The Da Vinci Code

Posted by: Willito on 04 May 2004

I first heard about the book last summer from a trio of American co-eds on their post-college European tour that I was fortunate enough to meet in a hotel bar in Barcelona. They raved about it, but made it sound like a mass market version of Foucault's Pendulum.

Subsequently, on each successive trip to the US that I made, I noticed the book occupying more and more shelf space in bookstores. On a few occasions, I glanced at the opening page, only to replace the book on the shelf.

Last week I finally succumbed to the combination of curiosity, and the fear of nothing to do on a flight to Lisbon. I picked up the novel in Heathrow, started it in the BA lounge, read the entire flight to Lisbon, continued reading in my hotel till three in the morning, read it in between meetings the next day, and finally finished it that evening on a flight to Paris. To say that I was obssessed would put it lightly.

But why?

IMHO, the writing (particularly the dialogue) was sketchy, the characterisation thin (with most of the Europeans resembling national caricatures out of National Lampoon's European Vacation), the story plotted like a made for TV movie, . . . and yet I was completely engrossed! I literally could not put it down. I just had to get to the heart of the conspiracy/mystery around which the book centers.

I have since come across a whole cadre of similarly-obsessed readers, some of whom have gone so far as it to secret it in work documents so as to continue reading it at the office on the sly.


Has anybody else read the book? If so, how did you find it? What makes it so engrossing? Is it just a need for a good old conspiracy tale so as to believe that hidden forces are always at work?
Posted on: 04 May 2004 by rodwsmith
Hello

I read it too, with much the same result - it is truly "unputdownable", and Dan Brown has to be credited for that. Great literature it ain't, however, for all the reasons you mention. It reads as though it was written quickly (although clearly the very detailed research indicates that it was not). I was even tempted to go and look at x's tomb in x religious edifice (not to spoil anything). How sad is that? The riddles were, to me, faintly of the ilk of a TV programme I remember called "3-2-1". I worked out the first few, but then started not to bother...

I also should comment that another book of his "Digital Fortress" (I think) is equally page-turning, with a more futuristic plot line, and to my mind greater characterisation (mainly Americans). I think there is a third, but I shall wait to buy it until I have a whole day to spare.

Definitely superior holiday reading. Effortless, involving, absorbing and mildly thought provoking. Like you, however, I cannot quite fathom exactly why Roll Eyes. A sort of Dornford Yates / John Buchan for this century...

Cheers

Rod
Posted on: 04 May 2004 by David Stewart
I too recently read it and found it a compulsive page-turner. This has much to do with his use of very short chapters and the way the action moves rapidly from one location to another.

Ultimately though, although the subject matter was fascinating, I found the book a somewhat unsatisfying read which fizzled out rather than providing a satisfactory denouement.

I've just finished 'Girl With A Pearl Earring' by Tracy Chevalier. Equally difficult to put down, much slower paced, but to me a far more satisfying book.

David
Posted on: 04 May 2004 by Wolf
I've not read the DaVinci book yet, tho a friend just loaned it to me. I seem to remember a book about 10 years ago that was about a "spiritual" conspiracy. Can't remember the name, but it was food for thought and a good page turner. I also read "The Girl with the Pearl Earing" and enjoyed it too.

I have to finish my current book on Barbara Stanwyck the actress who put the capital B in _itch. Next to Bette Davis that is.

glenn

Life is analogue
Posted on: 04 May 2004 by rodwsmith
Everyone on earth should read "Water Music" by T Coragesshan-Boyle (I am not sure of the spelling of that).

Often on the jackets of books the publishers print a quote from a reviewer or another author. On the cover of Water Music is a line from Salman Rushdie that says (I perhaps paraphrase) "this is better than getting drunk".

It is.
Posted on: 04 May 2004 by jayd
I agree. "DaVinci Code" was a bit of a "Bridges of Madison County" experience for me; winning story, schmaltzy prose.

The subject matter of "DaVinci Code" really grabs. And if you want the no-holds-barred version of the subject, read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" by Michael Baigent. It's the book on which "DaVinci Code" was based.
Posted on: 05 May 2004 by Peter Stockwell
I found thison the train, on the way to work, the other day. I'd agree that the writing skills are maybe not the best. The writer has put enough verifable historical information to make the book a compelling read. I intend to do some follow up.

Peter

User34 at Laposte dot net
Posted on: 06 May 2004 by JRHardee
I stuck with "The Da vinci Code" to find out how it ended. What was not predictable was very disappointing, and I cringed at all of the miracle rescues and coincidences. It was also interesting to use Google Images to look at the paintings referred to, and see that his interpretations were just plain wrong.

The US Supreme Court has defined pornography as that which "panders to prurient interest" and lacks "redeeming social value".
To my mind, "The Da Vinci Code" is Catholic porn, and the "Left Behind" series is fundamentalist porn.

Harrumph.