-reclocking DAC. But digital pre-processing and output stage is a key for CDS3 singing -- do we have the same in Naim DAC or it suggests a new voicing?
Do you feel it's a step up from Lavry?
quote:
Tests last year in my system concluded that a Sonos/Lavry via coax sounded better than Mac/Sonos via optical.
I suppose it was a misprint and you probably mean Sonos/Coax/Lavry vs Mac/Tosslink/Lavry. There was a number of threads around with focus on PC/Mac vs dedicated streaming solutions. I was supporting that streamers are sonically ahead of USB solutions at the moment. But I never tried Mac/Tosslink as a transport.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by garyi
Seems a shame to have to spend 50% on top for cables to get the dac sounding good. A better experiment would have been to leave the powerline and hiline out of the equation for a week and see how the DAC develops on its own.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by Former member
You must be deff then.quote:Originally posted by DHT:
Munch ,Graham said the dac sounded harsh and sibilant, and only improved with various power cables. I have never heard a power cable make the slightest difference.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by Stephen Tate
Seconded.quote:Originally posted by garyi:
Seems a shame to have to spend 50% on top for cables to get the dac sounding good. A better experiment would have been to leave the powerline and hiline out of the equation for a week and see how the DAC develops on its own.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by sean
quote:Originally posted by Julian H:
Graham [F]
Also, there are quite a few upgrades available for the internals of the Sonos that you may wish to consider if you are keeping this as your streaming device.
Julian
Julian, please do tell!!
Sean.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by DHT
quote:Posted Sat 12 December 2009 10:18 Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DHT:
Munch ,Graham said the dac sounded harsh and sibilant, and only improved with various power cables. I have never heard a power cable make the slightest difference.
You must
Deaf perhaps but not stupid enough to believe that one metre of power cable can make the slightest difference to the sound quality.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by GrahamFinch
quote:Deaf perhaps but not stupid enough to believe that one metre of power cable can make the slightest difference to the sound quality.
No need to be rude. If you can't hear any differences with a Powerline (assuming you have actually tried it) then that's fine by me but that does not make either you or me stupid.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by tonym
Not listened to a Powerline then.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by GrahamFinch
[quote]I think you should try a good quality optical connection to the DAC. The Sonos coax output is known to be pretty poor compared to the optical, on the older model at least. Also, there are quite a few upgrades available for the internals of the Sonos that you may wish to consider if you are keeping this as your streaming device.[quote]
Julian - I only bought the Sonos a few months ago and according to the website it's all up to date so please elaborate if you can on what upgrades are available. I am happy to consider anything. I could try an optical lead but am not sure if I have one long enough at the moment.
Cheers.
In respect of some other comments being made. I did not say the DAC sounded bad and had to have a Powerline and a Hiline to sound decent - only that these improved the perfomance considerably and were in my opinion a well worthwhile step. If you have a high end system 552 or 252 etc then I would regard them as being essential because of the sound you expect at that level but lower down the chain the case may be different.
I added a Powerline to my 555ps and a hiline to the CDS3 - does that mean it was a poor combination to start with?? Not in my view but the cables were a worthwhile upgrade none the less.
I am sure both would improve the sound but whether they would be worth it in the context of a lesser system is for the owner to decide. And please don't think I am making derogatory judgements about lesser systems. It's taken me over twenty five years of Naim ownwership to get to my current system and I still hanker for a NAP 500. So I am not making snobbish judgements just because I am lucky to have what I have.
In any event the real question (and I can't answer it) is whether the basic Naim DAC will sound better than the other alternatives. I am only commenting on my epxeriences SO FAR after a short period of use and without access to other dacs apart from the Dacmagic of course. As I said earlier that's for magazine reviewers to do or maybe a collection of mates with different dacs.
Julian - I only bought the Sonos a few months ago and according to the website it's all up to date so please elaborate if you can on what upgrades are available. I am happy to consider anything. I could try an optical lead but am not sure if I have one long enough at the moment.
Cheers.
