Advanced search

What we have learnt from the Naim DAC...

Posted by: PureHifi on 11 November 2009

I thought it was time that we posted a few tid-bits of our experience with the Ripping, storage and playback of music after our resent promotional event that formed a part of the New Zealand Naim roadshow.

As a Naim retailer we learned a lot from the New Zealand Naim distributor, Chris Murphy, and are finding the whole move to digital storage and playback very interesting...and a lot more involved than a lot of people might initially think.

Our roadshow kit was as follows:

CDX2 (latest with digital out)
HDX (used with digital out)
DAC (with and without a 555PS)
282/supercap, 250.2, Fraim/ Ovator S-600's

Apart from the obvious new speaker exploration we settled down to get to grips with the new CDX2 + DAC and experiment with the HDX a bit more. In particular we wanted to get a solid handle on the performance variations with ripping CD media and the storage and playback.

Ripping the software used does affect the final playback, Chris had files from the same CD Track ripped to WAV with several software packages (WMP, iTunes, EAC, DBpowerAmp, HDX, etc) and the outright winner was the HDX rip - iTunes sounded horrible - ragged & sibilant would best describe it.

Storing It became apparent that the storage medium also influences the audio performance. The simplest example was writing the same HDX ripped music file to different USB memory sticks and then playing them back via the USB input on the DAC - cheap memory sticks generally played back poorly compared to a higher priced stick from LaCie. Perhaps this reflects on Naim's choice of Hard Disk drives used in the HDX.

Playback Several things in the playback domain have cropped up recently for us, in both Naim's solutions and other brands that we stock. We have found, in terms of digital playback from PC laptops and MacBook, that the media player software has a huge impact on the music quality - WMP was poor but Winamp and Foobar were great by comparison (never got around to iTunes). The USB cable between a Cambridge DacMagic and our laptop was also a hugely variable item, we tried a range of normal looking USB cables (some with superior shielding and RF stoppers) and ran them against a Wireworld Ultraviolet USB1 cable, results were outstandingly in favour of the Wireworld item over all others tried. We could not try our Wireworld USB cable on the WD external HDD because of it's use of a mini USB connector but I am looking forward to testing it on a LaCie HDD that has the right USB connector.

The Western Digital 1TB external HDD feeding the HDX also benefited from a power supply upgrade, it might sound over the top but it made for a better result in the music (and was a good use for a spare NAPSC).

I can't explain in technical terms why a lot of these findings are the way they were, we judged everything on its sound merit and I am reporting our results.

What it highlighted most of all was the wonderful way that Naim's R & D has worked to make all those variables disappear for a customer in the HDX product - by providing Superior Ripping, storage and playback in one box.

The DAC is a wonderful device and will be a very successful product.
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by DHT
it is a pity we are so far apart, I would really like to sit you in a room with various rips and see whether you could tell them apert 'blind'.
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by js
I'm OK with it as long as we can discuss. No need to agree. We may grow closer in opinion over time. Smile Perhaps not but I'm sure a sit down would do us good regardless of the result. Drinks on me if you're ever in the town. We'll try not to get too blind before some listening. Winker
Here's a picture of my experiments:

Seriously, Windows 7 is now in the home PC and it seems very nice and easy on resources. I avoided Vista in a big way.
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by scottyhammer
wouldnt touch a bloody pc ever again now i have gone mac.
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by js
The spouse uses some genealogy programs not available on MAC so it was never an issue without more complication. I also like a bit of versatility in output drivers but I understand the love. Very consistant, freindly and virus resistant.

My home needs aren't very elaborate as I'm not a gamer and it's like I bought the OS and got the PC for free. Major label, 500gb, 2.7x2 processor, 3gb ram, DVD writer, W7/64. $299

Thought the ram might be tight for some things but it's been a champ. Seems more effeicient than XP. As good as Vista was bad.
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by pcstockton
quote:
Originally posted by Joe Bibb:
I wouldn't bother unless I hit a problem trying to rip a disc in iTunes.


How would you know there was a problem without a log reporting errors, secure mode ripping, no caching of data and an uncorrectable drive offset?

-p
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by Joe Bibb
quote:
Originally posted by pcstockton:
quote:
Originally posted by Joe Bibb:
I wouldn't bother unless I hit a problem trying to rip a disc in iTunes.


How would you know there was a problem without a log reporting errors, secure mode ripping, no caching of data and an uncorrectable drive offset?

-p


I'm only interested in listening to the results Patrick, not watching them.

By problem, I mean a skip, drop-out or anything audible.

Joe
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by scottyhammer
I think you hit the nail on the head Joe......musics all about enjoyment not statistics. more people should try using the things on either side of their heads more! Roll Eyes
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by Joe Bibb
quote:
Originally posted by scottyhammer:
I think you hit the nail on the head Joe......musics all about enjoyment not statistics. more people should try using the things on either side of their heads more! Roll Eyes


Well it's interesting, isn't it? You can own a top flight CDP for years and not give a shiny one whether it is producing too many errors unless you can hear something.

