Cordless optical Microsoft mouse
Posted by: J.N. on 07 May 2004
I'm getting used to my new PC with Windows XP and cordless keyboard and mouse.
Both work very well, but the red light on the mouse never seems to switch off. I'm told that it's supposed to switch itself off after a period of inactivity.
This does not seem to happen, and friends with them, tell me that they eat batteries as a result.
Any comments or ideas?
Both work very well, but the red light on the mouse never seems to switch off. I'm told that it's supposed to switch itself off after a period of inactivity.
This does not seem to happen, and friends with them, tell me that they eat batteries as a result.
Any comments or ideas?
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by matthewr
Unfortunately my tip is lways get one with a rechargable battery which not the most useful once you have already bought one. Mine just sits in it's cradle overnight and never runs out.
My other tip is don't use optical mice on cover of the first Stone Roses album as it freaks them right out.
Matthew
My other tip is don't use optical mice on cover of the first Stone Roses album as it freaks them right out.
Matthew
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by bigmick
Nick's completely right it's a diabolical Gatesian alliance. I stuck it for about a year and then got a rechargeable Logitech jobby.
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by Steve G
I've got a rechargeable Packard Bell one. It seems to do a pretty good use of going dormat when not in use as well.
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by oldie
Iv'e had a Mirosoft mouse and keyboard for about 12 months now and only changed the batteries once so obviously either Microsoft is very efficient or more likly I'm not useing the computer enough. I intended useing replacment re-chargable batteries when the current[ sorry ] ones run out.Maybe you could try the re-chargable option and see how you get on.
oldie
oldie
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by BigH47
I have a packard Bell cordless,it works well once you get used to putting the mouse back into the docking station for charging.
Howard
Howard
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by J.N.
Thanks for the feedback guys.
If it does prove expensive in batteries; I'll probably just replace it with a corded version.
Someone said that rechargables are not suitable as they are 1.2V as opposed to normal 1.5V AA batteries.
If it does prove expensive in batteries; I'll probably just replace it with a corded version.
Someone said that rechargables are not suitable as they are 1.2V as opposed to normal 1.5V AA batteries.
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by count.d
quote:
My other tip is don't use optical mice on cover of the first Stone Roses album as it freaks them right out.
Matthew,
I'm very sad. I have just tried your test on the Stone Roses lp and it worked perfectly. This could be either that mice work differently, your warning is a shot at humour or that you were refering to the very first pressing of the lp in which the covers were embossed. I have a later pressing in which there is no embossing and so can't test that option.
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by matthewr
Count.d
I haven't tried it with my current mouse (the Logitech rechargable one) but my first optical mouse, an early Microsoft "Intellimouse", would just fly randomly about the screen when used on the Stone Roses album. To be clear we are talking about the first album with the Jackson Pollack style cover which is what seemed to confuse my mouse. Maybe they have improved?
BTW The reason that I used it on an LP cover is becuase I generally use my laptop on a glass table (they definitiely don't work on glass) and The Stone Roses cover happened to be at hand when I first got an optical mouse. I now use a recent copy of The Guardian which works fine but means you get newsprint all over the heel of your hand.
Matthew
I haven't tried it with my current mouse (the Logitech rechargable one) but my first optical mouse, an early Microsoft "Intellimouse", would just fly randomly about the screen when used on the Stone Roses album. To be clear we are talking about the first album with the Jackson Pollack style cover which is what seemed to confuse my mouse. Maybe they have improved?
BTW The reason that I used it on an LP cover is becuase I generally use my laptop on a glass table (they definitiely don't work on glass) and The Stone Roses cover happened to be at hand when I first got an optical mouse. I now use a recent copy of The Guardian which works fine but means you get newsprint all over the heel of your hand.
Matthew
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by Arun Mehan
Regarding rechargeable batteries, you want the alkaline type. The older ni-cad types don't provide enough voltage but the newer alkaline ones are appropriate.
I'm surprised nobody mentioned that there are in fact two LEDs that should light up when your mouse is in use. One stays on constantly, indicating the mouse has power, and the second comes to life when the mouse is in motion. So your mouse is fine. Oh and LEDs take very little voltage so I'm surprised to hear people complaining about battery life.
I'm surprised nobody mentioned that there are in fact two LEDs that should light up when your mouse is in use. One stays on constantly, indicating the mouse has power, and the second comes to life when the mouse is in motion. So your mouse is fine. Oh and LEDs take very little voltage so I'm surprised to hear people complaining about battery life.
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by BigH47
quote:and a lot of spelling mistakes
The Guardian which works fine but means you get newsprint all over the heel of your hand.
Howard
Posted on: 07 May 2004 by garyi
Logitech MX700. Easily the most responsive wireless mouse and recharable to boot.
Lovely.
Also users of macs should get USB overdrive you can make them buttons do so much more!
Lovely.
Also users of macs should get USB overdrive you can make them buttons do so much more!