In respect of some other comments being made. I did not say the DAC sounded bad and had to have a Powerline and a Hiline to sound decent - only that these improved the perfomance considerably and were in my opinion a well worthwhile step. If you have a high end system 552 or 252 etc then I would regard them as being essential because of the sound you expect at that level but lower down the chain the case may be different.
I added a Powerline to my 555ps and a hiline to the CDS3 - does that mean it was a poor combination to start with?? Not in my view but the cables were a worthwhile upgrade none the less.
I am sure both would improve the sound but whether they would be worth it in the context of a lesser system is for the owner to decide. And please don't think I am making derogatory judgements about lesser systems. It's taken me over twenty five years of Naim ownwership to get to my current system and I still hanker for a NAP 500. So I am not making snobbish judgements just because I am lucky to have what I have.
In any event the real question (and I can't answer it) is whether the basic Naim DAC will sound better than the other alternatives. I am only commenting on my epxeriences SO FAR after a short period of use and without access to other dacs apart from the Dacmagic of course. As I said earlier that's for magazine reviewers to do or maybe a collection of mates with different dacs.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by DHT
quote:Posted Sat 12 December 2009 12:57 Hide Post
quote:
Deaf perhaps but not stupid enough to believe that one metre of power cable can make the slightest difference to the sound quality.
Graham Hi ,I wasn't implying that you were stupid, just responding to Munch who said I must be deaf because I couldn't hear a difference when I tried the powerline, aplogies.
I realy think that it is in those first few minutes with a new component that you really hear the differences, after a while you become accustomed to it, then you have to reintroduce the old component again!
No need
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by js
There, fixed it for you. Ladder DACs are less affected by jitter.quote:Originally posted by AMA:
We have to keep in mind that CDS3 transport is extremely low jitter so that CDS3's built-in DAC does NOT need re-clocking.
.
Reclocking does remove all jitter but the reclocking itself can be an issue with accuracy. It's no longer jitter that you hear but something may be off. It's why you need to be careful on how you do it.
When people don't hear a difference I do, they're neither deaf or stupid. If presented under the right circumstances/setup virtually all would probably hear it. It's the presentation part that comes into question.
Graham, my take was also that the stock cable corrected the issue you were having with the Cobra 3. I can understand choosing the Cobra 3 for the Cambridge as it needs a bit more sparkle. Keep the sonos playing through it while warming up even if your not listening. It will speed up the break in. Always found DIG kit to gel quite a bit. We found the Sonos better than the SB as player but you could definitely do better. If you compare the dig out of a sonos into a Uniti vs the internal streamer for instance it's no contest. SONOS was leaner, edgier. The tos suggestion may not be a bad one to try though we have preferred the coax in the past with other DACs.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by tonytronic
DHT said
A simplistic view. But in this case it leads to the wrong conclusion.
Naim (and others) successfully sell specialised mains leads to many people (who are not stupid) for a reason - because they make a real, noticeable difference in their systems.
If one regards a mains lead as simply a means to provide 50/60Hz power in sufficient quantity to 'do the job', then one is bound to struggle with any suggestion that exchanging it for another will make a difference.
Fortunately for specialist mains lead makers (and most unfortunately for the rest of us), the real world is not as simple, convenient or friendly as that.
"Mains power" is NOT just 50/60Hz pure sine wave power. It also contains, amongst other things the following free 'extras';-
a) harmonics (multiples of the power frequency eg. 100/120Hz, 150/180Hz, in various amounts right up and through to Khz multiples).
b) Spurious directly injected noise at various frequencies from connected equipment, both nearby and at a distance
c) RF interference
Most people are willing to accept that the above 'extras' in a 'typical' Mains supply are not welcome inside a piece of HiFi equipment. They all tend to degrade the performance. The amount and type of degradation is dependent upon many factors and I won't bore you with them, but higher performance equipment ('Naim' is one) tends to be more sensitive to, let's call it 'mains-borne degradation'.
