Music Works 6 way block

Posted by: Mick P on 03 March 2001

Gentleman

Today I drove down to Bournemouth to puchase a 3 month old NAT 05 tuner and a 10 month old 6 way Music Works block. Not too bad a deal for £500.

The NAT 05 has replaced a NAT 03 which is now in the dining room system and it does sound a lot better. I think Naim did well with this upgrade.

I then fitted the Music Work block and plugged everything in and yes, Jason Hector is right, it really does make everything sound so much shaper, so this is one little tweak which I thoroughly endorse.

Now the question.

I know that optimum performance from the block is obtained by plugging in the black boxes in a certain order.

I am bloody useless at experimenting, I keep getting myself all mixed up. So can anyone suggest the order of plugging in.

My equipment is :-

XPS/CDX....one plug

NAT 05

Super cap

82

250.
This makes 5 plugs in total

Your advice is welcomed.

Regards

Mick

[This message was edited by Mick Parry on SATURDAY 03 March 2001 at 22:09.]

Posted on: 03 March 2001 by Mike Hanson
Wouldn't that be four plugs: CDX/XPS (1), Super-Cap (2), NAPSC (3), 250 (4)?

Anyway, it seems that Canadians prefer source first, while Brits prefer amps first. The NAPSC should be plugged somewhere else.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 03 March 2001 by Mike Hanson
I just realized that your first "82" was probably supposed to be "NAT05", so five plugs it is. Same advice applies.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 03 March 2001 by Ade Archer
Is the NAPSC best plugged in to a seperate socket from the hifi spur, or onto the same spur, and why exactly does this make a difference. I've heard it mentioned before, and the quick experiment I tried left me undecided as to whether there was any difference. The only other socket conveniently available to me is the one my Lingo plugs into, seperate to the dedicated spur, and I didn't really want any Naim equipment plugged in next to it, and I thought from an earthing point of view, the ins and outs about which I must admit to not really understanding, all Naim gear is best on the same spur.
Surely Naim would mention something about this in the instructions if there was risk of the NAPSC causing some sort of interference.

Cheers

Ade

Posted on: 03 March 2001 by Mick P
Mike

You are correct and I have modified the text.

Thanks

Mick

Posted on: 03 March 2001 by Mike Hanson
The NAPSC is a noisy little brat. The biggest issue here is physical proximity to the pre-amp and CD player. Get it as far away as possible (hence its long cord connecting it to the 82/102).

Strangely, sharing plugs seems to be less of an issue. I can sense a very small difference if it's plugged into the same bar (a very slight smearing of the sound). If you can't find a separate plug, though, then don't worry about since the difference is so small. But if you have the option, then separate them.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 04 March 2001 by Thomas K
Hello Mick,

My dealer initially recommended plugging source first, then some weeks ago I read that NANA recommend amps first, which I tried. It makes a much bigger difference than one would expect – check out my thread “I started tweaking socially …”.

I was very impressed by the amp first configuration, but after about 3 weeks I tried source first again and have since stayed with it. To my ears, both configurations have their merits.

Thomas

Posted on: 04 March 2001 by Allan Probin
Discussion about source-first or reverse-source-first tends to send alarm bells ringing. If the sequence of plugging-in makes a difference then one way or the other, some components are being compromised in relation to others. If one comes to an opinion as to which is best then that simply means that a decision has been made as to which is the best compromise.

If a device such as a mains distribution block was truly star-wired then the sequence would be irrelevent - all outlets would *SEE* the same supply at all times.

Not sure that I've moved the discussion on any, but its an interesting point (I think !).

Allan

Posted on: 04 March 2001 by Mick P
Chaps

I am going to give the source first a try.

Quick question......The CDX is powered via the XPS. The lead comes out of the XPS. Would you classify this twosome as a source or amp.

Regards

Mick

Posted on: 04 March 2001 by Franz K
Dear Mick

CDX/XPS qualifies as the source.

In which position is the main switch on the back of your CDX? In an on or off position?
Does anybody know if it makes a difference when running the CDX powered via XPS in what position the main switch is?

Franz

Posted on: 04 March 2001 by ken c
allan,

as to why order matters, i offer the following explanation.

if all the equipment is connected as parallel loads to the supply, (i.e each earthed separately) then there should be no difference -- the whole thing is just one equivalent impedance, regardless of the order.

however, if the earthing arrangements are such that some equipment is only earthed to other kit, then effectively, i believe some kit become SERIES impedances, whose characteristics affect components "downstream". then the plugging sequence question becomes, which order minimises negative effects downtream..??

just my 2cents worth... i am sure someone with more knowledge can pick holes. i like learning too..

enjoy...

ken

Posted on: 05 March 2001 by Mick P
Franz

I have the CDX button swicthed on.

I now have another question.

Is it worth installing a dedicated spur if you use the Music Works block.

Regards

Mick

Posted on: 05 March 2001 by Mick P
Jason

Thanks for coming in.

Do you have a view on what order I should plug the boxes in. You being the Guru etc.

Thanks

Mick

Posted on: 05 March 2001 by Rico
quote:
Does anybody know if it makes a difference when running the CDX powered via XPS in what position the main switch is?

