The Epic Continues...

Posted by: Mike Hanson on 30 July 2001

I did a bunch of things to my system this weekend.

NAC52

It started with the arrival of my 52 on Friday. As to those who say Naim gear sounds "bad" before it's broken in, I would like to say that they're full of it. I realize that it will improve over the coming days, but out of the box it sounded far better than my 82. My initial perceptions have been reaffirmed after 1, 2 and 3 days. It's improved a bit, but it was showing its colors immediately.

In a nutshell, the 52 sounds very sophisticated, controlled, capable, smooth, clear and communicative. In contrast, the 82/Super sounds youthful and exuberant, sometimes in a rather uncontrolled fashion. It can be loads of fun, but sometimes it can be too extreme in its presentation, and I suppose you could even miss it occasionally. (This is probably why some people prefer a 3.5/Hi to a CDX. That exuberance can be enjoyable, even those it's "wrong".)

Neuance Platform

At friend visited, and brought his Neuance platform. This board is sold as a replacement for the Mana glass shelf, and we tried it under my CDS2 head unit. Suffice it to say that I didn't like the effect. It did a wonderful job of smoothing the highs and making the overall presentation much fuller and warmer. Annoying aspects of the performance (like overly bright cymbals) were greatly improved. However, it seemed to lose some of its life energy, and didn't have quite the same snap and punch. Once the Mana glass was back in place, the system regained its lust for life.

Speaker Platforms

As soon as I moved into my room a few months ago, I realized that I had a problem with my speakers transferring bass energy into the floor. I solved most of it by placing the speaker stands on MDF platforms, each of which was supported by three cones. This didn't solve all of it, though.

A friend helped create a replacement for the cones. A small 12"-square metal frame is used to hold some Vuk-style foot-balls, which support the MDF slab. This gives us one more layer of isolation, and now very little bass gets into the floor. As a result, the low frequencies seem significantly tighter.

I can see how Mana Sound Bases really help speakers, and I may have to consider those in the future. For now, though, these home-made isolation platforms seem to be doing the trick. Once I get used to all of these recent changes, I'll probably yearn for more improvements.

BTW, I was pretty happy with the sound of my system in my old apartment (19x19 foot living room, in the shape of an "L"). When I first setup my system here at the house, I thought that there was too much bass in my room. However, as the days and weeks went by, I started to believe that the bass was preferable this way. Then I heard a few other "good" systems (like the CDS2/52/500/NBL system at Innovative Audio in NYC), and I realized that my bass response was just right. The key issue was stopping it from overhanging and booming in the floor. Now that that's been solved, I think the bass level is pretty darn close to perfect.

Dedicated Mains Line

I often listen to music played quite loud, but my system seemed to get somewhat "shouty" as I climbed the dial. After having a number of individuals comment that this might be a problem with the Albions, I resigned myself to the fact that they just couldn't play as loud as I wanted. I was all set to upgrade my speakers sometime in the next year or so.

However, the former Royd distributor here in Canada told me that it definitely was NOT a problem with Albions. He said that my system sounded bad because of problems upstream. He said the Albions were very detailed and good at showing any problems with the source, amps, etc., while lesser speakers would mask these issues.

He suggested that it might be the Naim amps causing it, and urged me to try Exposure. However, I knew that I had heard many Naim systems without this problem, so I wasn't ready to blame the amps. I also found that it improved each time I upgraded a component. However, even with CDS2/52/250/Mana, it was still quite "searing" at higher volumes. This seemed rather silly, considering the value of electronics.

Well it turns out that rather than the amps causing troubles, it was noisy mains. Before proceeding with the installation job, we tried plugging a contractor's large-gauge extension chord into a wall socket next to the breaker box. This was fed up to my stereo room, and my custom power bar was plugged directly into extension chord.

I could not believe the difference in clarity and the reduction in noise! As soon as I heard it, I realized that we had to install the dedicated line. Five hours and $135Cdn later (approximately $90US or £55), the job was done and the system was sounding amazing.

We had to run the line in a conduit outside the house, which meant drilling through the wall in two places. (The in-house path from the breaker box to the stereo room was fraught with many insurmountable obstacles.) We also had to rearrange the breaker box a little, so that the dedicated circuit wasn't on the same rail as the "noisy" equipment (like the furnace, air conditioner, water heater, etc.)

