New speakers for me...

Posted by: Tony L on 10 January 2002

I did a little experiment last night, I brought the Heybrook Point 5s from my second system through and tried them in the main system. The results were mixed, the Point 5s are obviously not as good a speaker as a Kan (though they are an incredibly good speaker for their price), but they are more tonally even and shift a bit more air. The system sounded more evenly balanced and fuller, but had lost a lot of the musical ability and clarity it has with the Kans. It was painfully obvious how much better the Kan tweeter is, the Point 5s sound a bit muffled and shut-in in the top. It was equally obvious that the Kans are simply too small to drive my listening room. My room is quite big as it opens out to the kitchen, the whole space is about 19' x 13' with a high ceiling. The speakers are on the shorter wall and fire down the room.

My conclusion is that I definitely do need to get a bigger pair of speakers. Time to do some serious thinking… I have a feeling that a second hand pair of Credos, Elites, or reasonably sized Royds may be the answer.

I have heard Intros and Credos many times, and have heard both work well, so they represent safe ground. I suspect the Nait is up to driving them quite well (at 89db they have to be easier than Kans), I really don't want to force myself back onto the amp buying ladder, I am more than happy with the quality of the Nait, though intend to respect its quantity when choosing speakers.

I could then move the Kans into the second system (I ain't making the mistake of selling them again!) and then sell off the Point 5s. In my normal tight arsed fashion I probably won't want to buy new, so will be looking second hand…. (hmmm, anyone got a nice pair of AR 11s or 14s for sale?).

What else should I add to my list? I want a nice easy to drive and relatively full range speaker that is tight, musical, and works close to a back wall. I plan to do some thinking about this over the next few months - I am currently taking voluntary redundancy (yippee!), so won't be buying anything expensive immediately, but I am getting a good deal from the company, so assuming I find another job within the next few months I will come out nicely ahead financially… this is when I will buy some speakers!

Tony.

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by dave simpson
Take home a pair of Intros/Credos if possible. Place 'em close to a wall and beware The Wobbles. They are more sensitive to "wobble" than Linn speakers (god knows the leaf spring suspension doesn't help with removing wobble).Even minute wobble will get you 3 note poochie-fuzzy bass and glassy upper-mids with no top-end. Get the wobble out and the music that comes out of these pups is shocking... you'll forget to evaluate 'em wink

Not that he needs encouraging.... but I'd have my eye on a Vuk recommendation-the Neat Elites. Something about the posts about this speaker all over the 'net...just a "feeling".


regards,

dave

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by aybee
quote:
Originally posted by Paul D:

One serious suggestion would be something like a pair of the old Tannoy Lancasters or Yorks, which are massively efficient , move a hell of a lot of air and are still serviceable.

Paul Duerden


I'm currently using 10" Tannoy Golds and boy I agree they are fast and probably a Nait has more than enough power.

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by Tony L
Here is a quick panorama to give an idea of how my room works. The camera was mounted on a tripod positioned where the listening chair is. Apologies for some obvious stitching on the photo, but it is my first attempt at this.

I will attempt to make the perspective a little easier to understand: The guitar is on the left wall and behind the listening chair (the door to the room is just out of shot beyond it). The records are on the right wall next to the chair, and the kitchen is directly behind, but is obviously still part of the same acoustic space. Effectively the chair is directly in the middle of the acoustic space, i.e. it is in a position of minimum bass reinforcement, so the bass is really clean and uncoloured, but without much real substance or weight. Whenever I have been really successful with Kans (and I have been really successful with Kans in the past!), I have always relied on a little rear wall bass reinforcement to give that bit of extra low end kick that they naturally lack.

A few comments above are I am afraid non-starters, I am not prepared to take a massive financial hit by dumping the P9 for a LP12, I have had one in the past, and whilst I love them, I can’t live with them! (I chose the P9 over a fully Naimed LP12) Plus remember I’m a non-ferrous nutter now, so the logistics of using a LP12 well away from the rest of the gear (a la Cattlin) is not something I’m really prepared to consider. Then the fact that the decks balance would be miles different from the CD etc (the CDX and P9 are fairly similarly balanced tonally, the deck just sounds bigger, more spacious, and grooves a bit more).

Don’t think for a minute that I am going off Kans at all, they are great speakers, and I consider myself to be a experienced Kan user who can get them to sound right (all the best Kan systems I have heard have been mine!). I have a second system that I use a lot in a very small room where they will kick ass, so that is where they will eventually go!

As for records that sound thin: Just about anything on Blue Note, any dub - I put the 12” of Perpetual Dawn by The Orb last night and the Kans simply could not do the bass line (I know they can do it in a smaller room), sticking the larger Point 5s in really put some kick back, but still no boom. This room is as I say very clean sounding and well behaved.

