Linn Akiva cartridge - another review

Posted by: paul99 on 23 January 2003

Colleagues,

I have just taken delivery of an LP12, EKOS, Akiva, Lingo and Linto from Martin Kleiser. Actually, owing to varoius problems the delivery was made over the period from the beginning of November last year.

It is very likely that the Akiva set-up reviewed by Mike Lacey was mine.

I am glad that he liked my system.

However my opinion is rather different. Here then is my review of the Akiva, in all probability the very same cartridge as that reviewed by Mike Lacey.

Installation used for the review tests:

The installation of the Linn equipment was performed together with a Linn dealer (Colin Macey)and is to the best of our knowledge a satisfactory installation. The sound colouration does not exist with other inputs including other turntable/arm/cartridge arrangements.

Equipment used for the tests were: Linn: Akiva, Ekos, LP12, Lingo, Linto, Quad: 34, 707, ESL63s.

Review´:

This weekend I took delivery of my new LP12 again but with a new EKOS arm and Akiva cartridge. The Akiva replaces the Dynavector cartridge fitted as a temporary measure. Due to manufacturing defects and short-circuits the arm and some other components had also been changed. Here are a few comments on the Akiva as it operates in this set-up.

First point is that the mid-range bloom that I experienced with the previous Dynavector cartridge is much reduced but still present. The Akiva delivers a very hard muscular sound. When listening to rock or jazz music, the effect is very dynamic and involving. Problems set in when the recording has a large mid-range component, such as forward vocals, the mid-range bloom becomes a distracting honk.

The colouration produced by the cartridge/arm/turntable arrangement is such that differences between recordings are masked, everything comes out hard and aggressive.Even relatively gentle classical music (say, RVW Oboe Concerto) becomes aggressive, the deeper stringed instruments come in with a jazz-club-style punch. You don't hear the performance or its subtleties, all you hear is Linn.

It is said that the Akiv, and by inference the Akiva, extracts a large amount of information from the groove, this may well be the case but if so, the colouration obscures all this additional information. So bad is the mid-range bloom that while playing a recording of the "Ode to Joy" finale, I had the impression that I was listening to the music using a cheap pair of boxy loudspeaker rather than ESL63s.

My pre-amplifier features a filter which allows a step in the frequency response to be set. I think that this is intended to overcome room resonances. This filter can be used to reduce the mid-range honk. Listening to the effect of the various filter settings, I would judge that there is a bump, or flattened peak, in the frequency response of the LP12 combination somewhere between about 100Hz and 350Hz. I have since been informed that the "word on the street", so to speak, is that the peak in frequency response is at about 250 Hz.

This non-flat frequency response would explain the, by some people admired, punchy Linn sound. I can quite understand that this bass/mid range bump would lift a, let's say not so good, HiFi out of the doldrums and give an instantly impressive sound with the right kind of music.

It is almost pointless to try to compare the sound of a HiFi system with the "original sound", we don't what it is and even, in a studio or multi-miked set up, if it ever existed. What we can tell though, is do different pieces of music, different musicians, different recording venues sound different, can we hear these subtle, and not so subtle, differences? With the LP12, Akiva and so on, the answer is no. Everything sounds as though it were recorded in a jazz dive and, perhaps exaggerating slightly here, played by a jazz band. The Linn colouration obscures all this information. The LP12 converted my HiFi system (based upon the stunningly clear and neutral ESL63s) into a boom-box.

In conclusion, a cartridge with plenty of punch, good for rock or jazz. However, for listeners with good quality, neutral amplifiers and loudspeakers, the colouration will prove tiring. Particularly worrying is the way that all the different sound textures that can result from different collections of instruments, different scoring, different acoustics, different ways of playing are all lost and replaced with an aggressive punch. The musical and acoustic intentions of the composer, the musicians and the recording engineers are all but lost.

Quite a bit different, isn't it?

I do welcome and, in fact expect, comments. I am as surprised by the LP12/Ekos/Akiva performance as I am fairly sure you are.