We used individual 12-gauge wires, rather than a single cable. This made it much easier to fish it through the conduit. One of the wires is a spare, in case I decide to add a second circuit later. (I had only one spare breaker in the box, but I may upgrade my service in the future.) I've got my power bar plugged into the single hospital-grade socket. The system is plugged into the bar in order of amps-to-source, starting with the end nearest to the cable entrance on the power bar.

The dedicated spur has pretty much solved the shouty problem, and now I can play it with wonderful clarity to almost deafening levels. If you haven't already done this yourself, and if it's at all possible, don't delay! It's obscenely cheap, and the improvement is astronomical!

In Conclusion

I am amazingly happy with my system right now. The PRaT seems spot on, and it has amazing resolution and tonality. The instruments sound very natural and "pungent". The soundstage is comfortably ensconced in my room, not too close and not too far.

I still intend to upgrade to 135s at some point, and to get a Mana rack for the rest of my gear, but I can't imagine it sounding any better than it does right now. I'm sporting a grin from ear to ear, and I don't expect it to disappear any time soon.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by Bruce Woodhouse
I suppose you traded in your old 82? Shame, they never seem to crop up s/h and i know 2 people who are looking for them

Bruce

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by Mike Hanson
I'm having my dealer sell it for me, but it's more of a consignment thing than a trade-in. He's already got a couple of people interested in it.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by ken c
interesting post mike. isnt it just amazing how sometimes we blame speakers for a problem that may be elsewhere in the system???

problem with naim making your albions shout?? i am sure glad you didnt fall for that one!!!

i am glad you are happier with your system now. are performers in your room now?

enjoy

ken

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by Mike Hanson
quote:
interesting post mike. isnt it just amazing how sometimes we blame speakers for a problem that may be elsewhere in the system???

The only thing that hadn't changed (I mistakenly thought) was the speakers. All other components had been replaced with better versions. The stands were also improved compared to my apartment. I figured that the speakers were the only thing that was left. David Antonelli remarked on similar problems with his Albions, as did another fellow whose name I can't recall.

I didn't consider that it might be dirty power (the source of all evil wink ). Curiously, I've heard that David's power is also attrocious, which would explain his own complaints of the Albions.

quote:
are performers in your room now?

In a wonderful and natural way. I don't think I've ever heard a Naim system sound better than this. Yes, I've heard better Naim gear, but I suspect that other things (power, room setup, etc.) were conspiring against them.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by David Antonelli
"Curiously, I've heard that David's power is also
attrocious, which would explain his own complaints of the Albions."

My power is not a problem with the MUCH more transparent ACT 2s, not even close, so why would it have been to blame for the albions? Also, I would seriously doubt anyone who says 3 K speakers mounted on a set of matchsticks for stands are so revealing they show up the deficiencies of a CDS2/52/250. Are you sure your new 52 hasn't just come out of a funk and sprung to life?

Anyway, SK came down and sorted out my power, checking all the sockets with an oscilloscope and finding me a dedicated line that was already on the circuit board. While my track lights and fans are supposed to be a problem for a naim system, no matter what I do, how many things I have whirring away, the results are always the same: fabulous. I guess that's the difference between a well-engineered speaker and a mediocre one. The latter needs all the most sophistocated audio nerd tweaks just to get on par while the former just sings no matter what you do.

Enjoy the 52!

dave

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by woodface
Is the forum turning into a Bragathon, some contributors seem to buying equipment so quickly they will soon run out of upgrades. What then? Will their life lose all meaning? Will they have to buy even more expensive gear just because they can? Are they about to go the Levinson route?
Posted on: 30 July 2001 by David Antonelli
Vuk,

Good to see you back. Young elvis? I just saw Jailhouse Rock again a few weeks ago. Boy was he ever arrogant and disrespectful to those people who helped him out when he was just starting out! What a cad. He should have been sent to the pillory for such behavior.