Tony.

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by Allan Probin
Nice room Tony, when are the SBLs arriving ?

Allan

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by Martin Payne
quote:
Originally posted by Allan Probin:
Nice room Tony, when are the SBLs arriving ?


Hmm, a NAIT2 can drive SBLs.

Or maybe try out the patented Tony 'Free HiFi' approach. Buy the next pair of IBLs that come along & sell 'em again if they don't fit the bill.

cheers, Martin

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by redeye
Jesus Tony....

That room!!
New amp and speakers comin' up I think.

Sorry but seriously lots of space to fill eh?

Credos if you can stand that 'thin' thing they do confused

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by dave simpson
"Credos if you can stand that 'thin' thing they do"

Forgot Tony once had briks....


Vuk,

Just because some of us were born in The South;)

regards,

dave

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by David Dever
Tony-

Try looking for an older pair of SBLs with the mk I (M-S) driver--this will make it an easier transition form the Kans and, yes, you probably could get away with a NAIT 2 for a little while.

Dave Dever

Posted on: 10 January 2002 by Mark Dunn
Hi Tony:

Someone else mentioned activating the Kans and if the wall behind them is S-O-L-I-D then I think that work wonders. Trouble is you'd need new amplification.

I own Credos (with a 250) and have spent an awful lot of time getting them 'just so'. The Readers Digest version is:

1. The leaf spring suspension makes the mounting surface *absolutely* critical. Seriously, this is a real deal breaker if incorrect. I ended up R+Ding my own plinths which work well on a wooden floor (never tried on concrete).

2. Credos need a S-O-L-I-D back wall, like the Kans. Here in the land of the Longhorn the walls are all gypsum board, which is a no-no. My Credos are *way* out into the room, which I know you don't want.

3. Again like the Kans, source quality is starkly displayed at the frequency extremes. I expect that old P9 thing of yours would be OK ;-)

Someone posted earlier that the Credo's they heard sounded 'clangy' or like 'pots and pans'. Been there, done that, - a fatal room positioning issue or using M*** bases.

Hope this helps.

Best Regards,
Mark Dunnn

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by airness
Tony,

How about the new ATC speakers? SCM70, if I remember correctly. It's a non-ported design.

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Alex S.
Pod heretic here.

Do you expect a Nait2 to give lasting pleasure with Shahinians?

Let me know if you're ever in my part of the world.

Alex

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Dev B
quote:
Bonus Naim points to anyone spotting the correlation between the other pair of speakers lurking in the loft there.

Well, let me see, MS20's used a driver that was originally in the SBL (that Naim modified) and that Canon Omni was designed by Phil Ward of NBL fame (or at least Phil worked at Canon).

Dev

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by MarkEJ
Dev beat me to it...

(an imperfect
forum environment is
better than none)

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Dev B
Tony, my room is very similar to yours, except I have a even bigger space due to no back wall (my listening space is on the mezzanine level). My SBL's give bass that is precise with no overhang and you can follow it very clearly, but it isn't the deepest. The sort of room you (and I) have and the piccies suggest that you need some serious bass reinforcement. How bass works in a room is quite complicated and is not always related to a bigger driver, boundaries and distance are a big factor. As you love your Kans so much, unless you buy SBL's (with commensurate amplification) you will never match them for speed. Credos, etc need to be played at good volumes too with loads of current (it's not just about loudspeaker sensitivity) I reckon you would be better served with a subwoofer personally. I could write about this for hours but you can call me and we can talk.

cheers

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Tony L
quote:
I don't think people (see "Redeye" for eample) understand the fake perspective of the picture you've posted and are assuming you've got some insanely wide listening room.

The picture is hard to grasp without the knowledge that it is virtually a 360 degree view - it was made by stitching 7 individual wide angle pictures together. Acoustically the room is effectively a 19' x 13' rectangle, with the speakers straight ahead, the kitchen behind, and the chair in the middle. The wall that the Kans is against is rigid but not solid (it is an exterior wall with cavity insulation). The floor is a real wood laminate, and is a little on the boingy side, but is very flat and easy to level spikes on. It stores a fair bit of energy. I actually drew a floor plan and posted it here ages ago, but I'm buggered if I can find it with the search engine.

Ok, time to assess some more alternates:

SBLs: They are a bargain second hand, but I am not prepared to run a pair with a Nait - I would be laughed off the forum. One point I am desperately trying to make is that I don't want to be forced back into buying very expensive amplifiers. I want to use my Nait as I am completely happy with its sound quality. Basically I want to fix the thinness issue with the absolute minimum financial outlay, then when I want to fling more money at the system I will try and hunt down a XPS.