I want to stress that I have been very careful in ensuring that the performance noted was due to the addition of the LP12 to my system and not the uncovering of other latent problems.
Posted on: 13 February 2003 by Don Atkinson
Mike,,

Thanks for the info.

I presume that the dealer has offered a full refund on the full t/t, including arm and cartridge etc and that Paul99 has taken this refund and returned the equipment.

I presume that the dealer didn't install the t/t in the first place, but did, at some later stage, visit Paul99 and set the equipment up properly. It would be interesting to know how close to the ideal, Paul99 had managed to get his t/t set up by himself. Does this particular dealer normally deliver and install? (does any dealer deliver and install t/ts these days
or do they only do that in £50k+ systems in architect designed new homes ?)

Did the dealer warn Paul99 that the dem in the shop, using completely different equipment to his Quad, could give a different presenation to the music.

What did the dealer think of the sound of Paul99's system once the t/t had been properly installed.

Were the equipment breakdowns real.

I suppose the next one could only be answered by Paul99. If the kit in the shop sounded so superb, have you thought about selling the Quad part of the system and buying the full demo rig, either from this dealer or some other dealer ??

Again for Paul99, was it the Akiva you didn't like in your system, or the whole t/t, or was it that you didn't feel the dealer was doing enough to get the system to sound right or.......a range of issues......or.......??

Paul99, i'm sure that Naim, Linn the dealer and one or two others on this forum would be genuinely interested of your view of things and that we would all be willing to learn from your experiences. Posting the plain facts, non-emotionally, would be a good start.

Cheers

(Agony Aunt) Don
Posted on: 14 February 2003 by paul99
Colleagues,

To reply to the various comments which have been addressed to me over the last few days. First let me say that it is not my intention to upset anyone or cause offence.

First, I would like to defend my actions in placing some reviews on various web-sites. I think that reviews by actual owners are a good and useful thing. Each review will have been made using a different set up, different amplifiers, speakers and so on. Each reviewer will have different tastes in music. I was not able to find an LP12 review with the same QUAD set-up as I use.

Now such reviews are available. If that helps people avoid the problems I have had - good. If I am mistaken - I am sorry. I have really tried to give a fair and accurate assessment of the problem.

I have avoided criticising the dealer or the product (LP12 etc) and all my comments are to be read in the context of operation with the rest of my HiFi system. I have made it clear in my reviews exactly what equipment I am using.

I have, on the whole, appreciated the comments received.

I am wary of saying what could have been done better and, furthermore, as I now own neither an LP12 nor any Naim equipment, I feel somewhat ill-at-ease using Naim's forum.

Don - Could the dealer have done more? Well - he did a lot to keep me happy. As you know from my previous postings there were a lot of faults with the LP12 etc. The dealer arranged for a new plinth, lid, Ekos and cable. He even arranged that I should get the upgraded cable at no extra cost. He did install it when all the new parts and the Akiva arrived. And it was the dealer who offered to accept return of the equipment and give a refund if I was not happy. Really, he could not have done more. Apart from the fact that I would have preferred him to have made the original installation, I have no complaints whatsoever. Even then, the original installation was with a loaned cartridge and so was not the final set-up, so a dealer installation would, perhaps, not have been relevant. Oh yes, the dealer also lent me a cartridge while waiting for the Akiva.

On reflection, now that I have got over the disappointment, - full marks for service to Colin Macey of Martin Kleiser at Beaconsfield.

David C. - I am really confused. How can it be that it works with your QUAD (speakers at least) and not with my all QUAD system? I think that my QUAD34/707 combination is a competent (although not world-beating) amplifier and is not responsible for the problems.

Prior to returning the equipment, I took a day off work, to have one last go. I understand that something like 100,000 LP12s have been sold and 100,000 happy customers (quite a few of whom use this forum) cannot be wrong. So there must be something wrong with my set up.

