Let them eat cake! Or at least let them move to Texas!
Posted by: fred simon on 07 September 2005
.
Like mother:
"Almost everyone I’ve talked to says we're going to move to Houston." Then she added: "What I’m hearing, which is sort of scary, is they all want to stay in Texas. Everyone is so overwhelmed by the hospitality. And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this--this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them." - Barbara Bush, mother of President George W. Bush
Like son:
[President Bush] engaged in small talk, reminiscing at one point about the days when he used to party in New Orleans, and mentioning that [wealthy Republican Senator from Mississippi] Trent Lott had lost one of his houses but that it would be replaced with "a fantastic house - and I'm looking forward to sitting on the porch."
Expanding on former Texas governor Ann Richards' famous line, I guess it's not just the father who was born with a silver foot in his mouth.
.
Like mother:
"Almost everyone I’ve talked to says we're going to move to Houston." Then she added: "What I’m hearing, which is sort of scary, is they all want to stay in Texas. Everyone is so overwhelmed by the hospitality. And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this--this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them." - Barbara Bush, mother of President George W. Bush
Like son:
[President Bush] engaged in small talk, reminiscing at one point about the days when he used to party in New Orleans, and mentioning that [wealthy Republican Senator from Mississippi] Trent Lott had lost one of his houses but that it would be replaced with "a fantastic house - and I'm looking forward to sitting on the porch."
Expanding on former Texas governor Ann Richards' famous line, I guess it's not just the father who was born with a silver foot in his mouth.
.
Posted on: 07 September 2005 by Nime
"You get the politicians you deserve"?
Posted on: 07 September 2005 by Deane F
quote:Originally posted by Nime:
"You get the politicians you deserve"?
That would be an outright troll there wouldn't it, Nime old boy?
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by fred simon
.
50% of the voting population of the USA doesn't deserve it.
More to the point, surely the thousands of dead, and the hundreds of thousands of dispossessed, on the gulf coast don't deserve it.
Fred
.
quote:Originally posted by Nime:
"You get the politicians you deserve"?
50% of the voting population of the USA doesn't deserve it.
More to the point, surely the thousands of dead, and the hundreds of thousands of dispossessed, on the gulf coast don't deserve it.
Fred
.
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by MichaelC
50% of the voting population of the UK doesn't deserve it (Blair) either.
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by pratmaster
quote:Originally posted by MichaelC:
50% of the voting population of the UK doesn't deserve it (Blair) either.
If you don't like Democracy, theres allways communism, but that didn't work either
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by Deane F
Perhaps the good citizens of the USA get the politicians that the NRA, the agricultural sector and all the other staggeringly well-resourced lobby groups think they deserve?
Nahhh - that sounds too much like a conspiracy theory - GWB probably just woke up one day and thought it was a good idea...
Nahhh - that sounds too much like a conspiracy theory - GWB probably just woke up one day and thought it was a good idea...
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by Nime
GWB never had a good idea in his life. He prefers others to have them for him so he can read them off a card.(badly)
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by Mark Dunn
The U.S. has the best government money can buy.
Best Regards
Mark Dunn
(British expat living in Dallas)
Best Regards
Mark Dunn
(British expat living in Dallas)
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by Joe Petrik
quote:If you don't like Democracy, theres allways communism, but that didn't work either
Ah, the false dichotomy or fallacy of the excluded middle. May I suggest that other governing options exist, such as better functioning or more representative democracy.
But, hey, you're either with us or with the terrists.
Joe
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by pratmaster
quote:Originally posted by Joe Petrik:quote:If you don't like Democracy, theres allways communism, but that didn't work either
Ah, the false dichotomy or fallacy of the excluded middle. May I suggest that other governing options exist, such as better functioning or more representative democracy.
But, hey, you're either with us or with the terrists.
Joe
yeah, but how would we vote for the other forms of democracy, majority decision, or proportional representation, or should we vote for one of these first, could go round in circles
Posted on: 08 September 2005 by Steve Toy
In the case of the UK it's about 65%.
Posted on: 11 September 2005 by fred simon
.
Yes, but that's just the problem ... we've paid enough for an FDR but all we got was this lousy GWB.
Fred
.
quote:Originally posted by Mark Dunn:
The U.S. has the best government money can buy.
Yes, but that's just the problem ... we've paid enough for an FDR but all we got was this lousy GWB.