Yet I am happier to be a stereo neophyte with a great system than an "audio expert" with a mediocre system. And I wouldn't trade in my hundreds of CDs and system for those grains of stereo wisdom which, when piled together in the cruel light of day amount to absolutely nothing. It's how much your system moves and groves and not how much you know. I've chosen my system according to my ear and heart and eschewed the advice of those trying to steer me towards apparently well-respected time honored set ups, that ultimately sounded mid range forward, dry, agressive, flat and lifeless.

Viva the audio parvenu!

Have a vodka on me,

dave!

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by Simon Matthews
Mike , you heard Vuk and Woodface.

For God's sake stop having so much fun! Just because it's your money do you have to go and spend it? Just because naim make a better amp than an 82 do you have to go and buy it? Could you not just pretend you cannot afford a 52 and wait for 5 years or more, this way you will ensure you prevent any other forum members from going a little green. Oh, and finally, what do you think you are doing telling us all about how you made your naim system sound more musical on a naim audio forum? Surely there must be a more appropriate alternative place for all this obsession!

p.s - enjo

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by Mick P
Mike

I have just put in an order for a CDS11, so my system is just slighty behind yours.

I will have :-

CDS11+XPS / 82+Supercap / 250 / SBL's

Yours is on Mana.....I got taste and put mine on Hutter. Sorry couldn't resist that.

Quick question.......could you let me know if you think upgrading to the 52 makes sense.....is there sufficient improvement to make it worth while. You will know because I am following in your footsteps. I remember you saying the CDS11 sounded good even with only a 82 and that it sounded great.

I think I might call it a day after buying the 52 (assuming you think its worthwhile).

Thanks in advance

Mick

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by P
I trust your ears are not deceiving you with your new found audio bliss.

Having lived with a CDS2/XPS/52/Supercap/2x 135's system for a bit of a while I can understand just how good your ears must be feeling!

I hope you enjoy rediscovering your music collection as much as I did mine.


Pete.

Just what's it all about?

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by Mike Hanson
David Antonelli said:
quote:
My power is not a problem with the MUCH more transparent ACT 2s, not even close, so why would it have been to blame for the albions?

I hope I didn't offend you, although I knew my comment would get a response from you. smile I'm not suggesting that the Albions are better than your Act 2s. I'm merely saying that I used to have a problem with shouty sound, and I was thinking the Albions were to blame (partially because of your own comments). Then I fixed my power situation, and the problem disappeared. Since you also had problems with power, there seemed to be a pattern, and I wasn't sure when you improved your own power situation (pre- or post-Albions).

Woodface said:

quote:
Is the forum turning into a Bragathon, some contributors seem to buying equipment so quickly they will soon run out of upgrades. What then? Will their life lose all meaning?

Let me make it clear that I'm not bragging. I'm just trying to share my excitement and pleasure. As most of you know, my wife is utterly disinterested my music/stereo passion, so I can't discuss it with her. Since we're all here to talk about the benefits of Naim gear, I figured it was the appropriate place to voice my pleasure, et al.

I've often mentioned that I was "happy" with CDX/102/NAPSC/Hi/140, and that every system since then has been icing on the cake. However, I've also recognized the comprimises that I was accepting at each upgrade level. Now I believe I truly feel "no pain" on the hardware side; all music sounds great on my system, whereas my lesser systems would occasionally falter in some way or another. This new freedom means that I will enjoy my existing music collection even more, as well as any new purchases that I make. My continuing upgrade has always been and will always be music.

Simon Matthews said:

quote:
For God's sake stop having so much fun!

Thanks for the vote of confidence! wink

Mike Parry said:

quote:
Yours is on Mana.....I got taste and put mine on Hutter.

Hey Mick, you know I've got taste too. That's my mine's hidden away in the closet. razz

Mike Parry continues:

quote:
could you let me know if you think upgrading to the 52 makes sense

I believe so. The 52 has a sophistication and finesse that is hinted at by the 82, but not fully delivered. The 52 never falters, and the tonality and depth is astonishing. The instruments seem utterly natural and "right". In contrast, the 82 seems a touch exaggerated. Sometimes the 52 can seem more relaxed than the 82, almost as if it feels that it isn't necessary to show off. I could easily see you stopping your upgrades after the 52, as the CDS2/52/250 sounds very complete. I'm still planning to upgrade to 135s, though, just because the Albions were designed with those amps in mind. Otherwise, I would probably stay where I am right now. I really doubt, though, that I would upgrade to the 500. My room is only 8x12 feet, after all.

