b***'s guide to FM antenna connection

Posted by: bazz on 04 April 2004

Apropos of nothing really, but installing my new FM antenna put me in mind of all the small things which can prevent the signal which arrives at your tuner from being a mirror, if slightly attenuated, image of that generated by your antenna.

I’m not a professional in this field, but I do have a fair bit of experience and have learnt from my mistakes over the years.

I'll assume that you have a purpose-built roof or loft mounted FM antenna pointed at the transmitter, and that you don’t use 300 ohm ribbon to connect it to the tuner. (Ribbon actually suffers from much less signal attenuation than coax, but is horribly prone to RFI and multipath distortion)

If you are able to install an external Yagi then mad if you don’t. An indoor antenna or external half wave dipole will deliver but a fraction of your tuners potential.

Start with the balun, the little gizmo usually found at the antenna end of the cable which converts the balanced 300 ohm output of the antenna to the unbalanced 75 ohms impedance of coaxial cable and (probably) your tuner input. Most antennas come with a PCB balun already attached but some (such as mine) don’t. If you have to buy one, spend a couple of extra dollars/quid to get the best one in the shop as, believe it or not, an inefficient balun will absorb around 80% of the signal fed into it.

When you attach the balun to the antenna, make sure the flexible wires are kept equidistant between the attachment points on the antenna’s driven element and the balun body to maintain 300ohms impedance.

Coaxial cable: Turf that old RG59 coax in the shed. Use quality double screened RG59, RG6 or, preferably, quad screened RG6 as used in satellite TV installations. The quad screened stuff is a bit thicker and a bit awkward to work with, but worth the effort (heard that before somewhere?)

Coax relies on the screen to keep interference out and signal in. I have seen cheap RG59 with 20% braid coverage, which is hopelessly inadequate. The best coax has alternate layers of copper foil and braid screen with an air spaced dielectric (insulator) and a copper coated steel conductor.

Make sure too that the braid and foil are made of the same material. If they're not, electrolytic corrosion will occur when the cable becomes damp. Have a look at coax which uses differing screen materials after six months use and you’ll see that the conductor is black from corrosion. Alternatively, attach a zinc anode (just kidding!)

Also, when you’re terminating the coax with a balun or plug, make sure that no part of the screen comes into contact with the conductor, not even one stray strand of braid. (This may seem obvious, but I’ve seen some strange things when helping friends with their installations.)

Cable attenuation: Not really an issue at FM frequencies and with relatively short (say less than 50m) cable runs. Still worth keeping in mind though that the difference in attenuation between the best and worst cable is around 6db over 100 metres at 100 Mhz and we’re dealing with signals measured in microvolts.

Cable Routing: Don’t run the coax alongside AC mains cable. Even the best coax is only 85% effective at rejecting RFI/multipath/induced interference. If you have to cross a mains cable, do it at right angles and try to maintain some clearance.

Cable Joins: Avoid them. A join will result in reflections/standing waves, which will certainly compromise the VSWR the engineer who designed your antenna spent sleepless nights achieving. The same applies to wall plates, though I realise they are often a domestic necessity.

RF (booster) amplifiers: Avoid them at all costs. They will introduce noise and distortion to the signal and they kill music stone dead on contact. If you have a weak signal get a more efficient antenna.

Plugs: I personally prefer F connectors, but if your tuner uses a Belling Lee (PAL) type, then use one you can solder.

If all this sounds inconsequential I assure you it's not. The difference between cheap RG59 and quad screened RG6 for example is clearly audible in my system, and I only have 14 metres of cable between antenna and tuner.
Posted on: 04 April 2004 by dave simpson
Thanks for the guide Bazz! I'll be checking my screen tonight. I have a funny feeling it's making contact with the outer conductor in my NAT 101's PAL(?) plug and limiting reception. I also need to solder the inner conductor in this plug. Perhaps all of these limitations explain marginally improved reception after making dramatic changes to the antenna's location.


regards,

dave
Posted on: 04 April 2004 by Jens
Hi Baxx,

Thanks for the informative post. I've emailed Matchmaster to see if they'll help me out here in Perth, and when installing will certainly have a copy of your notes on hand. What was the model number of the antenna you ended up installing?

Cheers, Jens
Posted on: 04 April 2004 by bazz
Jens,

The catalogue number is 03MM-FMG8 - it's excellent.
Posted on: 05 April 2004 by Jens
Hi Barry,

I managed to track down the antenna in Perth and am ordering it in today. Should transform my NAT01 which hasn't been getting too much use because it just doesn't work properly without a decent aerial.

What type of balun, quad screened RG6 and F connector did you use for the job? I have a Dick Smith store just down the road, and presumably should be able to purchase all the components there?

Cheers, Jens
Posted on: 05 April 2004 by bazz
Jens,

Suitable Dick Smith stuff is:

RG6 - W2087
Balun - L4465
Naim tuners use PAL plugs & the only one DS appears to sell is a non-solder type, cat no. P2020. I've used those plugs and you can solder the conductor in place if you remove the retaining screw.

Your NAT01 will thank you.
Posted on: 05 April 2004 by Jens
Hi Barry,

Thanks very much for all that info, I'll get onto it ASAP and will report on the transformation of the NAT01.

Cheers,
Jens