Is it too late to stop Global Warming ?

Posted by: Don Atkinson on 13 March 2005

Is it too late to stop Global Warming ?

For the lazy sods amongst us, I have highlighted the gist of this topic.

"Global Warming is a disaster waiting to happen", said Mrs D yesterday. "Bollocks" was the gist of my reply, "It's already happened"

According to popular science (ie what I learned at school), the recent geological history of the earth (ie the last million years or so) has been dominated by a succession of ice-ages. These have helped to carve the current, familiar landscape out of the wind/water-eroded, crumpled fault-lines and thrust-mountains along the north and south tropics. We enjoy the resultant scenery in the Rockies, the Alps, the Norwegian Fjords the Andes and New Zealand's South Island (LOTR). ISTR from school that the ice-ages were associated with independent 100,000; 40,000 and 20,000 year cycles, the latter being due to a "wobble" of the earth on its axis. When all three effects are co-aligned, we get the more severe ice-age; with wobble-induced-fluctuations superimposed at 20,000 year intervals (I think this latter interval is actually nearer 22,000 years) .

circa 11,000 years ago, the last ice-age had already receded sufficiently for humans in Asia to move into North America; and shortly after for the UK to be cut off from Europe as the polar ice-cap melted etc. At this time we were all still hunter-gatherers (according to my uncle Albert who says he can remember) and I "presume" the earth was well on its way to that inter-glacial point in the glacial cycle, of maximum warmth, if not actually at that point.

I can't recall what drives the 100,000 year (shape of the solar orbits?) and 40,000 year cycles and which of the cycles is dominant. Does anybody know where we "should" be in the ice-age cycle(s)? I have a hunch that we "should" be at the coldest point in a 22,000 year ice-age. But I don't know where we are in the other cycles.

I say "should" because clearly, the burning of fossil fuels over the last 200 years could be having a significant effect on the earth's climate; and human activity in the form of wide-spread migration, farming, deforestation and the building of cities, (all over the past 10,000 years) could likewise have had a huge impact on the cycle. I am therefore not convinced that it will be enough to stop burning coal and oil. To save the planet as we know it today, I think we will have to dramatically reduce the population numbers (say) from 6 billion to 6 million and revert to hunter-gathering.

Long-live Mr Archer and Mr Fletcher

Perhaps you have a better idea, or aren't so pessimistic?

Cheers

Don
Posted on: 13 March 2005 by JonR
I take it you didn't actually say "bollocks" to your other half, Don Big Grin

It's because of global warming that I have to get a condenser boiler in the near future - despite how troublesome they are supposed to be Frown

Regards,

Jon
Posted on: 13 March 2005 by Don Atkinson
quote:
I take it you didn't actually say "bollocks" to your other half, Don


Too right Jon......I have got some sense left....after all, she's a bloody good cook...

but that was the general gist

cheers

Don
Posted on: 13 March 2005 by JonR
quote:
Originally posted by Don Atkinson:
....after all, she's a bloody good cook...


Then you are a very lucky man indeed Cool
Posted on: 13 March 2005 by Gianluigi Mazzorana
quote:
I think we will have to dramatically reduce the population numbers (say) from 6 billion to 6 million and revert to hunter-gathering.



Who want to go first?
Posted on: 13 March 2005 by Berlin Fritz
Yes it is too late innit.



Fritz Von I watched spider man tonight for the first time, great stuff innit, didn't get gear filums like that when I hit saturday moaning pictures, OH NO, it was yer National Anthem (stand up) Cartoons, and Old Mother Riley, and like it, it's them pianists, that's when the warming really started to get out of control Big Grin
Posted on: 13 March 2005 by Earwicker
The cyclic warming/cooling of the earth (causing "ice ages") is due to wobble - the tendency of the earth to move through a few rotational degrees on its axis over several thousand years. This cannot be changed. (Although the recent tsunami/earthquake changed it a bit.)

Greenhouse gasses etc don't help, but no one should kid themselves that human activity can really affect the global climate over the millenia.

EW
Posted on: 14 March 2005 by Don Atkinson
quote:
The cyclic warming/cooling of the earth (causing "ice ages") is due to wobble - the tendency of the earth to move through a few rotational degrees on its axis over several thousand years. This cannot be changed. (Although the recent tsunami/earthquake changed it a bit.)


This is the 22,000 year cycle and I think the more scientific term is "presession" as in a gyroscope. How extensive each sucessive 22,000 year ice-age is, probably depends on the state of the the other two cycles (100,000 and 40,000 year cycles) and one or two other things as well !!

quote:
Greenhouse gasses etc don't help, but no one should kid themselves that human activity can really affect the global climate over the millenia.


