Are S'hand 135s worth the investment
Posted by: Sean P on 13 January 2001
First post since the old conference
Having listened to the above 135s I believe I've answered that question for myself however I do have some niggling concerns. The 135s were previously used to drive the mid range on an active 6 pack for 6/7 years, what effect will such a confined frequency range have on the caps, I assume the amps will have to be burntin in so far as bass and treble are concerned in my passive full range system. Has anyone had a similar updrade experience.
How much should I pay for a pair of 6/7 year old 135s.
To put this in context my present system consists of CDI, 82, Supercap, Nap250, Audio Physic TemposII.
hi
Thanks for the replys. The 135s are giving me the kind of improvement to my system that I have been seeking however my dealer wants half price+ for these babies which dulls my enthusiam.
I intend to hold onto the amps for a few more days trial before I make my final decision.
Will let you know the outcome.
Thanks for the replys. The 135s are giving me the kind of improvement to my system that I have been seeking however my dealer wants half price+ for these babies which dulls my enthusiam.
I intend to hold onto the amps for a few more days trial before I make my final decision.Will let you know the outcome.
Sean
In the grip of nicotine withdrawl. 
Sorry for the delay in replying, too intent on 135 evaluation to visit the forum. 135s are now back with dealer however negotiations are ongoing. Many others have extoled the virtues of 135s bass mid and treble as separate entities however I operate on gut feeling and the 135s "felt right to me" across the whole audio spectrum and were an obvious improvement IMHO over my 250.
Sean
Still in the grip of nicotine withdrawl.