Guilty Pleasures

Posted by: Todd A on 19 October 2000

All right, ‘fess up: what horrible, corporate tripe do you like? You know that Kenny G or ‘N Sync song or artist that you secretly enjoy.

While I don’t expect anyone to actually enjoy those two artists, I am confident that every single one of you out there has at least a couple of pieces of music that you enjoy that you don’t generally talk or write about. I write this because I get the distinct impression from the musical threads and other threads that forum members generally place a premium on originality and quality. That, by default, eliminates most of the over-hyped pop / rock and “smooth” jazz garbage out there, and results in a higher-than-mass-market rate of classical, jazz, and underground music consumption.

My guilty pleasures include a little Enja, Boney James, Madonna (Ray of Light – an enjoyable piece of pop blah), and, Oh Lord have mercy, Bon Jovi (a little of the crap from the ‘80s no less!). There are a few others, but my shame is great enough as is.

(PS – I don’t know if one of these threads existed on the old forum.)

Posted on: 19 October 2000 by Ian P
Good call Todd.

How about :

Genesis
Pink Floyd
Alanis Morissette
Barenaked Ladies
Kate Bush
Madonna

I could go on. I think I've picked the least cool of my likes.

Hate/Loath whatever. I have also found a great deal of cool new stuff through this forum, but don't mind admitting I really enjoy the best output from the above.

Come on - out of the closet the rest of you !!

Ian

Posted on: 19 October 2000 by fred simon
>>I get the distinct impression from the musical threads and other
>>threads that forum members generally place a premium on originality
>>and quality. That, by default, eliminates most of the over-hyped pop
>>/ rock and "smooth" jazz garbage out there, and results in a
>>higher-than-mass-market rate of classical, jazz, and underground
>>music consumption.

I'm all for originality and quality, but why does that preclude pop and rock music? Besides, isn't there plenty of dreck in classical and jazz music? You know the old saying: there's two kinds of music -- good and bad. That's my credo.

For instance, someone mentions Genesis and Kate Bush as "guilty pleasures" ... why on earth must one feel guilty about digging the likes of those artists? May I suggest a bit more discernment so that we don't willy nilly lump the likes of Kate Bush in with Kenny G.

Ironically, I honestly have no guilty pleasures in that I can defend the artistic integrity of all music I enjoy, albeit some of which, no doubt, others here would designate as guilty, pleasurable or otherwise.

Posted on: 19 October 2000 by fred simon
See, that's what I mean ... why is Arvo Pårt a guilty pleasure? Why not just "pleasure" ... why so much guilt?

OK, Boney James I can see feeling guilty about digging (and he's not my cup of tea, so no guilt here!)

Posted on: 19 October 2000 by Ian P
In the offing ?????
Posted on: 19 October 2000 by Ian P
Like it.

Perhaps we should aspire to : NullPointerException.

Posted on: 19 October 2000 by Todd A
I don't know if I approve of the word "wankers." How about doofuses?
Posted on: 19 October 2000 by fred simon
Haven't heard Gorecki, Hovhaness has been around for awhile (gone now?) and I do enjoy some of his work (Mysterious Mountain, which I'm sure some here would qualify as deserving of guilt), but if I dig Pårt am I a wanker or a doofus?

But, really, are these composers truly the classical music equivalent of Kenny G? If so, then there's no room at the low end of the scale for Android Leper!

Posted on: 19 October 2000 by Todd A
None you ask about are the classical equivalent of Kenny G. John Williams, the (de)composer not the guitarist, is the classical equivalent of Kenny G. And he is a wanker. I would rank all three of the composers you mention as second-rate, but that’s not terrible. It’s not like I’m saying they’re as bad as Wagner, or anything.
Posted on: 20 October 2000 by Rico
quote:
I don't know if I approve of the word "wankers." How about doofuses?

Sorry, these words are not interchangeable.

Rico - musichead

Posted on: 20 October 2000 by Pete
There are a few things on the shelves which I got when I was wee, but which I probably wouldn't have touched with a bargepole a few years ago had I come to them the first time then. My first LP, ELO's "Eldorado", for example, and the first LP of my brother's I kept putting on myself, "This is the Moody Blues".

