Clavanovas

Posted by: cunningplan on 27 October 2004

Mrs CP has been pestering me for a while to get a piano and I've finally caved in, well sort of!!. Frown

The only downside is she can't play and wants to learn, my only fear is that the din will be unbearable during the learning process.

The cunningplan I've come up with is to get a Clavanova with headphone sockets, thus eliminating the noise altogether.

The few we've listened to have been Yamaha's
in particular the CLP-115 which sounds very good, almost as good as the real thing.

I was just wandering if any of you guys have any ideas as to what else I should be looking at for about the same price which is £800 and certainly no more than a £1000

Your input would be appreciated

Regards
Clive
Posted on: 27 October 2004 by jayd
My mom's old Ensoniq (circa mid-80s; an MR series, I think) had weighted keys and felt great to play. Came with 8 piano sounds ranging from Steinway to de-tuned upright "honky-tonk" piano. Sounded not half bad through headphones or through her small Fender keyboard amp.

Not sure what the current Ensoniq offerings might be, or if they're even still around.

jay
Posted on: 27 October 2004 by oldie
[QUOTE]Originally posted by cunningplan:
Mrs CP has been pestering me for a while to get a piano and I've finally caved in, well sort of!!. Frown

The only downside is she can't play and wants to learn, my only fear is that the din will be unbearable during the learning process.

The cunningplan I've come up with is to get a Clavanova with headphone sockets, thus eliminating the noise altogether.


Clive
Contact Tom for his free upright and get a outside shed, much cheaper Cool
oldie.
Posted on: 27 October 2004 by cunningplan
Oldie said
quote:
Clive
Contact Tom for his free upright and get a outside shed, much cheaper
oldie.


I hope you mean Tom's upright Piano, and not anything else that Tom has got upright Smile

Regards
Clive
Posted on: 27 October 2004 by oldie
Clive,
Naughty, Naughty, I would expect "double entendres on PFM or other such lowly sites but god dam you sir this is the Naim forum Eek
oldie.
Posted on: 27 October 2004 by cunningplan
Oldie
I apologise unreservedly!! I should know better.
As punishment I'll donate my CDX2 to charity.

Regards
Clive
Posted on: 28 October 2004 by Deane F
quote:
Originally posted by cunningplan:
As punishment I'll donate my CDX2 to charity.



And get a CoolturntableCool instead?

Deane
Posted on: 28 October 2004 by --duncan--
I'm mainly speaking on behalf of my wife here, who is a piano teacher. She would strongly suggest you get a real piano. The 'touch' of the instrument is inimitable and if you start to lean on an electronic keyboard it is hard to transfer the skill to a piano. A decent second-hand upright should be obtainable for £1000-1200 and will hold most of its value, unlike an electronic keyboard.

Speaking as someone who hears beginners most days, it's hard to make a really nasty sound on a piano. Be thankful she's not taking up the violin. Having live music around the house is a wonderful thing, even when it is at a very basic level. Rather than have her hidden away, you might enjoy sharing her progress. Having other people follow her development without making a performance of it will also encourage her when improvement is slow. Finally, I can’t believe the denizens of a forum dedicated to the nuances of sound reproduction can seriously suggest an artificial reproduction when you could be listening to The Real Thing!

duncan

Email: djcritchley at hotmail.com
Posted on: 30 October 2004 by MarkEJ
Completely agree with the above.

Trouble is, the "plastic piano" sound is becoming ubiquitous, and it follows that the "plastic piano" sound from the keyboard that one buys will become an increasingly acurate fake of the "plastic piano" sound used on commercial recordings. The more this happens, the less people will remember what a real piano sounds like.

Furthermore, the best feature of fake pianos is the key feel, which is almost universally superb. However, if you are attempting to improvise on the instrument, a fake will not cause the "next note" to appear in your mind the way a proper piano does -- I think this is to do with the fact that it is actually providing less information than it should. As a musical insrument, it feels and "sounds" OK, but it doesn't really work, in the fullest sense of the word.

Finally: the only digital instrument which has caused me any lasting excitement was the Kurzweil. It's astonishing, but it costs over two grand and still needs an amp. Half that spent on a used proper piano would be an infinitely better idea, IMHO.

If space is an issue, don't discount the Eavestaff...

They can be magnificent -- they look and can sound terrific, and they cost relative peanuts. The overall compromise is vastly less than with a digital thing. Have fun!

Best;

Mark
Posted on: 30 October 2004 by cunningplan
Thanks Duncan, Mark and Jekyll
Your input and advice is appreciated,the idea of the real thing as not been dismissed, but space is an issue but not a major one.

The Clavinovas we've listened to have been rather exceptional, and our local music shop has lent us the Yamaha CLP-115 for a week to audition. So far Mrs CP is in her element and enjoying her new toy ( I suppose much like us guys with a new bit of Hi-Fi Kit)

I suppose I'm mellowing a little bit and I'm coming round to her way of thinking as to putting up with the din.

Mark I'm interested in the Eavestaff can you give me some more info!!

Regards Clive
Posted on: 31 October 2004 by MarkEJ
Sure - not that I have much! The pic above came from an Eavestaff Minipiano ad (for sale) on http://www.thestonehouse.co.uk/, and these deco-cased models tend to change hands in various states of repair for 400 to 800 quid. Most of these are post 1930 -- there is a brief history here.

The main percieved problem with the Minipiano was "lack of musical quality", and you will see that many dealers/restorers still stick to this line. Since this seems chiefly to be inspired by the fact that since the strings are shorter, the instrument will not play as loud as a 9'6" Bosendorfer, I personally think that this is total bollocks. I have a client who has a battered Minipiano which plays superbly and cost them 350 quid. The case can be refinished any time (they regularly appear in "piano black" with deco brass kick plates around the pedals)...

...and since they are all iron-framed there is no issue with the thing becoming untuneable due to woodworm. The volume thing is usually counteracted by the fact that they tend to be housed in smaller rooms.

It may not apply in every case, but there's also something very nice about not having what amounts to a large sideboard in front of one's face when playing. The music rack is foldable/removeable, and the sensation is very conducive to good stuff being produced. There's also a nice flat surface for your drink/ashtray/plate of tapas, although of course much of this also applies to fast-depreciating digitals, and the undoubted convenience of being able to plug in headphones has value also.

I have no particular axe to grind (I'm not part of this industry) but I think much of the success of digitals stems from the fact that they are undeniably amazing when first experienced -- it's gobsmacking that all this sound emerges from something with no moving parts except the keys and the speaker cones -- but with successive generations this will become less of a dramatic selling point as digital technology gets more accepted and commonplace. Right now is the time when they will be most expensive.

I also find it astonishing that we are generally so keen on the "new and shiny" thing that we can sometimes ignore alternatives with lasting virtue. It may not be strictly relevant to you (or even interesting!), but around a grand will buy you a very playable Fender Rhodes piano (a fantastically expressive instrument good for anything from Bach to Beatles and back), and even a full-scale Hammond A, B, or C-series in great mechanical order, with Leslie box can be had for under 2.5k, complete with a nice smell of seasoned hardwood and engine oil... Now that's VFM!

Best;

Mark