I have an MC module for the QUAD 34 and tried that in place of the Linto. The thick, syrupy and blurred sound disappeared. I could now hear some detail, including record surface noise (oh well). For example, in a recording of Glenn Gould playing some Mozart, I could now hear his humming in the background and tell that he was playing a good piano. Quite a bit better. Incompatibility with the QUAD 34? - Well I don't think so. The output from the Linto is at a low impedance and the level falls well within the input range of the 34. I also tried different inputs with different sensitivities.

I now suspect that the Linto might have been faulty, it must have been - surely!?

So how did that leave the LP12/Lingo/Ekos/Akiva sounding? Well not too bad. Not quite as much detail as I had hoped for, but adequate, and with the more extended bass response that I was looking for. The mid-range bloom was still there but because there was now some high frequency content, it presented itself as one aspect of a cleaner sound rather than the complete sound.

I reported an aggressive and exaggerated bass-line. Using the QUAD MC module, the bass behaviour fits quite nicely within the whole sound.

So a lot better than it was but, quite frankly, not clearly better than my old Rega. The extended and punchier bass is obtained at the expense of still irritating mid-range colouration.

Don - What didn't I like? I think that it was the whole combination. The Linto for its colouration and lack of detail (I know that this will cause offence, but for whatever reason that is how it worked in my system) and the LP12/Ekos/Akiva for its mid-range bloom.

David - Reference point? Good question. Actually I want any new turntable to sound different that's why I am buying it. Just so long as the different is better! That means better than my Cyrrus (?) CD player (I forget which model it is - it has a separate PSU, if that helps) or the Rega and better than my cheapo DAB receiver (A Videologic something, which I reckon is really quite good).

Don - Buying all new equipment? When I hear something better, I'll buy it. Don't forget I intended to buy a new turntable and so on, so the comparison between old and new would be made on whatever demo equipment the dealer has on the assumption that it is good enough to hear the improvement.

As I explained in a previous posting, the LP12 sounded better than the Rega by a small margin because of a better bass performance and because the mid-range bloom was masked by the loudspeakers. Of course, only now do I understand that.

I know from previous comments that my response to the demo is considered foolish. I wasn't too sure about the sound of either the Rega or the LP12 played through the Linn equipment. I know that Linn make world-class equipment and that they sell about 30 million pounds worth of the stuff per year but my first impression is that it sounded coloured and aggressive although very good in absolute terms. Good enough for a turntable comparison, I thought.

To be quite frank, we could theorize about this all day or longer. It just didn't work with my kit. I am actually somewhat envious of all of you who have LP12-based systems that work.

A recent issue of Stereophile (or is it Audiophile?) magazine listed the top 100 HiFi products of all time. The LP12 was at number 1 and the QUAD ESL63 was at number 2. I was expecting to be, by now, the proud owner of the very, very best HiFi set up possible, apart from not having Naim amplifiers of course (oh, and the latest QUAD speakers and ...).

To return to the question of buying new kit. The QUAD amplification is due to go eventually. I bought it years ago as a stop-gap. I have not really thought about what to use instead.

I expect to have my new turntable in about three weeks time. Again, I feel slightly ill at ease making further postings as I am not a Naim user. However, as I have been asked to report how I get along, I hope that you will bear with me, if I make a further posting on that subject.

I may start a new thread sometime in the future on the subject of what amplification to use in place of the QUAD. But let's get this turntable nonsense cleared up!

I hope that that tidies up all loose ends. Thank you all for your comments. Once again, my apologies if I have caused offence.


Regards,

Paul.
Posted on: 14 February 2003 by Don Atkinson
Fools Rush In....

where Angels fear to tread....according to young Elvis.

Take care with the next t/t enteprise, Paul.

Think about your future system and make sure the intended t/t sounds right in that system. Otherwise you'll buy a new t/t that sounds fine in your current system but might severley limit your choice of future equipment. You already know that someone elses No 1 turntable and No 1 loudspeakers don't necessarily make for a match made in heaven.

Choose your next dealer with equal care, they are a bit like girls, most of them will make perfectly good wives, but not universal wives.

Cheers

Don