But I've got a lot more tolerant over the more recent past, listen to a wider range of music and am happy to appreciate a lot of stuff I'd have sneered at in the past (various stuff in others' lists falls into this category here, plus lots of 80s pop). Aside from overcooked wannabe soul from, well, you know who, there's very little I'll really turn my nose completely up to now, and in the case of The B man and The C woman, I actually find it physically distressing, literally so, rather than simply beneath my supposed dignity.

Pete.

Posted on: 20 October 2000 by woodface
I must admit to liking a couple of Britney Spears singles 'Hit me baby one more time' and 'Whoops I did it again'. Regardless of their manufactured nature they are classic pop singles. At least BS does not pretend to be anything other than a manufactured bit of fluff, unlike the truly dreadful 'spice girls'. All that girl power bollocks really got my goat - where's the power in repeating whatever their then male manager told them to say? The sporty/dogs breakfast one even refers to herself as an 'artiste' - please! Have you heard 'her' lyrics, her 5-year old fans could do better!
Posted on: 20 October 2000 by fred simon
It's probably impossible to come to consensus about truly guilty pleasures ... one person's guilt is another's pleasure.

I happen to love Ennio Morricone's film music, especially Once Upon A Time In America, and I'm not embarrassed to say so. And while some may consider Arvo Pårt a second rate composer, I do not.

Besides, the descriptive "second rate" is too pejorative. There has to be some middle ground ... not every composer can be among the giants (even if we could all agree on who they are, which we can't), and of those who aren't, not all can be aptly described as "second rate." How about "very good but not necessarily great"?

Posted on: 20 October 2000 by Todd A
You're reading too much into this thread. I just want to see what other people guiltily enjoy, whatever it happens to be. It's supposed to be fun and humorous.

There is not, and cannot be a comprehensive definition of "guilty pleasure" or "second-rate" composer since these are indeed purely subjective concepts. I do firmly believe that not all music is created equal - Beethoven is better than the Monkees, period - but beyond such silly comparisons, everything's a matter of taste.

For instance, someone mentioned Pink Floyd as a guilty pleasure when clearly they were a great rock band. Perhaps the author associates them with guilty feelings because of the extra-musical activities often associated with the band.

And I have a great description for second-rate (or second-tier) composers: Excellent. For instance, Kodaly is an excellent composer while Bartok is a great composer.


Posted on: 21 October 2000 by fred simon
I could have sworn there was more than a little bit of humor in my messages here when they left the terminal. If humor was lost in cyberspace please don't blame the messenger, simply read my messages again out in loud in the voice of Marge Simpson -- humor will be restored.

But seriously, serious issues are raised here in the midst of the humor, and I feel like addressing them ... no big whoop. Hey everybody, I'm down ... dig what you like and like what you dig, feel guilty or pleasure or both, whatever, rock on. It's a given that it's all subjective, even whether Beethoven is better than The Monkees (probably, but is he better than The Beatles? Which brings to mind Glenn Gould's essay purporting that Petula Clark singing Tony Hatch was better than The Beatles, as well as his essay claiming that only a relatively small portion of Beethoven's oeuvre, very early and very late, was of value, the rest being vastly over rated).

However, I feel moved to speak up when I see an "excellent" composer (sure, Todd, that's a fine adjective, I'll take it) like Arvo Pårt lumped in with Snoop Doggy Dog or Kenny G ... much too indiscriminate. Even poor John Williams doesn't deserve that fate (although Android Leper decidedly does).

And I don't feel comfortable when someone implies that worthy music is to be found mostly in genres A and B but not in genres B and C. Smash genrism, I say.

Posted on: 22 October 2000 by Allan Probin
I quite like the current All Saints single "Black Coffee". If you listen past the singing and listen to the music there's something going on there thats not bad at all.

As for Britney Spears - she had a single out about a year ago. I can't remember the title but the opening words were: "Sometimes I run, Sometimes I hide...". It was actually a top bit of songwriting, honest.

I spend too much time in the car listening to the radio.

Allan

Posted on: 22 October 2000 by fred simon
quote:
P.S. Did you happen to notice how you contradict yourself in the message you posted?

Which message? How so?

"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself (I am large, I contain multitudes.)" -Walt Whitman

Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Pete
There's a lot of very good songwriting coming from the mouths (though rather more rarely the pens) of manufactured pop bands: it makes sense if you're spending a fortune on marketing to have a decent set of hooks backing you up, after all, and background pop songwriting is hardly a new thing.

