The tyranny of choice...

Posted by: Top Cat on 08 April 2004

Interesting article at this link which I think applies to audio equipment as much as to photographic equipment.

Raises an interesting question: does the multitude of choice that we have in today's world lead to a perpetually unfulfilled quest to make the 'best' choice - often at the expense of actually maximising the use we get out of the choices we've already made?

For instance, I'll take myself as an example. I've recently acquired a 52/SC. I am very very pleased with it, but it doesn't stop me wondering about a 252 or 552. In fact, were it not for the fact that the 52 is as good as it is, I might wonder whether I should sell it and move to a 252 or 552. The fact that I can't afford the 552 is neither here nor there - where there's a will there's a way and all that.

So faced with such choices, much time is spent wondering whether we've made good choices and whether we could choose more wisely. The linked article was inspired by an article in Scientific American magazine, which I've never seen over here, but the premise is clear...

I guess I fit into the "maximizer" (sic) category - though I'd like to think I've "maximized" (sic) enough. I guess this polarises people, and there'll be many of use who fit into the "satisficer" (sic) category.

I found it quite interesting to appraise myself in this way, thought I'd pass the link on...

John
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Dev B
John,

Reading your posts recently makes me think that a 252 and a 250-2 will be a really good step forward in your system with your presentational tastes

regards
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Top Cat
Dev, behave.... Wink

I'm quite happy where I am now. Honest. No, really I am...

(but I do need to get the Linn sorted - I think I've ballsed it up a bit with my fiddling post Prefix)

John
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Geoff P
John

Sounds a bit akin to my intial discussion point in this thread:

http://forums.naim-audio.com/eve/forums?a=tpc&s=67019385&f=48019385&m=54010666

I think we might fall into the same category so have a think. Maybe the 552 effect would be a dissapointment

regards
GEOFF
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Derek Wright
Geoff

I am very confident that you would not find the 552 effect a dissapointment

You might regret all the years you had been listening to the hifi without one though

Derek

<< >>
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Phil Barry
I haven't gone to the link, but...

Our society is built on selling more stuff, and it's a lot easier to sell to current customers than to find new ones - if a seller can give the customer to buy again.

So the most repeated messages of the mass media is that we should be dissatisfied with what we have.

It takes significant and constant conscious effort to avoid buying into this message - and even then, the bias towards dissatisfaction is great.

And when something appeals anyway - as hifi and music appeal to most of us on this forum - it's extremely hard to resist dissatisfaction.

As far as hifi is concerned, where live music is the reference, the case for dissatisfaction is very real. Even a CDS3/552/500/DBL system is a weak, weak facsimile of the Chicago Symphony - much less the Cleveland or Vienna. :-)

After 47 tears of fascination with hifi equipment and love of orchestral music, and after acquiring a CDS1 to go with my LP12/ARO, I decided to love what I have. I perceive a real and often powerful emotional response to about 90% of the music I play, and that's a pretty good result.

So the desire to upgrade is in and around us, and it's hard to resist.

But all one has to do is to decide to be content wwith what s/he has.

Regards.

Phil
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Geoff P
quote:
I am very confident that you would not find the 552 effect a dissapointment



Derek

I don't find my 282 a dissapointment! So I am sure you are right that the 552 would not be a dissapointment.
However reality sets in for me roughly where I am now. Even reaching for a 252 is a temptation I do not find hard to resist.
The fact that I cán't afford either item, as top cat says, is not an absolute obstacle.
But I do console myself by using Phil's approach. I just cannot imagine how I will ever hear 7,000 pounds worth of improvement over my 282.
Though the 282 is very, very good I had a hard time convincing myself it improved the sound beyond my 112 by close on 4,000 pounds (including the supercap).

Of course money is not the only yardstick else I would not have bought the 282 but it does focus priorities.

regards
GEOFF
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Greg Beatty
I have heard the 2000's referred to as the "upgrade decade". More people now have what they need...its about trading up.

Better car...bigger house...more upscale clothes and accessories...

- GregB

Insert Witty Signature Line Here
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by kuma
quote:
Originally posted by Geoff P:
I just cannot imagine how I will ever hear 7,000 pounds worth of improvement over my 282.
Though the 282 is very, very good I had a hard time convincing myself it improved the sound beyond my 112 by close on 4,000 pounds (including the supercap).

Of course money is not the only yardstick else I would not have bought the 282 but it does focus priorities.


Geoff,

A perception of 'value' is a funny thing isn't it?
A return on an investment in hi-fi hierarchy gets smaller and smaller, indeed. It becomes a matter of one's disposable income, sonic preference ( quite often, difference in costilier gear is not really for better but different more than anything ) and, as you said, one's priority in life.

Even the mighty 552 might not be everyone's cup of tea. ( or simply not worth it for some sonically )

Just because a piece of gear sits at the top of the product line-up, I don't think we can assume it meets everyone's expectations.

Cost/performance ratio on digital gear is even worse. But as it is my only choice for the source, I reluctantly pay the dues. Music to me is a necessity. ( a good thing I don't have any other expensive habbits ) Wink
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by Geoff P
Kuma
I agree with all your comments. In particular

quote:
Music to me is a necessity. ( a good thing I don't have any other expensive habbits )


Music is also a necessity for me, but the books have to balance and leave room to buy new music to enjoy.

I think that is the intrinsic quality of NAIM gear. At every level in the range it delivers the life in the music and provides enjoyment which allows each of us to settle for what fits our life style, without feeling we are missing out on everything by not being able to go all the way up the ladder.

regards
GEOFF
Posted on: 08 April 2004 by kuma
quote:
Originally posted by Geoff P:
I think that is the intrinsic quality of NAIM gear. At every level in the range it delivers the life in the music and provides enjoyment which allows each of us to settle for what fits our life style, without feeling we are missing out on everything by not being able to go all the way up the ladder.



Geoff,

I totally agree on this.
However a mindset of racing to the top is what feeds the upgrade frenzy and leads to a discontentment. ( Particularly tragic, when a listener does not know what he/she is listening for )
Posted on: 09 April 2004 by Peter Stockwell
quote:
Originally posted by younaimit:
Maybe the equipment and its acquisition is part of the hobby and therefore part of the fun.


Most probably true for many here, I'd like to get the equivalent to what I have, Nait5+HiCap+Stageline, in 1 box. I'd see that as a real upgrade.

Peter

User34 at Laposte dot net