Mick

according to my local dealer (in Cheadle), this position of the on/off switch on the CDX is unimportant and makes no diff, when used with the XPS. HTH.

Rico - all your base are belong to us.

Posted on: 05 March 2001 by Jo Sharp
Mick,

I bet you came down the Avon valley?

Next time call in pse!!

Jo

Jo

Posted on: 06 March 2001 by Mick P
Chaps

I have used 5 out of the 6 sockets, will it do any harm to plug in my Garard 401 turntable.

Jo.......Are you in Salisbury Plain ?

Regards

Mick

Posted on: 06 March 2001 by Jo Sharp
Mick,

Yup.

email me for phone/address.
josharp@mcmail.com

Jo

Posted on: 06 March 2001 by Jo Sharp
Mark,

If you are still out there, or if PS or PD can forward pse:

get in touch - the invite for a drink/music/SBL set-up session still stands - could make it a 3-some with Mick ;-)


Warning! Cutting here could invalidate your monitor warranty

8<-----------------------

Jo

Posted on: 07 March 2001 by Derek Wright
Aa I was curious as to what MusicWorks power blocks are I found the following URL which gives information about them:

http://www.audiocounsel.u-net.com/MWpage1.htm

Enjoy

Derek W

Posted on: 12 March 2001 by Tony L
I've been and gone and done it - I am now running a Music Works six way Megablock and mains leads to all the Naim stuff (Hicap / 135s). In my normal cheapskate style I found some second hand for a pretty good price.

Verdict - In my system (usual disclaimers apply) the MW stuff sounds far more natural than the Maplin 4 way plug / Naim leads. Sonically there is a really marked reduction in glare, or any tendency toward slight hardness / grain, with acoustic space sounding far more real and less 'digital' (on both analogue and digital sources), there is also noticeably more weight and slam to the bottom end. My first reaction on an A B (I really hate A B dems) was that the MW has slightly slowed the bass end, after time I have concluded this is not the case, in fact the opposite is true, it has allowed it to breath. The effect is similar to the Kans on screw heads vs securely resting on spikes on floor - the sound is for me less rushed and more natural in the latter case.

All this would be meaningless if the music was impacted in any way - from a flat earth perspective in my system the music certainly makes more sense, it would definitely be considered a quite big improvement in a traditional 'Tune Dem'.

If I were to criticise my system as it stood, it would be that it had a slight tendency to dissect the music, and whilst it showed remarkable detail and insight, it could suffer a little with the overall coherence of the song. You could tell exactly what the individual musicians were doing, where the engineer had placed the mics, and what processing had taken place during the recording chain, though occasionally this tendency to 'over detail' distracted from the music as a whole. The Music Works kit has certainly improved this a hell of a lot from my listening perspective, music works better as a whole than it has previously. The clarity and detail is all still there, it just seems more in musical perspective now.

Tony.

PS Haven't played with plug order yet - I have it as Hicap / 135 / 135 / CD / Turntable now. Source last, but I am sure my sources are less picky about mains quality than the Naim kit. Once I have lived with it for a week or two I will switch it all round...

Posted on: 12 March 2001 by Tony L
quote:
Quick question though, how bad do you think your mains is?

I suspect it is terrible, I live in a rented flat that has been done out in true lowest common denominator landlord style. If the mains has been done as badly as visible stuff like the grouting round the bath, then it is probably absolutely lethal. I am looking to buy a flat at the moment, so things should change in the mains respect (I will get a seperate spur).

quote:
PS. I couldn't get that ARO cable in the end, bugger. I'll have to visit the factory or something.

Cool, rob loads of it whilst your there. Seems quite a lot of people want some.

Tony.

Posted on: 12 March 2001 by Allan Probin
quote:
If I were to criticise my system as it stood, it would be that it had a slight tendency to dissect the music, ... this tendency to 'over detail' distracted from the music as a whole - Tony

You've described exactly what I feel about my system at this point in time. Do you intend to do anything about it or are you just going to live with it ? Alarmingly for me, a number of favourite albums seem to be falling by the wayside because of it.

I'm using a 6-way block and intend getting a set of MW mains leads in a few weeks time. Not wanting to turn this into another rack thread, but when I have all that settled I think I'll give the QS stands a try and see how that goes.

Allan

Posted on: 12 March 2001 by Tony L
quote:
Do you intend to do anything about it or are you just going to live with it ?

The MW stuff (board and leads) has done a lot, this aspect has been very greatly reduced by their addition, I will live with it for a while now. I am sure a great deal of set up issues lie in the quality of mains, so once I am in a position to get a spur I suspect that will have it sorted. The system is sounding really good at the moment on the vast majority of material. It will occasionally rip something to shreads, but thankfully not at all often.

Tony.

Posted on: 12 March 2001 by bob atherton
Tony,

Glad you got to hear & enjoy Musicworks stuff.

I'm using their 6 way block, it was a no brainer in my system. I'm using some of their leads on all 3 sources & pre amp. when I tried one on my Hicap for SNAXO the music fell apart. Had a chat with non ferrous Larry about this & he didn't have any answer.

Are you keeping the block & cables well dressed? I found that set up verging on anal of block & leads gave big rewards.

Bob.

Posted on: 12 March 2001 by bob atherton
...brilliant! big grin