Cadbury's taken over by Kraft

Posted by: shoot6x7 on 19 January 2010

Fan-f__king-tastic,

Another great product about to be destroyed by greedy corporations ...

It's for the good of the shareholders.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by BigH47
quote:
It's for the good of the shareholders.


That usually means it's bad for everybody else.

Looking forward to chocolate covered Philly.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by FlyMe
I'm panic buying Crunchies
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by shoot6x7
BTW some optimists think that the takeover means a better chance to export Cadbury products to the US and Canada.

Well, let me tell you, Cadbury's do sell their chocolate bars in Canada and the US and they taste like garbage.

You can do a side by side taste test between UK and Canadian Flakes, Diary Milk, etc and there is a huge difference in quality.

I get all my chocolate fixes from the local 'British' store which imports their Cadbury products from the UK.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Exiled Highlander
quote:
You can do a side by side taste test between UK and Canadian Flakes, Diary Milk, etc and there is a huge difference in quality.
Not so much quality is it as opposed to being manufactured to US tastes - I can't abide most US chocolate - Hersheys? Yuk!

Jim
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by David Dever
Having worked professionally with Kraft as a foodstuffs supplier in another life, I assure you that they will keep the quality intact and may, in fact, actually improve some things.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by graham55
Cadburys make cr*p chocolate. Corporate raiders from the US can't make it any worse. But if, on the odd occasion that I want to eat chocolate, I'll go for Montezuma's or something from Paris or Belgium.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Mike-B
quote:
they will keep the quality intact

Its not the quality we are worried about, its the taste. Cadbury's is unique & sets the standard in taste for UK chocolate,
US beers quality is excellent, but it tastes like nothing in a glass.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Exiled Highlander
Mike
quote:
Cadbury's is unique & sets the standard in taste for UK chocolate,
I think there may be a bit of hyperbole there! Smile

Jim
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by graham55
Sadly, it may be correct, tastes like sh*te, as does most chocolate produced in the UK.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Bob McC
got to agree. Uk chocolate is execrable.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Exiled Highlander
LOL..now you guys have gone the other way! Smile

Jim
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Derek Wright
Disagree re all UK chocolate

Hotel Chocolate now make quite a bit of their product range in the UK as well as importing some from mainland Europe.

Hotel Chocolate is rather nice.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Mike Dudley
A great "British Tradition" of bunging a load of vegetable fat and sugar together with a little bit of cocoa and calling it "chocolate".

Cadbury's is crap. Good riddance. Razz
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by BigH47
I like it, that nasty pure foreign stuff yuuchh.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by JeremyT2
Only 10% of the Cadbury's workforce are located in the UK - the name and a few products are a British tradition. Cadbury was already a multinational but with its shares owned by "British" financial institutions. Now it is to be owned by an American shareholder leveraging the purchase with $8 billion of debt and looking for cost savings of £400 million a year!
As a small shareholder I will take their shilling and wave goodbye.

J
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by u5227470736789439
This is an example - if I am reading the runes right - of Globalisation.

Whether this is a good thing is probably a matter of opinion, but the French would never have let it happen.

I suspect that it will mainly be a good thing for the new shareholders, and a bad thing for the workforce.

I doubt the customer will notice much change.

ATB from George
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Kevin-W
quote:
Originally posted by bob mccluckie:
got to agree. Uk chocolate is execrable.


Indeed. But American chocolate is even worse.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by Kevin-W
quote:
Originally posted by GFFJ:
This is an example - if I am reading the runes right - of Globalisation.

Whether this is a good thing is probably a matter of opinion, but the French would never have let it happen.

I suspect that it will mainly be a good thing for the new shareholders, and a bad thing for the workforce.

I doubt the customer will notice much change.

ATB from George


Spot on George. Whether Cadbury's chocolate is any good is a bit of a moot point (although I have a real soft spot for Crunchies and Wispas). It's a company with a long and sometimes noble history, and a company with a real connection to this country, sold out to a dull, rather anonymous Yank conglomerate with a slightly dodgy environmental record. By a supine board.

And you're right - the French would NEVER have allowed a Cadbury-type company to be sold like that. I bet a few people in the UK will now lose their jobs as Kraft, which will be burdened with debt, struggles to cut costs.

What a shame.
Posted on: 19 January 2010 by shoot6x7
If you think British chocolate is crap, you should try US or Canadian Dairy Milk ... it really is disgusting.

It would put a chocaholic off chocolate for life - trust me it happened to me ! But then I found a British store and a German store who carried the imported stuff - I remember it being better, but what can you do ?

SOme Euro 'fine' chocolate is better, but for normal chocolate Cadbury's was the best.
Posted on: 20 January 2010 by deadlifter
A tragedy more British history gone, give it twelve months and that area will be covered with flats Roll Eyes
Posted on: 20 January 2010 by gary1 (US)
quote:
Originally posted by shoot6x7:
It's for the good of the shareholders.


Don't kid yourself, research has shown that most mergers do not work out well for either company. In fact the predictability of success is the percent ownership by the management.

What usually occurs is that the management of the purchased company makes huge money and the shareholders actually suffer the consequences.
Posted on: 20 January 2010 by Steve2701
quote:
A tragedy more British history gone, give it twelve months and that area will be covered with flats

For those around and in Bournville this could ring horribly true. I have had a great many family members work there in the past and not one of them has ever had a bad word to say about the place or the work. Tradition yes, but how many other owners of companies did what Cadbury (admitedly a time ago now) did for its workforce? It was not just a place to work but an entire comunity after work also.
As for the chocolate & whether it is to 'your' taste - well that is only ever going to be a matter of personal choice - but sales of it tell a rather good story eh?
Posted on: 20 January 2010 by Mike Dudley
Yeah, 50 million Germans couldn't have been wrong...


Kurt Vonnegut: "90 percent of everything is crud".

Winker
Posted on: 20 January 2010 by Roy T
quote:
Originally posted by Steve2701: Tradition yes, but how many other owners of companies did what Cadbury (admitedly a time ago now) did for its workforce? It was not just a place to work but an entire comunity after work also.

I would suggest that the shoemaker C&J_Clark is but one example of companies that cared for their workforce much along the lines of Cadbary and many other Quaker business concerns.
Posted on: 20 January 2010 by deadlifter
99% of company`s these days do not give a shit about the employee,you are just a number like the firm i used to work for, profits and targets is what matters. They do not seem to realise that if they looked after you it would come full circle and you would always go the extra mile for the good of the company, instead they spend there time pissing you off which also comes full circle and is bad for everyone. This comes about because of graduates and fast tracked people [managers] who know f*@#k all about the job but talk a good job trying to use the three b`s
bullshit baffles brains. Roll Eyes