Fred
.
Posted on: 11 September 2005 by Nime
quote:Originally posted by fred simon:
Yes, but that's just the problem ... we've paid enough for an FDR but all we got was this lousy GWB.
Inflation?
Posted on: 11 September 2005 by Phil Barry
Inflation is negligible in the US, according to the Bureau of Laboor Statistics.
Interesting how that has been computed - although prices in general are up significantly, residential rent have been down. 'Owner's equivalent rent' is the applicable component of the CPI, and since rents are 'down', they offset much of the rise in other prices, so the GDP deflator is low. And so the official inflation rate is low.
In reality, for those of us who have not refinanced, cost of living is up significantly.
Of course, for those of us who have succumbed to the bubble and upgraded our housing, housing costs have gone up, but that's not recognized by the BLS or the Fed.
Regards.
Phil
Interesting how that has been computed - although prices in general are up significantly, residential rent have been down. 'Owner's equivalent rent' is the applicable component of the CPI, and since rents are 'down', they offset much of the rise in other prices, so the GDP deflator is low. And so the official inflation rate is low.
In reality, for those of us who have not refinanced, cost of living is up significantly.
Of course, for those of us who have succumbed to the bubble and upgraded our housing, housing costs have gone up, but that's not recognized by the BLS or the Fed.
Regards.
Phil
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by Dave J
quote:Expanding on former Texas governor Ann Richards' famous line, I guess it's not just the father who was born with a silver foot in his mouth.
Fred,
I watch agog at the sheer incompetence of this man (and his family) and it saddens me deeply that such a wonderful country is run by such a buffoon.
Dave
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by Nime
It would be difficult to design an electoral system more likely to guarantee a buffoon (like scum) always rises to the top automatically. The system sought to buy a corruptable, ignorant & pliable puppet regardless of cost. It got one. So the US presidential electoral system works well. If it ain't broke, don't mend it! The world will go on marginalising the US ever more until it becomes merely a dirty stain in the history books.
But think what the US might have achieved with a real leader. One determined to stamp out corruption. Share its vast wealth more equably and guide the world responsibly and fairly towards real and sustainable progress. So why didn't it happen? That'll be the US electoral system.
"Self-praise is no recommendation." (particularly in politics)
But think what the US might have achieved with a real leader. One determined to stamp out corruption. Share its vast wealth more equably and guide the world responsibly and fairly towards real and sustainable progress. So why didn't it happen? That'll be the US electoral system.
"Self-praise is no recommendation." (particularly in politics)
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by Rasher
I don't really do this forum thingumy anymore, but having a browse here I can't resist replying to this one.
Bush is an embarassment to the USA and it disappoints me that the people voted Bush into office in the first place, let alone for a second term; but there are good reasons why that happened and it is important to remember that there is a huge population of rural citizens who do not take an interest in everyday politics ordinarily, and may have voted on one issue; National Security. They may in my opinion be mistaken in their reasoning, but it is the responsibility of the other Party to make their own case known and understood. However, whatever their view, they have as much right to it as anyone else, and that is the strength by which the USA stands (Ok, OK I know - in principle!). I have a huge respect for the American people for their patriotism, which we in the UK don't have. Americans have a pride in their country because they made it themselves - something some of us in the UK envy. However, any path through history is a result of action and reaction, and this administration is a backlash, for which there will probably be an opposite backlash. In the UK Muslims were getting abuse on the streets and in their homes due to the current situation, but the London bombings shocked all decent people and united Londoners against the bombers/extremists to redefine the differences, which then created a new "Londoner" identity irrespective of race. This Bush period will pass and balance will push the scales in the opposite direction again - too far probably, and off it goes again.
Think of it like this:
You are standing in the river and all you can see is water; you can't make out where you are. You wade to the side of the river and climb out, and climb up to higher ground and look down at the river. You can now see the river - where it is coming from, where it's going, and the path in between with all it's twists and turns. You can also see the other people in the river who can't tell where they are, fighting each other over which way to go. Sometimes you have to take in the whole picture. How can you possibly plan a path forward otherwise? The river of course already exists, its path determined - it's just those in the water that don't know that.
Good album Fred - I was playing it only last night.