P said:

quote:
I hope you enjoy rediscovering your music collection as much as I did mine.

Every month or so I get in a music rut, where I can't get excited about my existing CDs, yet I can't imagine what I might purchase to enjoy. This happens most often after I've really enjoyed a particular album (in this case Kevin Gilbert's "The Shaming of the True".) It usually takes a few days and some research to get the ball rolling again. Coincidentally, I've hit one of those ruts just as my system has hit its peak. Any suggestions for really stunning music (any genre will do just fine)?

Stephen Barnard said:

quote:
it was a big as an improvement as any of my equipment upgrades

I've been tempted to say that myself, but I've resisted the urge, as I don't think the spur has given as much of an improvement as going from the 82 to the 52. It's certainly a joy, though, as it's finally eradicated a longstanding annoyance. The clarity is an amazing breath of fresh air. Imagine learning that you've been unknowingly living with asthma for the past two years, and now the affliction is gone.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 30 July 2001 by Andrew L. Weekes
C'mon Mike - have you heard them yet (RRx)?

Andy.

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Alex S.
I am not Mike Hanson but I did do all the listening recently.

A 52 is a big leap from an 82/Super so long as you have a CDS2 at the front end. A CDX actually sounds better through an 82/Super since its shortcomings are thus better masked. You are wisely getting CDS2 first and this sounds splendid through an 82/Super but if you listen to the CDS2/52 you will hanker as I do. Once we have reached CDS2/52 I think we can safely put upgrading those departments to bed forever.

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Mike Hanson
Andrew L. Weekes said:
quote:
What about the Royds .... have you heard them yet (RRx)?

I heard the new RR1 on Friday, but it had been unpacked and running for only a few hours. Considering this, I expected both good things and bad things, and that's what I got. They most definitely needed to be run in a whole bunch more.

They sounded very rolled-off, muffled and constricted at frequencie extremes. Highs and lows seemed almost non-existant. I'm blaming all of this on the lack of break-in. The Albion, Squire and A7X had similar problems when new (albeit not this extreme).

One other problem, and this will probably not be completely solved by breaking them in, is that they are rather inefficient. I believe that Royd rates them at 84dB, or thereabouts. We were running them with a CDX/102/NAPSC/Hi/250, and we really had to crank the volume to get them to open up. Royd says that the Nait5 won't be able to drive them, but everything from a NAP150 up should be OK.

Now to the good stuff. The midrange band offered one of the most smooth, liquid, natural, coherent, cohesive performances that I've ever heard from a speaker. I was dumbfounded that it seemed so utterly "right". There's something really special going on there.

The speakers also complete disappeared. Even when I was staring directly at one speaker or the other, I couldn't convince my brain that the sound was coming from there.

The cabinets are also very well-built, although the stand/bass seemed a bit chintzy. It's a nice looking speaker, somewhat similar to the old Minstrel.

I hope to hear them again, once they've had more time to break in. We'll see how some of the deficiencies improve. There are also a set of RR2s in town, which I haven't heard.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Bas V
What will these Royds cost, Mike?
Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Jay
Mike

I heard the RR1's last week too and was pretty impressed. They'd been running in for the previous couple of days or so and the bass response was pretty good.

Like you say, finish is pretty good and they're available in Maple? and Cherry at the moment with more colours becoming available in the near future.

As for the price, well, that's another story. At over NZ$3200 they're about NZ$2000 more expensive than the Minstrals, but then again they're in a different league.

They were being run in with a NAP500. Now don't jump to any conclusions, they're not that inefficient! The 500 was being run in as well.

I managed to grab a look at the instructions which interestingly state that they will work well positioned far apart. Like really far apart. Don't know what to make of that, someone needs to test that one out.

Personally I'd like to hear the RR2 (I don't think my girlfriend would be that keen, I've bought a CDX and 102 in the last couple of months!). They're quite a bit bigger than the RR1 and by the looks a little bigger than the Doublet.

I was pretty impressed, I might have to go down again tomorrow and see how well they've run in.

Jay

PS thought they were going to cost circa 800 quid.

