Alternative Xmas message
Posted by: Exiled Highlander on 25 December 2008
So, is Channel 4 right to broadcast it's Alternative Xmas Message by using Iranian President Ahmadinejad (as dangerous an individual as he appears to be) or should they simply toe the line and take a safer approach?
FWIW, my view is that they are right to show this and that MP's like Mark Pritchard making statements such as
Merry Xmas
Jim
FWIW, my view is that they are right to show this and that MP's like Mark Pritchard making statements such as
are essentially trying to censor the press. I'm sure there are alternative views out there though.quote:"This raises serious questions about whether Channel 4 should receive an increased public subsidy for their programmes."
Merry Xmas
Jim
Posted on: 25 December 2008 by winkyincanada
What's a "Xmas Message"? I don't understand the concept. How does it it differ from publishing random opinions at other times of the year? Does some special gravitas or significance automatically attach to otherwise inane musings of certain individuals simply because of the time of year?
Posted on: 25 December 2008 by joe90
quote:Does some special gravitas or significance automatically attach to otherwise inane musings of certain individuals simply because of the time of year?
Apparently so.
Posted on: 26 December 2008 by 555
I agree Jim.
Posted on: 27 December 2008 by Tarquin Maynard-Portly
In Great Britain Her Majesty the Queen makes a broadcast to the Nation and the Commonwealth at 3pm on Christmas Day. She has been doing this since the 1950s.
Publishing an "alternative Christmas Message" is a more recent innovation by Channel 4 who seem to do it just to stir up controversy and the choice of the announcer seems to be designed to cause as much pique as possible, although the Ali G special was simply hilarious.
So, yes, there is some special significance to this, which is why C4 do it. Its self-serving.
Publishing an "alternative Christmas Message" is a more recent innovation by Channel 4 who seem to do it just to stir up controversy and the choice of the announcer seems to be designed to cause as much pique as possible, although the Ali G special was simply hilarious.
So, yes, there is some special significance to this, which is why C4 do it. Its self-serving.
Posted on: 27 December 2008 by 555
I think you've missed the point TMP.
Liz broadcasts her message, which is 'the state' telling us what's what.
C4 is giving a platform for an alternative POV. Surely this freedom is a good thing?
Liz broadcasts her message, which is 'the state' telling us what's what.
C4 is giving a platform for an alternative POV. Surely this freedom is a good thing?
Posted on: 27 December 2008 by Tarquin Maynard-Portly
Hiya
I was answering Winky who I assumed would not have known about Her Majesty's Christmas message. I should have made that clearer.
I'm not sure that its a State broadcast; remember her "annus horribilus" a few years back?
I'm all for freedom of speeh but this is all a bit puerile for me. Why have C4 not broadcast any other messages from Persia?
PS - the motto - are you late Scots Div?
I was answering Winky who I assumed would not have known about Her Majesty's Christmas message. I should have made that clearer.
I'm not sure that its a State broadcast; remember her "annus horribilus" a few years back?
I'm all for freedom of speeh but this is all a bit puerile for me. Why have C4 not broadcast any other messages from Persia?
PS - the motto - are you late Scots Div?
Posted on: 27 December 2008 by 555
She is the State, mate! 

Posted on: 28 December 2008 by winkyincanada
Interesting. I was aware of the Queen's "Christmas message". My query was not in relation to the freedom of expression and the right of anyone at all to broadcast their opinion about anything they choose and/or deem interesting; but rather to query why some special significance (or airtime) should be given to any of these things just because it is "Christmas".
I accept/suspect that the Queens message is/was carefully designed to provide some mental "nourishment" or re-assurance to the general populace. A placated populace is a non-revolutionary populace.
I accept/suspect that the Queens message is/was carefully designed to provide some mental "nourishment" or re-assurance to the general populace. A placated populace is a non-revolutionary populace.
Posted on: 28 December 2008 by TomK
Winky you're either taking the piss or you're so right on you're way out of touch. Christmas is the time of year when MOST people (obviously not you) are thinking of their families, reflecting on the year gone by, and planning, wondering, worrying about the coming year. With reference to the queen's Christmas speech, your statement "A placated populace is a non-revolutionary populace" smacks of youthful naiveté, student rhetoric, or whatever, and is frankly laughable. Are you 16 years old or thereabouts?
Frankly I couldn't give a fat rat what the queen had to say but merry Christmas to you whatever you're up to.
Frankly I couldn't give a fat rat what the queen had to say but merry Christmas to you whatever you're up to.
Posted on: 28 December 2008 by winkyincanada
No, pretty much just taking the piss. The whole non-revolutionary thing is obviously clumsy rhetoric, and delivered (hopefully) "tongue-in-cheek".
I also couldn't give a stuff about what the Queen has to say. It's interesting to me that this tradition survives, and that people seem bothered by it, but that's all.
As for the things "most people" do, I am no different. Except perhaps that I don't wait for Christmas to do any of these things.
My point (again) is that I don't understand what makes Christmas an especially appropriate time of the year for "messages" (or personal contemplation as you describe). If it is blindingly obvious to "most people" then I am indeed way out of touch.
Yours in Christmas cheer,
The Grinch
I also couldn't give a stuff about what the Queen has to say. It's interesting to me that this tradition survives, and that people seem bothered by it, but that's all.
As for the things "most people" do, I am no different. Except perhaps that I don't wait for Christmas to do any of these things.
My point (again) is that I don't understand what makes Christmas an especially appropriate time of the year for "messages" (or personal contemplation as you describe). If it is blindingly obvious to "most people" then I am indeed way out of touch.
Yours in Christmas cheer,
The Grinch
Posted on: 28 December 2008 by MilesSmiles
quote:... are essentially trying to censor the press. I'm sure there are alternative views out there though.
Merry Xmas
Jim
Jim,
I'm all for freedom of the press but I'm not sure what greater purpose it serves to give someone a forum who supresses his people, denies the Holocaust and wants to wipe Israel of the map. Might as well have asked Mugabe for an alternative Christmas message.
Just MHO ... cheers Oliver
Posted on: 29 December 2008 by Exiled Highlander
Oliver
Cheers
Jim
Mugabe would have been OK too....on the basis that we need to be able to hear directly from these people, even if it is only to give them enough rope to hang themselves. Otherwise we are simply facing a press and media that is allowed to braodcast only what the Government wants us to hear.....sound familiar? You either have freedom of speech or you don't....there is very little middle ground there.quote:I'm all for freedom of the press but I'm not sure what greater purpose it serves to give someone a forum who supresses his people, denies the Holocaust and wants to wipe Israel of the map. Might as well have asked Mugabe for an alternative Christmas message.
Cheers
Jim
Posted on: 29 December 2008 by 555
Spot on Jim.