Suddenly you transfer the same information from an optical disc to hard disc and need the emotional crutch of an error log? Big Grin

Nope I don't get that, but each to his own.

I'm sure if CDP makers had realised there was such a market they could have added it as a feature. Winker

Joe
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by pcstockton
quote:
Originally posted by scottyhammer:
musics all about enjoyment not statistics.


Says the man who will ONLY use a Mac, and will never touch a "bloody PC" ever again. Roll Eyes
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by scottyhammer
Dont know what thats got to do with the price of fish and for your information nobby I have a cd player - record deck - dac - all connected to naim amps and enjoy them all....whats wrong with that ? Roll Eyes
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by goldfinch
Joe, computer audio is so contradictory,
we can think computers let us control useful things such as ripping errors but at the same time many hear differences depending on what "ripping engine" is being used.
I got attracted to computer audio because I believed in the "bits are bits" concept, there shouldn't be performance differences once you have a bit perfect output. But afterwards you find out you have to deal with a lot of "relevant" choices including of course the ripping process -both hardware and software- (playing software, formats, HD vs. SSD, PSU, audio device...) Everything virtually matters, IMO threre is an insane trend about this, My ears just tell me that a computer can sound so good with the right DAC, the pefect bit could still be the key?
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by likesmusic
What do you all think people listen to in recording studios?
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by scottyhammer
music ??
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by u5227470736789439
quote:
Originally posted by likesmusic:
What do you all think people listen to in recording studios?


The music, usually in digital recordings, and sometimes from Hard Drives and sometimes tapes.

ATB from George
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by pcstockton
....and usually it is listened to in no ways similar to how the eventual master sounds.

the person "at the board" is usually listening through a myriad of effects and filters trying to dial in a specific sound or effect. Isolating the snare or kick drum to get a particular timbre.

In ALL of my studio experience, nothing heard was anything like "music".

But i feel you working.... If your point is that most engineers use something like Pro-tools on a Mac in the studio, and listen through powered monitors, I just dont see how this correlates to home music reproduction.

At this point in the discussion is the Mac vs PC debate really relevant? Tired, yes...

-p
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by scottyhammer
your the one who brought it up !
then go to bed. Winker
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by Joe Bibb
quote:
Originally posted by likesmusic:
What do you all think people listen to in recording studios?


The best monitoring system they can afford - which, interestingly, hardly ever seem to crop up in a domestic setting even though the gear is widely available and often costs less than many spend on domestic Hi Fi.

It's not possible to know in any meaningful way what is on the master tape or the resulting software, even if you hear the playback through the engineer's monitoring system. You are just getting that system's view. There isn't any "reference" playback system that sounds just like a live event but that hardly matters. We are all after what we perceive as the most enjoyable re-creation of our recorded music and all it's limitations - are we not?

Joe
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by Former member
Its all 1s and 0s Blips and Blobs Del.
Ajax Winker
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by pcstockton
quote:
Originally posted by scottyhammer:
your the one who brought it up !
then go to bed. Winker


I dont know what time it is in hammerland, but its 3:25pm here. I am 9 hours (and 9 pints) from sleepytime....
Posted on: 18 November 2009 by js
IT's
oh, oh, oh, oh, oh,oh,oh!
Posted on: 19 November 2009 by scottyhammer
pc,

perhaps you will be talking more sense in the morning then ?

scotty Winker
Posted on: 19 November 2009 by js
Can't touch this!
Posted on: 19 November 2009 by scottyhammer
There again probably ....NOT! Razz
Posted on: 19 November 2009 by js
Smile By the way, I don't care for studio talk either. Trust me when I say they don't generally sound special other than source and that aspect is leveling with 24/96. Itreminds me of Bose adverts with musicians and conductors. Frown Studios are purpose built and very functional for their purpose but most here would much rather listen at home.


PC, did you hear the DAC at Connan's?

I had loaded XMPlay in the past but after seeing the interface, dumped it without a listen. Didn't realize I had it before until I saw it again. I put it back yesterday, changed the skin and added ASIO and took the time to find a convenient way to use it. Easy to use quickly buy going to the file and just clicking a selection when set as default music player. Makes all the difference. Will play entire albums (folders) or individual selections this way. Playlists are available to make. Still bare bones but it handles WAV pretty well which is imporatant to me personally. Apparently the lowest resource player out there and an executable program, not a true install if that matters.

I'll give an idea on sound latter when used with a system and I'm hopeful after the posts by ghook2020 who seems to share some of my views on players.
Posted on: 19 November 2009 by js
Still like Foobar sonically overall though XMplay wasn't bad after adjusting ASIO device settings.