Nobel Peace Prize 2007 Shame

Posted by: Spotty on 15 October 2007

It is a political move!

Copy of the article from the Wall Street Journal:

"Not Nobel Winners
Some nominees for next year.

Sunday, October 14, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT

In Olso Friday, the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize was not awarded to the Burmese monks whose defiance against, and brutalization at the hands of, the country's military junta in recent weeks captured the attention of the Free World.

The prize was also not awarded to Morgan Tsvangirai, Arthur Mutambara and other Zimbabwe opposition leaders who were arrested and in some cases beaten by police earlier this year while protesting peacefully against dictator Robert Mugabe.

Or to Father Nguyen Van Ly, a Catholic priest in Vietnam arrested this year and sentenced to eight years in prison for helping the pro-democracy group Block 8406.

Or to Wajeha al-Huwaider and Fawzia al-Uyyouni, co-founders of the League of Demanders of Women's Right to Drive Cars in Saudi Arabia, who are waging a modest struggle with grand ambitions to secure basic rights for women in that Muslim country.

Or to Colombian President Àlvaro Uribe, who has fought tirelessly to end the violence wrought by left-wing terrorists and drug lords in his country.

Or to Garry Kasparov and the several hundred Russians who were arrested in April, and are continually harassed, for resisting President Vladimir Putin's slide toward authoritarian rule.

Or to the people of Iraq, who bravely work to rebuild and reunite their country amid constant threats to themselves and their families from terrorists who deliberately target civilians.

Or to Presidents Viktor Yushchenko and Mikheil Saakashvili who, despite the efforts of the Kremlin to undermine their young states, stayed true to the spirit of the peaceful "color" revolutions they led in Ukraine and Georgia and showed that democracy can put down deep roots in Russia's backyard.

Or to Britain's Tony Blair, Ireland's Bertie Ahern and the voters of Northern Ireland, who in March were able to set aside decades of hatred to establish joint Catholic-Protestant rule in Northern Ireland.

Or to thousands of Chinese bloggers who run the risk of arrest by trying to bring uncensored information to their countrymen.

Or to scholar and activist Saad Eddin Ibrahim, jailed presidential candidate Ayman Nour and other democracy campaigners in Egypt.

Or, posthumously, to lawmakers Walid Eido, Pierre Gemayel, Antoine Ghanem, Rafik Hariri, George Hawi and Gibran Tueni; journalist Samir Kassir; and other Lebanese citizens who've been assassinated since 2005 for their efforts to free their country from Syrian control.

Or to the Reverend Phillip Buck; Pastor Chun Ki Won and his organization, Durihana; Tim Peters and his Helping Hands Korea; and Liberty in North Korea, who help North Korean refugees escape to safety in free nations.

These men and women put their own lives and livelihoods at risk by working to rid the world of violence and oppression. Let us hope they survive the coming year so that the Nobel Prize Committee might consider them for the 2008 award. "

Look up the past winners if you do not believe me; see Jimmy Carter for instance!
Posted on: 15 October 2007 by Unstoppable
Tony Blair for a Nobel Peace prize ? The people of Iraq ? Really ?

Sounds like maybe you think they should have asked you first.



US
Posted on: 15 October 2007 by Shayman
One man's ridding the world of violence and oppression is another man's US sponsored terrorist.

Maybe Bin Laden should have won it for single handedly standing up to US imperialism and agression around the world?

Jonathan
Posted on: 15 October 2007 by NaimDropper
Uhm, a committee voting to give a prize to someone will make a political decision of some kind. That's the nature of such things.
So it's not fair then? I won't argue that.
The best way you can fight this is by putting up $1,000,000 US or eq. for the Spotty Peace Prize and pick your own winner.
David
Posted on: 20 October 2007 by JeremyD
Spotty,

As a science fiction fan I must admit to having been pleased that two sci-fi writers received Nobel prizes this year: Doris Lessing for her novels and Al Gore for his Convenient Untruth.

The Nobel Peace Prize is inevitably political. What I find more disturbing is that, judging by what I've read, the award of past prizes for literature seems to have had an inappropriate political dimension.

Also disturbing is the fact that science prizes often leave out key people, thanks at least in part to the rule that a prize can be awarded to at most three people. I must admit to being a little ashamed of the fact that I think of the discovers of DNA as being "Crick, Watson, Wilkins and Whatshername"...
Posted on: 28 October 2007 by Alexander
This article is saying "We hate Gore". For an editorial in a rightwing newspaper it's not that extraordinary.
The remarkable thing is the turnaround in the other media.

It appears that the anti-Gore campaign in the runup to the 2000 elections
became a bandwagon for the whole mainstream media. To quote Paul Krugman: Look at the 2000 presidential campaign, for example, where the media were so heavily biased against Al Gore. That’s what brought Bush to within a Supreme Court decision of the White House.

The claim "Gore reinvented himself" that is so popular now helps them save face.

I'd like a poll with the american public on their current beliefs concerning:
- Gore claiming falsely he made the investigations start into the environmental disaster of Love Canal
- his false claims on inventing the internet
- his growing up in the posh Fairfax hotel
- his false claims on his persona having inspired Love Story.
- he started wearing earth tones at Naomi Wolf's advice.