The active option is also a bit of a non-starter - I can't use both Naits as I need the other one in the studio, plus I don't want to put money into the amp at the moment - I see moving the Kans into the studio as being a no loss situation.

Shahinians: Hmmm, ok, but I will reiterate my requirement once again - can they be driven perfectly well with my Nait 2? The Nait is staying for the foreseeable future. If this is the case I guess Starters or Compasses might be an option. Problem is that I won't be able to get a dem without a real mountain of hassle (I don't even know who stocks them in the NW).

A sub: I'm not ruling this out. Is the Rega one any good? How much is it? Obviously REL are the market leaders, and something like a second hand Storm or whatever would be an option.

To be honest I really hope something like the Neat Mystique works for me, I get the impression the Nait will be happy driving them, plus they wouldn't upset the logical balance of my system the way a more expensive speaker would - they are not insanely expensive which is a big plus point. I am hopefully getting a decent listen to some Neats over the next month or so…

Tony.

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Andrew L. Weekes
quote:
PS.. IMO Doublets not as much fun but bassier

I believe Doublets need a better stand than the crappy base supplied.

Derren has a pair of custom stands (the manufacturer evades me at present) that transform them, giving VERY rigid mounting. They needed a very simple mod to work properly but are stunningly deep, tight, fast and musical. The tweeter is so much better than the Kan one too.

They also produce a soundstage like nothing else I've heard (except ESL's), real 'walk in touch the instruments stuff'.

Playing something like Mogwai's 'Come on die Young' you can close your eyes and imagine the band has really set up the drum kit in your living room - scary.

Andy.

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by P
No prize other than a well done Dev.

Phil Ward it was.

BTW I reckon this guy should buy me a drink because I also had a Mordaunt Short Prologic package with the big passive sub (now how embarrassing is that to admit!!!!)

Nice Panaroma Tony - how tall are your ceilings and what's below the floor?

P

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Andrew Randle
You say that the Kans are against an exterior wall, but it has a cavity. As long as there is a layer of bricks between the Kans and cavity then it should be OK.

Now for the interesting bit. Positioning your chair, and consequently your head, close to a back wall will usually result in the bass frequencies being reinforced. In your case you have a kitchen behind you... a load of space that is probably negatively affecting the bass performance of your room.

I would try firing across the width (I know it sounds strange), particularly if one of the walls are solid. Place the back of the chair close to the back wall.

Andrew Randle
The frightening thing is not dying
The frightening thing is not living

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Tony L
quote:
Playing something like Mogwai's 'Come on die Young' you can close your eyes and imagine the band has really set up the drum kit in your living room - scary.

Have you got the vinyl? It is absolutely stunning. Its cut across two 180g slabs of really quiet vinyl and ranks as one of the best recordings I have heard in my life.

Royds: I'm a bit vague with Royds as to which are which? The Sorcerers are the sort of 600 quid Kanalike (I've seen pics of Joe Petriks's pair), never heard them though. Are the Mintrals are those sort of flat small floorstanders with a port at the side? I assums the Minstral SE is just a better Minstral, not a totally different thing. The Abbots are kind of Rega XLA sloped baffle floorstanders, I have heard and liked these. Which are Doublets? Anyone got a pic?

Tony.

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Tony L
quote:
I would try firing across the width (I know it sounds strange), particularly if one of the walls are solid. Place the back of the chair close to the back wall.

I was waiting for someone to suggest that!

The main problem is my lovely elegant record storage solution would have to go out of the window. The record rack is simply too big to fit anywhere else in the flat (except for one place in the studio, but I have my keyboards / computer etc racked on that wall) - there is no available wall with a unbroken seven foot space that would not involve blocking a window. Even if there were the record storage had such a positive effect on the acoustics of the front room I would be very reluctant to shift it out into another room. Having to go out of the room just to get a record would really annoy me!

Good idea though, and one I gave a hell of a lot of thought to months ago.

quote:
I'm rather surprised no one has suggested a pair of isobariks yet ;-)

Read my lips... I USE A NAIT 2! wink

Tony.

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by John Channing
Tony,
Having scaled down from 32.5, 2*135s to a Nait 2 aren't you just going to end up going back up the amplifier chaing by wanting bigger speakers? The Elites won't work very well with the Nait, I have heard them on the end of a Nap90 and it wasn't good.
John
Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Andrew Randle
Well I did hear an Ion Systems Obelisk 1 drive a pair of bariks to stunning effect. Although the listening position a tad near-field (but still within sensible boundaries).