And as if the above is not enough to think about, there are many other equally significant factors at work relating to mains supply and wiring impedance, and earthing issues. Again I won't bore you with details. Just to say these must not be ignored, as these other factors tend to be in a precarious balance with the 'noise' problems listed above. As an example, you can insert an RF Filter in the mains lead to a Naim amplifier which reduces RF interference, BUT on balance it degrades the sound quality because it degrades these impedance-related parameters.
Now consider the mains lead as the conduit for ALL the above, not just the simple 50Hz/60Hz power signal.
And also consider that the design and construction of a mains lead can be varied, at a cost, to affect the 'mix' of above factors that make it through to the equipment.
Hopefully you can now appreciate how changing this mains lead can, potentially, affect the performance of sensitive HiFi equipment, beit in a good OR bad way.
Tonytronic
quote:Deaf perhaps but not stupid enough to believe that one metre of power cable can make the slightest difference to the sound quality.
A simplistic view. But in this case it leads to the wrong conclusion.
Naim (and others) successfully sell specialised mains leads to many people (who are not stupid) for a reason - because they make a real, noticeable difference in their systems.
If one regards a mains lead as simply a means to provide 50/60Hz power in sufficient quantity to 'do the job', then one is bound to struggle with any suggestion that exchanging it for another will make a difference.
Fortunately for specialist mains lead makers (and most unfortunately for the rest of us), the real world is not as simple, convenient or friendly as that.
"Mains power" is NOT just 50/60Hz pure sine wave power. It also contains, amongst other things the following free 'extras';-
a) harmonics (multiples of the power frequency eg. 100/120Hz, 150/180Hz, in various amounts right up and through to Khz multiples).
b) Spurious directly injected noise at various frequencies from connected equipment, both nearby and at a distance
c) RF interference
Most people are willing to accept that the above 'extras' in a 'typical' Mains supply are not welcome inside a piece of HiFi equipment. They all tend to degrade the performance. The amount and type of degradation is dependent upon many factors and I won't bore you with them, but higher performance equipment ('Naim' is one) tends to be more sensitive to, let's call it 'mains-borne degradation'.
And as if the above is not enough to think about, there are many other equally significant factors at work relating to mains supply and wiring impedance, and earthing issues. Again I won't bore you with details. Just to say these must not be ignored, as these other factors tend to be in a precarious balance with the 'noise' problems listed above. As an example, you can insert an RF Filter in the mains lead to a Naim amplifier which reduces RF interference, BUT on balance it degrades the sound quality because it degrades these impedance-related parameters.
Now consider the mains lead as the conduit for ALL the above, not just the simple 50Hz/60Hz power signal.
And also consider that the design and construction of a mains lead can be varied, at a cost, to affect the 'mix' of above factors that make it through to the equipment.
Hopefully you can now appreciate how changing this mains lead can, potentially, affect the performance of sensitive HiFi equipment, beit in a good OR bad way.
Tonytronic
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by likesmusic
tonytronic: I'll happily accept everything you say about mains having harmonics, spuriae and RF on it. Agreed. But don't you think it is the job of the power supply inside the product to deal with these issues, rather than an external mains lead? If a mains lead so noticeably improves the sound of a product, doesn't that imply the power supply inside the product isn't very good in the first place?
And how, exactly, in any case, does a main lead filter out 100Hz? Can you measure this?
And how, exactly, in any case, does a main lead filter out 100Hz? Can you measure this?
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by js
I've given up in trying to figure out why on some things, it just makes you crazy. Many things that shouldn't be very noticable are. I'm buying for my ears and not a scope so I let them decide. We've heard differences in power cables since forever, on everything and used to just select from stock units because the after market ones were almost always worse and sonded like they were doing something. A few exceptions were generally better but more different than those selected out. PL, we all now own. Naim has always recommended to not use power conditioning and many of us have heard the detrimental effects. Nothing new here.quote:Originally posted by tonytronic:
DHT saidquote:Deaf perhaps but not stupid enough to believe that one metre of power cable can make the slightest difference to the sound quality.
