SHOULD LONDON'S HIGH SECURITY CAMBERWICK GREEN POLICE STATION BE PRIVATISED ?

Posted by: Berlin Fritz on 06 February 2005

The new freedom of information act has been giving senior civil servants a
headache: not because they have been swamped with tricky requests for sensitive
material but beacuse they have been swamped with tricky requests to, er, monitor
the requests. The latest order to Whitehall bosses is to provide a twice weekly
breakdown of the requests being made by journalists, MP's, commercial bosses and
the public. This has provoked protests from civil servants, one of who'm
complained: "Monitoring the FOI is becoming an inhibitor to responding to them
(requests for information)." The monitoring is being demanded by government
departments, Downing Street, ministers' private offices, and the department of
constitutional affairs. When instructed that all FOI requests must be met
within 20 days, one senior home office worker complained: " Not only do we get a
new monitoring request (or more) everyday, but they are each required by
differing parts of the office which just adds to the impression that work is
being duplicated. The irony is that this request for information on compliance,
when combined with the multitude of other monitoring requests, is a threat to us
meeting it."

Private Eye Magazine : Issue 1125, Feb 2005: (handheld Steam-Powered Version)

A small bear in wellington boots and cushty hat was quoted outside the Police
Station as saying " As an illegal immigrant from Peru many years ago I fondly
remember being regularly kicked to fuck and endlessly asked who dunnit, or we'll
deport your family behind those shiny steel bars & doors", " let's face it, if a
national'newspaper' printed such a story and it was found to be untrue, they'd
swiftly be brought to task ( Murdoch & Barclay press excluded) wouldn't they, I
mean you just couldn't make it up, could you ?

N.B.
Messers P & R were spotted entering the sanctity of Pogles wood earlier too, but
nobody could be found (persauded) to comment, and even if they could it would
most very likely have been the usual " I cannie say to much at this stage I'm
afraid", innit, nice work if you can get it, eh ?


Fritz Von I think Israel is already getting uppetty with our Condi ! Big Grin
Posted on: 06 February 2005 by 7V
quote:
Originally posted by Berlin Fritz:
The new freedom of information act has been giving senior civil servants a
headache: not because they have been swamped with tricky requests for sensitive
material but beacuse they have been swamped with tricky requests to, er, monitor
the requests...

Fritz Von I think Israel is already getting uppetty with our Condi ! Big Grin

That's not the information that I'm reading on 'Condi goes to the Mid East'. All I heard was that the Israelis are a bit miffed that she visited Tony Blair first.

I would like to know who's giving you your information. Also I believe that certain Uber-Groupies wish to know how many other requests you're getting to divulge your sources. Smile This 'freedom' business is great isn't it?

Regards
Steve M
PS: I'm strongly inclined to think that the less Government there is, the better.
Posted on: 06 February 2005 by Berlin Fritz
I would say that's purely because Blair's the bigger player, and I refer to Israel being nervous about her possibly mediating with the Palestinians instead of their own direct communications & agains't their wishes, in other words, enough is enough Israel, time to reign you in somewhat !

Fritz Von Alsdaire Cambell for DPM Frown
Posted on: 06 February 2005 by 7V
quote:
Originally posted by Berlin Fritz:
...I refer to Israel being nervous about her possibly mediating with the Palestinians instead of their own direct communications & agains't their wishes, in other words, enough is enough Israel, time to reign you in somewhat !

Fritz,

You certainly have some strange ideas. An agreement will only come if both sides agree to it. The (very European) idea that either side can be 'pressured' into accepting a deal which they would otherwise find unacceptable is a joke isn't it?

The main difference between Abbas and Arafat is that Abbas is a pragmatist. He would have signed the Oslo accords in 2000 and he would sign something similar (at best) this time because he feels that there's plenty of time to get rid of the State of Israel after the accord is signed. Also he wants his Nobel prize.

Israel will accept a deal because they feel that if Palestine is truly democratic, then by the time they are in a position to threaten Israel militarily, they will have changed their minds and not bother. Also, Sharon wants his prize.

The difficulties are that the Israeli people need to be convinced that they can trust the Palestinians this time (after Oslo, Arafat declared another bloody Interfada) and the Palestinians need to be convinced that the 5 years of war since Oslo, which has resulted in 3,000 Palestinian and 1,000 Israeli deaths so far, is a no-win situation and needs to be abandoned for an agreement that they could have signed 5 years ago.

Neither of these real difficulties can possibly be helped by outside 'pressure' on the leaders of either side and of course, unlike the Europeans, Condi and W are well aware of this.

However, another pre-condition for peace, that Hezbollah and Hamas need to lose their sponsorship and support from the governments of Iran and Syria, is indeed likely to be 'strongly encouraged' by the Americans. On this issue too, I believe that Condee and Bush have made their agenda clear enough.

I think you'll find that Condee, Bush, Sharon and Abbas are singing from the same song-sheet. As usual, it's Europe and the UN that can't sing in tune.

Regards
Steve M
Posted on: 07 February 2005 by Lomo
Isn't it great that after Colon we have Condi.
Is he now taking a sabbatical or has he become a consultant?