Oh, the other bit of advice to do is to try different seating positions along the length of the room, until you hear an optimim level of bass. This will probably mean putting on a track and walking like a chicken along the length of the room - so don't let anyone see you wink

Andrew

Andrew Randle
The frightening thing is not dying
The frightening thing is not living

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Tony L
More stuff that I missed answering…

Paul R:

quote:
(The only Hifi I've bought in the last 6 years or so was an impulse purchase of a pair of old Kans that I think you used to own. I shall get them out of the loft and live with them for a week or so, in a 12x17ish room.

Which ones? I've sold two pairs over the years, a absolutely mint pair of black Mk IIs that I had from new and traded against Briks, and the late black Hiq tweeter'd Mk 1s that I sold to Rico. I'm certainly interested in your findings, but make sure you stick 'em on the narrow wall and sit right in the middle of the room to get a taste of my flat!

A few people mentioned JM Labs 90x speakers: I have heard a couple of this range, both at Larry's and at shows - my gut feeling is that they are pretty good, but I am not convinced they are what I'm after. They work astoundingly well for something with such a big hole in the front, but there is something about the treble that gets on my wick.

Totem, Triangle etc are probably too much hassle to track down in the north west of the UK.

Big Tannoys are a strange idea, but possibly not daft. I have a few music industry contacts, so I could possibly track down a pair of SRMs or whatever to try, I hate the looks of them though. I would be surprised if I could find a pair of 800s though (unless they are still current). I know the Tannoy sound quite well, and whilst I like certain aspects I am not sure it is what I want full time. I even considered Lowthers too, but I would probably kick them to death after a while.

Quad 57s are something I have really wanted to own since I was about 12, I can't emphasise enough how much I like this speaker - I will definitely try some at some point, though I always pictured them as part of a second "radically different perspective system" with a 301 and Quad 2 amp. The bottom line is that I love them, but am not convinced I want them in my front room!

quote:
The Elites won't work very well with the Nait, I have heard them on the end of a Nap90 and it wasn't good.

My source for Neat amp requirements is none other than Bob S! I suspect this man should know. I would actually be looking lower in the range than the Elites, the Mystiques are the ones that interest me the most. Remember the Nait 2 can do Kans fine, and Kans are only about 82-84db efficiency.

quote:
Tony said: Read my lips... I USE A NAIT 2!

To which Jim replied: So do I!

Bloody hell! And it works? Cattlin, get yer Briks round! (the neighbours would kill me).

Tony.

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by Andrew L. Weekes
quote:
Have you got the vinyl? It is absolutely stunning. Its cut across two 180g slabs of really quiet vinyl and ranks as one of the best recordings I have heard in my life.

Unfortunately not, I had a bad experience with 'Rock Action' which was better on CD.

I think I'll splash out though, the CD of C.O.D.Y. is pretty awesome - probably the best CD I have.

Doublets BTW are a tall floorstander of similar width to a Kan, but deeper. There's two small bass / mid units sandwiching a tweeter, all having seperate enclosures internally. I'd rate them rate as the best ported loudspeaker I've heard and the only one I've liked, but they wouldn't work in my room, needing to be a bit further from the wall than my Kans, owing to my small room.

The ports are side firing and we had a bitch of a job getting the speaker to work, only one position in the room worked well, and it's either side of a large opening through to another room. The speakers are toed in slightly, primarily to prevent reflections from a fireplace close to the left speaker, the ports then effectively fire into this open space. One of the reason they work so well I suspect - there's literally nothing between the 'speakers.

They sound great listening in any position, even significantly off-axis, which surprised me. The stands are a custom affair that sits the front bottom edge of the 'speaker on some truly evil spikes, the rear of the stand reaches half way up the rear of the doublet and as standard has a couple of carbon fibre pads for the speaker to rest against.

We didn't like this though, the speakers are very heavy and manhandling them onto the stand such that pressure is placed evenly on the rear pads is very difficult. Fitting a Partington 'Topper' (a small metal cone) in the middle of the rear support, such that the doublet only makes a single smaller point contact transformed them beyond my belief - not bad for a sudden inspiration on my part.

Andy.

P.S. Derren - tidy your room and post a photo wink

Posted on: 11 January 2002 by John C

I have Doublets and think they are great. I almost went for mystiques which are excellent on the end of a nait5 anyway but the Royd speakers had more of an out of the box and into the room sound. Andy is referring to Something Solid stands . Vuk once posted an ingenious method of improving the base of the doublets with custom made granite slab and a visit to the fastener shop. A nice pair of doublets and swop the P9 for a hyperspace and you will have great system.

John