A simplistic view. But in this case it leads to the wrong conclusion.
Naim (and others) successfully sell specialised mains leads to many people (who are not stupid) for a reason - because they make a real, noticeable difference in their systems.
If one regards a mains lead as simply a means to provide 50/60Hz power in sufficient quantity to 'do the job', then one is bound to struggle with any suggestion that exchanging it for another will make a difference.
Fortunately for specialist mains lead makers (and most unfortunately for the rest of us), the real world is not as simple, convenient or friendly as that.
"Mains power" is NOT just 50/60Hz pure sine wave power. It also contains, amongst other things the following free 'extras';-
a) harmonics (multiples of the power frequency eg. 100/120Hz, 150/180Hz, in various amounts right up and through to Khz multiples).
b) Spurious directly injected noise at various frequencies from connected equipment, both nearby and at a distance
c) RF interference
Most people are willing to accept that the above 'extras' in a 'typical' Mains supply are not welcome inside a piece of HiFi equipment. They all tend to degrade the performance. The amount and type of degradation is dependent upon many factors and I won't bore you with them, but higher performance equipment ('Naim' is one) tends to be more sensitive to, let's call it 'mains-borne degradation'.
And as if the above is not enough to think about, there are many other equally significant factors at work relating to mains supply and wiring impedance, and earthing issues. Again I won't bore you with details. Just to say these must not be ignored, as these other factors tend to be in a precarious balance with the 'noise' problems listed above. As an example, you can insert an RF Filter in the mains lead to a Naim amplifier which reduces RF interference, BUT on balance it degrades the sound quality because it degrades these impedance-related parameters.
Now consider the mains lead as the conduit for ALL the above, not just the simple 50Hz/60Hz power signal.
And also consider that the design and construction of a mains lead can be varied, at a cost, to affect the 'mix' of above factors that make it through to the equipment.
Hopefully you can now appreciate how changing this mains lead can, potentially, affect the performance of sensitive HiFi equipment, beit in a good OR bad way.
Tonytronic![]()
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by Derry
Two things learned:
1. the dac needs a 555ps and 2(?) powerlines to work at its best;
2. the forum is becoming a very intolerant place. Someone says he does not agree that naim mains cable make any difference and is called "deff" which most people would consider rude, but is not commented upon. The recipient then responds in kind and is castigated for not toeing the party line.
1. the dac needs a 555ps and 2(?) powerlines to work at its best;
2. the forum is becoming a very intolerant place. Someone says he does not agree that naim mains cable make any difference and is called "deff" which most people would consider rude, but is not commented upon. The recipient then responds in kind and is castigated for not toeing the party line.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by js
Of course it is rude to call somebody deaf. Perhaps it wasn't called out due to the recipient not exactly typing with kit gloves either. Still inappropriate.
The person that bought the DAC said he's leaving the 555ps on his CDP and enjoying the DAC just fine as is. There should be no doubt that best will be when used with the top available associated kit but perhaps it doesn't need to be at it's absolute best to satisfy more than the next comparably priced piece. That will be up to those that audition. I guess he's keeping it due his profound disappointment.
The person that bought the DAC said he's leaving the 555ps on his CDP and enjoying the DAC just fine as is. There should be no doubt that best will be when used with the top available associated kit but perhaps it doesn't need to be at it's absolute best to satisfy more than the next comparably priced piece. That will be up to those that audition. I guess he's keeping it due his profound disappointment.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by Former member
What kit do you have DHT??quote:Originally posted by DHT:quote:Posted Sat 12 December 2009 10:18 Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DHT: I have never heard a power cable make the slightest difference.
You must
Deaf perhaps but not stupid enough to believe that one metre of power cable can make the slightest difference to the sound quality.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by tonytronic
The "mains connection conduit" is not a panacea for all problems.
But it can help, depending upon it's implementation.
If it is implemented as a cable, then it's highly unikely to redress second harmonic (100/120Hz) mains distortion.