Bush is an embarassment to the USA and it disappoints me that the people voted Bush into office in the first place, let alone for a second term; but there are good reasons why that happened and it is important to remember that there is a huge population of rural citizens who do not take an interest in everyday politics ordinarily, and may have voted on one issue; National Security. They may in my opinion be mistaken in their reasoning, but it is the responsibility of the other Party to make their own case known and understood. However, whatever their view, they have as much right to it as anyone else, and that is the strength by which the USA stands (Ok, OK I know - in principle!). I have a huge respect for the American people for their patriotism, which we in the UK don't have. Americans have a pride in their country because they made it themselves - something some of us in the UK envy. However, any path through history is a result of action and reaction, and this administration is a backlash, for which there will probably be an opposite backlash. In the UK Muslims were getting abuse on the streets and in their homes due to the current situation, but the London bombings shocked all decent people and united Londoners against the bombers/extremists to redefine the differences, which then created a new "Londoner" identity irrespective of race. This Bush period will pass and balance will push the scales in the opposite direction again - too far probably, and off it goes again.
Think of it like this:
You are standing in the river and all you can see is water; you can't make out where you are. You wade to the side of the river and climb out, and climb up to higher ground and look down at the river. You can now see the river - where it is coming from, where it's going, and the path in between with all it's twists and turns. You can also see the other people in the river who can't tell where they are, fighting each other over which way to go. Sometimes you have to take in the whole picture. How can you possibly plan a path forward otherwise? The river of course already exists, its path determined - it's just those in the water that don't know that.
Good album Fred - I was playing it only last night.
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by fred simon
.
Hey, you think you're sad?
This is not what I signed up for. This is not what I marched in the streets for in the 1960s. In the words of the David Bowie/Pat Metheny song, This Is Not America.
Fred
.
quote:Originally posted by Dave J:quote:Expanding on former Texas governor Ann Richards' famous line, I guess it's not just the father who was born with a silver foot in his mouth.
Fred,
I watch agog at the sheer incompetence of this man (and his family) and it saddens me deeply that such a wonderful country is run by such a buffoon.
Dave
Hey, you think you're sad?
This is not what I signed up for. This is not what I marched in the streets for in the 1960s. In the words of the David Bowie/Pat Metheny song, This Is Not America.
Fred
.
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by Deane F
Activists are just as capable of effecting change as lobbyists. So march in the streets again.
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by fred simon
.
But he wasn't voted into office in the first place ... he lost the popular vote, and if not for the illegal and partisan intervention of the Supreme Court, would have been shown to have lost the electoral vote as well.
Once upon a time, that huge population of rural citizens voted progressive Democrat, until Nixon/Agnew, Reagan, Bush the Elder, and President Junior/Karl Rove snowed and cowed them into consistently voting against their own best interests. For more on this I recommend the excellent What's the Matter With Kansas? by Thomas Frank.
In 2004 the Rove Smear Machine was successful in selling fear of gay marriage and fear of terrorism, despite the fact that US policies have made the country, and the world, much less safe.
But then, the US has actually supported terrorism through the decades of modern history when it's served its own short-sighted interests. The Brotherhood of Islam, the precursor to Al Qaeda, was supported financially and politically by the Eisenhower administration in order to keep Egypt/Nasser from going communist, just as it supported the Taliban of Afghanistan in order to stick it to the USSR. Hell, they even wined and dined the Taliban in Texas hoping to make a deal to run oil pipeline from the Caspian Sea through Afghanistan. And during the Reagan era, Saddam Hussein was our boy, even when he was a bad boy and gassed the Kurds (with chemicals purchased from the US) while we looked the other way.
The fact is that in the four years since 9/11, the US government has done almost nothing to ensure "homeland security." Just one of many examples: there are hundreds of chemical plants near major populations that if attacked could injure and/or kill thousands; there are dozens of larger plants that if compromised could actually kill millions in one fell swoop. Security at some of these plants is pretty much as lax as it was on 9/10/01, and a big reason is that the chemical/petroleum industry, of which BushCo is a subsidiary, doesn't want to be bothered with the expense and trouble of fixing the problems, just as no one could be troubled to maintain and strengthen the levees in Louisiana, which could have prevented the worst effects of Hurricane Katrina.
Given the shamefully inept response to a disaster that could been seen coming for not just days before, but years and years before (devastation of New Orleans by hurricane flooding was one of three "worst disaster" scenarios projected by FEMA, the other two being a major terrorist attack on New York, and a major earthquake in Los Angeles), can you imagine the sheer horror of a successful terrorist attack on one of the large chemical plants? Or a nuclear attack?