Don't see the Spice Girls as any different in this regard. Certainly the Girl Power stuff is nonsense, but it was just marketing and not exactly disguised, and they've released some great pop singles that are fine for a yomp. Of course if you really like good pop you could listen to someone like XTC or REM, but that doesn't invalidate what the Spices et al are up to. Without external musical support they'd look a bit deflated, yes, but they have extra musical support, and asuch are a good outlet for some good light pop.

Pete.

p.s., Vuk, Kenny G was mentioned in the opening paragraph of the thread's first post, subsequently by Fred twice and again by Todd... double check before pulling posts apart!

Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Andrew Randle
About 20 years (when I was 7) I bought a number of Adam Ant tapes. Funny, they seem to be cool now.

I definitely dig the "Barnaked Ladies" and bought Gordon in 1995 before they became big. They still produce great music that makes me laugh, and that's what counts.

I nearly bought the "Mark Owen" album as I was amazed at how different he sounded from Take That (or the lead singer who's name I forget). I wonder if anyone bought any Robbie Williams.

A friend of mine actually likes "Kenny G"....
uh-oh. Anyone remember the Waynes World 2 sketch?

Other corporate stuff I own = Madonna, Fatboy Slim and maybe a couple of others.

I DO NOT own any Oasis (Corporate Wanker Gucci Pussies).

Andrew

Andrew Randle
2B || !2B;
4 ^ = ?;

Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Steve Catterall
King Crimson
Frank Zappa
Miles Davis
Captain Beefheart
Vivaldi
Bruce Springsteen
Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Todd A
Why on earth would you include Zappa in a "guilty pleasures" list? Joe's Garage. Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar? These are guilty pleasures? Sheesh.
Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Todd A
I didn't make it past Zappa. How could Miles Davis be on such a list? Why not just add Satchmo, too?

Now Vivaldi . . . as big a classical fan as I am, I'm not too fond of Vivaldi. I agree with Stravinsky's sentiments . . .

Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Pete
Don't own any Beefheart, but have plenty from the rest of Steve's list...

While I can appreciate stuff like Wake of Poseidon (the remake of "Mars", deary deary me!) or Islands being in a guilt list, Discipline onwards is fine stuff which hasn't really dated. And if you meant ca. 1970, you should say so rather than sweep all things Crim into a single pile: try the more recent ProjeKct releases, for example.

Miles Davis a guilty pleasure? What? Puh-leeeeeze!

Zappa similarly: he's written and performed a great deal of highly respected music across a variety of genres.

Vivaldi? Again, what's the problem here? Hardly his fault that everyone and his dog has the opening of "Spring" to hand. But check out, say, Palladian Ensemble's "Les Saisons Amusantes" for a fresh take revealing the music under the cliche.

And the Boss has made very few duff records. Anyone not liking Wild, The Innocent and the E Street Shuffle basically has hearing problems AFAICT.

In fact, only thing to be embarassed about here is that you're embarassed by these people in the first place...

Pete.

p.s., the Gallaghers may be a pair of plonkers, but the songwriting on What's the Story is, for the most part, good stuff. Shame about the recording and production rendering it almost unlistenable, mind...

Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Steve Catterall
Actually I only made that list up to illustrate the point that Fred's been making about 'pop' artists.

Just think its interesting how all the 'serious' music fans got so vocally upset.

Personally don't own any Zappa (virtuoso wank) - and would feel far more embarrassed to admit liking that to say liking someone like Kate Bush.

Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Todd A
Zappa is serious music - seriously funny and entertaining. Until you hear Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar (at least), you ought not criticize Zappa. If you do, I wish 1000 hours of Kenny G and 'N Sync upon you!
Posted on: 23 October 2000 by Steve Catterall
I've heard plenty of Zappa thank you. Fans of his 'music' always seem very keen to point out all the 'good' bits I've obviously missed.

Yes, its all very clever ... in a pretentious, self-congratulatory way. But I can't say I found it remotely funny - all a bit too obvious and (again) self-congratulatory. Very American I would say (although all the people I know who like him are English)

Sorry - but everything I've heard by him (including Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar) is just wank IMHO.

But then, what do I know ... I rate Kate Bush