Well, this is counter to the gist of my topic. I think that the combined effect of human activity (migration, defoestation, farming) starting 10,000 years ago, really could have affected the global climate. The last 200 years of burning coal and oil has accelerated the effect. I think the middle of the last ice-age was 22,000 years ago and 11,000 years ago saw the period of maximum warmth and we "should" now be in the middle the next ice-age. But we aren't !! If we stopped burning coal and oil, but continued farming, we would reduce the rate of global warming, but not actually stop it.

(The main greenhouse gasses I presume are carbon dioxide and methane ?)

Cheers

Don
Posted on: 14 March 2005 by Don Atkinson
quote:
Who want to go first?



...bit like asking turkeys to form an orderly queue for christmas !!....

I've just watched the end of "supervolcano" on BBC1, but even that would be too few and might never happen...

possibly global warming itself will solve the problem ?

Cheers

Don
Posted on: 14 March 2005 by Deane F
Thomas Malthus would have posted something by now if he was a Naim man.
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by Mick P
Chaps

I like global warming. If Swindon can have a mediteranean climate then no complaints from me.

Regards

Mick
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by Stephen Bennett
quote:
Originally posted by Mick Parry:
Chaps

I like global warming. If Swindon can have a mediteranean climate then no complaints from me.

Regards

Mick


Mick

One of the side-effects of global warming could be a cooling of Northern countries currently warmed by the gulf stream. Metling polar ice could dilute the sea and stop the north atlantic current which supplies warm water to our islands. Swindon will be plummeted into a northern scandinavian-like climate and you'll be overrun by Viking refugees from Scandinavia looking for Varmlands.

Eek

Regards

Stephen
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by Mick P
Stephen

I heard that Swindon will be be so bloody sunny that the Spanish will be coming here for their summer holidays.

Regards

Mick
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by TomK
I saw Bill Connolly in Los Angeles many years ago and he spent a large part of the show urging Americans to continue using their aerosols and driving unnecessarily large cars as the weather in Scotland was "fucking magic" because of it. His tee shirt bore the slogan "Fuck the future, get a tan".

It seemed funny then but perhaps a bit close to home now. I think it's very dangerous to assume that our own activities can't seriously affect the global climate over the millenia.
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by Nime
There have been many threads on this very subject on many other-interest groups.

Having read a number of fairly-convincing amateur pro and anti posts I was impressed by one poster's calm dismissal of these amateur objectors to human involvement in global warming.
He was a mature, qualified physicist and was able to quote endless studies (and published papers) by scientists (and groups of) with worldwide reputations.

If anyone thinks anybody can get anything past a peer group appraisal of one's work you'd be barking.

There are so many parallel cross-checks from completely independant and similarly ruthless competing disciplines that nobody except Wya should be in doubt as to the real dangers facing this, our only home.

The "emperor" can surround himelf in as many carefully selected "advisors" as he can get away with. But the scientific community isn't fooled and is openly willing to say so. (by the thousand)

Europe is making slow progress in reducing damaging pollution. While America's is still rising. From a base that leaves everyone else looking like self-sufficient hippy communes!

Ironic considering America once lead the world in alternative energy production research and self-sufficiency. Ironic too that there are lots of very real manufacturing and research jobs in these areas. Ironic, that localised heat and power production is a damn poor target for terrorists. While brown-out-prone centralised power production could be crippled with relative ease.

Perhaps the 9/11 terrorists chose the wrong targets? They could have taken out America's dirty power production with far less effort. It would have taken literally years to try and put it all back together again and would have severely damaged America long-term! (If they ever recovered)

But then it seems "they" were looking for high profile "soft" targets rather than really trying to hurt america.com. I wonder why?

Nime
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by Gianluigi Mazzorana
quote:


possibly global warming itself will solve the problem ?

Cheers

Don



I don't know much about the problem in scientific terms.
The only thing i know is that changing our habits could help this hearth to breath a bit more better.
Recycling is the first better step we could take ahead, but this means that we'd use more recyclable sources for our needs.
Stopping usin petrol should be the first, i think.
There's a lot of other sources that works as good, but this depend on our governements...........
Unfortunately, as i read in history books, i take that humans take important decisions about their life and desteny in the moment when "water gets the lips"!
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by Gianluigi Mazzorana
Did you know that the first model of car that Ford industries in USA produced was made for the 80% of canape!
But that's a thing we are not allowed to talk about.
Especially here in Italy.
Winker
Posted on: 15 March 2005 by Don Atkinson
quote:
I like global warming. If Swindon can have a mediteranean climate then no complaints from me.



Global warming in moderation......I like it

Perhaps George W is thinking along similar lines.

I only hope they know when to start turning the "wick" down a bit to keep it under control.

Cheers

Don