But as the frequency of 'unwanted' content increases, a cable can begin to have measurable effects, particularly at RF frequencies.
You're right that it suggests the power supply in a given product is not ideal.
But then no power supply is perfect and probably never will be, not in my lifetime.
The Naim power supply upgrades show what happens when you improve the supply as seen by the electronics. But it is at ever increasing cost.
The mains cable upgrade is just another way to improve this, in that it provides some noise filtering without degrading mains impedance parameters, so the power supply has less crap to deal with, but the smarter cable will be more costly in either time and effort, materials or both.
There is an old adage to consider here: it is better to eliminate a problem at source than to try to deal with the consequences of that problem at every destination. For example, it is wiser to fit a suppression device to the noisy motor, or switch contact, than to fit a filter on the mains input every sensitive device.
In the same way, it is wiser to reduce the amount of crap getting inside an amplifier or source via it's mains connection, rather than try to deal with whatever that crap may be once inside it.
I suspect this partly explains why Naim's Power supply improvement scheme involves using external boxes, rather than upgrading the supply fitted inside the amplifier or source device i.e. the unwanted crap is kept outside of the box that contains the sensitive circuits.
Tonytronic.
But it can help, depending upon it's implementation.
If it is implemented as a cable, then it's highly unikely to redress second harmonic (100/120Hz) mains distortion.
But as the frequency of 'unwanted' content increases, a cable can begin to have measurable effects, particularly at RF frequencies.
You're right that it suggests the power supply in a given product is not ideal.
But then no power supply is perfect and probably never will be, not in my lifetime.
The Naim power supply upgrades show what happens when you improve the supply as seen by the electronics. But it is at ever increasing cost.
The mains cable upgrade is just another way to improve this, in that it provides some noise filtering without degrading mains impedance parameters, so the power supply has less crap to deal with, but the smarter cable will be more costly in either time and effort, materials or both.
There is an old adage to consider here: it is better to eliminate a problem at source than to try to deal with the consequences of that problem at every destination. For example, it is wiser to fit a suppression device to the noisy motor, or switch contact, than to fit a filter on the mains input every sensitive device.
In the same way, it is wiser to reduce the amount of crap getting inside an amplifier or source via it's mains connection, rather than try to deal with whatever that crap may be once inside it.
I suspect this partly explains why Naim's Power supply improvement scheme involves using external boxes, rather than upgrading the supply fitted inside the amplifier or source device i.e. the unwanted crap is kept outside of the box that contains the sensitive circuits.
Tonytronic.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by tonytronic
By the way, I apologise if my offerings give offence. 
My intention was to try to give some rational, non-subjective reasons why a PowerLine or similar mains cable might make a difference. Simple as.
As for the people in this forum, I have the greatest respect for you all! Yours views about what you hear/don't hear are always interesting and are never be taken as offensive by me. They are considered as valid and equally important views.
My thanks to you all just for being here and being prepared to read my ramblings.
Respect to you all.
Tonytronic.
My intention was to try to give some rational, non-subjective reasons why a PowerLine or similar mains cable might make a difference. Simple as.
As for the people in this forum, I have the greatest respect for you all! Yours views about what you hear/don't hear are always interesting and are never be taken as offensive by me. They are considered as valid and equally important views.
My thanks to you all just for being here and being prepared to read my ramblings.
Respect to you all.
Tonytronic.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by likesmusic
tonytronic, you didn't offend me in the slightest. And your contentions are rational, though whether they are true or valid is entirely arguable. Are you claiming that 'good' mains lead filters out all frequencies above 50Hz (as in a low pass filter) or just that it filters out multiples of 50Hz (as in a notch filter)? Or are you actually withdrawing your claim that mains leads filter the harmonics of 50Hz when pressed to justify it?
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by tonytronic
likesmusic said
HaHarrr! LOL!!! Good one! Err... No.
HaHaHaHarr! LOL!!! Nice try. But again, No.
Very comic. And in response ...
I did not make such a claim - and you know that I wouldn't do so, don't you!