I truly feel as though my country has been overtaken by a cabal of evil men ... it's happened many times before in many countries, there's no reason at all it can't happen here.
Fred
.
quote:Originally posted by Rasher:
Bush is an embarrassment to the USA and it disappoints me that the people voted Bush into office in the first place, let alone for a second term
But he wasn't voted into office in the first place ... he lost the popular vote, and if not for the illegal and partisan intervention of the Supreme Court, would have been shown to have lost the electoral vote as well.
quote:... it is important to remember that there is a huge population of rural citizens who do not take an interest in everyday politics ordinarily, and may have voted on one issue; National Security.
Once upon a time, that huge population of rural citizens voted progressive Democrat, until Nixon/Agnew, Reagan, Bush the Elder, and President Junior/Karl Rove snowed and cowed them into consistently voting against their own best interests. For more on this I recommend the excellent What's the Matter With Kansas? by Thomas Frank.
In 2004 the Rove Smear Machine was successful in selling fear of gay marriage and fear of terrorism, despite the fact that US policies have made the country, and the world, much less safe.
But then, the US has actually supported terrorism through the decades of modern history when it's served its own short-sighted interests. The Brotherhood of Islam, the precursor to Al Qaeda, was supported financially and politically by the Eisenhower administration in order to keep Egypt/Nasser from going communist, just as it supported the Taliban of Afghanistan in order to stick it to the USSR. Hell, they even wined and dined the Taliban in Texas hoping to make a deal to run oil pipeline from the Caspian Sea through Afghanistan. And during the Reagan era, Saddam Hussein was our boy, even when he was a bad boy and gassed the Kurds (with chemicals purchased from the US) while we looked the other way.
The fact is that in the four years since 9/11, the US government has done almost nothing to ensure "homeland security." Just one of many examples: there are hundreds of chemical plants near major populations that if attacked could injure and/or kill thousands; there are dozens of larger plants that if compromised could actually kill millions in one fell swoop. Security at some of these plants is pretty much as lax as it was on 9/10/01, and a big reason is that the chemical/petroleum industry, of which BushCo is a subsidiary, doesn't want to be bothered with the expense and trouble of fixing the problems, just as no one could be troubled to maintain and strengthen the levees in Louisiana, which could have prevented the worst effects of Hurricane Katrina.
Given the shamefully inept response to a disaster that could been seen coming for not just days before, but years and years before (devastation of New Orleans by hurricane flooding was one of three "worst disaster" scenarios projected by FEMA, the other two being a major terrorist attack on New York, and a major earthquake in Los Angeles), can you imagine the sheer horror of a successful terrorist attack on one of the large chemical plants? Or a nuclear attack?
I truly feel as though my country has been overtaken by a cabal of evil men ... it's happened many times before in many countries, there's no reason at all it can't happen here.
Fred
.
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by fred simon
.
Thanks for the kind words, Rasher, and for your clever way of plugging Remember the River.
Fred
.
quote:Originally posted by Rasher:
Think of it like this:
You are standing in the river and all you can see is water; you can't make out where you are. You wade to the side of the river and climb out, and climb up to higher ground and look down at the river. You can now see the river - where it is coming from, where it's going, and the path in between with all it's twists and turns. You can also see the other people in the river who can't tell where they are, fighting each other over which way to go. Sometimes you have to take in the whole picture. How can you possibly plan a path forward otherwise? The river of course already exists, its path determined - it's just those in the water that don't know that.
Good album Fred - I was playing it only last night.
Thanks for the kind words, Rasher, and for your clever way of plugging Remember the River.
Fred
.
Posted on: 12 September 2005 by NaimDropper
Couldn't help it...
David
David
Posted on: 13 September 2005 by fred simon
.
My wife, the drummer, came up with this caption:
.
My wife, the drummer, came up with this caption:
- Latest cut in levee maintenance: $72 million
- War in Iraq: $200 billion and counting
- Big new fishing hole on fresh Gulf property: priceless
.
Posted on: 13 September 2005 by Nime
This is not fair! Those might be looters in the background and the president might be in great danger! What a farce! Heads should roll!
Posted on: 13 September 2005 by fred simon
.
We like this one even better:
.
We like this one even better:
.