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Steve B
quote:
Royd says that the Nait5 won't be able to drive them, but everything from a NAP150 up should be OK.

Musically I thought the RR1s sounded superb driven by my Nait 1. In fact I've hardly used my system since I took the home demo pair back to the shop.

My uprades will most likely be RR1's, Niam CD5, 112/150 in that order. (Though I intend to listen to the Denson CDP and amps before making a decision).

Steve B

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Mike Hanson
The RR1 is $2900Cdn, which is around $2000US. I'm not sure of the price in the U.K.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by woodface
On reading the replies to my original post - point taken. I was not so much having a go as pointing out the possibility of the forum becoming a bragathon. It seems that whenever somebody buys a piece of kit there is always some wag saying 'wait till you hear a xxxxx or you havent heard anything until you try xxxx' and so and so on. My point about Mr Hanson's steep upgrade path was just that it must be difficult to actually listen and enjoy his music collection while constantly mulling over his next purchase. I think it is best to appreciate what you have fully before looking to upgrade. By the way I am not 'green' about Mr Hansons system as I have an LP12 running through my 82/hi/250/sbl set up. It's hardly slumming it is it? Oops maybe I have just contributed to the bragathon?
Posted on: 31 July 2001 by ken c
quote:
I think it is best to appreciate what you have fully before looking to upgrade.

very good advice indeed. but quite hard to follow, especially when you are "high" on this hifi exotica.

its unlikely that i will be upgraging the balck boxes for a while, but i might sort out the mish-mash of racks that i have and rationalise on one type.

as i have said before, the best decellerator is the bank manager and or the wife (not at the same time)...

enjoy

ken

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by John G.
"It seems that whenever somebody buys a piece of kit there is always some wag saying 'wait till you hear a xxxxx or you havent heard anything until you try xxxx' and so and so on."

I've seen this on other forums as well.

"My point about Mr Hanson's steep upgrade path was just that it must be difficult to actually listen and enjoy his music collection while constantly mulling over his next purchase. I think it is best to appreciate what you have fully before looking to upgrade."

It's certainly more cost effective. I would have done the mains first, setup the Mana, and then digest that for quite awhile. He would also have been more informed on what he did. I only like to change one thing at a time and live with it for awhile, maybe even changing back before making a strong judgement one way or the other.


"By the way I am not 'green' about Mr Hansons system as I have an LP12 running through my 82/hi/250/sbl set up."

As Vuk's earlier post implied, Source First!

"It's hardly slumming it is it? Oops maybe I have just contributed to the bragathon?" big grin

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Mike Hanson
quote:
neither Mike or Dave own a proper high-end source, although when that Planar 3 is finished being butchered it will represent a step in the right direction.

Since when is the CDS2 not a proper high-end source?!? Well all I can say to you lot is that you're all a bunch of stinking vinyl lovers! mad

Speaking of vinyl lovers, I'm looking forward to starting my own tentative love affair. I don't know why it should take over six weeks to get a stupid Dynavector cartridge from Japan. I've got about 200 albums waiting for a spin on the platter, and I'm getting a little crazy.

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by woodface
Hi Mike, I wouldn't get too het up about vinyl if you are using a rega P3 - the CDS11 will blow it away. You are about to embark on a 'self fulfilling prophesy', as the lack of performance from the P3 will only prove your (flawed) theory about the relative merits of vinyl. Although you can always embark upon another upgrade frenzy - maybe this is part of the plan. You will soon be able to enlighten us with how you have 1) bought an LP12 or similar 2) Upgraded to Lingo/armageddon 3) Ekos/aro etc etc.
Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Mick P
Gentlemen

If Mike wishes to take an accelorated approach to Hifi virvana........good luck to him. He has the time, inclination and the lolly to do it, so lets wish him well.

You do not live long on this earth so cram it all in whilst you can. I cannot see the point in hanging on wanting to do something if you have the cash available to do it now.

Mike has taken a rational and structured approach to his Hifi and should be congratulated. He even hides his Mana in a closet......the true mark of a gentleman.

135's are next on his list.......just you watch.

Regards

Mick

Posted on: 31 July 2001 by Alex S.
Wait till you hear a Supercap and you haven't heard anything until you try 135s