To clarify for others - the list of 'unwanted' signals is a quite seperate issue and nothing to do with what any given mains cable might affect!
Look I'm sorry, I hope your trying to be funny, because otherwise my laughter at your questions might cause offence - and we wouldn't want that, would we? Equally I know you wouldn't be wanting to offend by asking what others who are less tolerant might interpret as poorly disguised derisory questions.
Luckily, I don't see it that way.
Thanks for the laugh! Have a nice day.
Tonytronic.
quote:Are you claiming that 'good' mains lead filters out all frequencies above 50Hz (as in a low pass filter)
quote:...or just that it filters out multiples of 50Hz (as in a notch filter)?
quote:...are you actually withdrawing your claim that mains leads filter the harmonics of 50Hz
Very comic. And in response ...
I did not make such a claim - and you know that I wouldn't do so, don't you!
To clarify for others - the list of 'unwanted' signals is a quite seperate issue and nothing to do with what any given mains cable might affect!
Look I'm sorry, I hope your trying to be funny, because otherwise my laughter at your questions might cause offence - and we wouldn't want that, would we? Equally I know you wouldn't be wanting to offend by asking what others who are less tolerant might interpret as poorly disguised derisory questions.
Luckily, I don't see it that way.
Thanks for the laugh! Have a nice day.
Tonytronic.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by Julian H
Sean
Google Cullen Circuits and Audiocom
J
Google Cullen Circuits and Audiocom
J
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by likesmusic
quote:Originally posted by tonytronic:quote:...are you actually withdrawing your claim that mains leads filter the harmonics of 50Hz
Very comic. And in response ...
I did not make such a claim - and you know that I wouldn't do so, don't you!
Tonytronic.
tonytronic, you did indeed make such a claim. Your exact words were:
quote:Originally posted by tonytronic:
"Mains power" is NOT just 50/60Hz pure sine wave power. It also contains, amongst other things the following free 'extras';-
a) harmonics (multiples of the power frequency eg. 100/120Hz, 150/180Hz, in various amounts right up and through to Khz multiples).
.. also consider that the design and construction of a mains lead can be varied, at a cost, to affect the 'mix' of above factors that make it through to the equipment.
Tonytronic![]()
Is that not absolutely a claim that a mains lead can be made to affect the mix of 50Hz harmonics that make it through to the equipment?
And what's wrong with being asked to justify it?
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by GrahamFinch
quote:Graham Hi ,I wasn't implying that you were stupid, just responding to Munch who said I must be deaf because I couldn't hear a difference when I tried the powerline, aplogies.
Apology accepted. My feedback on the DAC seems to have stirred up some controversy about power cables. Not my intention.
Have been too busy today to do any serious testing. I did try an opitical connection from the Sonus as suggested by someone but it was only a cheap Belkin optical, not a decent one. Sound was smoother but also duller, less detailed\spacious etc. I still think I need to try the DC1 and have mentioned this to my dealer. Whether it would be too good given the Sonus feed I don't know.
Posted on: 12 December 2009 by Don Atkinson
Likemusic,
Most of us use our ears to decide whether something affects hifi sound or not.
No need for oscillascopes or other fancy scientific gadgets.
Cables do affect the sound, according to my ears and those of many others. Obviously you are not afflicted in this way and for you that is excellent news - no need to spend significant sums of money on Powerlines or Hilines!!!
Tony has tried to help you by outlining some of the possible reasons that might explain how this comes about. Plenty of room for a PhD Thesis in there IMHO
Cheers
Don
Most of us use our ears to decide whether something affects hifi sound or not.
No need for oscillascopes or other fancy scientific gadgets.
Cables do affect the sound, according to my ears and those of many others. Obviously you are not afflicted in this way and for you that is excellent news - no need to spend significant sums of money on Powerlines or Hilines!!!
Tony has tried to help you by outlining some of the possible reasons that might explain how this comes about. Plenty of room for a PhD Thesis in there IMHO
Cheers
Don